Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Third Umpire Paul Reiffel CHEATS in favor of Australia

22 views
Skip to first unread message

FreedomOfThought

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 10:29:10 PM12/28/11
to
Third Umpire Paul Reiffel CHEATS in favor of Australia and declares Laxman out to a NO
BALL.

This is EXACTLY why India does NOT TRUST DRS operated by the Forked Tonguedfucks.

Pattinson's foot slid beyond the line in replays but third umpire Paul Reiffel declared
Laxman out quickly without watching the replays a second time.

DRS operated by Westerners CANNOT be TRUSTED.

BCCI was proved RIGHT again.












will_s

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 11:41:00 AM12/28/11
to
5. Fair delivery - the feet
For a delivery to be fair in respect of the feet, in the delivery stride
(a) the bowler’s back foot must land within and not touching the return
crease appertaining to his stated mode of delivery.
(b) the bowler’s front foot must land with some part of the foot,
whether grounded or raised
(i) on the same side of the imaginary line joining the two middle stumps
as the return crease described in (a) above
and (ii) behind the popping crease.
If the bowler’s end umpire is not satisfied that all of these three
conditions have been met, he shall call and signal No ball.

FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 10:50:06 PM12/28/11
to

"will_s" <wil...@node.net.au> wrote in message
news:4efbe14e$0$11118$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...
Pattinson's front foot was 1 cm beyond the noball line.

But Paul Reiffel declared Laxman out WITHOUT watching the replays a second and third time
like they did in Dravid's case in first innings when they watched the replays multiple
times even though the noball was "fairly obvious" in the first replay itself.

It is this "cheat at the first opportunity" mentality of Third Umpires, BCCI cannot TRUST
in supporting DRS.

Almost always they go against India and infavor of opposing teams as evidenced in Dravid's
overturned decision in England two months back.






Stex

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 10:46:17 PM12/28/11
to
> conditions have been met, he shall call and signal No ball.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Unfortunatly I agree with the looney. On the first frame where the
foot had actually landed it was in front of the line. On the frame
they relied on I dont believe the foot had actually been grounded.

Stex

FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 11:05:22 PM12/28/11
to

"Stex" <stex...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1cae38d1-5f46-4dfa...@e8g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
Finally ONE white man crossed the line and spoke the "truth".

Must be FULL MOON DAY today......



Suresh K S

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 11:15:43 PM12/28/11
to
I don't think that the decision would have made any difference to the
final result. However, Chappell-i played the frames in slo-mo several
times and called it a no ball without doubt. His foot did touch the
crease but the ball had not been released then. It was in his hands
for 2 frames *after* the foot was completely out of the popping
crease. When he released the ball his foot had slid beyond the popping
crease.

My point is not that it would make any difference to the result. It
was not even that VVSL had any reason to be miffed because the bowler
was ever so slightly out of the crease that it could not have helped
him deliver a "more dangerous" delivery because of yardage gained. I
don't think DRS would have made a difference here - since it was
digitally reviewed.

Perhaps the best attitude to take is - these things generally even out
over a few Tests.

Suresh

R. Spanditt

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 12:28:16 AM12/29/11
to

> I don't think that the decision would have made any difference to the
> final result. However, Chappell-i played the frames in slo-mo several
> times and called it a no ball without doubt. His foot did touch the
> crease but the ball had not been released then. It was in his hands
> for 2 frames *after* the foot was completely out of the popping
> crease. When he released the ball his foot had slid beyond the popping
> crease.

from http://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-24-no-ball,50,ar.html
(b) the bowler’s front foot must land with some part of the foot,
whether grounded or raised, behind the popping crease.

where the foot is when the ball is released is irrelevant.

shineything

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 12:30:32 AM12/29/11
to
Or in this case in the same test.

Not that - unless the no-ball rule has been changed again without the
ICC bothering to tell me - there was anything controversial about
Laxman's dismissal, except in the mind of the Nutter.

FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 12:34:41 AM12/29/11
to

"Suresh K S" <sureshka...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f285bfbf-ed7e-4317...@n6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
I call a spade a spader regardless of the situation and circumstances.

No ball replays are allowed in this series and Paul Reiffel should have
declared it a NO BALL. It was obvious in the second replay frame itself.

It didnt have to be digitally replayed for the 'right decision" to be made
by Paul Reiffel He deliberately CHEATED and declared Laxman out.
These guys dont have a history of playing a "fair game" ever.

Ofcourse it would have made a huge difference to India if Laxman was
still there with Tendulkar who was in great form. There are NO demons
in the pitch and 290 target was gettable.

The impact of Husseys' bad decision in I1 would have had "less impact"
on the result of the game than "Laxman's decision" because hussey's
decision was on Day 1 and Laxmans decision was on Day 4. There is
enough time and game left for the aussies to neutralize Hussey decision's
effect while India does not have that luxury in Laxman's case.




FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 12:50:16 AM12/29/11
to

"shineything" <shine...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4a83d507-40ce-4f83...@k22g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
You fucks have NOT learned anything from your own fucking christian history.

Does Galileo ring a bell ? You called him a "nutter" and almost "murdered him"

"Unique Geniuses" look like "nutters" to "dumb useless human filth" like you.

It is very easy to educate an Indian compared to westerners. You fucks are
at a point of no return because of your 24X7 lying and spinning culture.


FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 12:52:44 AM12/29/11
to
/
"R. Spanditt" <dnarm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c0595baf-8ed1-4f25...@s10g2000prj.googlegroups.com...
When the front foot landed completely, it was 1 cm beyond the legal line.




eusebius

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 2:38:32 AM12/29/11
to
It was a no ball, I could see it straight away. Nevertheless, the idea
that no balls are reviewed and not actual umpiring decision is frankly
ludicrous. The idea that it 'evens out' is non sequitur in that if
anything Australia had a significantly dud hand from the umpiring in
this match. Laxman didn't deserve to be recalled after such an
appallingly lazy shot, in the 4th innings, supposedly his arena, after
2 feckless wafts. The 'logic' that dictates that no balls can be
reviewed and not actual decisions to me is perverse in the extreme.

FreedomOfThought

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 2:49:02 AM12/29/11
to

"eusebius" <euseb...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8ee1f29c-894c-45bb...@g19g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
End of Story. Paul Reiffel deliberately CHEATED.


>Nevertheless, the idea
>>that no balls are reviewed and not actual umpiring decision is frankly
>>ludicrous.


Thats besides the point. The issue of this thread is whether Laxman
was out or not out based on the noball replay.

Laxman was NOT OUT.



>The idea that it 'evens out' is non sequitur in that if
>>anything Australia had a significantly dud hand from the umpiring in
>>this match.


Then you did NOT follow the match at all from day one. You should
go back to hibernation.


>Laxman didn't deserve to be recalled after such an
>>appallingly lazy shot, in the 4th innings, supposedly his arena, after
>>2 feckless wafts.


Great logic. How do you come up with this amazing pieces of wisdom ?

Are the umpires reading this genius eusibius's wisdom ?


>The 'logic' that dictates that no balls can be
>>reviewed and not actual decisions to me is perverse in the extreme.


Logic ?

Do you know the meaning of "logic" to being with ?




will_s

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 3:57:20 PM12/28/11
to
it doesnt matter


looney said it "slid beyond the line" so I thought would point out to
him the relevant law




will_s

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 4:00:37 PM12/28/11
to
its hard but we have to try :-)


now whether any part of his foot was behind the popping crease when he
landed is arguable



FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 3:02:16 AM12/29/11
to

"will_s" <wil...@node.net.au> wrote in message
news:4efc1d62$0$29989$c3e8da3$5496...@news.astraweb.com...
It matters my chipped friend will_s.

Laxman was NOT OUT and Paul Reiffel DELIBERATELY CHEATED.

One out of every 33 Americans is already secretly chipped by the Illuminati FBI, CIA
and NSA Terrorists.

Likewise the ratio is approximately same in England and Australia.

The ELITE departments at MI-6 and Australian spy agency is PART of this global
secret terrorist group called "The Illuminati".

The can literally make two chipped humans talk like muppets with their remote
computers even if you are in Non-White countries like India, China etc because
they have the ability to do it with Spy Satellites.

They can break relationships and marriages of chipped humans by remotely
manipulating them with "dream and thought projections".

Infact they broke up my relationship with my ex-girlfriend by remotely
programming her to include a word "obstinate/stubborn" in one of her emails
to me about a "third person". But in my case, they did NOT deliberately
break my relationship.......The Illuminati terrorists were trying to do something
else and unfortunately it broke my relationship with my ex-girlfriend.

But I know it for a FACT, they DELIBERATELY broke up marriages and
relationships of other chipped humans JUST FOR "FUN" to satisfy their
evil sadism of PLAYING GOD.

So next time remember, what you are thinking may NOT be your own
thoughts and what you are dreaming at night may NOT be your own dreams
but things that were projected into your chipped brain by the ILLUMINATI.

Funny thing is Westerners don't understand that Orwellian Society 1984 is already
in their countries. They just dont know it is already there.

The EVIL WHITE CHRISTIAN MEN in Western governments constantly
program your brains to keep YOUR FOCUS on muslims, china, iran, iraq, russia,
north korea, venezuela, cuba, non-white countries etc while they SECRETLY
CHIP YOU and turn you into "remotely manipulatable mind controlled slaves".

Simple Deception really.

Chipping a human is as easy as opening a can of beer and gulping it down.

For the rest of you all, there is nothing special about the following comments
posted by Ed Conrad who also posts by the name "Intrepid"

GOD ASKS THAT YOU PASS THIS ON
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/268e9f40f9c109c6?hl=en

But the "Secret Message" from the Illuminati FBI, CIA, NSA and MI-6 to "me"
is "God Asks That You Pass This On".

Ther are asking "me" to tell the rest of the humanity (you) about the
"God Like Powers and Technology" (they) the Illuminati possesses.

Bottom line is you should FEAR your own evil western governments. I am a hindu
and I am telling you, you have NOTHING TO FEAR from non-whites, non-christians
and other third world countries.

You are being secretly turned into "Robosapiens" by YOUR OWN EVIL WESTERN
CHRISTIAN GOVERNMENTS"




will_s

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 4:02:43 PM12/28/11
to
On 29/12/2011 6:38 PM, eusebius wrote:

>
> It was a no ball, I could see it straight away. Nevertheless, the idea
> that no balls are reviewed and not actual umpiring decision is frankly
> ludicrous. The idea that it 'evens out' is non sequitur in that if
> anything Australia had a significantly dud hand from the umpiring in
> this match. Laxman didn't deserve to be recalled after such an
> appallingly lazy shot, in the 4th innings, supposedly his arena, after
> 2 feckless wafts. The 'logic' that dictates that no balls can be
> reviewed and not actual decisions to me is perverse in the extreme.


perverse in an understatement




FreedomOfThought

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 3:05:51 AM12/29/11
to

"will_s" <wil...@node.net.au> wrote in message
news:4efc1ea5$0$29989$c3e8da3$5496...@news.astraweb.com...
I am sure it will be when our wife/girlfriend starts an affair with your neighbor.



FreedomOfThought

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 3:18:17 AM12/29/11
to

"will_s" <wil...@node.net.au> wrote in message
news:4efc1ea5$0$29989$c3e8da3$5496...@news.astraweb.com...
I am sure it will be when your wife/girlfriend starts an affair with your neighbor
or your friends.


Suresh K S

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 3:18:35 AM12/29/11
to
On Dec 29, 12:28 am, "R. Spanditt" <dnarmstr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> fromhttp://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-24-no-b...
> (b) the bowler’s front foot must land with some part of the foot,
> whether grounded or raised, behind the popping crease.
>
> where the foot is when the ball is released is irrelevant.

It is worth considering for a moment that the term front foot cannot
really be defined independently of release of the ball. The front foot
would be the foot on which the bowler lands or steps before he
releases the ball. Or stated this way the foot that it is in front
when the ball is released. If you do not build in the "release of the
ball" into the definition - how would you determine which is the front
foot? If a RH bowler runs in for about 18 paces and delivers the ball
and follows through, we would expect that he leaps lands on the left
foot (18th pace) delivers the ball and then follows through. What
happens after the ball is released does not matter for the no ball
rule (else almost all bowlers will be no balled).

> where the foot is when the ball is released is irrelevant.

If he lands and slides over the popping crease while still holding the
ball is it a no ball? If it is not then the bowler might get the
benefit of doubt here. In the fram it looked as a though a tiny last
bit of his heel might have been on the line. However, it was also
observed that the heel was not grounded and when it did get grounded
it was over the line. Not that it matters, the difference was too
small to be of consequence.

Suresh

will_s

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 4:22:51 PM12/28/11
to
we don't share a wife or girlfriend and I definitely dont want to share
your boyfriend

FreedomOfThought

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 3:32:22 AM12/29/11
to

"will_s" <wil...@node.net.au> wrote in message
news:4efc235c$0$13892$c3e8da3$7649...@news.astraweb.com...
I already corrected the typo.....chipped genius will_s.

I am sure it will be perverse when your wife/girlfriend starts an affair with your
neighbor
or your friends.

Go easy on your wife if you catch her sucking your friends/neighbors dick.


sdavmor

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 3:37:18 AM12/29/11
to
On 12/29/2011 12:18 AM, Suresh K S wrote:
> On Dec 29, 12:28 am, "R. Spanditt"<dnarmstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> fromhttp://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-24-no-b...
>> (b) the bowler’s front foot must land with some part of the foot,
>> whether grounded or raised, behind the popping crease.
>>
>> where the foot is when the ball is released is irrelevant.
>
> It is worth considering for a moment that the term front foot cannot
> really be defined independently of release of the ball. The front foot
> would be the foot on which the bowler lands or steps before he
> releases the ball. Or stated this way the foot that it is in front
> when the ball is released. If you do not build in the "release of the
> ball" into the definition - how would you determine which is the front
> foot? If a RH bowler runs in for about 18 paces and delivers the ball
> and follows through, we would expect that he leaps lands on the left
> foot (18th pace) delivers the ball and then follows through. What
> happens after the ball is released does not matter for the no ball
> rule (else almost all bowlers will be no balled).
>
>> where the foot is when the ball is released is irrelevant.
>
> If he lands and slides over the popping crease while still holding the
> ball is it a no ball?

No it is not.

> If it is not then the bowler might get the benefit of doubt here.
> In the fram it looked as a though a tiny last bit of his heel might
> have been on the line. However, it was also observed that the heel
> was not grounded and when it did get grounded it was over the line.
> Not that it matters, the difference was too small to be of
> consequence.
>
> Suresh

The real question here is why did VVS play that shot. Right into the
teeth of the trap. Oh well.
--
Cheers, SDM -- a 21st Century Schizoid Man
Systems Theory project website: http://systemstheory.net
find us on MySpace, GarageBand, Reverb Nation, Last FM, CDBaby
free MP3s of Systems Theory, Mike Dickson & Greg Amov music at
http://mikedickson.org.uk

will_s

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 4:42:35 PM12/28/11
to
actuaually you should change your name to something that suits you


something like "FreedomFromThought"

FreedomOfThought

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 3:47:39 AM12/29/11
to

"sdavmor" <sda...@fakeemailaddy.com> wrote in message
news:jdh8ru$f14$1...@news.albasani.net...
The real question here is why did Hussey play that shot in first innings.
Right into the teeth of the umpire's trap. Oh well.



FreedomOfThought

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 3:49:09 AM12/29/11
to

"will_s" <wil...@node.net.au> wrote in message
news:4efc27fd$0$29967$c3e8da3$5496...@news.astraweb.com...
I will if you change your name to "Trailer Trash will"




jzfredricks

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 4:51:51 AM12/29/11
to
On Dec 29, 5:38 pm, eusebius <eusebiu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It was a no ball, I could see it straight away. Nevertheless, the idea
> that no balls are reviewed and not actual umpiring decision is frankly
> ludicrous. The idea that it 'evens out' is non sequitur in that if
> anything Australia had a significantly dud hand from the umpiring in
> this match. Laxman didn't deserve to be recalled after such an
> appallingly lazy shot, in the 4th innings, supposedly his arena, after
> 2 feckless wafts. The 'logic' that dictates that no balls can be
> reviewed and not actual decisions to me is perverse in the extreme.

And I think umpires missing clear no balls is also perverse.
3rd ump reviewing no-balls is an EXCELLENT thing.

RH

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 5:12:02 AM12/29/11
to
On Dec 29, 3:29 am, "FreedomOfThought" <FreedomOfThou...@Humanity.com>
wrote:
> Third Umpire Paul Reiffel CHEATS in favor of Australia and declares Laxman out to a NO
> BALL.
>
> This is EXACTLY why India does NOT TRUST DRS operated by the Forked Tonguedfucks.
>
> Pattinson's foot slid beyond the line in replays but third umpire Paul Reiffel declared
> Laxman out quickly without watching the replays a second time.
>
> DRS operated by Westerners CANNOT be TRUSTED.
>
> BCCI was proved RIGHT again.


Translation: IndiaBlubber and Tendsnottoscorerunswhentheyareneeded
choke again... RH

will_s

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 6:58:23 PM12/28/11
to
DONE


trailer trash will

FreedomOfThought

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 6:12:42 AM12/29/11
to

"will_s" <wil...@node.net.au> wrote in message
news:4efc47cf$0$14132$c3e8da3$7649...@news.astraweb.com...
You are a Pathological Liar.

It still shows will_s



trailer trash will

unread,
Dec 28, 2011, 7:17:42 PM12/28/11
to
no it doesnt




FreedomOfThought

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 6:20:31 AM12/29/11
to
/
"trailer trash will" <wil...@node.net.au> wrote in message
news:4efc4c58$0$29983$c3e8da3$5496...@news.astraweb.com...
> On 29/12/2011 10:12 PM, FreedomOfThought wrote:
>> "will_s"<wil...@node.net.au> wrote in message
Excellent. Now your name represents exactly what you are.

Well done Trailer Trash Will sutton.




max.it

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 7:05:07 AM12/29/11
to
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:29:10 -0800, "FreedomOfThought"
<FreedomO...@Humanity.com> wrote:

>Third Umpire Paul Reiffel CHEATS in favor of Australia and declares Laxman out to a NO
>BALL.
>
>This is EXACTLY why India does NOT TRUST DRS operated by the Forked Tonguedfucks.
>
>Pattinson's foot slid beyond the line in replays but third umpire Paul Reiffel declared
>Laxman out quickly without watching the replays a second time.
>
>DRS operated by Westerners CANNOT be TRUSTED.
>
>BCCI was proved RIGHT again.

At least he knows the no ball law. Unlike you, stupid pedo.
Do you still molest young boys?

max.it

R. Spanditt

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 2:31:08 PM12/29/11
to


will_s wrote:
> On 29/12/2011 4:28 PM, R. Spanditt wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think that the decision would have made any difference to the
> >> final result. However, Chappell-i played the frames in slo-mo several
> >> times and called it a no ball without doubt. His foot did touch the
> >> crease but the ball had not been released then. It was in his hands
> >> for 2 frames *after* the foot was completely out of the popping
> >> crease. When he released the ball his foot had slid beyond the popping
> >> crease.
> >
> > from http://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-24-no-ball,50,ar.html
> > (b) the bowler�s front foot must land with some part of the foot,
> > whether grounded or raised, behind the popping crease.
> >
> > where the foot is when the ball is released is irrelevant.
>
>
> its hard but we have to try :-)
>
>
> now whether any part of his foot was behind the popping crease when he
> landed is arguable

You can only try so hard will. I don't really even read his posts,
waste of time. This post was for people capable of rational thinking

jzfredricks

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 2:43:47 PM12/29/11
to
On Dec 30, 5:31 am, "R. Spanditt" <dnarmstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can only try so hard will. I don't really even read his posts,
> waste of time. This post was for people capable of rational thinking

Give the bloke a break - it can't be easy when your mother is known as
The Punjab Cumbucket.

eusebius

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 5:11:42 PM12/29/11
to
Not when they aren't correcting clearly missed/ or erroneously given
lbws and catches. Why should there be even more favours given to
batsmen?

FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 5:48:49 PM12/29/11
to

<max.it> wrote in message news:4efc5749...@news.btinternet.com...
Yes you are right. Paul Reiffel knows the lbw law and HOW TO
CHEAT and get away with it just like the umpire who got away
overturning Dravid's not out decision WITHOUT an IOTA of
EVIDENCE.

Molesting young boys is PERVERTED WHITE CHRISTIAN HOBBY.

I am NOT a christian, thankfully.



jzfredricks

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 6:12:20 PM12/29/11
to
Ideally there would be no umpiring mistakes, both through improved
umpiring and DRS (in some form, and including no-ball checking).
No-ball checking is relatively easy, so let's do it.
I believe "Benefit of the Doubt in the batsman's favour" is implied in
the Laws, and for good reason. I think cricket is better when a
batsman is incorrectly given not out, as opposed to a batsman
incorrectly being given out.

You should consider no-ball checking as 2 steps forward, 1 step back
(no pun intended).

trailer trash will

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 7:31:33 AM12/29/11
to
and you once again show your true colours


btw: in Australia we call them "Caravans"

trailer trash will

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 7:35:45 AM12/29/11
to
On 29/12/2011 7:57 AM, will_s wrote:
> On 29/12/2011 2:46 PM, Stex wrote:
>> On Dec 29, 5:41 am, will_s<wil...@node.net.au> wrote:
>>> On 29/12/2011 2:29 PM, FreedomOfThought wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Third Umpire Paul Reiffel CHEATS in favor of Australia and declares
>>>> Laxman out to a NO
>>>> BALL.
>>>
>>>> This is EXACTLY why India does NOT TRUST DRS operated by the Forked
>>>> Tonguedfucks.
>>>
>>>> Pattinson's foot slid beyond the line in replays but third umpire
>>>> Paul Reiffel declared
>>>> Laxman out quickly without watching the replays a second time.
>>>
>>>> DRS operated by Westerners CANNOT be TRUSTED.
>>>
>>>> BCCI was proved RIGHT again.
>>>
>>> 5. Fair delivery - the feet
>>> For a delivery to be fair in respect of the feet, in the delivery stride
>>> (a) the bowler’s back foot must land within and not touching the return
>>> crease appertaining to his stated mode of delivery.
>>> (b) the bowler’s front foot must land with some part of the foot,
>>> whether grounded or raised
>>> (i) on the same side of the imaginary line joining the two middle stumps
>>> as the return crease described in (a) above
>>> and (ii) behind the popping crease.
>>> If the bowler’s end umpire is not satisfied that all of these three
>>> conditions have been met, he shall call and signal No ball.- Hide
>>> quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Unfortunatly I agree with the looney. On the first frame where the
>> foot had actually landed it was in front of the line. On the frame
>> they relied on I dont believe the foot had actually been grounded.
>>
>> Stex
>
>
> it doesnt matter
>
>
> looney said it "slid beyond the line" so I thought would point out to
> him the relevant law
>
>
>
>

actually recorded the 2 hour package from Foxsports and did a slow
motion ( 1/8 speed ) and I reckon part of his foot was just behind the
line which is according to the laws a "legal ball "



FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 6:37:59 PM12/29/11
to

"jzfredricks" <jzfre...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e81cfd6d-4d20-4107...@k22g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
As opposed to your TRAILER TRASH MOM
known as a "Cum Eating Perpetual Cock Suckng White Whore".

99% of Westerners like you live in a "Delusional World" far far far away
from reality.

Go easy on your wife if you catch her having an affair with your
neighbors and best friends because it may not be her fault. It could
be YOUR "forked tongued" government terrorists programming
your wife to have an affair with them and sucking their dicks.

Next time you have a conversation with your wife, step back and
analyse if there is anything "unusual" (something out of ordinary)
in your conversations, actions, behavior and relationships.



Wotawonderfulworld

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 8:58:46 PM12/29/11
to
"FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer"
<FBInCIAnNSATerrori...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:4efcf9e1
$0$16711$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com:

>
> "jzfredricks" <jzfre...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e81cfd6d-4d20-4107-b2cd-
d56c90...@k22g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
Hm... take it we won AGAIN by that outburst.. Is it now 5 tests in a row
India has lost outside India ?

Seems you can only win in your own little sand pit...

FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

unread,
Dec 29, 2011, 9:13:04 PM12/29/11
to

"Wotawonderfulworld" <itdoesn...@who.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9FCB849217B2Cit...@74.209.131.10...
You MUST be jzfredricks's DICK SUCKING "WIFE".



Wotawonderfulworld

unread,
Dec 30, 2011, 5:15:16 PM12/30/11
to
"FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer"
<FBInCIAnNSATerrori...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:4efd1e3a
$0$16618$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com:
Nope... BUT WE WON.

FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

unread,
Dec 30, 2011, 5:17:23 PM12/30/11
to

"Wotawonderfulworld" <itdoesn...@who.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9FCC5EAEBBF73it...@74.209.131.10...
Congratulatiions to YOU and Australia for winning the Melbourne Test.

You are still jzfredricks' dick sucking wife.



Wotawonderfulworld

unread,
Dec 31, 2011, 1:59:14 AM12/31/11
to
"FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer"
<FBInCIAnNSATerrori...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:4efe3874
$0$30167$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com:
Well said. Hopefully the second will see a close contest as well.

FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer

unread,
Dec 31, 2011, 3:10:00 AM12/31/11
to

"Wotawonderfulworld" <itdoesn...@who.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9FCCB7846FC44it...@74.209.131.10...
> "FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer"
> <FBInCIAnNSATerrori...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:4efe3874
> $0$30167$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com:
>
Hopefully Muslims make H5N1 Virus and spreads it all over USA, UK and Australia the
AXIS of EVIL FORKED TONGUED CHRISTIAN TERRORIST TRIUMVIRATE.

I will Pay $100,000 to anyone for MERCILESSLY "BEHEADING" FBI, CIA, MI-6 and NSA Agents
and their family members regardless of their age like FUCKING PIGS.

To All Muslims,


You neither have the intelligence nor the money nor the forked tongues like
the EVIL WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICAN TERRORISTS.


You have to IMPROVISE to KILL these EVIL AMERICAN CHRISTIAN
SADISTS, PERVERTS and BASTARDS.


Just BUY SWORDS and KNIVES and go STAKE the FBI, CIA and NSA
offices and RANDOMLY "STAB", "BEHEAD" and "MURDER" them
like FUCKING PIGS.

Or make H5N1 Virus aka Bird Flu and RELEASE it near FBI, CIA and NSA offices.

http://www.kurzweilai.net/how-to-make-a-virus-that-could-kill-millions?utm_source=KurzweilAI+Weekly+Newsletter&utm_campaign=6a5317b97b-UA-946742-1&utm_medium=email


How to make H5N1 Bird Flu Virus and KILL American Christian Terrorists

http://bit.ly/rSKJGe

www.fbi.gov
www.cia.gov
www.nsa.gov


IMAGINE and PERCEIVE these FBI, CIA and NSA AGENTS like
PIGS which YOU MUSLIMS HATE.......


Email a link and this post to every one of your friends, family members,
colleagues and every one you know and educate them. Do not forget to
post this on every forum, discussion and websites.


FBI, CIA, NSA Psychopaths who call themselves "The Illuminati" secretly
CHIPPED about 1 Million Americans with Synthetic Telepathy Mind Reading
and Mind Manipulation Chips and torturing the victims with Directed Energy
Weapons developed under secret MKULTRA and COINTELPRO programs for
more than 20 years.


I CHALLENGE all readers to email my THREAT to FBI, CIA, NSA and
Secret Service and get me arrested.......FBI TRANSVESTITES will NOT
ARREST and PROSECUTE me because of my Unique abilities and also they
do NOT want me to EDUCATE the rest of the Americans.


This is my profile at FBI, CIA and NSA
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.mindcontrol/msg/4e65272b433d1c1c?h...


You American MORONS.........just listen to me.......Everything mentioned in the
following Torture Bible is REAL and FBI, CIA and NSA had this technology for
more than 20 years........


TORTURE BIBLE of FBI, CIA and NSA Illuminati Terrorists
Covert Operations of NSA - Mind Control and Directed Energy Weapons
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25664429/Conspiracy-Mind-Control-Covert-Ope...


1) Bomb these American Federal Buildings and American INFRASTRUCTURE
BUILDINGS and KILL as many FBI, CIA, DNI and NSA PSYCHOPATHS
as possible.


White House
US Congress Building
FBI Headquarters - Edgar Hoover Building in Washington DC
CIA Headquarers in Langley, Virginia
NSA Headquarters in Ft George Meade, Maryland
DNI Headquarters in Washington DC
GoldenGate Bridge, SanFrancisco
Empire State Building and Brooklyn Bridge, Newyork
Hoover Dam, Nevada
Willis Tower, Chicago
Washington Monument, Washington DC
Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon Headquarters
Xe Company Headquarters
Booz Allen Hamilton
The Heritage Foundation, Manhattan Institute
Rand Corporation, American Enterprise Institute
American Embassies in every country


2) Kill the MASS MURDERERS and CHRISTIAN TERRORISTS George Bush Jr,
Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and FBI Director Robert Mueller III, CIA
Director David Patraeus, NSA Director Keith Alexander, DNI director Dennis
Blair.........


I am NOT a muslim myself and It is NOT the Muslims who will take away your
FREEDOMS and CIVIL LIBERTIES that you NEVER HAD in the first place.


Muslims neither have the INTELLIGENCE nor the TECHNOLOGY nor the MONEY nor
the CUNNING FORKED TONGUES to even make a DENT in your fucking pathetic
programmed slavish lives.........


Ronald Reagan said "Trust but Verify" about Russians.


I am telling all Americans and the rest of the humanity to NEVER TRUST the EVIL
FORKED TONGUED FBI, CIA and NSA CHRISTIAN TERRORISTS and
PSYCHOPATHS because "YOU do NOT have the INTELLIGENCE and SKILLS
to VERIFY them".


You CANNOT VERIFY if you do NOT know that a CRIME has been committed. So YOU
will NEVER be able to VERIFY these Evil Bastards FBI, CIA and NSA Illuminati.


Your EVIL FBI, CIA and NSA Christian Sadists and Terrorist Bastards
secretly chipped and remotely programmed Melanie Iglesias's chipped brain to tweet
"My gift is also a curse" on 9-22-10


http://twitter.com/#!/MelanieIglesias


That tweet was meant as a SECRET MESSAGE to me from the evil FBI, CIA and
NSA TERRORIST PSYCHOPATHS that they think "My Gift is also a Curse" because
I can SEE their CRIMES very EASILY but I cannot do anything about it.


FBI, CIA and NSA Illuminati Terroists and I are the ONLY TWO ENTITIES who know
that Melanie Iglesias is chipped with Synthetic Telepathy mind reading and mind
manipulation chips.


For the rest of the humanity, it appears as fiction. But for ME it is a DAILY RITUAL
because of my Unique abilities no other human being has.


Since NO other American or human being can VERIFY these CRIMES being
Committed by the EVIL FBI, CIA and NSA Bastards, you should NEVER TRUST THEM.


Your EVIL FBI, CIA and NSA TERRORISTS communicated with me via a secret message
that they already chipped 1 million Americans ie 1 out of every 33 Americans.
Your psychopathic governments programmed your brains to think every one who
accuses the government of tortures is "delusional".


MKULTRA and COINTELPRO were never terminated. They merely became SECRET
TORTURES.


Stop watching those stupid fucking reality shows Kardashians, Jon and Kate,
Jersey Shore and the rest of the dumb american shit and use that fucking
time to google and youtube for SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY, MKULTRA,
DEW Weapons and COINTELPRO.........


REAL WORLD HERO
AmerGovtPsychopathsExposer
FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer
HusbandOfALLFBInCIAnNSA Agents






eusebius

unread,
Jan 3, 2012, 3:31:00 AM1/3/12
to
I think cricket is a better spectacle when bowlers are not
disadvantaged. Equality may not be a possible outcome, but bowlers are
worked to death and punished more and more. I hate to see the balance
further upset by a slightly perverse and selective regulation. Of
course, batsmen dominate cricket and its administration, and always
have.

max.it

unread,
Jan 3, 2012, 6:07:16 AM1/3/12
to
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:48:49 -0800, "FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer"
<FBInCIAnNSATerrori...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
><max.it> wrote in message news:4efc5749...@news.btinternet.com...
>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:29:10 -0800, "FreedomOfThought"
>> <FreedomO...@Humanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Third Umpire Paul Reiffel CHEATS in favor of Australia and declares Laxman out to a NO
>>>BALL.
>>>
>>>This is EXACTLY why India does NOT TRUST DRS operated by the Forked Tonguedfucks.
>>>
>>>Pattinson's foot slid beyond the line in replays but third umpire Paul Reiffel declared
>>>Laxman out quickly without watching the replays a second time.
>>>
>>>DRS operated by Westerners CANNOT be TRUSTED.
>>>
>>>BCCI was proved RIGHT again.
>>
>> At least he knows the no ball law. Unlike you, stupid pedo.
>> Do you still molest young boys?
>>
>> max.it
>
>
>Yes you are right.
>Molesting young boys is my HOBBY.
>

We already knew that.

max.it
0 new messages