"Kane"

[The Boss]

mdd...@jove.acs.unt.edu wrote:
>
> Mikeymc12 <mike...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>That was NOT Kane! No tatoos. I thought you guys were talking smack, but
> >>now
> >>I see. Who was that?
>
> > kane doesn't have tatoos. ut does.
> And Lee has tatoos as well.
>
And fake tatoos are really easy to put on.

[BeaFuddle]

That was NOT Kane! No tatoos. I thought you guys were talking smack, but now
I see. Who was that?

Queen of the misquotes.

Taking your thoughts and making them mine.

[Mikeymc12]

>That was NOT Kane! No tatoos. I thought you guys were talking smack, but
>now
>I see. Who was that?

kane doesn't have tatoos. ut does.

Narcolept

Free Koko B. Ware

[mdd...@jove.acs.unt.edu]

Mikeymc12 <mike...@aol.com> wrote:
>>That was NOT Kane! No tatoos. I thought you guys were talking smack, but
>>now
>>I see. Who was that?

> kane doesn't have tatoos. ut does.

And Lee has tatoos as well.

--
-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-==-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-==--=-=-=-
Michael Durr aka Kedrix of Aldrianian(*The Forgotten One*)
http://kedrix.home.ml.org http://smsreview.home.ml.org
http://3doreview.home.ml.org http://laparka.home.ml.org
http://come.to/AmyYasbeck(new page for Amy Yasbeck fans)
"What do you want to burn today"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=

[Conspire13]

>>That was NOT Kane! No tatoos. I thought you guys were talking smack, but
>>now
>>I see. Who was that?
>
>kane doesn't have tatoos. ut does.

No, UT has MORE Tattoos. Tonight's Kane had none, totally differeent dude.
WHO??????? Psycho Sid??
Softball must have been good to him
~~^~~^~~^~~^~^~~^~^~^~~^~^~^~
The Wise Cracker
~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~^~~
resisting the forces of government and the influence
of youth
"let the grasping of sarcasm be the whole of the law"

[KidCALOS]

Hello Brian

[Mikeymc12]

>>>I see. Who was that?
>
>> kane doesn't have tatoos. ut does.

>And Lee has tatoos as well.

what? Umm. I meant, ut's tattoo's are ALL up and down his arms, etc. kane's are
pretty much invisible, even when he wears the kane suit w/ no sleeve.

[Tribal Prophet]

>>>That was NOT Kane! No tatoos. I thought you guys were talking smack, but
>>>now

>>>I see. Who was that?
>>
>>kane doesn't have tatoos. ut does.

>No, UT has MORE Tattoos. Tonight's Kane had none, totally differeent dude.

Different from who? Kane has never had tatoos buddy.

Tribal Prophet

The Greatest Lines in the History of our Sport:
Tony S: The dancing fools. The dancing dildos.
Tenay (proudly): They all fit.
Tony S (acknowledging): They all fit.
- Monday Nitro, July 13th

[Conspire13]

>Different from who? Kane has never had tatoos buddy.
>

There is more than one Kane. The Kane that
has appeared over the last couple of months,
the one who appeared dressed up as UT had tattoos. Less tattoos than UT, as
they don't cover the entire upper arm.
This is part of an upcomming angle, I'm sure.
The ORIGINAL Kane (not Kane the UT) had no tattoos, i.e. the guy last night.
The Tattoo Kane was used (I belive) to make people think that UT was
Kane, to enhance the angle. One of them is going to be unmasked, and there
still may be another Kane.Vince wanted us to see the difference between them,
hence the different outfits.

[M C]

If everyone will think back, a few years ago there were two undertakers in
the wwf. One was heel with Paul Bearer, the other was the true undertaker.
The heel was played by, Chainz of Doa, though his name was different and he
was working for Smokey Mountain wrestling. To better play the part he got
tatto's to match those of the real undertakers. Plus he hasn't been around
lately.
BeaFuddle wrote in message
<199808310312...@ladder01.news.aol.com>...

>That was NOT Kane! No tatoos. I thought you guys were talking smack, but
now
>I see. Who was that?
>
>
>

[Tribal Prophet]

> There is more than one Kane. The Kane that
>has appeared over the last couple of months,
>the one who appeared dressed up as UT had tattoos. Less tattoos than UT, as
>they don't cover the entire upper arm.
> This is part of an upcomming angle, I'm sure.
>The ORIGINAL Kane (not Kane the UT) had no tattoos, i.e. the guy last night.
> The Tattoo Kane was used (I belive) to make people think that UT was
>Kane, to enhance the angle. One of them is going to be unmasked, and there
>still may be another Kane.Vince wanted us to see the difference between them,
>hence the different outfits.

Sorry to break it to you, but it was the same Kane all along. His
"tatoos" were the same kind that Crush had on his forehead (ie. Fake.
They were rubbing off by the end of the brawl). It was just to make
him look like the Undertaker to trick Austin, that's all.

I hope this doesn't start one of those "How many Warriors are there?"
threads (when we all know that there were 3). 8^)

[Conspire13]

>Sorry to break it to you, but it was the same Kane all along. His
>"tatoos" were the same kind that Crush had on his forehead (ie. Fake.
>They were rubbing off by the end of the brawl). It was just to make
>him look like the Undertaker to trick Austin, that's all.

I'll take your wond on that. But if we see double Kanage around the time of the
unmasking, you'll be hearing from me.
So this same Kane got rid of his fake tatts and
and roided up like an SOB, cause he looked much more buff.

[Tribal Prophet]

>and roided up like an SOB, cause he looked much more buff.

I thought so too. I figure it's just the way he looks after seeing
him all covered up for the last few months. Last night was the first
time he had his old one-arm-showing outfit on.

[Robert Brian Vollman]

There is but one Kane, Glen Jacobs (and, of course, Undertaker
dressing up as Kane).

Brian Lee (aka Chainz, aka evil Undertaker from years ago) is no
longer with the WWF.

Glen Jacobs has a tattoo on his right arm, none on his left.
Fake tattoos are easy enough to add, of course. The Undertaker
has loads of tattooes covering both arms.

Rob

--
"...you are a credit to wrestling." --Owen Hart to me