Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"Acting White" Quantified

0 views
Skip to first unread message

David V. Loewe, Jr

unread,
May 19, 2008, 4:52:06 PM5/19/08
to
http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11326407

"Cool to be dumb

His most striking contribution to the debate so far has been to show
that black students who study hard are accused of “acting white” and
are ostracised by their peers. Teachers have known this for years, at
least anecdotally. Mr Fryer found a way to measure it. He looked at a
large sample of public-school children who were asked to name their
friends. To correct for kids exaggerating their own popularity, he
counted a friendship as real only if both parties named each other. He
found that for white pupils, the higher their grades, the more popular
they were. But blacks with good grades had fewer black friends than
their mediocre peers. In other words, studiousness is stigmatised
among black schoolchildren. It would be hard to imagine a more
crippling cultural norm. "
--
"Liberalism is a philosophy of consolation for Western Civilization as it
commits suicide."
James Burnham

Huck Kennedy

unread,
May 19, 2008, 5:38:51 PM5/19/08
to
On May 19, 1:52 pm, "David V. Loewe, Jr" <davelo...@charter.net>
wrote:

> http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11326407
>
> "Cool to be dumb
>
> His most striking contribution to the debate so far has been to show
> that black students who study hard are accused of “acting white” and
> are ostracised by their peers. Teachers have known this for years, at
> least anecdotally. Mr Fryer found a way to measure it. He looked at a
> large sample of public-school children who were asked to name their
> friends. To correct for kids exaggerating their own popularity, he
> counted a friendship as real only if both parties named each other. He
> found that for white pupils, the higher their grades, the more popular
> they were. But blacks with good grades had fewer black friends than
> their mediocre peers. In other words, studiousness is stigmatised
> among black schoolchildren. It would be hard to imagine a more
> crippling cultural norm. "

MAY B TH4T 15 WHA'T5 R0N6 W1TH RSFC!!!!@!!1!!!~

Ralph Kennedy

"This is rsfc, not the Algonquin roundtable."
-xyzzy, 2/16/07


rich hammett

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:17:43 PM5/19/08
to
Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, David V. Loewe, Jr:
> http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11326407

> "Cool to be dumb

> His most striking contribution to the debate so far has been to show
> that black students who study hard are accused of “acting white” and
> are ostracised by their peers. Teachers have known this for years, at
> least anecdotally. Mr Fryer found a way to measure it. He looked at a
> large sample of public-school children who were asked to name their
> friends. To correct for kids exaggerating their own popularity, he
> counted a friendship as real only if both parties named each other. He
> found that for white pupils, the higher their grades, the more popular
> they were. But blacks with good grades had fewer black friends than
> their mediocre peers. In other words, studiousness is stigmatised
> among black schoolchildren. It would be hard to imagine a more
> crippling cultural norm. "

Odd, I see a few dozen other ways to interpret that data, and
any interpretation would depend on knowing the racial balance
at a particular school in the study.

I wonder what it would show for republicans who learn about
science? I bet they have problems having republican friends.

rich
--
-to reply, it's hot not warm
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ Rich Hammett http://home.hiwaay.net/~rhammett
/ He always pictured himself a libertarian, which to my
\ way of thinking means ``I want the liberty to grow rich
/ and you can have the liberty to starve''. It's easy to
\ believe that no one should depend on society for help
/ when you yourself happen not to need such help.

Emperor Wonko the Sane

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:24:50 PM5/19/08
to

No wonder I never make the kewl threads (*snicker*),

Doug

Emperor Wonko the Sane

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:28:09 PM5/19/08
to
On May 19, 5:17 pm, rich hammett <bubbaric...@warmmail.com> wrote:
> Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
> olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, David V. Loewe, Jr:
>
> >http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11326407
> > "Cool to be dumb
> > His most striking contribution to the debate so far has been to show
> > that black students who study hard are accused of “acting white” and
> > are ostracised by their peers. Teachers have known this for years, at
> > least anecdotally. Mr Fryer found a way to measure it. He looked at a
> > large sample of public-school children who were asked to name their
> > friends. To correct for kids exaggerating their own popularity, he
> > counted a friendship as real only if both parties named each other. He
> > found that for white pupils, the higher their grades, the more popular
> > they were. But blacks with good grades had fewer black friends than
> > their mediocre peers. In other words, studiousness is stigmatised
> > among black schoolchildren. It would be hard to imagine a more
> > crippling cultural norm. "
>
> Odd, I see a few dozen other ways to interpret that data, and
> any interpretation would depend on knowing the racial balance
> at a particular school in the study.
>
> I wonder what it would show for republicans who learn about
> science?  I bet they have problems having republican friends.
>

You must be very popular with the black kids.

Doug

Sean S

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:48:13 PM5/19/08
to
"David V. Loewe, Jr" <dave...@charter.net> laid this on me:

> http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11326407
>
> "Cool to be dumb
>
> His most striking contribution to the debate so far has been to show
> that black students who study hard are accused of “acting white” and

> [snip]


> their mediocre peers. In other words, studiousness is stigmatised
> among black schoolchildren. It would be hard to imagine a more
> crippling cultural norm. "

Or, they coulda watched Chris Rock 10 years ago, and saved all that
$$ on the study.

Sean
--
"If I had six hours to chop down a tree, I'd spend the first four hours
sharpening the axe".
-- Abraham Lincoln

deem...@aol.com

unread,
May 19, 2008, 7:04:22 PM5/19/08
to
On May 19, 6:17 pm, rich hammett <bubbaric...@warmmail.com> wrote:
> Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
> olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, David V. Loewe, Jr:
>
> >http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11326407
> > "Cool to be dumb
> > His most striking contribution to the debate so far has been to show
> > that black students who study hard are accused of “acting white” and
> > are ostracised by their peers. Teachers have known this for years, at
> > least anecdotally. Mr Fryer found a way to measure it. He looked at a
> > large sample of public-school children who were asked to name their
> > friends. To correct for kids exaggerating their own popularity, he
> > counted a friendship as real only if both parties named each other. He
> > found that for white pupils, the higher their grades, the more popular
> > they were. But blacks with good grades had fewer black friends than
> > their mediocre peers. In other words, studiousness is stigmatised
> > among black schoolchildren. It would be hard to imagine a more
> > crippling cultural norm. "
>
> Odd, I see a few dozen other ways to interpret that data, and
> any interpretation would depend on knowing the racial balance
> at a particular school in the study.
>
> I wonder what it would show for republicans who learn about
> science?  I bet they have problems having republican friends.
>
> rich
> --
>

Such a clever little guy.

John Rogers

unread,
May 19, 2008, 8:57:15 PM5/19/08
to
Huck Kennedy <temp...@gmail.com>, don't waste your summer praying in
vain for your Obama to rise from these streets...

HAW!!@!!! HAV3 ANUTH3R B33R U MORAN!!!@!!!!!~1!!!


John Rogers
AU Class of 1985
The Al Del Greco of Atlanta

"We are not fighting so that you will offer us something. We
are fighting to eliminate you." (Hussein Massawi, Hezbollah)

"There are good and decent people who cannot fathom the darkness
in these men and try to explain away their words. It's natural,
but it is deadly wrong." (President Bush)

rich hammett

unread,
May 19, 2008, 10:04:19 PM5/19/08
to
Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, Emperor Wonko the Sane:

Only with the ones good at science.

Bill Lang

unread,
May 19, 2008, 11:09:46 PM5/19/08
to
On Mon 19 May 2008 06:17:43p, rich hammett (bubba...@warmmail.com)
wrote

> I wonder what it would show for republicans who learn about
> science? I bet they have problems having republican friends.

This has to be the dumnest non-sequitor snark I have ever read.

--
wjlmuttatyeahwhodotcom

"I before E except after C, and E before N in chicken"

rich hammett

unread,
May 20, 2008, 12:21:30 AM5/20/08
to
Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, Bill Lang:

> On Mon 19 May 2008 06:17:43p, rich hammett (bubba...@warmmail.com)
> wrote

>> I wonder what it would show for republicans who learn about
>> science? I bet they have problems having republican friends.

> This has to be the dumnest non-sequitor snark I have ever read.

I shoulda put "PS" in front of that for some of you.

It does seem to be a perfect analogy, BTW.

deem...@aol.com

unread,
May 20, 2008, 6:26:39 AM5/20/08
to
On May 20, 12:21 am, rich hammett <bubbaric...@warmmail.com> wrote:
> Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
> olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, Bill Lang:
>
> > On Mon 19 May 2008 06:17:43p, rich hammett (bubbaric...@warmmail.com)

> > wrote
> >> I wonder what it would show for republicans who learn about
> >> science?  I bet they have problems having republican friends.
> > This has to be the dumnest non-sequitor snark I have ever read.
>
> I shoulda put "PS" in front of that for some of you.
>
> It does seem to be a perfect analogy, BTW.
>
> rich
> --

It's definitely anal.

the_andr...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 20, 2008, 8:20:06 AM5/20/08
to
On May 19, 4:52 pm, "David V. Loewe, Jr" <davelo...@charter.net>
wrote:

> http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11326407
>
> "Cool to be dumb
>
> His most striking contribution to the debate so far has been to show
> that black students who study hard are accused of “acting white” and
> are ostracised by their peers. Teachers have known this for years, at
> least anecdotally. Mr Fryer found a way to measure it. He looked at a
> large sample of public-school children who were asked to name their
> friends. To correct for kids exaggerating their own popularity, he
> counted a friendship as real only if both parties named each other. He
> found that for white pupils, the higher their grades, the more popular
> they were. But blacks with good grades had fewer black friends than
> their mediocre peers. In other words, studiousness is stigmatised
> among black schoolchildren. It would be hard to imagine a more
> crippling cultural norm. "

Acting "white"?

As if "white" people have a lock on scholarship?

Look around this chat machine.

a.

Tom Enright

unread,
May 20, 2008, 8:56:06 AM5/20/08
to
On May 20, 8:20 am, "the_andrew_sm...@yahoo.com"
<the_andrew_sm...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Acting "white"?
>
> As if "white" people have a lock on scholarship?
>
> Look around this chat machine.

Wait. You mean we aren't all Asian here?

-Tom Enright

> a.

the_andr...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 20, 2008, 9:28:40 AM5/20/08
to

Only Hoover's wife.

a.

rich hammett

unread,
May 20, 2008, 9:42:50 AM5/20/08
to
Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, deem...@aol.com:

> It's definitely anal.

It's an obvious analogy, when I see somebody else attacking
education for the last 20 years or so.

0 new messages