Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Warner in potential trouble over tweet
24 views
Skip to first unread message
Ramapriya
May 18, 2013, 6:44:33 AM5/18/13
to
I've found this welcome tendency of cricketers openly speaking their
minds (some will call it indiscretion) on Twitter, and the latest
episode involving Warner and Conn seems to follow in that tradition.
Craddock wrote something that Warner didn't approve of, and
retaliated. Conn ganged up and Warner railed against him as well.
I hope CA doesn't bag Warner for this. There's little wrong - or so it
should be - about people having opinions and enjoying the freedom to
be, well, free.
Ramapriya
minds (some will call it indiscretion) on Twitter, and the latest
episode involving Warner and Conn seems to follow in that tradition.
Craddock wrote something that Warner didn't approve of, and
retaliated. Conn ganged up and Warner railed against him as well.
I hope CA doesn't bag Warner for this. There's little wrong - or so it
should be - about people having opinions and enjoying the freedom to
be, well, free.
Ramapriya
jzfredricks
May 18, 2013, 7:10:11 AM5/18/13
to
On Saturday, May 18, 2013 8:44:33 PM UTC+10, Ramapriya wrote:
> I hope CA doesn't bag Warner for this. There's little wrong - or so it
> should be - about people having opinions and enjoying the freedom to
> be, well, free.
Agree, but it should certainly hurt his chances of being promoted to leadership positions.
> I hope CA doesn't bag Warner for this. There's little wrong - or so it
> should be - about people having opinions and enjoying the freedom to
> be, well, free.
0 new messages