New email PROVES that the Deep Swamp backed Lyin' Biden

[Tommy]

A letter was released signed by FIFTY ONE national security "professionals" declaring that Hunter BooBoo's laptop was Russian disinformation. This, of course, was FALSE and they KNEW it was false. Here is a smoking-gun email showing that they were doing it to illegally influence the 2020 election:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-cia-boss-wrote-colleague-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-talking

[Alan]

We don't know it's false.

[Tommy]

Of course we do - you are one of very few libtards that think otherwise. And I don't think you believe that.

[Tommy]

Additionally, they signed the letter for the sole purpose of influencing (also called manipulating) the election. This, BY ITSELF, is ILLEGAL.

[Alan]

How do we know that, Sunshine?

Just give us your take on it.

No links until you present an argument.

[Alan]

Cite for that law that would make it illegal to sign a letter expressing
your honest beliefs, please!

[Tommy]

LOL! I KNEW you would bellyache about that!! First off, I know because of my past employment at PNNL, a federal facility where we had mandatory training on the subject. Second, you can look it up, it is called the Hatch Act.

[Alan]

I'll look it up...

...if you can state in plain English what clause of the Hatch Act they
violated.

[Tommy]

All Department of Justice employees are subject to the Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. 7323(a) and 7324(a), which generally prohibits Department employees from engaging in partisan political activity while on duty, in a federal facility or using federal property.

[Alan]

Except:

None of the 51 people who signed the letter were still employees of the
US federal government.

'More than 50 FORMER [emphasis mine] senior intelligence officials have
signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure
of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic
earmarks of a Russian information operation.”'

<https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276>

From your own source, Sunshine:

'Ex-CIA boss Morell wrote colleague'

'EX-CIA boss', Sunshine. Ergo: not subject to the Hatch Act.

And just FYI: the Hatch Act doesn't just apply to DoJ employees).

'The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political
Activities, is a United States federal law. Its main provision prohibits
civil-service employees in the executive branch of the federal
government,[3] except the president and vice president,[4] from engaging
in some forms of political activity. It became law on August 2, 1939.
The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico.[5] It was most
recently amended in 2012.'

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act>

You really are bad at this, Sunshine.

[Tommy]

No, YOU are:
"current Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco" IS subject to the Hatch Act.
Two points:
1. If there were using ANY federal government resources they were in violation of the law.
2. They used their status of prior employment to affect public opinion using FALSE information.
All of this deserves public disclosure so that voters can see for themselves how they were manipulated during the 2020 election. Many, enough to have changed the outcome, have said they WOULD NOT have voted for Lyin' Biden if they had known the truth.

[Alan]

She's held that position "since April 21, 2021"

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Monaco>

The letter she signed was dated October 19, 2020...

...at which time she was in the private sector:

'In 2017, Monaco joined CNN as a national security analyst.'

'In 2019, Monaco joined international law firm O'Melveny & Myers as a
partner, where she co-chaired the firm's Data Security and Privacy group'

'A hearing on her nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee was
held on March 9, 2021,[ and she was confirmed by the Senate on April 20,
2021. She was sworn in the next day.'

Are you done getting your ass handed to you yet, Sunshine?

No? OK!

> Two points: 1. If there were using ANY federal government resources
> they were in violation of the law.

1.A Got any proof that any federal government resources were used, Sunshine?

> 2. They used their status of prior employment to affect public
> opinion using FALSE information.

2.A Their "status of prior employment" is irrelevant to your Hatch Act
claim.

2.B Got any proof they used "FALSE information"?

> All of this deserves public disclosure so that voters can see for
> themselves how they were manipulated during the 2020 election. Many,
> enough to have changed the outcome, have said they WOULD NOT have
> voted for Lyin' Biden if they had known the truth.

Got any proof of that last claim, Sunshine.

You should really quit while you're behind.

:-)

[Tommy]

There were FIFTY-ONE signatories to that letter, Fool. Do YOU have proof that ALL of them were not federal employees at the time? I didn't think so...

[Alan]

Actually, it's YOUR claim that they were subject to the Hatch Act...

...and so far you're batting .000 for your claim.

[Tommy]

And the BIGGER issue is the public's right to know that this was a coordinated effort by government officials, current or former, to deceive the public and manipulate an election with FALSE information.

[Alan]

You've yet to show any coordination between those who wrote and signed
the letter and any government official at the time. Michael Morell
wasn't a government official when he emailed Brennan, who also wasn't a
government official at the time.

You've yet to show that anything in the letter was false.

But I can see why you want to run away from your claim that anyone had
violated the Hatch Act.

[Tommy]

LOL! The VERY FIRST POST contained the email showing said coordinating, Fool.

The ENTIRE Russian Collusion hoax was FALSE - this has been PROVEN by Mueller after spending TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS investigating it.

You have not PROVEN that the Hatch Act WASN'T violated.

[Alan]

Not between any government official, Sunshine.

>
> The ENTIRE Russian Collusion hoax was FALSE - this has been PROVEN by
> Mueller after spending TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS investigating it.

1. The Russian collusion wasn't a hoax.

2. The Hunter Biden issue is completely unconnected to it in any case.

>
> You have not PROVEN that the Hatch Act WASN'T violated.

You have to prove it was, Sunshine.

You're the one who claimed it was violated.

[bruce bowser]

Any names? dates? locations? You haven't ever proven SHIT.
Never any names, any dates, any locations. Just name-calling. Like "Deep Swamp".

[Tommy]

Oh, REALLY? Think again, Bozo:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-fbi-agent-timothy-thibault-resigns/

[Alan]

"But these officials also said that Thibault had reached retirement age,
and they added that all of those who retire hand over their badge and
gun and are escorted out of the building."

[-hh]

Precisely correct, and since it was Tommy’s claim that the Hatch Act
applies, it is Tommy’s responsibility to substantiate that connection.

Mandatory training on the Hatch Act = another thing Tommy never had.

-hh

[Tommy]

What part of "FIRED" don't you understand?

[Alan]

On 2023-05-07 23:19, Tommy wrote:
>>>>>>> And the BIGGER issue is the public's right to know that this was a
>>>>>>> coordinated effort by government officials, current or former, to
>>>>>>> deceive the public and manipulate an election with FALSE
>>>>>>> information.
>>>>>> You've yet to show any coordination between those who wrote and signed
>>>>>> the letter and any government official at the time. Michael Morell
>>>>>> wasn't a government official when he emailed Brennan, who also wasn't a
>>>>>> government official at the time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You've yet to show that anything in the letter was false.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I can see why you want to run away from your claim that anyone had
>>>>>> violated the Hatch Act.
>>>>> LOL! The VERY FIRST POST contained the email showing said coordinating, Fool.
>>>>>
>>>>> The ENTIRE Russian Collusion hoax was FALSE - this has been PROVEN by Mueller after spending TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS investigating it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have not PROVEN that the Hatch Act WASN'T violated.
>>>> Any names? dates? locations? You haven't ever proven SHIT.
>>>> Never any names, any dates, any locations. Just name-calling. Like "Deep Swamp".
>>> Oh, REALLY? Think again, Bozo:
>>> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-fbi-agent-timothy-thibault-resigns/
>> "But these officials also said that Thibault had reached retirement age,
>> and they added that all of those who retire hand over their badge and
>> gun and are escorted out of the building."
> What part of "FIRED" don't you understand?

I understand that nowhere in the article is there any claim that he was
fired.

I understand that the only place "fired" appears in the text is a
statement denying he was fired.

I understand that the only people who but him "under fire" (totally
different meaning in that phrase from "fired", BTW) is a politician with
an axe to grind.

[Bigbird]

Only one mention of that word in that article.

A statement from Thibault's counsel said he was "not fired, not forced
to retire and not asked to retire," and he walked out of the FBI
building "by himself."

"Claims to the contrary are false," the statement said.

Now, what was it you were asking, Betty?

[Tommy]

LOL! Don't you fuckers know the phrase "retire or be fired"? There was NOTHING "voluntary" about his "retirement!"

[Alan]

On 2023-05-09 20:08, Tommy wrote:

That is supported by literally nothing you've posted.

[Bigbird]

I have never heard it but I think we can surmise you did.

What goes right over your head is that the only article you found to
reference does nothing to support your fabrications.

Looks like you have been caught again, Betty.

[Bigbird]

Lying again, Betty.

^^^^^
For educational purposes; the correct use of "again".

[Tommy]

On the contrary, Fool - the article detailed it perfectly:

"Thibault, who worked in the FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., had recently been removed from his position as assistant special agent in charge at the FBI's Washington Field Office, which covers all of the District of Columbia and Northern Virginia.

Thibault came under fire earlier this year from Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley who had accused him of "improper conduct" in the Hunter Biden investigation, alleging that Thibault had tried to shut down any investigatory activity."

The "resignation" was merely an obvious move on Thibault's part to preserve retirement benefits that would have been lost in a firing.

[Tommy]

Hey BirdBrain, that isn't even a complete sentence, so don't lecture me on the proper use of English.

[Alan]

Why do you think that "removed" is perjorative, Sunshine?

[Bigbird]

It is; you need more help than I am willing to give you.