Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Who is putting more service in India for bating?

162 views
Skip to first unread message

ppan...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
Azharuddheen is putting second highest service in batting for India in
bad positions. First is Dravid. Tendulker is getting own money to
increase and getting support from gavaskar, vengasker and
krishnamachari type fellows.

every body is saying Australia is first in the top position for winning
the world cup. When austrlia came to senai I was also thinking that
sane warne and other bowlers will be danger for our team. Every body
was saying Tendulker can hold sane warne bowling better than all the
peoples. But in first inning tendulker was going for kattu-adi mattu-
adu batting and was not holding sane warne's balls. Sane warne got
tendulker to go into public toilet and gave only 5 runs. Every body was
afraid of sane warne. That time Dravid who is from our boys, came
forward and was holding sane warnes balls for 8 or 9 wickets. One ball
also was not in giving him any type problems. Why? he is not putting
bet, he is not getting own name up and india name down and he is
keeping the national service in front of personal service. Every OBC
boy has given good type of service like thin in the army. Even Pakistan
army was openly saying that in 1972, 1975 we are not making India go to
the public toilet becuase OBC boys are putting their chest into the
bullets, guns and other type of attack and India is coming forward.
Eating brinjal cannot make you hero or make health body.
In caclutta also Azharuddheen is holding all sane warne's balls and
putting them into boundary. All australian type fellows are looking for
his balls and standing near boundary. Even sane warne said openly that
azharuddheen and Dravid can hold my balls and put boundaries and so we
are not geting victories. Why? he is from muslim boys. But
Krishnamchari type fellows are giving chance only for brinjal eating
type fellows. Snake will know snake's legs and paapan will speak like
paapan's parrot.

venkat was in captaincy position for three times and India came back to
home with baandinakku. kapil Deve, punjabi OBC type fellow, pushed the
world cup to fall into India. Why? becuase Venkat is asking for his
friends and his boys to play for India. If gavaskar and tendulker are
so great why is there no world cup falling into india for 30 years?
putting bet is not own money but India's name is in public toilet.

I am asking all of you openly to think who is giving service to India?
and we will give clappings for those fellows

1. Dravid
2. Azharuddheen
3. Sinddhu
4. Dodda
5. karim

Other fellows can try to eat brinjal in the back area and ask for some
paisa from good players.

Yours Faithfully
Perumselva Pandiyan


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---

Razi C.

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
> Yours Faithfully
> Perumselva Pandiyan
>

Can you post your CV on this news group. We all are eager to see your
history and geography.

Cheers.
Razi


KaranRaj

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
>Subject: Who is putting more service in India for bating?
>From: ppan...@my-dejanews.com

\

Adarniye Pnndiyan bhaisaab,
I want to send u some $$$ via bank wire transfer, can u pls give me yr obc
account ##? I want to support yr cause so keep these mails
coming........Pandiyan ZINDABD!!
Pandiyan ji ki jai ho!!!

Kazranraj
" It's only people like Pandiyan who make this cruel world
go on"

Prashant Murti

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to

A few days away from rsc and I return to find that the esteemed ppandiyan
has outdone himself. This man is a frigging national treasure...

BTW I always did know that eating Brinjal was bad for you, I tried in vain
to convince my mom of that as a kid. Now I know why I never made the
Indian team, it was all that brinjal. I just would not be able to bring
myself to hold Sane Warne's balls after that...

Prashant

[ROTFLM`bottox'O]

Ram Tekumalla

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
The resurgence of the Veera Pandiyan! We are now glad to know that Warne is
"Sane" even after Azharuddin and Dravid held his balls and "put them to the
boundary" repeatedly. Warne must have too many balls and is probably a
medical curiosity now.

Now, does this Perumaselve Pandiyan really exist or this someone's prank?
Also, could the Tamil-advantaged tell me if the language below is kinda
like a literal translation from Tamil? just curious

-Ram

samarth harish shah

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Ram Tekumalla wrote:

<snip>

> Also, could the Tamil-advantaged tell me if the language below is kinda
> like a literal translation from Tamil? just curious

Yes. To me, it does seem as if at least some of the sentences are
absolutely literal translations from tamil.

-Samarth.


Harish Chandramouli

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
In article <Pine.SOL.3.96.990510...@ux12.cso.uiuc.edu>,

samarth harish shah <shs...@students.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>> Also, could the Tamil-advantaged tell me if the language below is kinda
>> like a literal translation from Tamil? just curious
>
>Yes. To me, it does seem as if at least some of the sentences are
>absolutely literal translations from tamil.

Bloody awful literal translations I might add. Its one thing when you're
dealing with a foreign base and you can get away with flawed writing,
quite another when you have such well spoken literary critics of the
language such as myself and Rohan around. No one is fooled.

Cheers,

Harish (the kitchen-Tamil critic)
--
AT WI-XI: 1. Hunte 2. Worrell (c) 3. Headley 4. Weekes 5. Walcott
6. Sobers 7. Dujon (wk) 8. Marshall 9. Ambrose 10. Roberts 11. Holding

Samir Dhume

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
Ram Tekumalla <rptek...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: The resurgence of the Veera Pandiyan! We are now glad to know that Warne is

: "Sane" even after Azharuddin and Dravid held his balls and "put them to the
: boundary" repeatedly. Warne must have too many balls and is probably a
: medical curiosity now.

: Now, does this Perumaselve Pandiyan really exist or this someone's prank?

: Also, could the Tamil-advantaged tell me if the language below is kinda


: like a literal translation from Tamil? just curious

The man's a genius. If that's a genuine post, I'll eat my
shoes. Without ketchup. Moonswamy means anything to anybody
here ?

samir

Dhruv Gupta

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to

ppan...@my-dejanews.com wrote in article <7h767j$b01$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...

> In caclutta also Azharuddheen is holding all sane warne's balls and

Aha! now we know why Warne didn't ball that well in India. But if some guy
started grabbing at my balls, I don't know if you could call me "Sane"

> All australian type fellows are looking for
> his balls and standing near boundary.

Wow. I didn't know the Aussies had such a fetish about Warne's balls

> Even sane warne said openly that
> azharuddheen and Dravid can hold my balls

So Warne has finally come clean and admitted his homosexuality. I guess
thaqt explains the dyed blond hair and earring. I still don't know if I'd
call him sane, though.

Cheers
Dhruv

PS: I almost never poke fun at somebody's usage of English (given that ngs
are an international forum). I make an exception when the substance of the
post is also ludicrous. I don't see what brinjals have to do with Indian
cricket, though I do agree that Dravid's contribution to the Indian team is
under-appreciated in comparison to Tendulkar's.


Ragupati - Chandrasekaran

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Ram Tekumalla wrote:

> The resurgence of the Veera Pandiyan! We are now glad to know that Warne is
> "Sane" even after Azharuddin and Dravid held his balls and "put them to the
> boundary" repeatedly. Warne must have too many balls and is probably a
> medical curiosity now.
>
> Now, does this Perumaselve Pandiyan really exist or this someone's prank?
> Also, could the Tamil-advantaged tell me if the language below is kinda
> like a literal translation from Tamil? just curious
>

> -Ram

well,if u were to believe my roomie,this is some one's prank and he
reached that conclusion after the post abt tendu not being the prime
minister:).and as samarth said,it is like a literal translation from
tamil.and boy,is it hilarious or what?

Ragu[whose roomie might lay claim to #1 pandian supporter,if he gets
around to the view that he exists in the first place:)]


RoshanCat

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
>The man's a genius. If that's a genuine post, I'll eat my
>shoes.

Actually I did some research on Pandiyan posts. He has posted only to RSC & has
some 7-8 posts. All those posts have the following things in common, Pappan,
public toilet, maharastri brahmin & the same misspelt names.

IMHO this Pandiyan's posts are genuine & not attempt of humor by a really smart
guy (If he was really smart atleast he would have attempted different themes),
but he continues to harp on only one thing from post 1 to post 9 (which
reflects more frustration than humor)

Cheers,
Roshan [I'm sure another couple of posts you'll be sick of this guy]

Nitin Mangalvedhe

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
I am willing to bet that this guy, whoever he is, is ROTFL seeing people
responding to his posts seriously. Some of his previous posts seemed
genuine but I think this one is a give-away. If nothing else, the double
entendre (which is what I think it is) surely is? It does not seem to be
accidental abuse of the the English language but rather a deliberate attempt.
Well, whatever it is, it sure makes for hilarious reading! Of course some
of the humor was lost on me since I don't understand Tamil.

Nitin

Samir Dhume wrote:


>
> Ram Tekumalla <rptek...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> : The resurgence of the Veera Pandiyan! We are now glad to know that Warne is
> : "Sane" even after Azharuddin and Dravid held his balls and "put them to the
> : boundary" repeatedly. Warne must have too many balls and is probably a
> : medical curiosity now.
>
> : Now, does this Perumaselve Pandiyan really exist or this someone's prank?
> : Also, could the Tamil-advantaged tell me if the language below is kinda
> : like a literal translation from Tamil? just curious
>

> The man's a genius. If that's a genuine post, I'll eat my

Ram Tekumalla

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
> Samir Dhume wrote:
> >
> > The man's a genius. If that's a genuine post, I'll eat my
> > shoes. Without ketchup. Moonswamy means anything to anybody
> > here ?

Moonswamy rings familiar ....now, where did I come across him?

-Ram

Message has been deleted

Razi Chaudhry

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
> Perumselva Pandiyan
>

Hi Pandiyan,

I have perfect reply for your... courtesy GOPI.
I hope you can convert it back to your "Tamil".

Have fun !
Razi
------
CRICKET: As explained to a foreigner...

You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in
the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next man
goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out comes
in and the side thats been in goes out and tries to get those coming in,
out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out.

When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and
when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in. There
are two men called umpires who stay all out all the time and they
decide when the men who are in are out. When both sides have been in and all
the men have out, and both sides have been out twice after all the
men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end of the
game!

Contributed by Gopi (go...@mem.odu.edu)


samarth harish shah

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Nitin Mangalvedhe wrote:

> I am willing to bet that this guy, whoever he is, is ROTFL seeing people
> responding to his posts seriously. Some of his previous posts seemed
> genuine but I think this one is a give-away. If nothing else, the double
> entendre (which is what I think it is) surely is? It does not seem to be
> accidental abuse of the the English language but rather a deliberate attempt.

I tend to agree with Nitin, here. Simply because our Thiru Pandiyan hasn't
made that many spelling errors, if you notice. Ok, he almost always
mis-spells names, but most English words are quite correctly spelt. (The
errors - few and far between - seem genuine to me ). For example, notice
the words "defeated", "European", "worshippers", "partiality",
"boundaries, "captaincy". All quite easy to mis-spell, and yet, spelt
correctly by Thiru Pandiyan. Come to think of it, even his vocabulary
isn't bad at all!!!

I don't really know of someone whose grammar is this bad, but whose
spelling is not bad at all...

-Samarth [ presuming, of course, that my English and judgement of others'
English is *reasonably* good ].

PS - I agree with Roshan, too, though, and hence I'm just going to sit on
the fence for the moment...


ravi iyengar

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
Ragupati - Chandrasekaran wrote in message ...

>> Now, does this Perumaselve Pandiyan really exist or this someone's prank?

the guy exists alright. he has posted even in 1997! he disappeared after a
few posts then, so he seems to be for real.


Blade

unread,
May 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/10/99
to
>Azharuddheen is putting second highest service in batting for India in
>bad positions. First is Dravid. Tendulker is getting own money to
>increase and getting support from gavaskar, vengasker and
>krishnamachari type fellows.

Dead Right buddy...Now go see your shrink !

Call : 1-800-4-PSYCHO


Matt van de Werken

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
samarth harish shah wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Nitin Mangalvedhe wrote:
>
> > I am willing to bet that this guy, whoever he is, is ROTFL seeing people
> > responding to his posts seriously. Some of his previous posts seemed
> > genuine but I think this one is a give-away. If nothing else, the double
> > entendre (which is what I think it is) surely is? It does not seem to be
> > accidental abuse of the the English language but rather a deliberate attempt.
>
> I tend to agree with Nitin, here. Simply because our Thiru Pandiyan hasn't
> made that many spelling errors, if you notice. Ok, he almost always
> mis-spells names, but most English words are quite correctly spelt. (The
> errors - few and far between - seem genuine to me ). For example, notice
> the words "defeated", "European", "worshippers", "partiality",
> "boundaries, "captaincy". All quite easy to mis-spell, and yet, spelt
> correctly by Thiru Pandiyan. Come to think of it, even his vocabulary
> isn't bad at all!!!
>
> I don't really know of someone whose grammar is this bad, but whose
> spelling is not bad at all...

...Note also, the use of the word "bating" (instead of "batting") in
the header. Perhaps a pun on "baiting"? I don't know, but what I *do*
know is that the post is either extremely clever (as noted by Samarth et
al)
or extremely dumb (as noted by RoshanCat et al).

Cheers,
MvdW [Who, like Samarth, chooses to sit on the fence, with his balls
intact
and not being fondled by Tendulkar or anyone else]

Sailesh Krishnamurthy

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
> I don't really know of someone whose grammar is this bad, but whose
> spelling is not bad at all...
>

I'm not so sure. Like you, I think that many of his expressions are
literal translations from Tamil (the "our boys" thing for instance).
Some others though, are common mistakes in English we Tamilians make.

> PS - I agree with Roshan, too, though, and hence I'm just going to sit on
> the fence for the moment...

I think Perumselva is on the level. Perhaps that's because I have
actually met people who harbour similar views, and I can see where he's
trying to come from. Not that it makes his posts any the less hilarious
:-)

Although of course, for the life of me, I cannot imagine anybody
thinking of Tendulkar in such fashion.

What foxes is me though is "baandinakku". Most Tamil slang is easily
traceable, and I thought I knew it all .. ! "Baandinakku" is definitely
new to me.

--
Pip-pip
Sailesh (http://www.meer.net/~sailesh)
Ph: (408) 225-8035 [H]
(408) 463-3176 [W]

Sanjeev Sayeeraman

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to

I am not convinced. I still feel that this is an attempt to inroduce
humour into this newsgrp. btw "baandinaaku" foxes me too never heard of
it..

the referances to warne's anatomy and animal anatomy(snake legs etc..)
make it a suspect.. anyway if it was a delibrate attempt at humour. must
say its one of the best i've seen in some time..
actually i have seen similar structure in a writeup.. if i recall correct
its an essay on a cow. if i can find it i shall post it.. the structure is
similar except for the fact that the essay in a north indian context.


Sanjeev[1 more fence sitter.]

--------------------------------------------------------
Sanjeev Sayeeraman
Snail Mail:
Home Office
55 North Cherry Avenue,#215 923C Gould Simpson Bldg,
Tucson, Arizona 85719 Arizona 85719
Yell Mail:520 6237049 Email:san...@cs.arizona.edu
WWW: www.cs.arizona.edu/people/sanjeev


Anant Rege

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to

samarth harish shah wrote in message ...

>On Mon, 10 May 1999, Nitin Mangalvedhe wrote:
>
>> I am willing to bet that this guy, whoever he is, is ROTFL seeing people
>> responding to his posts seriously. Some of his previous posts seemed
>> genuine but I think this one is a give-away. If nothing else, the double
>> entendre (which is what I think it is) surely is? It does not seem to be
>> accidental abuse of the the English language but rather a deliberate
attempt.
>
>I tend to agree with Nitin, here. Simply because our Thiru Pandiyan hasn't
>made that many spelling errors, if you notice. Ok, he almost always
>mis-spells names, but most English words are quite correctly spelt. (The
>errors - few and far between - seem genuine to me ). For example, notice
>the words "defeated", "European", "worshippers", "partiality",
>"boundaries, "captaincy". All quite easy to mis-spell, and yet, spelt
>correctly by Thiru Pandiyan. Come to think of it, even his vocabulary
>isn't bad at all!!!
>
>I don't really know of someone whose grammar is this bad, but whose
>spelling is not bad at all...
>


Well you can find correct spelling in a dictionary but not grammer. But I
tend to agree that this guy is a very smart fellow and not a mentally
challanged one as he is portraying. Now ignore the style of writing, but
where have I read those ideas before? Only if this guy had added some stats
to his post and some Kapil bashing. :-)

>-Samarth [ presuming, of course, that my English and judgement of others'
>English is *reasonably* good ].
>

cricke...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
In article <Pine.SOL.3.96.99051...@ux9.cso.uiuc.edu>,

samarth harish shah <shs...@students.uiuc.edu> wrote:

>
> -Samarth [ presuming, of course, that my English and judgement of
others'
> English is *reasonably* good ].
>
> PS - I agree with Roshan, too, though, and hence I'm just going to
sit on
> the fence for the moment...
>
>


So am I, as I have been for over a year now, since the First Ever
PPandian Post (the Dark Ages before which are universally known as
BPPP, of course). As Roshan pointed out, every one of the posts has
been on an identical theme - from Bardman's and Tendulkar's spasma
crying, to Dravid holding Sane's balls, to him and me uniting against
the Nadars (who will run away like silent dogs after seeing our
backsides). Maybe thats why I didnt find this current post quite as
hilarious as the first ones - constant variation is needed by a good
comic, even with the best material.

Sadiq [ only degrees of hilarity, of course - its still funny ] Yusuf

cricke...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
In article <3737CE04...@cat.csiro.au>,
Matt van de Werken <m.vand...@cat.csiro.au> wrote:
> samarth harish shah wrote:
> >

> >
> > I don't really know of someone whose grammar is this bad, but whose
> > spelling is not bad at all...
>

> ...Note also, the use of the word "bating" (instead of "batting") in
> the header. Perhaps a pun on "baiting"? I don't know, but what I *do*
> know is that the post is either extremely clever (as noted by Samarth
et
> al)
> or extremely dumb (as noted by RoshanCat et al).
>


Though, of course, "baiting" is fairly common (partly caricatured)
Gujarati pronunciation for batting - as Samarth will tell you (no doubt
because thats what he says himself ;-)

You know, as in "arre, thait Tendulkar, yaar, what an abe-sho-loot
Master Baiter he is, yaar".


Sadiq [ who doesnt know enough to agree or not ] Yusuf


> Cheers,
> MvdW [Who, like Samarth, chooses to sit on the fence, with his balls
> intact
> and not being fondled by Tendulkar or anyone else]
>

RoshanCat

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
>I am not convinced. I still feel that this is an attempt to inroduce
>humour into this newsgrp

On 9th April 1998, Pandiyan posted his first message (a test one)

<-------------------------------------->
Subject: testing please
Date: 1998/04/08
Author: ppandiyan <ppan...@hotmail.com>

only for testing please not for reading
perumselvan pandiyan

<-------------------------------------->

Now I dont believe anyone to be too smart to even post a test message like
this, since this is his first message on any NG its a genuine testing.

Also if he really wanted to get juicy "bites" out of his postings he could have
definitely posted on RSI (through which I conclude he is not smart at all) but
he has never posted anything outside RSC

His first posting (other than the test one was)

<--------------------------------------------------->
>,
ro...@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Rohan Chandran) wrote:
>
> Ankush Sahai <ank...@cornell.edu> said
> >Was he actually drafted during WW2?
>
> Bradman actually enlisted in 1940 at the RAAF in Adelaide. He was
> taken in on the air crew as an "observer". Interestingly he was only
> just below the 32 age limit at the time. He eventually transferred to
> the army, having been left to stagnate somewhat in the Air Force. He
> joined up as a physical training instructor, but at this point his
> health began to falter. I believe there were a lot of eyebrows raised
> when he was posted to far flung Victoria :-) People suggested that
> although he had vlunteered for active fighting service, he had been
> given a "cushy" job, as he was far too valuable to Australia in other
> ways. Bradman actually refused to play cricket at this time too,
> suggesting that he would only hold a bat if it was in aid of the War
> effort somehow.
>
> Then came the shock of having his eyesight being declared below par by
> the Air Force opthalmologists who were doing research into improving
> vision and reflexes in pilots. Add to this muscle spasms in the back,
> a first-class average of 4.50 in the 1940-41 season, and he was
> eventually into hospital. The diagnosis was "fibrositis" and
> eventually in mid-1941 he had to be invalided out of the Army. It took
> him about a year to actually recover, and thereafter he continued his
> work as a stockbroker. Didn't lift a bat again until around 1946,
> after the War had ended. He still suffered from the muscular spasms as
> well at that point in time, and he was 37 to boot. It's not as if
> anyone was sure quite what to expect. He declined to go to New Zealand
> in 1946, and then suffered more illnesses in the year immediately
> prior to the English visit of 1946-47. Compton is on record as saying
> that Bradman looked a more likely candidate for a nursing home than a
> cricket pitch when England arrived on Australian shores. The rest, of
> course, is cricketing history.
>
> One does have to wonder though, what might have happened if it wasn't
> for the war. Conventional wisdom suggests that Bradman would have
> scored runs in copious quantities, but maybe it's not complete
> sacrilege to suggest that things may not have been so rosy. His ill
> health may, for all we know, have contrived to force him into a
> premature retirement......
>
> cheers,
>
> Rohan.
> --
> MR Ramprakash, FEC
>

You are talking like champion only . what about poor people in your country ?
they are alos having eye problem spasma etc. why not feel bad for them ?
because of what they are not upper castes ? why only tendulkar's problems?

yours faithfully
perumselva pandiyan

<------------------------------------------------------->

The above posting is no attempt of humor, but another genuine frustration of a
person who still think India is dominated by upper castes (I have met these
kind of people honestly, like who think Madhuri Dixit is given roles only
because she is a brahmin)

His third posting goes like this (the best)
<------------------------------------------------------>
> > > One does have to wonder though, what might have happened if it wasn't
> > > for the war. Conventional wisdom suggests that Bradman would have
> > > scored runs in copious quantities, but maybe it's not complete
> > > sacrilege to suggest that things may not have been so rosy. His ill
> > > health may, for all we know, have contrived to force him into a
> > > premature retirement......
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > >
> > > Rohan.
> > > --
> > > MR Ramprakash, FEC
> > >
> >
> > You are talking like champion only . what about poor people in your
country ?
> > they are alos having eye problem spasma etc. why not feel bad for them ?
> > because of what they are not upper castes ? why only tendulkar's problems?
>
> This comment beats me. The thread did not have anything about SRT's
> problems. It discussed some physical problems of the don.
> Mr. Pandiyan, could u please comment.
>
>

That fellow was posting that tendulkar cannot become bardman becuase he was
having eye problems, spasma and other problems. He was crying for bardman and
tendulkar. Bardman was not even Indian and only he was crying for tendulkar
becuasue he is maharashtri brahmin. Indian people of non-brahmin race are som
much in disease and suffering but for them we will not cry. They are only non-
brahmins and why cry for lower humans. I am a deep cricket loving man who
played for college in Thyagaraya college in madurai but brahmin there was alos
showing partiality. Why are you joining them and trying to attack me ? because
you brahmins are majority here in this country where our Nadars cannot even get
letters for recommending us to get scholarship. You are like refugees from
india defeated by our OBC complete strength, we will come here also and then we
will see if you can shout at us. Nadars will come and then tendulkar and
bardman can both suffer from permanent spasma.
yours faithfully
perumselva pandiyan

<--------------------------------------------------------->

Samarth noticed there were no spelling mistakes, but spellings can always be
looked up in a lexicon, but a good grammar requires sound english skills

Another important point is, he has messed up the spellings of cricketers(which
again is not available on a lexicon)

My conclusion,
Mr Pandiyan is yet another frustrated person who thinks OBC are denied
opportunities in glamor fields

Mr. Pandiyan had also thought Sadiq was supporting him, read the following

<------------------------------------------------------->
>
> >You are talking like champion only . what about poor people in your
country ?
> >they are alos having eye problem spasma etc. why not feel bad for them ?
> >because of what they are not upper castes ? why only tendulkar's problems?
>
> Thank you :-) Ive rarely enjoyed a follow up as much as this one. You made
my
> day :-)
>
> Sadiq [ still rofl'ing ] Yusuf
>
>

At least one fellow is coming helping to me openly. Other peoples are showing
false tears for tendulkar for bardman for kumble and like that many upper
castes. One fellow only is for openly supporting my opinion. In tamil we say
that when the lion is coming out barking dogs will look at its backside
quietly. Now sadiq and me are both coming out openly and only because we are
mutually having the same enemies. Upper castes fellows who are here like flies
and all. The barking dogs will become silent and look at our backside and the
run away.

yours faithfully
perumselva pandiyan
<--------------------------------------------------------->

Yours faithfully
Roshan [dont you think thats the give away]

Samir Dhume

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
cricke...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
: In article <Pine.SOL.3.96.99051...@ux9.cso.uiuc.edu>,

: samarth harish shah <shs...@students.uiuc.edu> wrote:

: crying, to Dravid holding Sane's balls, to him and me uniting against


: the Nadars (who will run away like silent dogs after seeing our
: backsides). Maybe thats why I didnt find this current post quite as
: hilarious as the first ones - constant variation is needed by a good
: comic, even with the best material.


We do have a clue about him. He has a pretty backside
(like Sadiq).

samir

KaranRaj

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
I tend to agree with Roshan's arguement. This guy is genuine.
A frustated fellow, but humorous :)
Karanraj

samarth harish shah

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
On Tue, 11 May 1999 cricke...@my-dejanews.com wrote:

> Though, of course, "baiting" is fairly common (partly caricatured)
> Gujarati pronunciation for batting - as Samarth will tell you (no doubt
> because thats what he says himself ;-)
>
> You know, as in "arre, thait Tendulkar, yaar, what an abe-sho-loot
> Master Baiter he is, yaar".
>
>
> Sadiq [ who doesnt know enough to agree or not ] Yusuf

Sadiq-bhai,

You haid baiter note make fern oaf us Gujjus, haan, other-whyze, I wheel
also make fern oaf you.

:-)

-Samarth.


Sridhar

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
cricke...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
>
> Though, of course, "baiting" is fairly common (partly caricatured)
> Gujarati pronunciation for batting - as Samarth will tell you (no doubt
> because thats what he says himself ;-)

just as surely as he urges his grocer to thoroughly violate limbless
reptiles when he only means to get him to "wrap the snacks well".


>
> You know, as in "arre, thait Tendulkar, yaar, what an abe-sho-loot
> Master Baiter he is, yaar".

fayk, pandyan might be a master-baiter in his own right, though not
in the gujju sense.

Sridhar

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
cricke...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
>
> So am I, as I have been for over a year now, since the First Ever
> PPandian Post (the Dark Ages before which are universally known as
> BPPP, of course). As Roshan pointed out, every one of the posts has
> been on an identical theme - from Bardman's and Tendulkar's spasma
> crying, to Dravid holding Sane's balls, to him and me uniting against
> the Nadars (who will run away like silent dogs after seeing our
> backsides). Maybe thats why I didnt find this current post quite as
> hilarious as the first ones - constant variation is needed by a good
> comic, even with the best material.

maybe he doesn't want to be a "good comic". maybe he's just exploiting
the fact that more people will respond to his flames now, than if he
varied his theme trying to be a "good comic".
kind of like you get 3 full length balls from waqar younis and then get
on the backfoot, expecting the 4th to be a short one. but what happens
- he castles you with another full ball.
btw, when your full ball is as good as that of vintage waqar,
you don't need to vary your length to be a "good bowler".

>
> Sadiq [ only degrees of hilarity, of course - its still funny ] Yusuf
>

sid...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
ch...@cs.utexas.edu (Harish Chandramouli) wrote:
> --
> AT WI-XI: 1. Hunte 2. Worrell (c) 3. Headley 4. Weekes 5. Walcott
> 6. Sobers 7. Dujon (wk) 8. Marshall 9. Ambrose 10. Roberts 11. Holding
>

Aaargh! No Richards ?

Harish Chandramouli

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
In article <7ha66p$l7b$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, <sid...@my-dejanews.com> wrote:
>ch...@cs.utexas.edu (Harish Chandramouli) wrote:
>> --
>> AT WI-XI: 1. Hunte 2. Worrell (c) 3. Headley 4. Weekes 5. Walcott
>> 6. Sobers 7. Dujon (wk) 8. Marshall 9. Ambrose 10. Roberts 11. Holding
>>
>
>Aaargh! No Richards ?

Not over Headley, no. I am not sure what a survey would indicate, but
at least based on the picture (Sir Michael) Manley paints of the great
George Headley, I would consider him to be a superior player to what
Viv was. Not quite as destructive in style of course, but nonetheless,
a player second only to the Don (and perhaps Hammond, although Headley
played for a weak team and Walter for a strong one, so the latter's
achievements are all the more creditable) during the decade he
featured in. If memory serves me correctly, between 1929 and 1939,
Headley averaged a staggering 70+ (his final figures were somewhat
diminished because he came back after the war and featured in the
side on a very on and off basis) -- but more than that, he earned the
respect of all of his contemporaries. There's much more to it as well,
but since I am out of time, I'll stop here.

And oh, just for interest's sake, here's a second XI (and if it
placates you any, I DO have Richards in this one!):

1. Greenidge 2. Haynes 3. Richards 4. Kanhai 5. Lloyd (c) 6. (Collie)
Smith 7. Murray (wk) 8. Constantine 9. Ramadhin 10. Croft 11. Garner

Cheers,

Harish
--
AT Ind-XI: 1. Gavaskar 2. Merchant 3. Hazare 4. Tendulkar 5. Amarnath 6. Mankad
7. Kapil (c) 8. Kirmani (wk) 9. Amarsingh 10. Pras/Bedi/Chandra 11. Nissar

sidd

unread,
May 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/12/99
to

Harish Chandramouli wrote in message
<7ha8li$dk3$1...@wensleydale.cs.utexas.edu>...

>In article <7ha66p$l7b$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, <sid...@my-dejanews.com> wrote:
>>ch...@cs.utexas.edu (Harish Chandramouli) wrote:
>>> --
>>> AT WI-XI: 1. Hunte 2. Worrell (c) 3. Headley 4. Weekes 5. Walcott
>>> 6. Sobers 7. Dujon (wk) 8. Marshall 9. Ambrose 10. Roberts 11. Holding
>>>
>>
>>Aaargh! No Richards ?
>
>Not over Headley, no.

Not over Headley. I would put him in over Walcott.

Cheers,

Siddhartha ( who is reminded here of the old man Glanville's all time
Brasilian selection which included just 1 player from the last 30 years ).


Harish Chandramouli

unread,
May 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/12/99
to
In article <7hcjif$7f0$1...@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
sidd <sid...@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip the bit arguing for Richards to be included>

>Not over Headley. I would put him in over Walcott.

Actually, Sid, Walcott's _career_ average of 56.** compares quite
favourably in itself to Richards's 50.**. But as Steve the Bajan will
tell you when he next pops by, as a pure batsman, Walcott averaged in
excess of SEVENTY-THREE. Thats right, 7 3! And as a batsman-keeper,
but 38, which explains why his numbers ended up where they did...

Not that the numbers are everything of course, but if Richards was
dominating and destructive, then Walcott was equally brutal: and his
series against Lindwall and Miller in 54-55 (when he scored two tons
in the same test, *twice* over the course of 5 games) is the stuff
that legends are truly made of.

No, I'd keep Walcott just where he is.

RV

unread,
May 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/18/99
to
Having read this, now I fully understand the meaning of ROTFL. And about 7
other colleagues who sit around me, have become RSC regulars.

Pandiyan, you can take on a North Indian. His name is Jaspal Bhatti.

<ppan...@my-dejanews.com> wrote in message
news:7h767j$b01$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...


> Azharuddheen is putting second highest service in batting for India in
> bad positions. First is Dravid. Tendulker is getting own money to
> increase and getting support from gavaskar, vengasker and
> krishnamachari type fellows.
>

> every body is saying Australia is first in the top position for winning
> the world cup. When austrlia came to senai I was also thinking that
> sane warne and other bowlers will be danger for our team. Every body
> was saying Tendulker can hold sane warne bowling better than all the
> peoples. But in first inning tendulker was going for kattu-adi mattu-
> adu batting and was not holding sane warne's balls. Sane warne got
> tendulker to go into public toilet and gave only 5 runs. Every body was
> afraid of sane warne. That time Dravid who is from our boys, came
> forward and was holding sane warnes balls for 8 or 9 wickets. One ball
> also was not in giving him any type problems. Why? he is not putting
> bet, he is not getting own name up and india name down and he is
> keeping the national service in front of personal service. Every OBC
> boy has given good type of service like thin in the army. Even Pakistan
> army was openly saying that in 1972, 1975 we are not making India go to
> the public toilet becuase OBC boys are putting their chest into the
> bullets, guns and other type of attack and India is coming forward.
> Eating brinjal cannot make you hero or make health body.
> In caclutta also Azharuddheen is holding all sane warne's balls and
> putting them into boundary. All australian type fellows are looking for
> his balls and standing near boundary. Even sane warne said openly that
> azharuddheen and Dravid can hold my balls and put boundaries and so we
> are not geting victories. Why? he is from muslim boys. But
> Krishnamchari type fellows are giving chance only for brinjal eating
> type fellows. Snake will know snake's legs and paapan will speak like
> paapan's parrot.
>
> venkat was in captaincy position for three times and India came back to
> home with baandinakku. kapil Deve, punjabi OBC type fellow, pushed the
> world cup to fall into India. Why? becuase Venkat is asking for his
> friends and his boys to play for India. If gavaskar and tendulker are
> so great why is there no world cup falling into india for 30 years?
> putting bet is not own money but India's name is in public toilet.
>
> I am asking all of you openly to think who is giving service to India?
> and we will give clappings for those fellows
>
> 1. Dravid
> 2. Azharuddheen
> 3. Sinddhu
> 4. Dodda
> 5. karim
>
> Other fellows can try to eat brinjal in the back area and ask for some
> paisa from good players.
>
> Yours Faithfully
> Perumselva Pandiyan

0 new messages