Keep Loving Boxing,
Alex Dombroff
"Alex Dombroff" <yank...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20011216175650...@mb-cq.aol.com...
"Observer8" <Obse...@cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
news:0O9T7.12472$ED6.2...@typhoon.neo.rr.com...
WHAT??!! you have to be kidding...he is one of the biggest flakes on the
Showtime payroll.
dissonant <unli...@mail.com> wrote in message
news:2zcT7.315$ns3.1...@news.uswest.net...
"WingNut" <fak...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:9vjrl2$gnr$1...@bob.news.rcn.net...
I think the only reason Merchant looked 'great' early on was because he was
around great fighters during that time in his career. (Duran, Leonard,
Hearns, Hagler, Tyson...).
I don't think it was Merchants great commentary that made people take note
to his ability as a commentator but the great champs that he happened to be
around at the time to interview and comment on.
"Alex Dombroff" <yank...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20011216175650...@mb-cq.aol.com...
>Truthfully Id rather see Merchant go...Merchant is coming to his end in
>announcing anyway.
You agree with George that those guys are champions? Come on...George is just
being a contrarian and acting like because he got in the ring that somehow makes
him the authority on all things boxing. I think they should dump George and
bring back Roy Jones. Roy was the best ringside announcer I've seen. In some
ways he's better suited personality wise to be an announcer than a boxer.
>I think they should dump George and
> bring back Roy Jones. Roy was the best ringside announcer I've seen. In
some
> ways he's better suited personality wise to be an announcer than a boxer.
Agreed. At least as an announcer Jones was willing to be involved in a
competitive fight.
I don't like Bernard Hopkins much as a fighter because he is so dirty and he
strikes me as more of a mercenary than a real lover of the game but the man
always impresses me when he speaks. I think Hopkins would make a great
commenttator. Put him and Foreman on the same broadcast and then you will
see the sparks really fly. Has anybody ever listened to what Hopkins had to
say about Foreman after he (Foreman) accused Hopkins of being a dirty
fighter. That was some seriously funny shit that Hopkins said
"Zomby Wooof" <zomby...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9vk31c$fkg71$1...@ID-102219.news.dfncis.de...
While it is not a prerequisite that someone has to have fought in the ring
before commentating on a fight, Larry has absolutely no respect for what the
fighters give of themselves in the ring.
Unless two fighters are pounding each other into submission, he comments
that the fights are boring and that the fighters do not have any courage or
heart (at least not as much as he does huh?).
Brian
"Zomby Wooof" <zomby...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9vk31c$fkg71$1...@ID-102219.news.dfncis.de...
>I don't think that it is a conincidence that Larry doesn't get along with
>both Roy and George.
>
>While it is not a prerequisite that someone has to have fought in the ring
>before commentating on a fight, Larry has absolutely no respect for what the
>fighters give of themselves in the ring.
>
>Unless two fighters are pounding each other into submission, he comments
>that the fights are boring and that the fighters do not have any courage or
>heart (at least not as much as he does huh?).
>
>Brian
Courage is the main factor that "allows"
a man to climb through the ropes. A fool
allows himself to be pounded for the glory
of boxing. A well trained, prepared, and
experiences fighter understands the not so
subtle differences.
There are a lot of ex fighters walking
around with barely enough sense to come in
from the rain and have no place to stay dry.
DCI
Brian wrote:
> I don't think that it is a conincidence that Larry doesn't get along with
> both Roy and George.
>
> While it is not a prerequisite that someone has to have fought in the ring
> before commentating on a fight, Larry has absolutely no respect for what the
> fighters give of themselves in the ring.
>
> Unless two fighters are pounding each other into submission, he comments
> that the fights are boring and that the fighters do not have any courage or
> heart (at least not as much as he does huh?).
>
I agree with the above comments and I will add that I didn't find the fight
boring. I was looking to see who would take charge and it was Holyfield who
decided that he wanted it more. I found it more of a chess match granted at slow
speed but the rounds were close and my sense was it could got either way.
Tony...
Merchant is a cynic and that's what he get's paid for. You have George
tight-cast as the moron for comic relief who also tries to offer a glance
through a punch drunk fighter's eyes. You have Merchant giving his overly
cynical point-of-view. And then you have Lampley for standard blow-by-blow
and to pull the whole thing together. It kind of evens out..
"Brian" <bleed...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:_UIT7.636$NM4.32852@rwcrnsc53...
You don't know what "punch drunk" means. But your wife likely will when
you go for your morning shave a short 15 years from now...
Foreman easily exceeds Merchant's grasp of thought these days. Merchant
was once an excellent boxing commentator. But he looks and sounds like another
old alki these days.
BoxM
Oh no. Czyz is THE worst. The most biased and inane "boxing"
commentator out there. Czyz is worse than the worst of Kellerman.
BoxM