Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

OT: Free speech... ...as long as the Liar-in-Chief approves

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 9, 2019, 2:09:21 PM8/9/19
to
'Reports say White House has drafted an order putting the FCC in charge
of monitoring social media

The White House is contemplating issuing an executive order that would
widen its attack on the operations of social media companies.

The White House has prepared an executive order called “Protecting
Americans From Online Censorship” that would give the Federal
Communications Commission oversight of how Facebook, Twitter and other
tech companies monitor and manage their social networks, according to a
CNN report.

Under the order, which has not yet been announced and could be revised,
the FCC would be tasked with developing new regulations that would
determine when and how social media companies filter posts, videos, or
articles on their platforms.

The draft order also calls for the Federal Trade Commission to take
those new policies into account when investigating or filing lawsuits
against technology companies, according to the CNN report.'

<https://techcrunch.com/2019/08/09/reports-say-white-house-has-drafted-an-order-putting-the-fcc-in-charge-of-monitoring-social-media/>

So let's be clear:

Unlimited political contributions from big business and the uber-rich:

Great!


Companies choosing what is acceptable for themselves to publish:

Bad!

:-)

TomS

unread,
Aug 9, 2019, 11:30:17 PM8/9/19
to
Tell us, what is the equivalent of the FCC up in Canuck Land?

Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 10, 2019, 2:31:06 AM8/10/19
to
How is that relevant?

TomS

unread,
Aug 27, 2019, 12:23:42 AM8/27/19
to
How about answering the question, Snowflake?

Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 27, 2019, 1:09:04 AM8/27/19
to
Sure. Right after you tell me why it's relevant.

:-)

TomS

unread,
Aug 29, 2019, 1:03:25 AM8/29/19
to
No, answer the question

Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 29, 2019, 1:22:05 AM8/29/19
to
Sure. Right after you explain why it is relevant.

:-)

TomS

unread,
Aug 29, 2019, 7:03:24 PM8/29/19
to
Nope, you answer the question.

Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 29, 2019, 7:09:40 PM8/29/19
to
Sure! Right after you explain why it is relevant.

TomS

unread,
Aug 29, 2019, 10:53:33 PM8/29/19
to

Alan Baker

unread,
Aug 29, 2019, 11:25:27 PM8/29/19
to
:-)
0 new messages