Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

No.

161 views
Skip to first unread message

GrtArtiste

unread,
Nov 16, 2022, 4:33:39 PM11/16/22
to
This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/

GrtArtiste

Ken Olson

unread,
Nov 16, 2022, 5:00:22 PM11/16/22
to
I'll extend that to Joe Biden.
--
ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

Слава Україні та НАТО

GrtArtiste

unread,
Nov 16, 2022, 5:17:03 PM11/16/22
to
On 11/16/2022 5:00 PM, Ken Olson wrote:
> On 11/16/2022 4:33 PM, GrtArtiste wrote:
>> This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
>> conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can
>> agree or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
>>
>> https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
>>
>> GrtArtiste
>
> I'll extend that to Joe Biden.

On 11/16/2022 5:00 PM, Ken Olson wrote:
> On 11/16/2022 4:33 PM, GrtArtiste wrote:
>> This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
>> conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can
>> agree or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
>>
>> https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
>>
>> GrtArtiste
>
> I'll extend that to Joe Biden.
I'll extend that to Joe &! Kamala.

GrtArtiste


Ken Olson

unread,
Nov 16, 2022, 5:37:57 PM11/16/22
to
OMG +1

Eric Ramon

unread,
Nov 16, 2022, 6:03:34 PM11/16/22
to
well thought out, nicely expressed.

JGibson

unread,
Nov 16, 2022, 8:02:34 PM11/16/22
to
Is it going to be any more effective than this was?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/

Con Reeder, unhyphenated American

unread,
Nov 16, 2022, 9:12:58 PM11/16/22
to
"His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of a
president undermined him from beginning to end."

His magazine is to some extent living up to his most famous
quote:

“A conservative is someone who stands athwart history, yelling
Stop, at a time when no one is inclined to do so..."

--
"The formula for achieving a successful relationship is simple: you
should treat all disasters as if they were trivialities but never
treat a triviality as if it were a disaster." -- Quentin Crisp

Con Reeder, unhyphenated American

unread,
Nov 16, 2022, 9:13:12 PM11/16/22
to
Yes.


--
"We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more
than they hate us". -- Golda Meir

Michael Falkner

unread,
Nov 16, 2022, 10:06:45 PM11/16/22
to
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:12:58 PM UTC-8, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:

> "His inability to approximate the conduct that the public expects of a
> president undermined him from beginning to end."

Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a strongman.

Mike

RoddyMcCorley

unread,
Nov 16, 2022, 11:53:26 PM11/16/22
to
On 11/16/2022 4:33 PM, GrtArtiste wrote:
N.Y. Post coverage: There was just a cover blurb, “Florida man makes
announcement,” and then a short staff report buried on page 26.

--
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In
practice, there is." Ruben Goldberg

xyzzy

unread,
Nov 17, 2022, 7:42:17 AM11/17/22
to
Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <cons...@duxmail.com> wrote:
> On 2022-11-17, JGibson <james.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:33:39 PM UTC-5, GrtArtiste wrote:
>>> This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
>>> conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
>>> or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
>>>
>>> https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
>>>
>>> GrtArtiste
>>
>> Is it going to be any more effective than this was?
>>
>> https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
>
> Yes.

What’s likely to be effective in stopping him is the fact that he’s now
lost them 3 elections in a row, not any principles or real objections to
his wannabe strongman clownery.

https://nbatitlechase.com/2022/01/23/photo-get-in-loser-were-going-losing-donald-trump-meme/

--
“I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian,
liberal personality.” — Altie

unclejr

unread,
Nov 17, 2022, 9:32:57 AM11/17/22
to

Michael Falkner

unread,
Nov 17, 2022, 10:51:20 AM11/17/22
to
On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 4:42:17 AM UTC-8, xyzzy wrote:

> What’s likely to be effective in stopping him is the fact that he’s now
> lost them 3 elections in a row, not any principles or real objections to
> his wannabe strongman clownery.
>
> https://nbatitlechase.com/2022/01/23/photo-get-in-loser-were-going-losing-donald-trump-meme/

They don't believe they lost. Seriously.

Which is one of the reasons I continue to ask why they don't just start shooting the American Left, rank and file and "tyrannical government".

Mike

Con Reeder, unhyphenated American

unread,
Nov 17, 2022, 12:03:16 PM11/17/22
to
On 2022-11-17, xyzzy <xyzzy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Con Reeder, unhyphenated American <cons...@duxmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2022-11-17, JGibson <james.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:33:39 PM UTC-5, GrtArtiste wrote:
>>>> This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
>>>> conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
>>>> or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
>>>>
>>>> GrtArtiste
>>>
>>> Is it going to be any more effective than this was?
>>>
>>> https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
>>
>> Yes.
>
> What’s likely to be effective in stopping him is the fact that he’s now
> lost them 3 elections in a row, not any principles or real objections to
> his wannabe strongman clownery.
>
> https://nbatitlechase.com/2022/01/23/photo-get-in-loser-were-going-losing-donald-trump-meme/

Of course. His advantage was his fanbois belief in his "strength", and
when you lose you look weak.

I gotta think that his announcing early is going to make him weaker
yet, because it's clear that he will struggle to get exposure. As he
starts feeling ignored, he'll do things which make him look truly
desperate. That isn't a good look. DeSantis should keep waiting; the
Donald risks implosion month by month. If his rallies stop pulling in
crowds, he's done.

--
Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them.
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.

xyzzy

unread,
Nov 18, 2022, 10:41:04 AM11/18/22
to
Almost every past presidential primary teaches us that the last thing
DeSantis (or anyone) wants to do is peak too early.

Corky

unread,
Nov 18, 2022, 10:56:27 AM11/18/22
to
By all means let's elect someone that says the right things but doesn't get shit done for the country. If it had been left up to our current population we would've lost WWII and all be boot licking Germans.

'To his credit, Trump killed off the Clinton dynasty in 2016, nominated and got confirmed three constitutionalist justices, reformed taxes, pushed deregulation, got control of the border, significantly degraded ISIS in Syria and Iraq, and cinched normalization deals between Israel and the Gulf states, among other things. These are achievements that even his conservative doubters and critics — including NR — can acknowledge and applaud.'

Michael Falkner

unread,
Nov 18, 2022, 12:04:57 PM11/18/22
to
On Friday, November 18, 2022 at 7:56:27 AM UTC-8, cork...@gmail.com wrote:

> By all means let's elect someone that says the right things but doesn't get shit done for the country. If it had been left up to our current population we would've lost WWII and all be boot licking Germans.

More than a few Trumpites wish we had!

And so does more than a bit of the US manufacturing industry of the 1930s.

Mike

Con Reeder, unhyphenated American

unread,
Nov 19, 2022, 2:45:46 PM11/19/22
to
Well, Garland and the Biden Administration has made their smart move -- indict
him so they can keep him on the ballot for a third election. One thing that's clear;
the Dems are really bad but when they run against Trump they are a favorite.

--
There's nothing sweeter than life nor more precious than time.
-- Barney

Con Reeder, unhyphenated American

unread,
Nov 19, 2022, 2:47:27 PM11/19/22
to
If he'd conceded the last election gracefully, then spent the next couple years
talking about what he had accomplished, I think the Republicans would have
won this last election. And Trump would be a favorite to get the nomination for
'24.

Not that Trump is capable of doing that.


--
The minimum wage law is most properly described as a law saying
employers must discriminate against people who have low skills.
-- Milton Friedman

Workday

unread,
Nov 19, 2022, 11:57:14 PM11/19/22
to
On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> posted some
news:9f075c02-860e-4caa...@googlegroups.com:
What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy
types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and
females?

Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should
simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool.

The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years.
Put them down and end this stupidity.

<https://fotos.perfil.com/2022/02/20/trim/1040/780/sam-briton-1315514.jpg>

RoddyMcCorley

unread,
Nov 20, 2022, 2:03:34 AM11/20/22
to
Heil Hitler!

Spoken like a true Nazi.

Michael Falkner

unread,
Nov 20, 2022, 2:04:09 PM11/20/22
to
On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 8:57:14 PM UTC-8, Workday wrote:
> On 16 Nov 2022, Michael Falkner <darkst...@gmail.com> posted some
> news:9f075c02-860e-4caa...@googlegroups.com:

> > Except many of his supporters do not want a President -- they want a
> > strongman.

> What would you want if you saw your country turning into a bunch of xyzzy
> types who refuse to acknowledge the basic difference between males and
> females?

Two responses to that: START SHOOTING US THEN, YOU FUCKING CUCK.

And two, you don't know the difference between human and not human.

> Those kinds of people and their supporters are defectives, and should
> simply be wiped from the face of the Earth to cleanse the gene pool.

Shoot me then, you fucking cuck.

Show a ball. Not even two. Show me you have even one and fill my cranium full of lead, you sanctimonious whore.

> The human race did just fine without them for tens of thousands of years.
> Put them down and end this stupidity.

Where's your address? So I can see if you actually MEAN that...

Fucking cuckold.

Mike

Michael Falkner

unread,
Nov 20, 2022, 2:04:28 PM11/20/22
to
On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 11:03:34 PM UTC-8, RoddyMcCorley wrote:

> Heil Hitler!
>
> Spoken like a true Nazi.

That's the idea, as I said.

Mike

Ed Rhodes

unread,
Nov 21, 2022, 6:25:14 PM11/21/22
to
Heil wokery!

Spoken like a true degenerate.
--

Die Juden sind unser Unglück.
- Heinrich Gotthard Freiherr von Treitschke (1834-1896)

%

unread,
Nov 21, 2022, 6:38:33 PM11/21/22
to
you're not even ed rhodes

Michael Falkner

unread,
Nov 21, 2022, 6:39:00 PM11/21/22
to
On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 3:25:14 PM UTC-8, Ed Rhodes wrote:

> Heil wokery!
>
> Spoken like a true degenerate.

Do something about us then.

You speak like a true coward.

Or a Republican, but I repeat myself.

Mike

Ed Rhodes

unread,
Nov 21, 2022, 9:55:45 PM11/21/22
to
You're not even 10% of percent.

Some dued

unread,
Nov 22, 2022, 12:43:45 AM11/22/22
to
Woke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nazi
HTH

TE

unread,
Nov 22, 2022, 8:17:11 PM11/22/22
to
National Review is establishment GOP, the party of Washington DC. not of the rank and file.
I read NR for decades, almost everything they wrote, dead tree and digital, until about a decade
ago, I can't recall the last time I've read any of their stuff.

Trump isn't conservative or establishment or DC. The NR would rather have Clinton, either one,
than Trump. Status quo buys the scotch and pays for Georgetown thinktanks.

-TE

“So… what’s the essential difference between [Dylan] Mulvaney and [Rachel] Dolezal? You’d
have to ask a women’s and gender studies scholar to get the convoluted answer. Before you
do, just remember that asking questions is what white supremacist transphobe domestic
terrorists do.”

TE

unread,
Nov 22, 2022, 8:20:40 PM11/22/22
to
I guess that depends on where you are standing. Gay? Correct. Saxon? Nope. Catholic? It's a push.

-TE

Con Reeder, unhyphenated American

unread,
Nov 23, 2022, 8:19:31 AM11/23/22
to
On 2022-11-23, TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 8:02:34 PM UTC-5, JGibson wrote:
>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:33:39 PM UTC-5, GrtArtiste wrote:
>> > This is from the National Review, perhaps the most respected
>> > conservative publication that has existed in my lifetime. You can agree
>> > or disagree as you choose but for me...this is priceless:
>> >
>> > https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/no/
>> >
>> > GrtArtiste
>
>> Is it going to be any more effective than this was?
>>
>> https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
>
> National Review is establishment GOP, the party of Washington DC. not of the rank and file.
> I read NR for decades, almost everything they wrote, dead tree and digital, until about a decade
> ago, I can't recall the last time I've read any of their stuff.
>
> Trump isn't conservative or establishment or DC. The NR would rather have Clinton, either one,
> than Trump. Status quo buys the scotch and pays for Georgetown thinktanks.
>

Can't agree with your characterization. They didn't want Trump, for sure, but didn't
endorse Biden or Clinton either. The recent election shows why Trump is bad, as the
candidates embracing his "stop the steal" crap ran 5-7 points behind generic Republicans.

NR is completely behind DeSantis or Pompeo, both of whom could be expected to pursue
Trump-like policies without the toxic baggage of said petty narcissist.

--
How far can you open your
mind before your brains
fall out?

Some dued

unread,
Nov 23, 2022, 11:50:57 AM11/23/22
to
Those woke concentration camps are brutal.

Ken Olson

unread,
Nov 23, 2022, 12:00:01 PM11/23/22
to
As philosophies, they're both rsfcked.
--
ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

Слава Україні та НАТО

Michael Falkner

unread,
Nov 23, 2022, 12:53:36 PM11/23/22
to
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 8:50:57 AM UTC-8, Some dued wrote:

> Those woke concentration camps are brutal.

Many call them the school system.

One conservative actually called the most dangerous person in America...

... the head of the teachers' union.

If they believe that shit, they might as well say girls need to learn to suck dick one way, and boys in another.

Mike

Eric Ramon

unread,
Nov 23, 2022, 2:33:13 PM11/23/22
to
On Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 5:17:11 PM UTC-8, TE wrote:

> >
> > https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/01/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace/
> National Review is establishment GOP, the party of Washington DC. not of the rank and file.
> I read NR for decades, almost everything they wrote, dead tree and digital, until about a decade
> ago, I can't recall the last time I've read any of their stuff.
>
> Trump isn't conservative or establishment or DC. The NR would rather have Clinton, either one,
> than Trump. Status quo buys the scotch and pays for Georgetown thinktanks.
>

the Republicans might nominate Trump but they'll lose again. The rank and file Repubs might be a majority of the party but a minority of the country. I think even Hillary would beat Trump in 2024 and that's saying a lot about Trump's non-electability. Boy, that would be a horrible choice, as it was in 2016.

TE

unread,
Nov 23, 2022, 9:00:36 PM11/23/22
to
...and your race, sexuality, politics and religion gets you entry too!

-TE

"You don’t think such-and-such because you reasoned logically to that conclusion; you think such-and-such because you are a white, heterosexual, middle-class American female, and so forth. In this way, totalitarians do not persuade or refute their interlocutors with reasoned arguments. They merely impute bad faith to their opponents and refuse to engage in meaningful debate. They forcibly cut their adversaries off from the sphere of enlightened conversation. One does not bother arguing against such dissidents; one simply steamrolls them after placing them outside the realm of acceptable opinion."
0 new messages