"That SOB Van Owen" <
spa...@not.com> wrote in message
news:cnf9p8hdsh61j9sns...@4ax.com...
I think that's only true more recently. Maybe those of us who grew up with
boxing in the 80s were spoiled, we had so many fighters to get behind
(especially middleweight). The only one I can think of who really divided
opinion was Eubank, and that was for his ridiculous behaviour outside the
ring. But they all gave us value for money, Frank Bruno was a bit of a joke
figure but everyone loved him and supported him. I don't ever remember
watching a Brit fighting and hoping he would lose because I didn't like him,
or I thought he was more mouth than talent. We used to talk about what they
did (or could do in the future) *in* the ring rather than read months of
trash talk in the papers and then watch them run away for 12 rounds because
of a sore toe.
We had a mini-revival of (British) heavyweight boxing more recently with
Danny Williams, Skelton, Gary Mason, Sprott, Julius Francis etc., but it's
all gone stale now. We just don't have the fighters any more who make you
like them outside the ring and keep you supporting them. Fury is an
obnoxious imbecile, David Price has no personality. What Fury doesn't
realise is that his behaviour might sell tickets to his biggest fans, but
he's turned the rest of us off him. There's a fine line between mouthing off
but backing it up (Eubank) and making people think "I want to pay to go and
watch this guy win/get beat" and having them think (Fury) "this guy isn't a
great fighter but he's arrogant and dismissive, I'm going to watch on free
TV or stream a PPV channel online and hope he gets flattened".
We like guys who give everything, Bruno always did, so did Calzaghe, Eubank,
Benn, John "The Beast" Mugabi (remember him??), we can always forgive
anything if we can see they've done their best. Haye still has to earn that,
and I'm not sure he ever will.