I'd like to see this practice benevolently tolerated as a sort of
pitchers revenge on the steroid revolution that has given the batters
such a mean advantage.
Besides, can u just imagine how a scuffed ball would curve in the
hands of a Pedro Martinez? It'd be a real site to see.
As a Montrealer, I'm getting sick of every other team blasting 10 runs a
game off the good guys, I'd like to know if there's any chance of the
ancient art of the spitball returning.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
There's a big difference between cutting or scuffing a baseball and throwing
the spitter.
The cut or scuff serves to increase the aerodynamic effects of a thrown
baseball - that is, if the scuff and the movement of the baseball are properly
coordinated, you can get a more wicked cuve or a fastball with great movement.
The spiiter is different. It was outlawed because it was then and still is a
dangerous pitch because you cannot control it. The spitter is thrown with wet
fingers so that the ball "squirts" out of your hand, kind of like a watermelon
seed. (Not exactly, but that's the idea). Anyway, when thrown with little to no
rotation it acts like a knuckleball and eventually catches a wind current and
changes direction, the later the better. But unlike a knuckleball, it is thrown
with a fastball velocity.
--------------------------------
Mark Wolven ----comis...@aol.com
Beloved Commissioner-for-Life
What's your feeling, did Gaylord Perry, the all time modern day spitter
king, have more hit batsmen than others?
Is it a legitimate worry that guys'll get beaned by spitballs?