You cannot disprove God; it cannot be done
dun...@yahoo.com
2. Light particles can communicate with each other.
3. Light particles are naturally attracted to one another, even across
long distances.
Think God doesn't exist?
Prove it...and I'll give you my entire Playstation 2 gaming collection
(plus some really great DVD movies, too).
Paul
Donn Miller
> 1. Light particles have intelligence.
No.
> 2. Light particles can communicate with each other.
No.
> 3. Light particles are naturally attracted to one another, even across
> long distances.
No. Photons are attracted to each other? Where did you dream this stuff up?
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Jefferson N Glapski
How can you prove the non-existence of something? You can't.
Disprove the existence of that pink elephant behind you. I'll extend the
same offer back to you.
--
Jefferson N. Glapski
http://www.freealberta.com
Wizard of Odd
Donn Miller replied (in quotes):
> 1. Light particles have intelligence.
"No."
These particles will be manipulated by the mind into forming
intelligent structure. As the evolution of humans are still in the
primitive stage this is not possible for the majority, the spiritual
side is currently in ascendence which will transform mankind from the
physical into the spiritual realm.
> 2. Light particles can communicate with each other.
"No. "
Only through the process of thought and how can you define thought?
Is there such a thing as a thought-wave?
> 3. Light particles are naturally attracted to one another, even across
> long distances.
"No. Photons are attracted to each other? Where did you dream this
stuff up? "
This seems more closer to Einstein's quote "spooky action from a
distance" - Quantum Theory.
As we develop there will be a solution explaining distance is
non-existant and we can traverse above space and time.
E=c^n - Approaching Infinity (5th Dimensional)
dun...@yahoo.com
The pink elephant behind me does not exist because it is invisible to
the senses. Scientific analysis of my house confirms through infra-red
spectrums that the pink elephant does not emit traditional signs of
body warmth (consistant with most -- all? -- mammals).
The pink elephant cannot be a ghost, simply because elephants don't
have spirits and cannot become ghosts in the afterlife. Also, keep in
mind that we've never seen a pink elephant in the wild before. It is
not evolutionarily advantageous to have a pink color -- how would the
pink elephant camouflage itself against a rock, a tree or a grassy
plain?
I win.
Paul
C The Shocker
his underwear only to discover:
> Jeff,
>
> The pink elephant behind me does not exist because it is invisible to
> the senses. Scientific analysis of my house confirms through infra-red
> spectrums that the pink elephant does not emit traditional signs of
> body warmth (consistant with most -- all? -- mammals).
>
> The pink elephant cannot be a ghost, simply because elephants don't
> have spirits and cannot become ghosts in the afterlife. Also, keep in
> mind that we've never seen a pink elephant in the wild before. It is
> not evolutionarily advantageous to have a pink color -- how would the
> pink elephant camouflage itself against a rock, a tree or a grassy
> plain?
>
> I win.
>
> Paul
This may be the most retarded post in the history of Usenet.
--
C The Shocker
2005 King of RSPW
I'm Not Nice.
Jefferson N Glapski
> Jeff,
>
> The pink elephant behind me does not exist because it is invisible to
> the senses. Scientific analysis of my house confirms through infra-red
> spectrums that the pink elephant does not emit traditional signs of
> body warmth (consistant with most -- all? -- mammals).
So is god. Nor does god.
> The pink elephant cannot be a ghost, simply because elephants don't
> have spirits and cannot become ghosts in the afterlife. Also, keep in
> mind that we've never seen a pink elephant in the wild before. It is
> not evolutionarily advantageous to have a pink color -- how would the
> pink elephant camouflage itself against a rock, a tree or a grassy
> plain?
Prove that elephants don't have spirits. I've never seen god in the wild
before. What did god evolve from? My pink elephant is all-powerful and
all-knowing, and is the alpha and the omega; it didn't evolve from anything.
> I win.
You lose, again.
Playstation, bitch.
dun...@yahoo.com
that image produced? It surely wasn't paint. And photography did not
exist in 30 A.D.
So how did the image of Jesus form on the linen shroud, in absense of a
plausible explanation?
There's an easy way to prove or disprove God:
Write down the first 63 numbers that come to mind, in the range of 0 to
255. Post them here and I'll convert them into a pictorial program. If
these numbers truly come from God, then the picture won't be random at
all, but represent something 2D/3D.
Paul
rastafar...@yahoo.com
dun...@yahoo.com wrote:
> 1. Light particles have intelligence.
> 2. Light particles can communicate with each other.
> 3. Light particles are naturally attracted to one another, even across
> long distances.
>
> Think God doesn't exist?
What is your definition of intelligence?
Even if there were some basis of reality for these statements above,
why would this prove that God exists? Unless by God, you mean Apollo,
God of Light. Him I trust -- how can you not when he RUTSed the Python
who turned out to be the Oracle of Delphi (who knew?) when he was only
4 _days_ old?!?
rastafar...@yahoo.com
dun...@yahoo.com wrote:
> 1. Light particles have intelligence.
> 2. Light particles can communicate with each other.
> 3. Light particles are naturally attracted to one another, even across
> long distances.
>
> Think God doesn't exist?
What is your definition of intelligence?
rastafar...@yahoo.com
dun...@yahoo.com wrote:
> 1. Light particles have intelligence.
> 2. Light particles can communicate with each other.
> 3. Light particles are naturally attracted to one another, even across
> long distances.
>
> Think God doesn't exist?
What is your definition of intelligence?
rastafar...@yahoo.com
(Sorry for the multiple posts -- my button was stuck)
deem...@aol.com
Religion will do that to you.
Jefferson N Glapski
> You still haven't proven me wrong on the Shroud of Turin issue. How
> was that image produced? It surely wasn't paint. And photography did
> not exist in 30 A.D.
Read Penn and Teller.
> So how did the image of Jesus form on the linen shroud, in absense of
> a plausible explanation?
It's an image of my elephant, not your faker.
> There's an easy way to prove or disprove God:
>
> Write down the first 63 numbers that come to mind, in the range of 0
> to 255. Post them here and I'll convert them into a pictorial
> program. If these numbers truly come from God, then the picture won't
> be random at all, but represent something 2D/3D.
How does that prove anything?
C The Shocker
something wet, then checked his underwear only to discover:
I'm glad I have that moron killfiled... but that "Pictorial Proof" nonsense
just blows my mind. Either Panks is a really, really clever troll, or a
really dangerous idiot.
dun...@yahoo.com
validated that God exists.
Paul
Jefferson N Glapski
> Belief in God is not something that is unscientific. In fact, it can
> be validated that God exists.
Then do it, Captain Insano.
winnard
<dun...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129533190....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Dude, if I can prove it, I don't even want your playstation. I want a new
Pontiac.
winnard
dun...@yahoo.com
Pi is infinite. God is infinite.
I win.
Paul
Jefferson N Glapski
> Jefferson N Glapski wrote:
>> dun...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> Belief in God is not something that is unscientific. In fact, it can
>>> be validated that God exists.
>>
>> Then do it, Captain Insano.
>
>
> Pi is infinite. God is infinite.
>
> I win.
God is a number?
You may want to work on the relationship between god and pi.
Otherwise, some smartass would simply write that:
Pi is infinite. I am infinite.
dun...@yahoo.com
God = infinite.
Pi = infinite.
Paul
rastafar...@yahoo.com
How is pi infinite? Just because it's an irrational number? Pi is
well-defined, not unbounded. I can "capture" pi easily by saying that
it is between 3.14 and 3.15. Have I also captured God?
In any case, your proof needs work. For example, is pi omnipotent?
Omniscient?
rastafar...@yahoo.com
> You still haven't proven me wrong on the Shroud of Turin issue. How was
> that image produced? It surely wasn't paint. And photography did not
> exist in 30 A.D.
>
> So how did the image of Jesus form on the linen shroud, in absense of a
> plausible explanation?
>
> There's an easy way to prove or disprove God:
>
> Write down the first 63 numbers that come to mind, in the range of 0 to
> 255. Post them here and I'll convert them into a pictorial program. If
> these numbers truly come from God, then the picture won't be random at
> all, but represent something 2D/3D.
>From where do you get "if the numbers come from God, the pictures won't
be random". What does it even mean and how do you define "random"?
Anyway, can you create a picture for me -- I'd like to see God. My
numbers are 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...62.
Thanks in advance.
dun...@yahoo.com
http://members.tripod.com/~panks/62.jpg
62 consecutive numbers produced the picture above.
Of course, "God" weighed in on his opinion, too. :-)
Paul
rastafar...@yahoo.com
Thanks. You've convinced me. I was blind but now I see, etc. Surely
God's hands were influential in that picture of three parallel blobs.
Regards
Google Beta User
to
255. Post them here and I'll convert them into a pictorial program. If
these numbers truly come from God, then the picture won't be random at
all, but represent something 2D/3D. >>
Hee Hee Hee
Autymn D. C.
>1. Light particles have intelligence.
>2. Light particles can communicate with each other.
>3. Light particles are naturally attracted to one another, even across
>long distances.
1. They have rules. Rules are dumb.
2. The /charges/ communicate with each other using them. They are
hardly particles themselves, but the /difference/ in charged particles.
3. Geons are hard.
>Think God doesn't exist?
>Prove it...and I'll give you my entire Playstation 2 gaming collection
>(plus some really great DVD movies, too).
what God? which God?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/search?q=God+lysdexia&start=0&scoring=d&
>The pink elephant behind me does not exist because it is invisible to
>the senses. Scientific analysis of my house confirms through infra-red
>spectrums that the pink elephant does not emit traditional signs of
>body warmth (consistant with most -- all? -- mammals).
spectra
>The pink elephant cannot be a ghost, simply because elephants don't
>have spirits and cannot become ghosts in the afterlife. Also, keep in
>mind that we've never seen a pink elephant in the wild before. It is
>not evolutionarily advantageous to have a pink color -- how would the
>pink elephant camouflage itself against a rock, a tree or a grassy
>plain?
>I win.
All live wihts have ghosts, because they are alive and not still. All
matter in motion has advanced and retarded and imaginary waves that
correspond to spectral doppelgangers.
>You still haven't proven me wrong on the Shroud of Turin issue. How was
>that image produced? It surely wasn't paint. And photography did not
>exist in 30 A.D.
>So how did the image of Jesus form on the linen shroud, in absense of a
>plausible explanation?
Look it up. It was made centuries after.
>Calculate Pi (3.14 etc etc etc).
>Pi is infinite. God is infinite.
http://egroups.com/message/free_energy/19210
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/search?q=infinite+lysdexia&start=0&scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/search?q=infinity+lysdexia&start=0&scoring=d&
-Aut
I win again.
dun...@yahoo.com
Whoa, Nellie. Whoa there. Just a moment. They have determined that the
Shroud of Turin has actual human blood on it, in addition to flowers
from the area of 1st century Syria. In addition, the computer images of
Jesus showed...
Hold on. I have to take a shit.
Paul
dun...@yahoo.com
The point is, the image of Jesus showed a 3D face on a 2D plane. How is
that possible? The only logical explanation is that the energy coming
out of Jesus was so powerful that it caused an almost "photographic"
image to form on the shroud.
This is consistent with biblical scripture.
Paul
donsto...@hotmail.com
God), science and religion are equal and there's nothing to prove or
disprove: God is the Universe.
lysd...@sbcglobal.net
>Whoa, Nellie. Whoa there. Just a moment. They have determined that the
>Shroud of Turin has actual human blood on it, in addition to flowers
>from the area of 1st century Syria. In addition, the computer images of
>Jesus showed...
Yes, it was another person. People have actual human blood. Tell me
about these flowers.
> The point is, the image of Jesus showed a 3D face on a 2D plane. How is
> that possible? The only logical explanation is that the energy coming
> out of Jesus was so powerful that it caused an almost "photographic"
> image to form on the shroud.
Fabric can shrink. Stop making shit up; it belongs in your toilet.
> This is consistent with biblical scripture.
what is?
-Aut
lysd...@sbcglobal.net
Why is God the Universe and why is the Universe God?
Jefferson N Glapski
Because Spinoza would have been arrested and had his life ruined if he was
thought to have been an atheist. HTH.