On Tuesday, January 9, 2024 at 10:18:17 AM UTC-8, The NOTBCS Guy wrote:
> > > Kindly explain to us (a) who has the authority to "revoke the title" (hint: the NCAA cannot vacate titles it did not give out), and, more importantly, (b) the reasoning for the decision.
>
> > a) should've been the Big Ten Conference. We're now to the point where this title has to go the route of the Reggie Bush situation. So, the CFP Committee after the NCAA does it's job and vacates "wins".
> Unless you can show that Michigan cheated against either Alabama or Washington,
They cheated to get there. See Bush, Reggie.
I would think that obvious.
> Please, please, please, pleasepleaseplease, PLEASE, did I mention "please", please tell me you don't certainly think that the CFP is going to respond, "Well, if Michigan vacated those regular season games, it would not have qualified for the CFP championship (especially as you don't know that), so we can vacate the CFP championship."
Not only do I believe that, I would think it an OBVIOUS outcome of the unsportsmanlike conduct already declared.
> The Reggie Bush situation is different - he played in the BCS championship game after agreeing to be represented by an agent, which made him ineligible to play in that game, which is pretty much an automatic vacating of that win by the NCAA.
> > b): The two suspensions should've been enough right there
> He served his NCAA suspensions. I will repeat the question: for what specific reason would the NCAA vacate the CFP championship game win?
The second suspension was the Big Ten's. Also, on top of it, you are getting to the point where the presence of any sanctioning body becomes an absurdity at the rate things are going if something of meaning is not done here.
Mike