The AP rankings

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

At the moment I'm not sure Bama could beat OU or Clemson...

The offense is hit or miss and the defense is not much with 5 LBs out
with injuries. Bama has 4 5-star running backs and the QB is the
rushing leader - hmmm!

Tua, Najee and Jeudy have not shown they belong on a college football
field yet.

Bama has more room for improvement this year than most years.

Plus, some broad thought the Canola bar beat Triple G last night.

Help me, mia.

Hugh

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[michael anderson]

On Sunday, September 17, 2017 at 10:34:26 AM UTC-5, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> At the moment I'm not sure Bama could beat OU or Clemson...
>
> The offense is hit or miss and the defense is not much with 5 LBs out
> with injuries. Bama has 4 5-star running backs and the QB is the
> rushing leader - hmmm!
>
> Tua, Najee and Jeudy have not shown they belong on a college football
> field yet.
>
> Bama has more room for improvement this year than most years.
>

> Plus, somes broad thought the Canola bar beat Triple G last night.
>
> Help me, mia.

did you watch our only game so far this year hugh? sure hurts and the o looked underwhelming, but we are clearly the best team again. aND its not particularly close. And evans is coming back so LBis fine.

[Tonawanda Kardex]

This is what white trash looks like, Ma.

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:24:56 -0700 (PDT), michael anderson
<miande...@gmail.com> wrote:

>did you watch our only game so far this year hugh? sure hurts and the o looked underwhelming, but we are clearly the best team again. aND its not particularly close. And evans is coming back so LBis fine.

Actually I drew my usual chart of every play for all three games this
year.

I think Clemson put Louisville testicles in a vise and UL has a better
offense than Bama (so far). Our RBs are little better than 3 yards and
a cloud of dust. I had high hopes for Bo.

Bama defense has problems with an accurate passer who knows his left
foot from his right. Mayfield may be the current leader for that
position.

I'm hoping the last two games have been for the purpose of
experimenting and not what Bama fans should expect in the future.

Vandy always plays Bama tough - I have attended several of the games
in Nashville.

Maybe my problem is that Crimson-colored glasses are never on sale 400
miles from T-town.

[jim brown]

Again? Were you the best team last year?

[agavi...@gmail.com]

Only a few years as a Bammer and the random capitalization begins to appear.

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:26:51 -0700 (PDT), Tonawanda Kardex
<tonawan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>This is what white trash looks like, Ma.

Ain't this country wunnerful - in a few years you can become that
advanced. You have probably already heard your ma tell you that.

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:33:19 -0700 (PDT), "the_andr...@yahoo.com"
<agavi...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Only a few years as a Bammer and the random capitalization begins to appear.

I would almost fight for your right to properly capitalize Cow U.

[michael anderson]

were we better than clemson? Sure...the best team doesnt always win. Thats why they play the games. Clemson deservedly won because they were better for those 60 minutes

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:14:39 -0700 (PDT), jim brown
<jimbr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Again? Were you the best team last year?

That deserves a reply...

FACT: Clemson won.

THEORY: Bo was on a tear for the last several games of the season, and
was doing well in this game. He broke his leg, the offense sputtered,
the defense was on the field too long toward the end of the game.

THEORY: Had Watson broken his leg Bama would have by several TDs.

To answer your question I think Bama was the better team.

INESCAPABLE FACT: Clemson won.

[dotsla...@gmail.com]

Would you apply that same logic to the Bama Texas game a few years back and concede that texas was the better team?

Cheers.

[Michael Press]

In article <f6db7c3f-42d0-42b2...@googlegroups.com>,

dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:

> Would you apply that same logic to the Bama Texas game a few years back and concede that texas was the better team?
>
> Cheers.

Lest we forget

Utah 31
Alabama 17

--
Michael Pres

[Ken Olson]

On 9/19/2017 1:36 PM, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> Would you apply that same logic to the Bama Texas game a few years back and concede that texas was the better team?
>
> Cheers.
>

This is rsfc. Why are you bringing up logic?

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:36:29 -0700 (PDT), dotsla...@gmail.com
wrote:

>Would you apply that same logic to the Bama Texas game a few years back and concede that texas was the better team?
>
>Cheers.

Bama won.

Certainly Texas was the better team.

Bama won.