Bush League Private Property
Jeff Davis
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/aug2002/bush-a01.shtml
[note:]"Moreover, the owners were allowed to buy back the stadium for a
mere $60 million..."
*******************
The ire with which the Republicans greeted the SCOTUS decision is comic:
accuse someone else of doing what you do. Just do it first!
Jim Brown
"Jeff Davis" <jd_...@alltel.net> wrote in message
news:3ccfa$42bed1e4$8b373f03$31...@ALLTEL.NET...
What are you trying to accomplish with this?? Most here agree the recent
SCOTUS ruling is not right. Did bush get a sweetheart deal in texas?
Probably. Is it a sweatheart deal similar to dozens associated with pro
sports across the country? yes. Was this covered in the election in 2000?
Absolutely. Have you guys run out of ammo on bush and need to continue to
resort back to things that happened more than a decade ago? Apparently.
Jeff Davis
> "Jeff Davis" <jd_...@alltel.net> wrote in message
> news:3ccfa$42bed1e4$8b373f03$31...@ALLTEL.NET...
>
>>http://www.bushfiles.com/bushfiles/SweetheartDeal.html
>>
>>
>>http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/aug2002/bush-a01.shtml
>>
>>[note:]"Moreover, the owners were allowed to buy back the stadium for a
>>mere $60 million..."
>>
>>
>>*******************
>>
>>The ire with which the Republicans greeted the SCOTUS decision is comic:
>>accuse someone else of doing what you do. Just do it first!
>
>
>
>
> What are you trying to accomplish with this??
Vent my anger at douchebags.
> Most here agree the recent
> SCOTUS ruling is not right. Did bush get a sweetheart deal in texas?
> Probably. Is it a sweatheart deal similar to dozens associated with pro
> sports across the country? yes. Was this covered in the election in 2000?
> Absolutely. Have you guys run out of ammo on bush and need to continue to
> resort back to things that happened more than a decade ago? Apparently.
The issue just raised by SCOTUS. Bush made millions on a similar deal.
Are the people who are angry about it sincere now? What changed?
Trent Woodruff
>http://www.bushfiles.com/bushfiles/SweetheartDeal.html
Didn't we cover all of this crap back in 2000 during the election?
Have you really lost all ability to harrangue Bush without bringing up
this sort of stuff?
Trent
Chairborne "Nine of Diamonds" Ranger
...To be a great NCO, you need three bones: a backbone, a wishbone and a funny bone.
Dennis
Be SQUARE
WHITEWATER LAND DEAL MAN!!!!
VINCE FOSTER WAS MURDERED I TELL YOU!!!!
--
"People who read the tabloids deserve to be lied to" - Jerry Seinfeld
"Education is the progressive discovery of our own Ignorance" - Will Durant
"We are drowning in information, while starving for wisdom." - E.O. Wilson
"the glass is not only half full the first half was delicious" --Me
To Reply: Scrape off the end bits...
Dennis
it aughta Be SQUARE
>>Jeff Davis was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...
>
>>http://www.bushfiles.com/bushfiles/SweetheartDeal.html
>
>Didn't we cover all of this crap back in 2000 during the election?
>
>Have you really lost all ability to harrangue Bush without bringing up
>this sort of stuff?
A more stinging endictment of Mr. Bush is he comes off more often as
a whiney kid who didn't get a lollipop at the fair when people
disagree with him.
Charles Beauchamp
> wood...@cableone.net (Trent Woodruff) You're digging it round, when
> it aughta Be SQUARE
>
>>> Jeff Davis was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...
>>
>>> http://www.bushfiles.com/bushfiles/SweetheartDeal.html
>>
>> Didn't we cover all of this crap back in 2000 during the election?
>>
>> Have you really lost all ability to harrangue Bush without bringing
>> up this sort of stuff?
>
> A more stinging endictment of Mr. Bush is he comes off more often as
> a whiney kid who didn't get a lollipop at the fair when people
> disagree with him.
only in the eyes of twits that are locked in a contrarian position towards
the President
--
"I call on those who question the motives of the President and his
national security advisors to join with the rest of America in
presenting a united front to our enemies abroad" - Sen. Durbin, 1998
v/r Beau
Jeff Davis
>>Jeff Davis was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...
>
>
>>http://www.bushfiles.com/bushfiles/SweetheartDeal.html
>
>
> Didn't we cover all of this crap back in 2000 during the election?
>
> Have you really lost all ability to harrangue Bush without bringing up
> this sort of stuff?
The recent Supreme Court decision indicated you all had forgotten it.
Trent Woodruff
I don't know why you'd get that idea, since the decision was roundly
criticized by pretty much everyone in the newsgroup.
Rather, you simply saw an opportunity to try to take yet another
gratuitous slap at Bush. How typical.
Jeff Davis
>>Jeff Davis was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...
>>
>>>Trent Woodruff wrote:
>>>
>>>>Jeff Davis was cut from the Baylor football team for saying...
>
>
>
>>>>http://www.bushfiles.com/bushfiles/SweetheartDeal.html
>
>
>>>Didn't we cover all of this crap back in 2000 during the election?
>>>Have you really lost all ability to harrangue Bush without bringing up
>>>this sort of stuff?
>
>
>>The recent Supreme Court decision indicated you all had forgotten it.
>
>
> I don't know why you'd get that idea, since the decision was roundly
> criticized by pretty much everyone in the newsgroup.
>
> Rather, you simply saw an opportunity to try to take yet another
> gratuitous slap at Bush. How typical.
Republicans who had said nothing about Bush's abuse...
Tom Enright
Jeff Davis wrote:
> Trent Woodruff wrote:
> > Didn't we cover all of this crap back in 2000 during the election?
> >
> > Have you really lost all ability to harrangue Bush without
> > bringing up this sort of stuff?
> The recent Supreme Court decision indicated you all had forgotten it.
I see a small parallel between the SCOTUS decision and the flag
burning issue.
I believe that a person should be able to burn their flag, because
it's their property and they may do anything they wish with it.
The recent SCOTUS decision, in a way, supports the ban on flag
burning because it states that one's property is at some level
at the mercy of government based on the "greater good" principal.
If one made the case that preventing the burning of the flag serves
the "greater good" of the community, what then?
-Tom Enright
Jeff Davis
As you know, "property rights" aren't the thing itself. There are lots
of property rights. Eminent domain is one kind of property right. The
recent SC decision didn't make that up.
Trent Woodruff
Again, we covered all this back in 2000. You're just as bad as the
folks that can't let go of Clinton's issues. Grow up.
Jim Brown
"Dennis" <drju...@verizon.netSCRAPE.com> wrote in message
news:f99ub154jneenlg58...@4ax.com...
> "Jim Brown" <ji...@wells.net> You're digging it round, when it aughta
> Be SQUARE
>
> >
> >"Jeff Davis" <jd_...@alltel.net> wrote in message
> >news:3ccfa$42bed1e4$8b373f03$31...@ALLTEL.NET...
> >> http://www.bushfiles.com/bushfiles/SweetheartDeal.html
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/aug2002/bush-a01.shtml
> >>
> >> [note:]"Moreover, the owners were allowed to buy back the stadium for a
> >> mere $60 million..."
> >>
> >>
> >> *******************
> >>
> >> The ire with which the Republicans greeted the SCOTUS decision is
comic:
> >> accuse someone else of doing what you do. Just do it first!
> >
> >
> >
> >What are you trying to accomplish with this?? Most here agree the recent
> >SCOTUS ruling is not right. Did bush get a sweetheart deal in texas?
> >Probably. Is it a sweatheart deal similar to dozens associated with pro
> >sports across the country? yes. Was this covered in the election in
2000?
> >Absolutely. Have you guys run out of ammo on bush and need to continue
to
> >resort back to things that happened more than a decade ago? Apparently.
> >
>
> WHITEWATER LAND DEAL MAN!!!!
>
> VINCE FOSTER WAS MURDERED I TELL YOU!!!!
I KNEW this would come up. Whitewater had illegalities purported. There
are none here. Even dave agrees what bush did was perfectly legal...the
SCOTUS just agreed as well.
Tom Enright
Jim Brown wrote:
> "Dennis" <drju...@verizon.netSCRAPE.com> wrote in message
> news:f99ub154jneenlg58...@4ax.com...
> > WHITEWATER LAND DEAL MAN!!!!
> >
> > VINCE FOSTER WAS MURDERED I TELL YOU!!!!
> I KNEW this would come up. Whitewater had illegalities purported. There
> are none here. Even dave agrees what bush did was perfectly legal...the
> SCOTUS just agreed as well.
Conviction Bowl
Arkansas 15
Texas 0
-Tom Enright
Jeff Davis
Bush was only being scorned tangentially in my original. The point of my
post was the number of people bemoaning the SCOTUS decision who had
conveniently forgotten Bush's land grab. "Oh, a terrible decision, boo
hoo...."
Matthew Hennig
If Bush did or didn't do something similiar has absolutely no impact on
the terrible decision regarding the recent case. Conservatives can be
just as against that decision now regardless of what Bush may or may not
have done in the past. That you think that because Bush may have done it
that it means conservatives HAVE to be for it just shows your blindness.
MH
--
Ten of Spades
Aggee Fedayeen Chief
Supreme Ruler of the Obvious
"We just got outplayed today. That's the bottom line. And we got
outcoached."
- OU Head Coach Bob Stoops following the Texas A&M game, Nov 9, 2002
Jeff Davis
"Oh what a terrible decision, boo hoo...."
Matthew Hennig
Does whatever may have happened with Bush and the Rangers really change
anything about the decision being a bad one???
Jeff Davis
Bush was only being scorned tangentially.
Dennis
when it aughta Be SQUARE
>
>Does whatever may have happened with Bush and the Rangers really change
>anything about the decision being a bad one???
>
>MH
why is this even considered a Liberal/conservative thing?
it's a WRONG thing from both sides.
liberals will claim it hurts the little guy in terms of being run over
by fat cats and Corporations, Conservatives will argue the same
property angle to keep it from Government.
Matthew Hennig
news:2vh0c195gfdd51dcd...@4ax.com:
> Matthew Hennig <ma...@aggies.No_JuNk.com> You're digging it round,
> when it aughta Be SQUARE
>
>>
>>Does whatever may have happened with Bush and the Rangers really
>>change anything about the decision being a bad one???
>>
>>MH
>
> why is this even considered a Liberal/conservative thing?
>
> it's a WRONG thing from both sides.
>
> liberals will claim it hurts the little guy in terms of being run over
> by fat cats and Corporations, Conservatives will argue the same
> property angle to keep it from Government.
I agree with you. I'm not sure why Jeff is trying to make it into one,
other than his hate of Chimpy McHitlerburton.
Dennis
when it aughta Be SQUARE
>Dennis <drju...@verizon.netSCRAPE.com> wrote in
>news:2vh0c195gfdd51dcd...@4ax.com:
>
>> Matthew Hennig <ma...@aggies.No_JuNk.com> You're digging it round,
>> when it aughta Be SQUARE
>>
>>>
>>>Does whatever may have happened with Bush and the Rangers really
>>>change anything about the decision being a bad one???
>>>
>>>MH
>>
>> why is this even considered a Liberal/conservative thing?
>>
>> it's a WRONG thing from both sides.
>>
>> liberals will claim it hurts the little guy in terms of being run over
>> by fat cats and Corporations, Conservatives will argue the same
>> property angle to keep it from Government.
>
>I agree with you. I'm not sure why Jeff is trying to make it into one,
>other than his hate of Chimpy McHitlerburton.
>
>MH
we all have axes to grind so we can hide the bodies....