Lyin' Biden's Gestapo raids Mara Lago

[TomS]

The senile pervert's Gestapo (aka FBI) raided a FORMER PRESIDENT and likely POLITICAL OPPONENT'S HOME, Mar-a-Lago today. This was done under the guise that they wanted to "preserve presidential records," but they did not elaborate on it. Many boxes of documents at Mar-a-Lago were seized w/o ANY review of what they contained. This is referred to as a "dragnet operation." No search warrant has been published:
"And no publicly available federal search warrants filed in South Florida recently shed light on why agents were there"

This proves how scared Lyin' Biden is of Trump running against him next year. Ironically, Lyin' Biden was having a pretty good week (good for the senile bastard, that is) until this ham-fisted move.

[Alan]

Tell us all, Sunshine:

Who appointed the current director of the FBI?

[Tom Elam]

Trump just needs to go away.

[Alan]

On 2022-08-08 18:50, TomS wrote:

'Trump failed to return classified docs requested by the National
Archives. A federal judge issued a search warrant for probable cause of
a crime. This is not some rando move by the FBI so you shitforbrains
Republicans calling for “defunding the FBI” for once try to be less stupid'

Would you care to hazard a guess who said that, Sunshine?

Liarboy: would you care to chime in?

:-)

[TomS]

WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?

[Alan]

Trump took classified documents to Mar-a-Lago.

That was a crime.

A federal judge had to sign the warrant to authorize the search.

And the head of the FBI is someone Trump selected as at least honest,
and let's face it: probably loyal to him.

What has the government done that is supposedly illegal?

[Bigbird]

TomS wrote:

Apparently they found well in excess of 239lb of dope.


--
Bozo Bin
Alan Baker
Texasgate

[-hh]

On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 6:59:01 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
> On 2022-08-09 15:53, TomS wrote:
> > On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:57:59 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

> >> ...

> >> Tell us all, Sunshine:
> >>
> >> Who appointed the current director of the FBI?
> >
> > WTF does that have to do with illegal government behavior?
>
> Trump took classified documents to Mar-a-Lago.
>
> That was a crime.

“After calling for Hillary Clinton to be jailed, in 2018 Trump
signed a law that stiffened the penalty for the unauthorized
removal and retention of classified documents from one year
to five years, turning it into a felony offense”

<https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/09/why-the-trump-search-warrant-is-nothing-like-hillarys-emails-00050691>

Believe the technical term for this is: "hoisted upon one's own petard".

> A federal judge had to sign the warrant to authorize the search.

Trump's lawyers have a copy of the warrant, for which they are free
to release it to the public. As such, the "keeping secrets" spin attempt
is duplicitous, as the Fed is required to maintain privacy, which is why
a release of the warrant to the public is the purview of the one served.

> And the head of the FBI is someone Trump selected as at least honest,
> and let's face it: probably loyal to him.
>
> What has the government done that is supposedly illegal?

<<crickets>>

Tommy seems to be having problems with the basic US Constitutional
principle that no one is above the law.

Likewise, to assert that a warrant against a former POTUS being
unprecedented needs to be viewed in the context that the relevant
denominator isn't how many total POTUS's the USA has had, but
rather, how many former POTUS's we've had who've tried to overthrow
the US government. As such, the precedent is "1 for 1" (one warrant
for one insurrectionist).

-hh

[TomS]

No, not possible because the President is the final arbiter of what is classified.

Shrillary, however, DID take classified documents off-site and made them available to UNCLEARED people, as well as the Russians.

[TomS]

A typical libtard's convoluted justification of an UNJUSTIFIABLE banana republic move. This is going to backfire BIG into the Dim's IQ 50 faces. And WHAT were those perverts doing, anyhow, going thru Melania's underwear???

[-hh]

Not when he’s no longer POTUS…

You’ve never had a clearance to know the regulations and EO’s that specify the
declassification process that must be followed. Even by the POTUS.

-hh

[-hh]

> A typical libtard's convoluted justification of an UNJUSTIFIABLE banana republic move.

Except for now they already had worked with the Feds months ago, turning over
boxes of govt docs they weren’t authorized to have; this could be as simple as
them lying when they claimed that they had previously turned everything over.

> This is going to backfire BIG into the Dim's IQ 50 faces. And WHAT were those
> perverts doing, anyhow, going thru Melania's underwear???

Since the Trumpets whined about how Trump’s lawyers & staff were not allowed
to witness the FBI sweep, how do you know that their claim just isn’t YA lie?
Be specific.

-hh

[TomS]

Hey Lyin' Asshole, the Feds went thru ALL of these documents in question in June and APPLAUDED how cooperative Trump was with them. This RAID was NOT about these documents: it was a FISHING EXPEDITION looking for ANYTHING that might be used against him. This is SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED by the Constitution (you have heard about the Constitution, haven't you?):
1. The Fourth Amendment, search and seizure.
2. The Fourteenth Amendment, equal protection.
and also by the FBI's OWN RULES:
FBI Rule 41

This is backfiring BIG TIME for that senile pervert, Lyin' Biden

[Alan]

Then you'll surely have a citation for that...

> This RAID was NOT about these documents: it was a FISHING EXPEDITION
> looking for ANYTHING that might be used against him.

And you know this, because...

> This is
> SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED by the Constitution (you have heard about the
> Constitution, haven't you?): 1. The Fourth Amendment, search and
> seizure. 2. The Fourteenth Amendment, equal protection. and also by
> the FBI's OWN RULES: FBI Rule 41

And a federal judge—I've heard a Trump appointee—signed the search warrant.

Care to comment?

[-hh]

Ummm...because press releases never contain any lies or spin...? /s

> > This is
> > SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED by the Constitution (you have heard about the
> > Constitution, haven't you?): 1. The Fourth Amendment, search and
> > seizure. 2. The Fourteenth Amendment, equal protection. and also by
> > the FBI's OWN RULES: FBI Rule 41
>
> And a federal judge—I've heard a Trump appointee—signed the search warrant.
>
> Care to comment?

"First president to be impeached twice.
First president to attempt a coup d'état.
First president to have his home searched by the FBI.
First president to take the Fifth.
It's just so impressive."
- George Conway <https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1557395603767844864>


In the meantime...
<https://twitter.com/scottjshapiro/status/1557380142951014401>

-hh

[Bigbird]

TomS wrote:

> No, not possible because the President is the final arbiter of what
> is classified.
>

That's not how it works, shit for brains; unless there is an official
record of the fat cunt declassifying those specific documents while in
office then they are not and he is open to criminal proceedings.

[-hh]

What Tommy is merely expressing is that he's never had a security clearance
to actually know (because mandatory training) just what the rules are.


-hh

[Irving S]

On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:31:06 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:

You imbecile, get ready to be calling that "fat cunt" Mr. President in a few years. If not Trump, another MAGA candidate just as good. The progressive left is shit, and going down the drain like shit deserves.

Interesting, an unemployed dog walker calling someone else shit for brains. LOL! A total failure, you are, the pot calling the kettle black. Now go cry to mommy, maybe she will cook you some brownies. Mommy knows how to comfort her sad little boy. She loves you so. And we laugh at you so.

Oh, and please say hello to daddy. I hear Tyrone is a great guy.

[-hh]

Tonight’s hot take:

“ I’m confused: How can Trump be so sure that he declassified the evidence that the FBI planted?”

-hh

[Alan]

LOL!

:-D

[Alan]

Niiiiiiiice.

:-)