Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Leak of SCOTUS abortion decision unprecedented?

45 views
Skip to first unread message

xyzzy

unread,
May 3, 2022, 10:48:30 PM5/3/22
to
Nope. Roe v Wade was also leaked.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2022/05/02/leak-time-magazine-roe-wade/


--
“I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian,
liberal personality.” — Altie

Michael Falkner

unread,
May 4, 2022, 1:10:54 AM5/4/22
to
On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 7:48:30 PM UTC-7, xyzzy wrote:
> Nope. Roe v Wade was also leaked.
>
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2022/05/02/leak-time-magazine-roe-wade/

But, a day and almost a half afterward, they MAY in fact be the only two known such cases.

The other thing is that it is still a MASSIVE breach of the trust of the Court, etc.

Whether it's chargeable as a crime... That could depend on interpretation.

Mike

The NOTBCS Guy

unread,
May 4, 2022, 1:36:52 PM5/4/22
to
There have been a few leaks in the past; pretty much invariably, they resulted in the decisions' announcements being delayed by a few weeks, but the decisions themselves ended up being unchanged. Considering that this is the sort of decision that is usually announced on the final day of the term, I don't expect there to be any delay past that, although theoretically the court can wait until the new term begins in October.

Ken Olson

unread,
May 4, 2022, 5:02:35 PM5/4/22
to
100% agreement

--
ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

Слава Україні та НАТО

Con Reeder, unhyphenated American

unread,
May 4, 2022, 10:46:32 PM5/4/22
to
On 2022-05-04, xyzzy <xyzzy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nope. Roe v Wade was also leaked.
>
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2022/05/02/leak-time-magazine-roe-wade/
>

On the morning of the announcement by one publication, in the days
when information traveled a lot slower. Not nearly the same....

--
"Systemic Racism' is such a perfect Marxist formulation. It
delegitimizes and entire society without blaming anyone in particular,
so it generates little opposition. It signifies everything and nothing
simultaneously. It can't be proven or disproven. It's genius
propaganda. -- Noah Pollak
0 new messages