On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 9:17:12 AM UTC-5, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
> On 2021-03-05, xyzzy <
xyzzy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 9:07:02 AM UTC-5, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
> >> On 2021-03-05, xyzzy <
xyzzy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 8:15:39 AM UTC-5,
jimbr...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> >>
https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2021R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB3305/Introduced
> >> >
> >> > From my shallow reading of this bill, it doesn't ban biodiesel or petroleum diesel used off-road in agriculture, generators, etc.
> >> >
> >> > It just bans selling petroleum diesel for on-road use. A bunch of countries and cities in Europe and parts of China are also enacting similar restrictions.
> >> Just?
> >
> > just, only, simply, ... substitute whatever limiting helper word you prefer. Clarifying the header which implied all diesel fuel banned by the proposed bill.
> >
> My point is that the measure means the many diesel cars are essentially
> banned in Oregon by this bill. That isn't simply, just, or even only.
Yup, I'm sure that's their ultimate goal. I wouldn't be concerned with cars so much as trucks, especially long-haul interstate trucks. It bans selling the fuel but not driving with it so if this bill passes (don't know how likely that is) I can see massive truck plazas just outside the Oregon border being very lucrative.
Diesel is very dirty. For years it got a pass and then when we all learned it was getting a pass because diesel car makers were cheating on emissions tests, the backlash was (and still is) intense.