info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Sample Entrance Exam For High School In Philippines Pdf
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Fabiola Boysel
Dec 7, 2023, 10:09:01 PM12/7/23
to
Many private and independent high schools have admissions processes that, in some cases, mirror those of colleges and universities. Students and parents are asked to fill out lengthy applications, provide evidence of achievements, and sit for an in-person interview. Such a process helps high schools evaluate the numerous applicants who may apply during a given year in order to identify those who can flourish at the school, while also contributing to its academic mission.
This question gives admissions counselors a glimpse into who you are as a person and what interests you. Be honest and state the subjects you actually like and dislike. Do not try to give the answer you think the listener wants to hear. Answering this question will be your opportunity to highlight your strengths and the ways the school can help you enhance them.
Sample Entrance Exam For High School In Philippines Pdf
DOWNLOAD https://t.co/TivfB7MeHv
Private and independent high schools often interview prospective parents in addition to their children. Doing so helps the admissions team get a better understanding of the family in order to determine if there will be a good fit between the family and the school. This is also a great opportunity for parents to ask their own questions about the school. During the interview process, parents may encounter questions similar to the following:
The application requirements are the same for all applicants whether a student attends high school inside or outside the U.S. All first-year candidates must complete the Common Application or the Coalition Application along with the required supplements. We have no preference and each application is treated equally by the Admissions Committee. View our detailed application requirements here.
Please note that we do not have quotas or limits based on either citizenship or location of high school. Furthermore, admissions decisions are made without regard to whether an applicant has applied for financial aid, even if the applicant is a foreign citizen.
Those applying to law school will need to take the LSAT, a three-and-a-half-hour exam that includes one writing section, one reading comprehension section, one analytical reasoning section, two logical reasoning sections, and one unscored section. Each section is 35 minutes long and is multiple-choice, with the exception of the writing assessment. The LSAT is scored on a scale of 120-180. The LSAT is a written test and is only offered four times a year at designated testing centers. For list of test dates and locations, visit the LSAT website here.
Tying teacher evaluation and sanctions to test score results can discourage teachers from wanting to work in schools with the neediest students, while the large, unpredictable variation in the results and their perceived unfairness can undermine teacher morale. Surveys have found that teacher attrition and demoralization have been associated with test-based accountability efforts, particularly in high-need schools.
Adopting an invalid teacher evaluation system and tying it to rewards and sanctions is likely to lead to inaccurate personnel decisions and to demoralize teachers, causing talented teachers to avoid high-needs students and schools, or to leave the profession entirely, and discouraging potentially effective teachers from entering it. Legislatures should not mandate a test-based approach to teacher evaluation that is unproven and likely to harm not only teachers, but also the children they instruct.
The most acceptable statistical method to address the problems arising from the non-random sorting of students across schools is to include indicator variables (so-called school fixed effects) for every school in the data set. This approach, however, limits the usefulness of the results because teachers can then be compared only to other teachers in the same school and not to other teachers throughout the district. For example, a teacher in a school with exceptionally talented teachers may not appear to add as much value to her students as others in the school, but if compared to all the teachers in the district, she might fall well above average. In any event, teacher effectiveness measures continue to be highly unstable, whether or not they are estimated using school fixed effects.23
Analysts must average test scores over large numbers of students to get reasonably stable estimates of average learning. The larger the number of students in a tested group, the smaller will be the average error because positive errors will tend to cancel out negative errors. But the sampling error associated with small classes of, say, 20-30 students could well be too large to generate reliable results. Most teachers, particularly those teaching elementary or middle school students, do not teach enough students in any year for average test scores to be highly reliable.
The Mathematica models, which apply to teachers in the upper elementary grades, are based on two standard approaches to value-added modeling, with the key elements of each calibrated with data on typical test score gains, class sizes, and the number of teachers in a typical school or district. Specifically, the authors find that if the goal is to distinguish relatively high or relatively low performing teachers from those with average performance within a district, the error rate is about 26% when three years of data are used for each teacher. This means that in a typical performance measurement system, more than one in four teachers who are in fact teachers of average quality would be misclassified as either outstanding or poor teachers, and more than one in four teachers who should be singled out for special treatment would be misclassified as teachers of average quality. If only one year of data is available, the error rate increases to 36%. To reduce it to 12% would require 10 years of data for each teacher.
Because of the range of influences on student learning, many studies have confirmed that estimates of teacher effectiveness are highly unstable. One study examining two consecutive years of data showed, for example, that across five large urban districts, among teachers who were ranked in the bottom 20% of effectiveness in the first year, fewer than a third were in that bottom group the next year, and another third moved all the way up to the top 40%. There was similar movement for teachers who were highly ranked in the first year. Among those who were ranked in the top 20% in the first year, only a third were similarly ranked a year later, while a comparable proportion had moved to the bottom 40%.29
The problems of measurement error and other sources of year-to-year variability are especially serious because many policy makers are particularly concerned with removing ineffective teachers in schools serving the lowest-performing, disadvantaged students. Yet students in these schools tend to be more mobile than students in more affluent communities. In highly mobile communities, if two years of data are unavailable for many students, or if teachers are not to be held accountable for students who have been present for less than the full year, the sample is even smaller than the already small samples for a single typical teacher, and the problem of misestimation is exacerbated.
First, it is less expensive to grade exams that include only, or primarily, multiple-choice questions, because such questions can be graded by machine inexpensively, without employing trained professional scorers. Machine grading is also faster, an increasingly necessary requirement if results are to be delivered in time to categorize schools for sanctions and interventions, make instructional changes, and notify families entitled to transfer out under the rules created by No Child Left Behind. And scores are also needed quickly if test results are to be used for timely teacher evaluation. (If teachers are found wanting, administrators should know this before designing staff development programs or renewing teacher contracts for the following school year.)
Such test preparation has become conventional in American education and is reported without embarrassment by educators. A recent New York Times report, for example, described how teachers prepare students for state high school history exams:
Recent survey data reveal that accountability pressures are associated with higher attrition and reduced morale, especially among teachers in high-need schools.58 Although such survey data are limited, anecdotes abound regarding the demoralization of apparently dedicated and talented teachers, as test-based accountability intensifies. Here, we reproduce two such stories, one from a St. Louis and another from a Los Angeles teacher:
I come from a small, economically depressed town in Northern Wisconson. Many people in this former mining town do notgraduate high school and for them college is an idealistic concept, not a reality. Neither of my parents attendedcollege. Feelings of being trapped in a stagnant environment permeated my mind, and yet I knew I had to graduatehigh school; I had to get out. Although most of my friends and family did not understand my ambitions, I knew Iwanted to make a difference and used their doubt as motivation to press through. Four days after I graduated highschool, I joined the U.S. Army.
Only admitted students are required to submit the Final Report, which provides final secondary school grades and examination marks. Admitted students submit the Final Report in the summer before fall matriculation.
If your secondary school provides predicted results for external exams such as A-levels, the International Baccalaureate, and other international or national testing organizations, they should be submitted by your school alongside your transcript or Mid-Year Report.
The sample test questions are provided to familiarize applicants with the format and type of questions that may be on the exam. They are for illustrative purposes only and may not represent the actual difficulty level of the questions on the exam. The NYS Courts do not release exam questions. Test-takers are prohibited from taking test materials and copying tests questions from examinations.
eebf2c3492
This question gives admissions counselors a glimpse into who you are as a person and what interests you. Be honest and state the subjects you actually like and dislike. Do not try to give the answer you think the listener wants to hear. Answering this question will be your opportunity to highlight your strengths and the ways the school can help you enhance them.
Sample Entrance Exam For High School In Philippines Pdf
DOWNLOAD https://t.co/TivfB7MeHv
Private and independent high schools often interview prospective parents in addition to their children. Doing so helps the admissions team get a better understanding of the family in order to determine if there will be a good fit between the family and the school. This is also a great opportunity for parents to ask their own questions about the school. During the interview process, parents may encounter questions similar to the following:
The application requirements are the same for all applicants whether a student attends high school inside or outside the U.S. All first-year candidates must complete the Common Application or the Coalition Application along with the required supplements. We have no preference and each application is treated equally by the Admissions Committee. View our detailed application requirements here.
Please note that we do not have quotas or limits based on either citizenship or location of high school. Furthermore, admissions decisions are made without regard to whether an applicant has applied for financial aid, even if the applicant is a foreign citizen.
Those applying to law school will need to take the LSAT, a three-and-a-half-hour exam that includes one writing section, one reading comprehension section, one analytical reasoning section, two logical reasoning sections, and one unscored section. Each section is 35 minutes long and is multiple-choice, with the exception of the writing assessment. The LSAT is scored on a scale of 120-180. The LSAT is a written test and is only offered four times a year at designated testing centers. For list of test dates and locations, visit the LSAT website here.
Tying teacher evaluation and sanctions to test score results can discourage teachers from wanting to work in schools with the neediest students, while the large, unpredictable variation in the results and their perceived unfairness can undermine teacher morale. Surveys have found that teacher attrition and demoralization have been associated with test-based accountability efforts, particularly in high-need schools.
Adopting an invalid teacher evaluation system and tying it to rewards and sanctions is likely to lead to inaccurate personnel decisions and to demoralize teachers, causing talented teachers to avoid high-needs students and schools, or to leave the profession entirely, and discouraging potentially effective teachers from entering it. Legislatures should not mandate a test-based approach to teacher evaluation that is unproven and likely to harm not only teachers, but also the children they instruct.
The most acceptable statistical method to address the problems arising from the non-random sorting of students across schools is to include indicator variables (so-called school fixed effects) for every school in the data set. This approach, however, limits the usefulness of the results because teachers can then be compared only to other teachers in the same school and not to other teachers throughout the district. For example, a teacher in a school with exceptionally talented teachers may not appear to add as much value to her students as others in the school, but if compared to all the teachers in the district, she might fall well above average. In any event, teacher effectiveness measures continue to be highly unstable, whether or not they are estimated using school fixed effects.23
Analysts must average test scores over large numbers of students to get reasonably stable estimates of average learning. The larger the number of students in a tested group, the smaller will be the average error because positive errors will tend to cancel out negative errors. But the sampling error associated with small classes of, say, 20-30 students could well be too large to generate reliable results. Most teachers, particularly those teaching elementary or middle school students, do not teach enough students in any year for average test scores to be highly reliable.
The Mathematica models, which apply to teachers in the upper elementary grades, are based on two standard approaches to value-added modeling, with the key elements of each calibrated with data on typical test score gains, class sizes, and the number of teachers in a typical school or district. Specifically, the authors find that if the goal is to distinguish relatively high or relatively low performing teachers from those with average performance within a district, the error rate is about 26% when three years of data are used for each teacher. This means that in a typical performance measurement system, more than one in four teachers who are in fact teachers of average quality would be misclassified as either outstanding or poor teachers, and more than one in four teachers who should be singled out for special treatment would be misclassified as teachers of average quality. If only one year of data is available, the error rate increases to 36%. To reduce it to 12% would require 10 years of data for each teacher.
Because of the range of influences on student learning, many studies have confirmed that estimates of teacher effectiveness are highly unstable. One study examining two consecutive years of data showed, for example, that across five large urban districts, among teachers who were ranked in the bottom 20% of effectiveness in the first year, fewer than a third were in that bottom group the next year, and another third moved all the way up to the top 40%. There was similar movement for teachers who were highly ranked in the first year. Among those who were ranked in the top 20% in the first year, only a third were similarly ranked a year later, while a comparable proportion had moved to the bottom 40%.29
The problems of measurement error and other sources of year-to-year variability are especially serious because many policy makers are particularly concerned with removing ineffective teachers in schools serving the lowest-performing, disadvantaged students. Yet students in these schools tend to be more mobile than students in more affluent communities. In highly mobile communities, if two years of data are unavailable for many students, or if teachers are not to be held accountable for students who have been present for less than the full year, the sample is even smaller than the already small samples for a single typical teacher, and the problem of misestimation is exacerbated.
First, it is less expensive to grade exams that include only, or primarily, multiple-choice questions, because such questions can be graded by machine inexpensively, without employing trained professional scorers. Machine grading is also faster, an increasingly necessary requirement if results are to be delivered in time to categorize schools for sanctions and interventions, make instructional changes, and notify families entitled to transfer out under the rules created by No Child Left Behind. And scores are also needed quickly if test results are to be used for timely teacher evaluation. (If teachers are found wanting, administrators should know this before designing staff development programs or renewing teacher contracts for the following school year.)
Such test preparation has become conventional in American education and is reported without embarrassment by educators. A recent New York Times report, for example, described how teachers prepare students for state high school history exams:
Recent survey data reveal that accountability pressures are associated with higher attrition and reduced morale, especially among teachers in high-need schools.58 Although such survey data are limited, anecdotes abound regarding the demoralization of apparently dedicated and talented teachers, as test-based accountability intensifies. Here, we reproduce two such stories, one from a St. Louis and another from a Los Angeles teacher:
I come from a small, economically depressed town in Northern Wisconson. Many people in this former mining town do notgraduate high school and for them college is an idealistic concept, not a reality. Neither of my parents attendedcollege. Feelings of being trapped in a stagnant environment permeated my mind, and yet I knew I had to graduatehigh school; I had to get out. Although most of my friends and family did not understand my ambitions, I knew Iwanted to make a difference and used their doubt as motivation to press through. Four days after I graduated highschool, I joined the U.S. Army.
Only admitted students are required to submit the Final Report, which provides final secondary school grades and examination marks. Admitted students submit the Final Report in the summer before fall matriculation.
If your secondary school provides predicted results for external exams such as A-levels, the International Baccalaureate, and other international or national testing organizations, they should be submitted by your school alongside your transcript or Mid-Year Report.
The sample test questions are provided to familiarize applicants with the format and type of questions that may be on the exam. They are for illustrative purposes only and may not represent the actual difficulty level of the questions on the exam. The NYS Courts do not release exam questions. Test-takers are prohibited from taking test materials and copying tests questions from examinations.
eebf2c3492
0 new messages