> On 16-Jul-2017, Freezer <free...@hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 1) Constantly playiing both sides just makes you look like
>> you do it to stir the shit.
>
> It's called searching for truth, I read both the New York
> Times and the Wall Street Journal and I view Meet The Press, I
> watch Bloomberg News as my daily source and I watch Desus/Nero
> and I read various other souses along the way: to be blunt I'm
> not a sockpuppet like a few here
Oh, so you're on "I'm On Team No Side, which makes me smarter
than you." Cool.
>> 2) It only counts a crime if you actually competent at it?
>
> When you find stuff where I'm wrong let me know
>
>
>> 3) THIS ONE.
>>
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/11/110.20
>
> That Link is for financial which has not been proved, at best
> you have people screaming the Sky is Falling and there is no
> proof.
The law forbids illegal campaign contributions. I think
illegally obtained documents on your opponent counts.
And last I checked, recieving stolen goods is still illegal. Or
is this another "It doesn't count because he didn't go through
with it" scenario?
> Trump during the debates with Hillary admitted he liked
> Russian support for knowledge
He also said neither he nor anyone on his campaign had met with
any Russian officials during the campaign. If you can point out
how that's somehow not a blatant lie, I'm listening.