Chris Tsao <
rigid...@aol.com> writes:
> First of all for this fight we will use the Bengal
> Tiger, instead of the much larger Siberian Tiger, so
> we can give the poor Lion a chance. The fact is that
> the Lion still would have no shot. The Tiger is just
> a far superior animal. It is stronger and faster.
There are individuals in the world of animals just as
there is in the world of men.
Pick up a book on birds, it'll tell you the juvenile
birds look like this, the adult birds like this, the
females like this, the males like this, in the winter
like this, etc., etc., and then compare that to what
you see in the field and you'll see that's correct ...
most of the time!
It is just like asking: who would win, a boxer, a
Muay Thai fighter, or a Karate fighter? The answer is
of course not MMA, but: "It depends."
One animal isn't superior to another. They are all
experts to live in the respective habitat, doing
sometimes similar but still different things (or
perhaps the same thing, differently).
> It hunts bigger prey and doesn't need the help of
> something called a pride. Pride? The Lion should be
> ashamed. Tiger wins easily.
Does the male lion hunt *at all*? On the other hand,
the male lion fights other lions. That's one its main
purposes. Isn't the tiger more about stealth?
--
underground experts united