On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 5:16:51 PM UTC-7, TE wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2022 at 10:04:54 PM UTC-4, RoddyMcCorley wrote:
> > Hillary might have been a decent POTUS and had she won we would have
> > avoided the shitstorm of the past six or so years. But she and her party
> > were smug and thought they were entitled to the oval office. They effed up.
Hillary was smug, and she forgot there's a lot of White Men (and a lot of White Women willing to submit to them to be daddied and raped -- yeah, I said it, if by the right man... They're whores just looking for the right price!) who want to be Trump. He offered them that and the possibility that "they" (LGBTQ's, immigrants, all other useless) would be killed and eliminated.
His cowardice and theirs are the only reason we still vote -- and that might not be the case much longer.
> Well, the GOP was anti-smug. If the leadership thought that Trump had a chance
> in hell they would have sabotaged his run. See: Sanders, Bernie. Breaking the
> bipartisan nature of the thread, but the "shitstorm" was more of the reaction to
> Trump than Trump himself.
Trump would've third-partied at that point. His idea was actually to enact The Contract On America and start killing the "others". They were all waiting for the word, and it sounds like he WAS actually going to give it!
> > I'm wondering how many votes she lost, especially from women, by the way
> > she dressed? Always looked like her clothes were made from old slip
> > covers and curtains.
> I doubt that made much of a difference. Without looking it up I thought she
> lost votes from suburban part/full time moms.
Who were, then, willing to be bent and raped to have relevance/legitimate purpose/a place at all in America going forward?
Mike