Poor Tigger...

[Stapler]

Now he's down 15-14 in majors to Roger....

[Howard Brazee]

On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:26:13 GMT, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:

>Now he's down 15-14 in majors to Roger....

He likes that competition believing he will leave Roger behind in a
sport that isn't as hard on aging.

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

[Stapler]

But he'll never get over the fact that Roger broke his majors record well
before Tiger did. That's bragging rights forever.

[Bobby Knight]

On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 16:48:02 -0600, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net>
wrote:

>On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:26:13 GMT, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:
>
>>Now he's down 15-14 in majors to Roger....
>
>He likes that competition believing he will leave Roger behind in a
>sport that isn't as hard on aging.

What makes either of you think that these two are in competition with
each other? I'm sure that neither of them thinks anything about it,
since its obvious to anyone with an IQ of 75 that the sports aren't
comparable with regard to victories, majors or otherwise.

BK

[Howard Brazee]

On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:04:12 GMT, Bobby Knight <bkn...@conramp.net>
wrote:

>>He likes that competition believing he will leave Roger behind in a
>>sport that isn't as hard on aging.
>
>
>What makes either of you think that these two are in competition with
>each other? I'm sure that neither of them thinks anything about it,
>since its obvious to anyone with an IQ of 75 that the sports aren't
>comparable with regard to victories, majors or otherwise.

It's not a real competition - but it's worth a few texts back and
forth (as he did with Annika).

Sort of like competing for fewer putts by having more short chips.
It's a smiley thing.

[Stapler]

Actually Roger has bragging rights forever since he broke the majors record
in his sport years before Tiger will. Not only that but did it at 27.

[Bobby Knight]

On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:28:21 -0600, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net>
wrote:

>On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:04:12 GMT, Bobby Knight <bkn...@conramp.net>

>wrote:
>
>>>He likes that competition believing he will leave Roger behind in a
>>>sport that isn't as hard on aging.
>>
>>
>>What makes either of you think that these two are in competition with
>>each other? I'm sure that neither of them thinks anything about it,
>>since its obvious to anyone with an IQ of 75 that the sports aren't
>>comparable with regard to victories, majors or otherwise.
>
>It's not a real competition - but it's worth a few texts back and
>forth (as he did with Annika).
>
>Sort of like competing for fewer putts by having more short chips.
>It's a smiley thing.

Its the kind of thing that people on this news group complain about
when the media brings it up.

bk

[Shelly Kearns]

On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:26:13 GMT, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:

>Now he's down 15-14 in majors to Roger....

At least his wife is a HELL of a lot better looking than Roger's.

[R&B]

In a sport that's much easier to dominate than golf.

Randy

[Annika1980]

On Jul 5, 4:26 pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:
> Now he's down 15-14 in majors to Roger....

Yeah, but will Roger catch Jack?

[Stapler]

"Annika1980" <annik...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f1b231cd-c806-4137...@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...

>>>Yeah, but will Roger catch Jack?<<<

I think so. He'll win 17-20 by the time he's done.

[Stapler]

"R&B" <none_of_yo...@all.com> wrote in message
news:2009070521210116807-noneofyourbusiness@allcom...

Really? Any evidence of domination on the level of Roger's before? You can't
find any.

[KG]

So why is the record for winning majors in tennis 15 when it's 18 in
golf?

[hoser1605]

I agree. It's a media thing. Gotta write about something.