On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 9:39:41 AM UTC-7, The NOTBCS Guy wrote:
> Football could do it tomorrow if it wanted to, with the "superconference" concept. The only differences from my impression of how you expect that to work appear to be:
> (a) There is no association between any particular "college" team and any NFL team - this isn't MLB.
I'd semi-expect it on an association, also to try to get it to 32 "colleges" and spread it out, otherwise you'd have 10 schools in the Southeast and maybe 6-10 otherwise.
> (b) There is no drafting of high school players; they play wherever they want, although the college teams may agree to some roster limit.
You could see programs collapse if there wasn't, and this is why I'm not 100% sure on part (a), though I understand where you are coming from in that regard.
> (c) There does not have to be a team near each NFL team's city - you're not going to be able to do this without at least one team in Alabama. Besides, even baseball doesn't do this; Milwaukee's AAA team is in Nashville, and the Dodgers' is in Oklahoma City.
You see, that's the thing which makes your case for (a) more solid. Who does Carolina get? Atlanta gets Georgia and to get a team in Alabama you'd almost have to leap over.
Mike