Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

When Chagaev started losing the bout with Klitschko.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

ne...@millions.com

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 1:59:33 AM6/21/09
to
The short snapping right hand by Klitschko in the second round
put Chagaev on notice: the end is coming!

What a waste of time. But we should give Ruskan Chagaev his props.
He took the fight on short notice.

Robotic Klitschko had two punches in his arsenal, the straight
heavy-handed jab, and the straight right-hand shots. He was very
methodical in taking Chagaev apart.

I was able read my book, sip a cup of hot green tea, and watch the
fight. The book is a heavy reading, the tea tasted great, and
Klitschko was absolutely predictable in his pedestrian approach to
hitting but not getting hit.

DCI

Ruddell

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 1:04:39 PM6/21/09
to
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:59:33 -0600, ne...@millions.com wrote
(in article <reir35lo132mktehc...@4ax.com>):


I screwed up on recording it. We came downstairs after supper to watch it
and well, it wasn't there. Go figure? Oh well, guess the media reports are
all I'll get for this one.

So what book are you reading? I just finished 'Diary of a Rock n Roll Star'
about Ian Hunter/Mott the Hoople and it's a dandy. Hopefully the guy I lent
it to will return it someday. And I'm about to start 'My View From the
Corner' by Angelo Dundee which I borrowed from a different friend who
probably feels the same way. He said it's a pretty good book but a slow read
whatever the hell that means...

--
Cheers!

Dennis

Remove 'Elle-Kabong' to reply

ne...@millions.com

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 1:19:50 PM6/21/09
to

A slow read could mean many things. For instance, any book about
applied astrophysics would slow me down a bit, and any book about the
intelligent contribution of Hollywood movie starlets would put me to
sleep, thus, slow to the finish.

In regard to the televising of the Chagaev vs Klitschko, I happened up
it by accident at 2:00 pm on ESPN here on the west coast. Up to that
point, I could find no mention of it other than what some of the
helpful members of the RSB regulars posted.

DCI


Walter Mitty

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 2:19:02 PM6/21/09
to
ne...@millions.com writes:

> The short snapping right hand by Klitschko in the second round
> put Chagaev on notice: the end is coming!
>
> What a waste of time. But we should give Ruskan Chagaev his props.
> He took the fight on short notice.

This fight yes. But he had been in shape to fight Valuev a few weeks
before.

>
> Robotic Klitschko had two punches in his arsenal, the straight
> heavy-handed jab, and the straight right-hand shots. He was very
> methodical in taking Chagaev apart.
>
> I was able read my book, sip a cup of hot green tea, and watch the
> fight. The book is a heavy reading, the tea tasted great, and
> Klitschko was absolutely predictable in his pedestrian approach to
> hitting but not getting hit.
>
> DCI
>

--
I want to keep fighting because it is the only thing that keeps me out
of the hamburger joints. If I don't fight, I'll eat this planet.
-- George Foreman

D. Flynn

unread,
Jun 21, 2009, 10:27:33 PM6/21/09
to

You're right, "Klitschko was absolutely predictable". And yet he keeps
winning even though every opponent knows exactly what Wlad's fight
plan will be.

Walter Mitty

unread,
Jun 22, 2009, 6:33:17 AM6/22/09
to
ne...@millions.com writes:

WK did what he does well - use his abilities and physical advantages. It
was a good performance from him and Chagaev was never in the
fight. Which is astonishing when you think he beat the bigger Valuev.

Turban Joe Balasootoe

unread,
Jun 22, 2009, 7:00:02 PM6/22/09
to
> -- George Foreman- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


He ran from the Big Guy, did not beat him, in the opinion of some.

Walter Mitty

unread,
Jun 23, 2009, 6:12:16 AM6/23/09
to

He didn't run at all. He stepped in a bashed him then stepped back. A
clear win IMO.

D. Flynn

unread,
Jun 23, 2009, 12:35:18 PM6/23/09
to
On Jun 23, 6:12 am, Walter Mitty <mitti...@gmail.com> wrote:

A clear win for Chagaev. Let's also remember that Valuev was offered
the Wlad fight after Haye's injury but chickened out.

Walter Mitty

unread,
Jun 23, 2009, 12:47:06 PM6/23/09
to
"D. Flynn" <gu...@msn.com> writes:

I didn't know that. Wlad or Vit would crucify that monster I think. They
have the reach and the strength. Speed not required.

pmfan57

unread,
Jun 23, 2009, 9:52:00 PM6/23/09
to

I thought Valuev fought pretty well in that fight, but I guess he
deserved to lose the decision. He didn't look terrible. Wlad would
annihilate him though.

ne...@millions.com

unread,
Jun 28, 2009, 2:21:36 PM6/28/09
to
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:47:06 +0200, Walter Mitty <mitt...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Seed is one dimension, quickness is another. It is seen often in
boxing disguised as beating the opponent to the punch. Klitscko has
several forms of the jab that he uses very well with great measured
discipline.

DCI

Pastor Marc

unread,
Jun 29, 2009, 12:24:39 AM6/29/09
to
On Jun 28, 12:21 pm, ne...@millions.com wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:47:06 +0200, Walter Mitty <mitti...@gmail.com>

Wladimir has developed a tremendous left jab and he will be a very
hard man for anyone to beat because of it.

ne...@millions.com

unread,
Jun 29, 2009, 2:16:41 AM6/29/09
to

>> Speed is one dimension, quickness is another. It is seen often in


>> boxing disguised as beating the opponent to the punch. Klitscko has
>> several forms of the jab that he uses very well with great measured
>> discipline.
>>
>> DCI
>
>Wladimir has developed a tremendous left jab and he will be a very
>hard man for anyone to beat because of it.

I think you're correct.

DCI

0 new messages