I'm a fan of wind pants of any variety - those that are made for xc,
bicycling, running, or misc Sam's Club specials. Although, really, any kind
will do for touring, I personally like wind pants or jackets designed for XC
skiing or bicycling the best. They just seem to be cut better and are more
comfortable for skiing than pants made for running or hiking.
What I like is that they can be infinitely adjusted for temp because you can
wear them over anything ranging from nothing, to light or heavy polypro long
underwear, tights, or heavy pile pants. Heck, you could even wear them
over your jeans or sweat pants and no one would know! (except for you when
they bind up and get wet or otherwise uncomfortable). Wind pants are light
weight, shed snow, dry immediately, cut the wind (which I like because even
if it's warm and still, there's wind in XC skiing when you go downhill).
I went XC skiing in Norway for a couple of weeks last spring and it seemed
everyone was wearing normal athletic-type (e.g. Nike or Addidas) two piece
wind suits for touring (or shopping at the mall). For the most part, only
the serious trainers/racers wore actual dedicated nordic wear.
Dan Johnson
Nylon and such - material that keeps the wind from blowing through your
clothes.
DJ
SportHill's "XC Pant" and similar "XC Cross Pant" (no ankle zipper)
are a great choice for trail skiing and even backcountry. Their 3SP
fabric is quite wind resistant with adequate insulation for XC skiing
into the -10C or lower temperature range. (www.SportHill.com)
My other alternative is Patagonia R1 Pants under a SportHill wind
shell pant. this alternative to the one piece SportHill XC Pant is
more versitile in that wicking light weight or medium weight long
underwear can be added, or the wind pant can be removed to add
insulation, or increase cooling.
I like my Patagonia R1 Zip top with or without a windshell (an old
Sunbuster anorak).
Edgar
"G.Reif" <gre...@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message news:<ZHDL7.13522$8C6.3...@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com>...
I just wear runners' training tights/pants. If it's chilly put a pair
of longjohns underneath (polypro or similar), though I rarely bother.
As well as not holding moisture like cotton, they allow far more freedom
of movement so are much more comfortable.
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch University of Dundee
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net p.j.c...@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
In article <2199ac3c.0111...@posting.google.com>, ej...@juno.com
(Edgar) writes:
>Subject: Re: xc pants??
>From: ej...@juno.com (Edgar)
>Date: 25 Nov 2001 20:44:52 -0800
>
>Hello,
>
>SportHill's "XC Pant" and similar "XC Cross Pant" (no ankle zipper)
>are a great choice for trail skiing and even backcountry. Their 3SP
>fabric is quite wind resistant with adequate insulation for XC skiing
>into the -10C or lower temperature range. (www.SportHill.com)
>
>My other alternative is Patagonia R1 Pants under a SportHill wind
>shell pant. this alternative to the one piece SportHill XC Pant is
>more versitile in that wicking light weight or medium weight long
>underwear can be added, or the wind pant can be removed to add
>insulation, or increase cooling.
>
>I like my Patagonia R1 Zip top with or without a windshell (an old
>Sunbuster anorak).
>
>Edgar
>
To respond via email remove CLOTHES
Do they come in a nice brown or forest green with accent piping? Dark
red? Nifty blue? If so, they sound great! Oh, they only come in black
or navy-black...bummer. Black...what a nordic color, eh? Reminds me of
forests and snowflakes....I think they must get the black from our
nordic heritage.... Not. Ugh. I bet they work great, they just look
bad. --JP
Jonathan Scheuch
G.Reif <gre...@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:ZHDL7.13522$8C6.3...@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <c94aca2f.01112...@posting.google.com>,
j...@outyourbackdoor.com (Jeff Potter) writes:
>> When Jeff Potter finally buys a pair at XCHQ or The Shop, he will stop
>his
>> annual querry for good XC pants <Grin>.
>
>Do they come in a nice brown or forest green with accent piping? Dark
>red? Nifty blue? If so, they sound great! Oh, they only come in black
>or navy-black...bummer. Black...what a nordic color, eh? Reminds me of
>forests and snowflakes....I think they must get the black from our
>nordic heritage.... Not. Ugh. I bet they work great, they just look
>bad. --JP
>
Gene Goldenfeld
--
Jeff Potter j...@outyourbackdoor.com
"OutYourBackdoor.com": friendly webzine of modern folkways and culture revival
... the world's only line of alternative outdoor culture books, bookstore &
forum ... full of bikes, boats, skis, movies, books, philosophy and more
Here's a funny one: in the mid 80's I lived in downtown Boulder. I recall a scary
character that used to lurk about the area. I thought he was a transvestite
homeless person. They grew em wild in Boulder. He hung out wherever I saw him in
wild clashing lycra tights and seemed grubby and had fingernail polish, earrings.
Foppish LA-glam-rock-plus-bed-head hairdo. At that point the sports people still
mainly changed into street wear for street life even if they wore lycra in
sports. This guy seemed totally 'out' and behaved oddly, walked funny, seemed
drugged like so many there do. He was skinny but seemed drugs-skinny. Turns out
he was just about the top climber of the period. I thought I knew posing but man
I didn't even recognize this off the charts posing. He was the real McCoy of
"total attitude." And I even knew some top climbers, too. --JP