info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
I knew laughing wasn't a crime...
38 views
Skip to first unread message
dotsla...@gmail.com
Jul 14, 2017, 5:06:05 PM7/14/17
to
A D.C. judge has tossed out a jury’s conviction of a protester who laughed during Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ Senate confirmation hearing, finding on Friday that the government had improperly argued during the trial that her laughter was enough to merit a guilty verdict.
Weird. I remember all the rsfc legal big branes claiming her laughing wasn't the issue at all... it was all about her behavior while being arrested / removed.
Cheers.
Weird. I remember all the rsfc legal big branes claiming her laughing wasn't the issue at all... it was all about her behavior while being arrested / removed.
Cheers.
J. Hugh Sullivan
Jul 14, 2017, 6:40:10 PM7/14/17
to
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 14:06:02 -0700 (PDT), dotsla...@gmail.com
wrote:
>A D.C. judge has tossed out a jury=E2=80=99s conviction of a protester who =
>laughed during Attorney General Jeff Sessions=E2=80=99 Senate confirmation =
>hearing, finding on Friday that the government had improperly argued during=
>'t the issue at all... it was all about her behavior while being arrested /=
> removed.
>
>Cheers.
Either her laughter disturbed the right of others or it did not. I
don't know which.
If she interrupted I recommend feeding the baby - you know, a bust in
the mouth.
Hugh
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
wrote:
>A D.C. judge has tossed out a jury=E2=80=99s conviction of a protester who =
>laughed during Attorney General Jeff Sessions=E2=80=99 Senate confirmation =
>hearing, finding on Friday that the government had improperly argued during=
> the trial that her laughter was enough to merit a guilty verdict.
>
>Weird. I remember all the rsfc legal big branes claiming her laughing wasn=
>
>'t the issue at all... it was all about her behavior while being arrested /=
> removed.
>
>Cheers.
Either her laughter disturbed the right of others or it did not. I
don't know which.
If she interrupted I recommend feeding the baby - you know, a bust in
the mouth.
Hugh
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Michael Press
Jul 14, 2017, 9:09:32 PM7/14/17
to
In article <ec0d5b19-7408-41e7...@googlegroups.com>,
There is no accounting for what a judge will do.
That is because they are not accountable.
The judge is only right because there is no appeal.
I am right and he is wrong.
Still the idiot had her warning.
She shows up in court again and
it might not go so well for her.
--
Michael Press
That is because they are not accountable.
The judge is only right because there is no appeal.
I am right and he is wrong.
Still the idiot had her warning.
She shows up in court again and
it might not go so well for her.
--
Michael Press
dotsla...@gmail.com
Jul 15, 2017, 12:05:37 AM7/15/17
to
Wasn't about what the judge did, press. What the prosecution said in their closing argument is enough to prove you wrong. Go back and read it. Carefully.
Cheers.
Cheers.
Michael Press
Jul 15, 2017, 7:53:01 PM7/15/17
to
In article <66f5fff9-bbf8-40a4...@googlegroups.com>,
The judge says it was not disruptive. He was not in the chamber
and neither were we.
There is no accounting for what a judge will do.
That is because they are not accountable.
The judge is only right because there is no appeal.
I am right and he is wrong.
--
Michael Press
dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> Wasn't about what the judge did, press. What the prosecution said in their closing argument is enough to prove you wrong. Go back and read it. Carefully.
>
> Cheers.
Read what? If the laugh was disruptive then that is sufficient.
> Wasn't about what the judge did, press. What the prosecution said in their closing argument is enough to prove you wrong. Go back and read it. Carefully.
>
> Cheers.
The judge says it was not disruptive. He was not in the chamber
and neither were we.
There is no accounting for what a judge will do.
That is because they are not accountable.
The judge is only right because there is no appeal.
I am right and he is wrong.
Michael Press
dotsla...@gmail.com
Jul 15, 2017, 8:45:30 PM7/15/17
to
You aren't reading it carefully. Already gave you the punchline.
Cheers.
Cheers.
Michael Press
Jul 16, 2017, 3:00:43 PM7/16/17
to
dotsla...@gmail.com
Jul 16, 2017, 4:21:54 PM7/16/17
to
Already led you to the water, hoss. What you do now is up to you.
Cheers.
Cheers.
Michael Press
Jul 17, 2017, 12:30:02 PM7/17/17
to
In article <12bad67d-d75f-422d...@googlegroups.com>,
dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> Already led you to the water, hoss. What you do now is up to you.
>
> Cheers.
> Already led you to the water, hoss. What you do now is up to you.
>
> Cheers.
0 new messages