Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

colorado....wtf???

0 views
Skip to first unread message

mianderson

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 11:48:37 PM11/26/09
to
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4691895

Is this a sign of the economy or something? Because I really don't
see *ANY* reason why hawkins should be back......are they just too
cheap/not enough resources to negotiate a buyout?

Because really, not canning him would be far more embaressing than
canning him.....

sheeesh

Tonawanda Kardex

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 12:15:23 AM11/27/09
to

Don't get it, either, and as an alum, it's disappointing. I like
Hawkins, but he clearly hasn't produced.

mianderson

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 12:17:54 AM11/27/09
to
On Nov 27, 12:15 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

and this is the end of *year 4*......

i mean it's one thing to give someone a third year after 2 horrendous
years. yes I disagree with the richrod decision but I do understand
it somewhat.

But we are talking about FOUR whole years of suckitude.

I mean wtf?

mianderson

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 12:23:40 AM11/27/09
to
On Nov 27, 12:15 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

now word is starting to trickle out that it is all because of the
buyout and stuff......

I *sorta* get that, but it's not like you owe him weiss money left on
the deal(hell it was a 5 year deal and this is year 4).......

I remember after the last game against okstate, chris fowler and the
other guys pretty much said when hawkins was walking off the field
that he would definately not be back as CU coach.....it was just a
foregone conclusion thing.

And now the CU people drop this bombshell on us.........

they think they cant afford to fire him. What they dont realize is
that they cant *not* afford to fire him.

J.C. Watts Enslin

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 7:34:31 AM11/27/09
to


If money isn't the issue, than his is a real head-scratching move.
There is some talk of comparisons to Mike Stoops and the patience that
Arizona has shown him, but Stoops took over a tough program and has
made steady progress. The Colorado program, while difficult, was in
decent shape when Hawkins took over...and it's gotten worse.

Next year's schedule has non-conference games at Cal and home v.
Georgia...yikes.

Jon

xyzzy

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 10:28:59 AM11/27/09
to

Maybe that's why, like they don't want the new guy to have such a
tough start. Kinda like how Wisky's first year coach chickened out of
playing VT.

Adam Xavier

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 12:39:55 PM11/27/09
to

"mianderson" <miande...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:85a9c8cc-aa39-4d18...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

I agree he should be gone, but the program is such a wreck now it doesn't
matter if they bring him back for another year or fire him now, they won't
be contenders for the Big 12 North for 3-5 years. They will need almost an
entire recruit class to play through before they'll be able to draw the
needed players to be a 9-3 team.

Save the money and the embarassment of having your 1st year coach go 2-10.
Have Hawkins explain that record to his next suitor.

Dan Bretta

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 1:06:35 PM11/27/09
to
On Nov 26, 10:48 pm, mianderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote:

He'll get a 5 year extension after he puts a RUTSing on the Huskers
today.

Dan

0 new messages