Lever-Power-Golf™
Debo
...Stop buying those $300 drivers, the video's made by some low-class
golf teacher, and the $50 per dozen golf balls.
...Golf has been around for about 1,000 years, but in the last 100
years it has gotten really popular. About 25 years ago is when people
started to make "high-tech" golf clubs and balls.
...HOWEVER, You got the $300 driver.
...You bought that video from the low-class golf teacher.
...Did it work??
... I DON'T THINK SO!!
...You know how I know??
...Because for the last 100 years the golf score has been 100 or
higher.
.....THERE IS A NEW WAY TO SWING A GOLF CLUB, AND THERE IS NO GOLF
TEACHER THAT TEACHES THIS SWING THAT WE KNOW OF.
..If you are still with me you must want to know more about it, so I
will tell you.
..The swing is called Lever-Power-Golf™
by the Golf Magazine Top 100 Teacher Jack Kuykendall. Jack will teach
you how to use his new, and never done before golf swing. LPG will do
the following for you:
- More distance.
- 100% greater accuracy.
- No back, or shoulder strain.
- Learn in 30 days or less.
- Hit 18 of 18 fairways and greens.
- Never hit a bad shot again.
I am a LPG golfer. It took me 18 days to not only learn LPG, but also to
MASTER it. I played with the traditional golf swing for 12 years, and I
was never as far ahead with traditional than I am with LPG. Here are the
most common asked questions people ask.:
Q: Why don't and PGA, or LPG Tour players use this swing?
A: Because it has only been around for 2 years, and because no tour
player has the time to change a swing in 30 days.
Q: Do I need any special clubs for this swing?
A: Jack Kuykendall has his own line of clubs out for a single-axis golf
swing like LPG. You do not need special golf clubs unless you make a
very fast improvement. Q: Who is Jack Kuykendall?
A: Jack Kuykendall is a Golf Magazine Top 100 Teacher, and the inventor
of single-axis golf.
Q: Where can I contact Jack Kuykendall?
A: You can contact Jack Kuykendall the following ways:
NOTE:
I am a user of Jack Kuykendalls LPG golf swing. Please tell him The Golf
Teacher at web tv.net told you about LPG, or give him code number 2136
when you call to get more information or to order LPG. He will know what
you are talking about.
Here are the following ways to reach Jack Kuykendall:
- E-mail him at: Kuy...@aol.com
- Visit the following websites:
- http://www.scigolf.com
- http://www,golfbykuykendall.com
I thank you all for your time, and I know you will improve in 30 days or
less with Lever-Power-Golf™ or LPG. Again, when you contact Jack
Kuykendall to order LPG, or just to get more information about LPG
please tell him that The Golf Teacher at web tv.net told you about LPG,
or give him code number 2136.
Sincerely,
Debo
Daniel Driscoll
rec.sport.golf and the WebTV Terms of Service Agreement.
------solicitation begins---------
Path:
thumper.cis.varian.com!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!webtv.net!not-for-mail
From:
GolfT...@webtv.net (Debo)
Newsgroups:
rec.sport.golf
Subject:
Lever-Power-Golf™
Date:
Sun, 9 Apr 2000 10:49:27 -0400 (EDT)
Organization:
WebTV Subscriber
Lines:
75
Message-ID:
<17766-38...@storefull-614.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
localhost.webtv.net
Mime-Version:
1.0 (WebTV)
Content-Type:
Text/Plain; Charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Quoted-Printable
X-WebTV-Signature:
1
ETAuAhUAjraQ8Bdg2I/hpyr3IouvCIbdpfoCFQCd56eX3UObmDZHMC4pO7pRaq/PKw==
Content-Disposition:
Inline
Bruce Newman
this is no better than the SPAM. Why not just complain to the offending ISP
without posting here? I don't get it. It just seems to be a double
standard.
Bruce
In article <38F1FAC6...@BiteMe.com>, Daniel Driscoll
<NoSpa...@BiteMe.com> wrote:
> The message copied below is a violation of the FAQ for the newsgroup
> rec.sport.golf and the WebTV Terms of Service Agreement.
>
> ------solicitation begins---------
> Path:
>
>
thumper.cis.varian.com!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!webtv.net!not-fo
r-mail
> From:
> GolfT...@webtv.net (Debo)
[snipped]
Bruce Newman * Fredericton, NB, Canada * bene...@nbnet.nb.ca
RSG Roll Call: http://u1.netgate.net/~kirby34/rsg/newmanb.htm
Daniel Driscoll
ISP's typically won't open or read attachements and they require that
the full header be included. So when you send a complaint about one of
their customers you have to cut and paste the message, with all of the
headers, into an e-mail. As a shortcut, some of us typically post the
first complaint back to RSG, with the abuse address and all of the
headers, then everyone else can just resend it to the abuse address.
Canned complaints to the ISP's abuse monitor do work. But it should only
be posted back to RSG once. This isn't a policy or anything formal, some
of us have just found that it seems to work OK and it seems to encourage
more people to complain to the offender's ISP when all they have to do
is resend it.
Bruce Newman wrote:
>
> Dan, if SPAM is such a terrible thing, why post this back to RSG? To me,
> this is no better than the SPAM. Why not just complain to the offending ISP
> without posting here? I don't get it. It just seems to be a double
> standard.
>
> Bruce
--
Dan Driscoll
Current USGA Handicap Index - 16.1
RSG Roll Call http://u1.netgate.net/~kirby34/rsg/driscolld.htm
Keep Usenet Clean, Trash a Spammer!
Bruce Newman
I copy the message, full headers and all, and send it to the ISP through
Spamcop. If I were to do this on my own and then post to the group, saying
I had done it, that simply creates more garbage for everyone to wade
through, to my way of thinking at least. Better to just let the SPAM flow;
there would be less traffic.
But, that's just me.
Bruce
In article <38F217F4...@BiteMe.com>, Daniel Driscoll
<NoSpa...@BiteMe.com> wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> ISP's typically won't open or read attachements and they require that
> the full header be included. So when you send a complaint about one of
> their customers you have to cut and paste the message, with all of the
> headers, into an e-mail. As a shortcut, some of us typically post the
> first complaint back to RSG, with the abuse address and all of the
> headers, then everyone else can just resend it to the abuse address.
> Canned complaints to the ISP's abuse monitor do work. But it should only
> be posted back to RSG once. This isn't a policy or anything formal, some
> of us have just found that it seems to work OK and it seems to encourage
> more people to complain to the offender's ISP when all they have to do
> is resend it.
Bruce Newman * Fredericton, NB, Canada * bene...@nbnet.nb.ca
Mike Dalecki
Spammers see this kind of post (Daniel's) as a warning and a promise. I
think that, when we publicly vilify spammers here on RSG, we have less
of a problem for a while. I think the 1 percent or so of RSG bandwidth
that we use to fight spammers prevents another 25 percent (or more!
Look at some other groups) from being wasted by same.
Mike Dalecki
Bruce Newman wrote:
>
> Dan, if SPAM is such a terrible thing, why post this back to RSG? To me,
> this is no better than the SPAM. Why not just complain to the offending ISP
> without posting here? I don't get it. It just seems to be a double
> standard.
>
> Bruce
>
> In article <38F1FAC6...@BiteMe.com>, Daniel Driscoll
> <NoSpa...@BiteMe.com> wrote:
>
> > The message copied below is a violation of the FAQ for the newsgroup
> > rec.sport.golf and the WebTV Terms of Service Agreement.
> >
> > ------solicitation begins---------
> > Path:
> >
> >
> thumper.cis.varian.com!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!webtv.net!not-fo
> r-mail
> > From:
> > GolfT...@webtv.net (Debo)
> [snipped]
>
Lionel E. Dotson
Daniel Driscoll wrote:
>
> The message copied below is a violation of the FAQ for the newsgroup
> rec.sport.golf and the WebTV Terms of Service Agreement.
The message about LeverPowerGolf is no spammier than the rest of the
crap that the TitaniumClub-GraphiteShaft-MultiLayerTitaniumBall people
talk about all the time. Kuykendalls' method is just as valid as the one
used by Palmer-Nicklaus et. al. It's a little overstated but far more
useful than most of the drivel we're inundated with, regarding golf, by
pseudo-experts.
--
Ed Dotson-ChordWorshipper
Frank Thorne,Cardinal
ledo...@home.com Check out EasyEds Woodshed
http://members.home.net/ledotson/
David Laville
<ledo...@home.com> wrote:
>Daniel Driscoll wrote:
>>
>> The message copied below is a violation of the FAQ for the newsgroup
>> rec.sport.golf and the WebTV Terms of Service Agreement.
>
>The message about LeverPowerGolf is no spammier than the rest of the
>crap that the TitaniumClub-GraphiteShaft-MultiLayerTitaniumBall people
>talk about all the time.
The message was posted with a reference number that identified the
person to Lever-Power-Goof and he asked that you mention the number
when you call . There's marketing behind that number and why it's
considered spam.
> Kuykendalls' method is just as valid as the one
>used by Palmer-Nicklaus et. al.
Lever-Power-Goof is worse than Kuykendalls Natural Golf.
>It's a little overstated but far more
>useful than most of the drivel we're inundated with, regarding golf, by
>pseudo-experts.
If anyone is a pseudo-expert it's Jack Kuykendall. His line of
Natural Golf clubs were nothing more than clubs from his failed club
company called Right Way Golf he started in the early 80's. He conned
people into believing they were specially built clubs for his Natural
Golf swing, a swing he ripped off from Moe Norman and name he ripped
off from Peter Croker.