Undefeated teams part II
RaginPage
For your perusal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_undefeated_Division_I_football_teams
Not that I am generally a wiki fan, but hey, the work is already done,
so here you go.
Brent
Tonawanda Frankenstein
> For your perusal
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_undefeated_Division_I_football_t...
>
> Not that I am generally a wiki fan, but hey, the work is already done,
> so here you go.
Love those three-game seasons where the undefeated team was unscored
upon.
I mean, who cares what happened before 1936?
J. Hugh Sullivan
<tonawandaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
Some of us do have the intellectual capacity. Others are limited.
Hugh
Solnichka Frankenstein
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 07:31:21 -0700 (PDT), Tonawanda Frankenstein
>
> >On Jun 30, 7:28=A0am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> For your perusal
>
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_undefeated_Division_I_football_t...
>
> >> Not that I am generally a wiki fan, but hey, the work is already done,
> >> so here you go.
>
> >Love those three-game seasons where the undefeated team was unscored
> >upon.
>
> >I mean, who cares what happened before 1936?
>
> Some of us do have the intellectual capacity. Others are limited.
Intellectual capacity to what? Claim greatness based on ridiculous
inequity?
Yeah, the South loves that MO.
Futbol Phan
> For your perusal
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_undefeated_Division_I_football_t...
>
> so here you go.
>
> Brent
Having watched too much World Cup 'action', I now have a greater
appreciation for Jackie Robinson's undefeated 1939 UCLA squad, which
went 6-0-4, including nil-nil draws against both Santa Clara and U$C.
J. Hugh Sullivan
<solnichkaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jun 30, 9:50=A0am, Ea...@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 07:31:21 -0700 (PDT), Tonawanda Frankenstein
>>
>> <tonawandafrankenst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Jun 30, 7:28=3DA0am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> For your perusal
>>
>> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_undefeated_Division_I_football_t..=
>.
>>
>> >> Not that I am generally a wiki fan, but hey, the work is already done,
>> >> so here you go.
>>
>> >Love those three-game seasons where the undefeated team was unscored
>> >upon.
>>
>> >I mean, who cares what happened before 1936?
>>
>> Some of us do have the intellectual capacity. Others are limited.
>
>Intellectual capacity to what? Claim greatness based on ridiculous
>inequity?
No - to recall something about football before 1936.
Wasn't Bush the most recent inequity?
Hugh
Solnichka Frankenstein
Texas is in the South.
Solnichka Frankenstein
Del .net> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:25:05 -0700 (PDT), Solnichka Frankenstein
>
>
>
>
>
> <solnichkafrankenst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Players before that time were not really football players and didn't
> understand the game or have the mad skillz that players during that
> season and after did.
>
> I mean, if you want to be some kind of old time kook and go all the way
> back to 1936 and when a bunch of untalented honkeys were on all the
> teams, be my guest.
Well, it actually began when Michigan State became the 10th team in
the Western Conference, actually ...
Chuck Charlton
<c78ee718-945b-4979...@i16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
Tonawanda Frankenstein <tonawandaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Love those three-game seasons where the undefeated team was unscored
> upon.
>
In 1914 Auburn was not scored upon in a nine-game season. Too bad
about the tie. The offense should have apologized to the defense.
Oh, wait ...
John Rogers
animal.
Weird. They don't have "2008 bammer" listed.
Somebody needs to break it to Hugh.
John M. Rogers
AU Class of 1985
The Al Del Greco of Atlanta
"The grandchild, far from being incidental, is decisive. Civilization persists when
there is a widespread sense of an ethical obligation on the part of the present
generation for the well-being of the third generation - their own grandchildren. A
society where this feeling is not widespread may last as a civilization for some
time - indeed, for one or two generations it might thrive spectacularly. But
inevitably, a society acknowledging no transgenerational commitment to the future
will decay and decline from within."
(Lee Harris, "The Future of Tradition")
J. Hugh Sullivan
<solnichkaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Texas is in the South.
The Southwest actually. I know because I have been there.
Hugh
J. Hugh Sullivan
wrote:
>Hey, RaginPage <btpag...@yahoo.com>... keep the change, you filthy
>animal.
>
>>
>>
>>For your perusal
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_undefeated_Division_I_football_teams
>>
>>Not that I am generally a wiki fan, but hey, the work is already done,
>>so here you go.
>
>Weird. They don't have "2008 bammer" listed.
>
>Somebody needs to break it to Hugh.
>
>John M. Rogers
The list includes post-season games. I spoke of regular season. Plain
speech is too subtle for you.
I hear you would be interested in some of Tiger's girls - if you
thought you could get past the used part.
Hugh
The Ghost Of Edward M. Kennedy
>>Texas is in the South.
>
> The Southwest actually. I know because I have been there.
Dumbass. Part of Texas is in the South and the other part
is in the Southwest.
--Tedward
J. Hugh Sullivan
It's West of the Big River.
Hugh
Michael Press
<0608e12b-6f5d-48f8...@b4g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
Solnichka Frankenstein <solnichkaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
Michigan State never were a member of the Western Conference.
They became the eleventh university in the Big Ten Conference.
--
Michael Press
Tonawanda Frankenstein
> In article
> <0608e12b-6f5d-48f8-9b0c-eb0e9bdaa...@b4g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
Uh ... you couldn't be more wrong, but whatever.
The Big Ten name wasn't official until 1984, in truth; also, Penn
State was the 11th school.
Michael Press
<996203a5-100f-4564...@s17g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
Tonawanda Frankenstein <tonawandaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
I looked it up. Thanks. Appears to be 1987, actually.
> also, Penn
> State was the 11th school.
I count Chicago, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Northwestern,
Purdue, Wisconsin, Indiana, Iowa, Ohio State, Michigan State, Penn State,
making MSU the eleventh.
--
Michael Press
Tonawanda Frankenstein
Don't rely on Wikipedia for facts.
> > also, Penn
> > State was the 11th school.
>
> I count Chicago, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Northwestern,
> Purdue, Wisconsin, Indiana, Iowa, Ohio State, Michigan State, Penn State,
> making MSU the eleventh.
But Chicago wasn't in the conference when MSU joined. They pulled out
(heh) in 1940.
Thus, MSU was the tenth team when it joined in 1949 to begin play a
few years later.
Michael Press
<d377e34b-78bd-4582...@x24g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
Tonawanda Frankenstein <tonawandaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
Still makes MSU the eleventh university in the conference.
--
Michael Press
Tonawanda Frankenstein
ODL.
If you're going that way, you're still wrong.
Since Michigan actually left the conference from 1907 to 1917 ...
Enough already.
Michael Press
<5cf1b5c8-37c7-40d5...@s24g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
Tonawanda Frankenstein <tonawandaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
I made my list, counted to eleven, and there was MSU.
> Since Michigan actually left the conference from 1907 to 1917 ...
What?
> Enough already.
Have you had enough?
--
Michael Press