Whirling around vs controlled spin
taichiskiing
> I used to *have* to do that to teach sometimes. It wasn't fun. It's
> probably a lot easier on those short things. I don't know anyone that
> goes out and actually *tries* to do that. More than once anyway. After
> that you've done it.
No, just whirling around and controlled spin are two different things,
you'd get bored if you spin more 3 times in a roll, and it doesn't
take much skill to do that, that's why it isn't fun.
However, controlled spins are different story all together. The
previous clip showed two kinds of spin: one in "normal" (following the
"turn" of the curved path) entry at the apex, and the other is what I
call "tumbling turn," an outward spin 360 at the top/high-C of the
turn while maintaining the GS/long-turn line of skiing to exit,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvCPj10NAUc
These maneuvers require the upmost awareness of the turning/spinning
forces (the combined force of the centripetal force, the centrifugal
force, and gravity), delicate balance, total control of the whole skis
(not just edges), and the line that skis travel. Come with the
heightened awareness, spinning is thrilling, care-free, so it is fun.
It may sound simple, but few can do it smoothly. Here's another look
at the spinning in normal speed,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEdVpE_cnn8
:)
IS
Dave Cartman
<7ae8fe37-1992-449a...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
taichiskiing <thedreamo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> These maneuvers require the upmost awareness of the turning/spinning
> forces (the combined force of the centripetal force, the centrifugal
> force, and gravity), delicate balance, total control of the whole skis
> (not just edges), and the line that skis travel. Come with the
> heightened awareness, spinning is thrilling, care-free, so it is fun.
> It may sound simple, but few can do it smoothly.
You are ADORABLE! Who's a silly netkook!? Who's a sillu netkook!?
You're a silly a netkook!!!! Ah, boo-boo-boo-boo-boo!
Norm
"Dave Cartman" <ver...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vern93-C4B924....@host81-136-209-74.in-
>> (not just edges), and the line that skis travel. Come with the
>> heightened awareness
>
> You are ADORABLE! Who's a silly netkook!? Who's a sillu netkook!?
> You're a silly a netkook!!!! Ah, boo-boo-boo-boo-boo!
While those of us with English as a first language will only require a
cursory knowledge of children to get this joke, I suspect it will not
translate well and Itchie will just plain "not get it".
Course that hardly makes it any different from anything else people have
told him...
Carry on.
taichiskiing
wrote:
Oops, youtube aborted the uploading, so this link doesn't work. Here's
the new link,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCPxQiG7Yug
> :)
> IS
taichiskiing
> "Dave Cartman" <ver...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:vern93-C4B924....@host81-136-209-74.in-
>
> >> (not just edges), and the line that skis travel. Come with the
> >> heightened awareness
>
> > You are ADORABLE! Who's a silly netkook!? Who's a sillu netkook!?
> > You're a silly a netkook!!!! Ah, boo-boo-boo-boo-boo!
Cute, like a dumb blonde singing on the stage, and the crowds are
shouting, "Take it off, take it off, ..."
> While those of us with English as a first language will only require a
> cursory knowledge of children to get this joke, I suspect it will not
> translate well and Itchie will just plain "not get it".
And here comes the can-can girls, and the crowds are shouting,
"higher, higher, ..."
> Course that hardly makes it any different from anything else people have
> told him...
Oops, the stunt falls apart...
> Carry on.
Thanks for the show.
:)
IS
Stuart
lame....
"taichiskiing" <thedreamo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7ae8fe37-1992-449a...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
pigo
wrote:
WTF are you talking about. The only difference between your whirl and
mine was that I didn't go so slow. Spin half way, check out the
student, spin back or finish it (doesn't matter which) and go on.
Better than stopping.
I hardly ever look at anything you post. It all seems like shit that
anyone with 100 days of skiing in their lives could do. Yet you
present it like it's difficult. Why don't you ever show pics of deep
powder, tight trees, air, straight lines and speed in the bumps?
Maybe on your 2nd 100 days?
Stuart
>
> - Show quoted text -
If you can do an elementary front cross over first, ie place your left
ski in front of your right boot and put your left ski down on the snow
on the right side, then pull you right leg through behind you into the
Rouel position, all while doing 2- 360 degree spins. Or, lift your
left leg into 90 degrees of pure sideways abduction with the left ski
in the air straight up and down, then internally rotate the left hip,
and tuck the left ski behind the right leg while starting a spin to
the right then while spinning, insert the left ski in from behind up
onto the right side, put your weight on that ski, then drag your right
ski tip (which is on the left side) outwards, using the drag to induce
a spin to the left.
lal_truckee
>
>
> Oops, youtube aborted the uploading, so this link doesn't work. Here's
> the new link,
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCPxQiG7Yug
Taichi - I think you ski well enough, and are young enough (what, about
60?) to try some real terrain. Get yourself a beacon (learn to use it,)
shovel, probes, emergency gear, jerky; stuff it all (except the beacon -
you wear that on your body) in that knapsack you wear, find a
like-minded buddy, and try some beyond the boundary skiing. There's
plenty out there to learn, the shear beauty is good for the soul, and
it'll keep you busy till you grow old and decrepit at which point you
can move back to the groomed like the 90 year olds around here.
P.S. I forgot - you'll also need poles for the hikes; you can strap them
to your pack if you really need to ski without them.
P.S.S. Spins are silly-easy on twin tips; you want to find some old
straight 200cm+ skis with a true flat tail and then spin yourself dizzy
- in this case the difficulty is in the tool.
Yabahoobs
wrote:
> > > You are ADORABLE! Who's a silly netkook!? Who's a sillu netkook!?
> > > You're a silly a netkook!!!! Ah, boo-boo-boo-boo-boo!
>
> Cute, like a dumb blonde singing on the stage, and the crowds are
> shouting, "Take it off, take it off, ..."
Norm was right. You didn't get it at ALL.
VtSkier
Yeah, I used to do this when I was young and dumb,
as did all of us. Then one of the "us" did it,
buried both tails, came to an immediate STOP with
two torn ACL's. I don't do it any more unless I
have twin tips. Then my buddies behind me complain
about the rooster tail they are skiing into.
The Real Bev
> As a former ballet/acro skiing competitor, your routine is lame lame
> lame....
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvCPj10NAUc
I did stuff like that the first year I skied just to see if I could. It didn't
seem like anything special at the time and still doesn't.
>> These maneuvers require the upmost awareness of the turning/spinning
>> forces (the combined force of the centripetal force, the centrifugal
>> force, and gravity), delicate balance, total control of the whole skis
>> (not just edges), and the line that skis travel. Come with the
>> heightened awareness, spinning is thrilling, care-free, so it is fun.
>> It may sound simple, but few can do it smoothly. Here's another look
>> at the spinning in normal speed,
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEdVpE_cnn8
"This video has been removed by the user."
--
Cheers, Bev
==========================================================
"The last thing you want is for somebody to commit suicide
before executing them."
-Gary Deland, former Utah director for corrections
VtSkier
> Stuart wrote:
>
>> As a former ballet/acro skiing competitor, your routine is lame lame
>> lame....
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvCPj10NAUc
>
> I did stuff like that the first year I skied just to see if I could. It
> didn't seem like anything special at the time and still doesn't.
>
>>> These maneuvers require the upmost awareness of the turning/spinning
>>> forces (the combined force of the centripetal force, the centrifugal
>>> force, and gravity), delicate balance, total control of the whole skis
>>> (not just edges), and the line that skis travel. Come with the
>>> heightened awareness, spinning is thrilling, care-free, so it is fun.
>>> It may sound simple, but few can do it smoothly. Here's another look
>>> at the spinning in normal speed,
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEdVpE_cnn8
>
> "This video has been removed by the user."
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KCS2raOFFs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l93ptBEHwF4
Certainly Suzy looks the best, sorry Ichen,
she's LOTS better looking than you, even now
at over 60.
And Suzy isn't the only one who knows how.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WljL-pdp5-4&feature=related
lal_truckee
>
> Okay, let's try these:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KCS2raOFFs
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l93ptBEHwF4
Wooeeeee - 4:09
> Certainly Suzy looks the best, sorry Ichen,
> she's LOTS better looking than you, even now
> at over 60.
Suzie Chapstick is hot.
Note she didn't need a twin-tip, either.
(let's drag out Wayne Wong next...)
taichiskiing
This link is no longer valid, use the new one,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCPxQiG7Yug
>
> WTF are you talking about. The only difference between your whirl and
> mine was that I didn't go so slow.
The clip is showing the "slow motion."
> Spin half way, check out the student,
> spin back or finish it (doesn't matter which) and go on.
> Better than stopping.
Yup, that's how/what most people can do--whirling around--but what I
was talking about were controlled spins, spin at the apex and the top
of a turn while doing a S-turn, so you have to deal with the spinning
force for the spin as well as the turning force for your turn, and all
these forces are invisible, to coordinate them to ski like water flows
is quite challenging, and that's what thrilling of spin all about.
> I hardly ever look at anything you post. It all seems like shit that
> anyone with 100 days of skiing in their lives could do.
> Yet you present it like it's difficult.
That's your lost. Yes, it is difficult if you can do it at the
"cruising" speed,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwBG67NVaJQ
and it is more difficult if you can do it ad-hoc.
> Why don't you ever show pics of deep powder, tight trees,
> air, straight lines and speed in the bumps?
Yes, I did, but you gappers don't know how to read them. You gappers
don't read beyond the images, and have no idea on how those invisible
forces act on the human body. And a good footage is hard to come by.
> Maybe on your 2nd 100 days?
Here's one of my encounters related to spinning: I was "formation
skiing" with my "no-name" skiing buddy. At an intersection where
trails merge, a beginner lady who just got out of the chairlift,
staggering straight down to her boyfriend, across our path. My buddy
sped up crossed her path before her, and she run straight down to me,
and her boyfriend was yelling "brake, brake..." and she started to
scream and came straight to my face, I spun out of her path and
continued "formation skiing" with my buddy without missing a beat,
left her boy cheered in amaze. No, this kind of moment you don't
usually catch it on video.
:)
IS
taichiskiing
> As a former ballet/acro skiing competitor, your routine is lame lame
> lame....
Fancy, but no, I don't do ballet/acro skiing, my skiing is called
"Taichi Skiing," and it's in martial art discipline--defensive skiing--
turn at any time, in any direction and any condition.
Here's another story about this maneuver: I was doing bumps on a steep
blue trail, a hot shot instructor was chasing behind me, turn for
turn, which was good, then the trail steepened, he missed his turn and
no longer "followed" my line but came straight down cross my line, and
we came to face to face collision. I stopped my forward momentum, did
a switch and spun away and continue skiing without missing a beat. And
that's what I spin for.
:)
IS
> "taichiskiing" <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
taichiskiing
> taichiskiing wrote:
>
> > Oops, youtube aborted the uploading, so this link doesn't work. Here's
> > the new link,
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCPxQiG7Yug
>
> Taichi - I think you ski well enough, and are young enough (what, about
> 60?) to try some real terrain. Get yourself a beacon (learn to use it,)
> shovel, probes, emergency gear, jerky; stuff it all (except the beacon -
> you wear that on your body) in that knapsack you wear, find a
> like-minded buddy, and try some beyond the boundary skiing.
As I said, you ski too hard; been there, done that, I don't work that
hard for my turns anymore.
> There's plenty out there to learn, the shear beauty is
> good for the soul, and it'll keep you busy till you grow
> old and decrepit at which point you can move back to the
> groomed like the 90 year olds around here.
Good skiing is where I can make perfect turns, and once out of groomed
trails, inbound and out-of-bound skiing don't really make that much a
difference in "Sierra" skiing to me. No, there's nothing out there to
learn on my way of skiing/Taichi Skiing anymore. And Heavenly does
have the best "killer view" of Lake Tahoe around.
> P.S. I forgot - you'll also need poles for the hikes; you can strap them
> to your pack if you really need to ski without them.
Actually, I can go wherever you poled-skiing can go.
> P.S.S. Spins are silly-easy on twin tips; you want to find some old
> straight 200cm+ skis with a true flat tail and then spin yourself dizzy
> - in this case the difficulty is in the tool.
I did that before the "shaped skis",
http://www.taomartialarts.com/ski/ski_p_tc_is.jpg
:)
IS
taichiskiing
> Okay, let's try these:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KCS2raOFFshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l93ptBEHwF4
The terrain's kind of flat, isn't it? Sure good for making a
commercial thou.
> Certainly Suzy looks the best, sorry Ichen,
> she's LOTS better looking than you, even now
> at over 60.
Of course, with all those cosmetic and plastic surgery, she is much
prettier; nevertheless, at over 60, can she still do what she did?
> And Suzy isn't the only one who knows how.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WljL-pdp5-4&feature=related
Not my kind of skiing.
Heavenly Cal-base is open, gone skiing, :)
IS
Alan Baker
<836f3083-f0b9-46bc...@m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
taichiskiing <thedreamo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 6:42 pm, VtSkier <vtsk...@somewhere.net> wrote:
>
> > Okay, let's try
> > these:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KCS2raOFFshttp://www.youtube.com/watch
> > ?v=l93ptBEHwF4
>
> The terrain's kind of flat, isn't it? Sure good for making a
> commercial thou.
It's not much flatter than what you typically show in your videos...
...and she's doing things that are much more difficult.
>
> > Certainly Suzy looks the best, sorry Ichen,
> > she's LOTS better looking than you, even now
> > at over 60.
>
> Of course, with all those cosmetic and plastic surgery, she is much
> prettier; nevertheless, at over 60, can she still do what she did?
Why is that important?
>
> > And Suzy isn't the only one who knows
> > how.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WljL-pdp5-4&feature=related
>
> Not my kind of skiing.
>
> Heavenly Cal-base is open, gone skiing, :)
> IS
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
Alan Baker
<7385f04c-7138-496d...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
taichiskiing <thedreamo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 9:04 am, lal_truckee <lal_truc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > taichiskiing wrote:
> >
> > > Oops, youtube aborted the uploading, so this link doesn't work. Here's
> > > the new link,
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCPxQiG7Yug
> >
> > Taichi - I think you ski well enough, and are young enough (what, about
> > 60?) to try some real terrain. Get yourself a beacon (learn to use it,)
> > shovel, probes, emergency gear, jerky; stuff it all (except the beacon -
> > you wear that on your body) in that knapsack you wear, find a
> > like-minded buddy, and try some beyond the boundary skiing.
>
> As I said, you ski too hard; been there, done that, I don't work that
> hard for my turns anymore.
>
> > There's plenty out there to learn, the shear beauty is
> > good for the soul, and it'll keep you busy till you grow
> > old and decrepit at which point you can move back to the
> > groomed like the 90 year olds around here.
>
> Good skiing is where I can make perfect turns, and once out of groomed
> trails, inbound and out-of-bound skiing don't really make that much a
> difference in "Sierra" skiing to me. No, there's nothing out there to
> learn on my way of skiing/Taichi Skiing anymore. And Heavenly does
> have the best "killer view" of Lake Tahoe around.
Making perfect turns on wide-open perfectly groomed green runs is pretty
boring.
>
> > P.S. I forgot - you'll also need poles for the hikes; you can strap them
> > to your pack if you really need to ski without them.
>
> Actually, I can go wherever you poled-skiing can go.
LOL
>
> > P.S.S. Spins are silly-easy on twin tips; you want to find some old
> > straight 200cm+ skis with a true flat tail and then spin yourself dizzy
> > - in this case the difficulty is in the tool.
>
> I did that before the "shaped skis",
>
> http://www.taomartialarts.com/ski/ski_p_tc_is.jpg
And you skied badly back then, too.
Stuart
lame lame lame
taichiskiing
> "taichiskiing" <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dfddf1f0-7d43-4fb8...@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Dec 10, 7:01 am, "Stuart" <f...@net.net> wrote:
> >> As a former ballet/acro skiing competitor, your routine is lame lame
> >> lame....
>
> > Fancy, but no, I don't do ballet/acro skiing, my skiing is called
> > "Taichi Skiing," and it's in martial art discipline--defensive skiing--
> > turn at any time, in any direction and any condition.
>
> > Here's another story about this maneuver: I was doing bumps on a steep
> > blue trail, a hot shot instructor was chasing behind me, turn for
> > turn, which was good, then the trail steepened, he missed his turn and
> > no longer "followed" my line but came straight down cross my line, and
> > we came to face to face collision. I stopped my forward momentum, did
> > a switch and spun away and continue skiing without missing a beat. And
> > that's what I spin for.
>
> > :)
> > IS
> lame lame lame
Blah, blah, blah, maybe you can show us how it is done?
:)
IS
Stuart
(today) Come on up to Marmot Basin..
Just teasing you dude, your spins are pretty ethereal. I did like them.
BTW collisions no good. I betcha your respective energies had some kind of
strange interactive query about 5 seconds prior to impact. It's what
subatomic particles do also. They have "intelligence" just like the human
field.
"taichiskiing" <thedreamo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2b435f29-0675-4041...@u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
Stuart
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-67117...@62.Red-83-42-141.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net...
How 'bout an aerial 720 on apair of 215 Alu's My 6'6" cousin used to throw
'em. Very impressive to watch. Maybe 10 feet of air.
pigo
wrote:
> > Why don't you ever show pics of deep powder, tight trees,
> > air, straight lines and speed in the bumps?
>
> Yes, I did, but you gappers don't know how to read them. You gappers
> don't read beyond the images, and have no idea on how those invisible
> forces act on the human body. And a good footage is hard to come by.
What's to "read beyond the images". That's pretty much all I do. I'm
quite familiar with the "forces on the human body".
> > Maybe on your 2nd 100 days?
>
> Here's one of my encounters related to spinning: I was "formation
> skiing" with my "no-name" skiing buddy. At an intersection where
> trails merge, a beginner lady who just got out of the chairlift,
> staggering straight down to her boyfriend, across our path. My buddy
> sped up crossed her path before her, and she run straight down to me,
> and her boyfriend was yelling "brake, brake..." and she started to
> scream and came straight to my face, I spun out of her path and
> continued "formation skiing" with my buddy without missing a beat,
> left her boy cheered in amaze. No, this kind of moment you don't
> usually catch it on video.
>
> :)
> IS- Hide quoted text -
Stuart
"pigo" <bobt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d6a52a75-77b7-48f6...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> > Why don't you ever show pics of deep powder, tight trees,
> > air, straight lines and speed in the bumps?
>
> Yes, I did, but you gappers don't know how to read them. You gappers
> don't read beyond the images, and have no idea on how those invisible
> forces act on the human body. And a good footage is hard to come by.
What's to "read beyond the images". That's pretty much all I do. I'm
quite familiar with the "forces on the human body".
He's not talking solely biomechanics. He's talking spirit Chi and the brain
frequency within the spin...
I think. :)
Bob F
> "pigo" <bobt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:d6a52a75-77b7-48f6...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 11, 11:30 am, taichiskiing <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> Why don't you ever show pics of deep powder, tight trees,
>>> air, straight lines and speed in the bumps?
>>
>> Yes, I did, but you gappers don't know how to read them. You gappers
>> don't read beyond the images, and have no idea on how those invisible
>> forces act on the human body. And a good footage is hard to come by.
>
> What's to "read beyond the images". That's pretty much all I do. I'm
> quite familiar with the "forces on the human body".
>
> He's not talking solely biomechanics. He's talking spirit Chi and the
> brain frequency within the spin...
>
> I think. :)
He's just boasting about his superiority over everyone else in the world, as
usual.
pigo
> He's just boasting about his superiority over everyone else in the world, as
> usual.- Hide quoted text -
Well we've seen the videos that it's not in his skiing!
taichiskiing
> I still keep a couple of maneuvres in my repertoire even at 56 yrs of age
> (today) Come on up to Marmot Basin..
> Just teasing you dude, your spins are pretty ethereal. I did like them.
Thanks. It looks like we've got ourselves a real gem in the group,
welcome; glad that you are not a gappers, they are no fun.
Ski Canadian Rockies is really nice, but the weather is too cloudy for
me. How about ski the sunny California? :)
> BTW collisions no good. I betcha your respective energies had some kind of
> strange interactive query about 5 seconds prior to impact. It's what
> subatomic particles do also. They have "intelligence" just like the human
> field.
That's quite true, as a martial artist, I always "feel" my
surrounding, and I ski as a martial art practice. As the time goes on,
the "feeling" develops the "intelligence" on its own, so the body
responds to the change spontaneously. That's the thrilling of the
skiing I'm really skiing for.
The best way to avoid collisions in a confined area where the two
skiers ski at a compatible speed is to follow the front skier's line/
track, same track guarantees pretty much the same speed. Any deviation
will lead to scissoring, to figure 8, and eventually, face to face
collision, if one or both skiers cannot maintain their turns. But when
I do that, people (like Bob F kind) think I'm showing off. Go figure.
:)
IS
taichiskiing
> On Dec 11, 11:30 am, taichiskiing <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > Why don't you ever show pics of deep powder, tight trees,
> > > air, straight lines and speed in the bumps?
>
> > Yes, I did, but you gappers don't know how to read them. You gappers
> > don't read beyond the images, and have no idea on how those invisible
> > forces act on the human body. And a good footage is hard to come by.
>
> What's to "read beyond the images". That's pretty much all I do. I'm
> quite familiar with the "forces on the human body".
The force is invisible, so is the momentum, and certain movements
cannot be done without the adequate momentums; your "hinge-door" joint
movements would only destroy it.
In no-mind, totally relaxed, "the perfection that we experienced is
not ours but the making of the nature," what force do you think
generates this image?
http://www.taomartialarts.com/ski/ski_p_is_tcs1.jpg
:)
IS
Stuart
I'm a gem because I am generally agreeable? I think you have a neat idea for
instructors. As far as anyone laming you, just ignore if it bothers you in
any way. They are nice people enjoying their internet fun. Nothing's
serious.
Inner skier dude, that's where it's at alpha or approx 10 cps EEG activity.
Many with various stages of adreneline or high beta addictions don't
normally go there. Probably more than represented here in this newsgroup.
Of course one can look beyond the visual in your skiing. I think your
detractors are just pretending to choose not to.
twobuddha
> "taichiskiing" <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Bullshit. Total bullshit. There are no nice people hanging out
here. Nice people don't stalk in real life, threaten people's lives,
tell vile and disgusting lies.
Since just about everyone left in this shithole either does exactly
that or has no objection to people who do exactly that, nobody here is
a nice person.
Hey, freak? Wanna tell me what is so much fun about falsely accusing
me of molesting children? Making sick jokes about doing that?
Alan Baker
<f5f8b882-990d-4627...@e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
twobuddha <twob...@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't stalk anyone.
> threaten people's lives,
I've never threatened anyone.
> tell vile and disgusting lies.
I've never told any lies.
> Since just about everyone left in this shithole either does exactly
> that or has no objection to people who do exactly that, nobody here is
> a nice person.
> Hey, freak? Wanna tell me what is so much fun about falsely accusing
> me of molesting children? Making sick jokes about doing that?
Your brother accused of that... ...before he committed suicide.
twobuddha
wrote:
> On Dec 12, 8:00 am, "Stuart" <f...@net.net> wrote:
>
> > I still keep a couple of maneuvres in my repertoire even at 56 yrs of age
> > (today) Come on up to Marmot Basin..
> > Just teasing you dude, your spins are pretty ethereal. I did like them.
>
> Thanks. It looks like we've got ourselves a real gem in the group,
> welcome; glad that you are not a gappers, they are no fun.
>
> Ski Canadian Rockies is really nice, but the weather is too cloudy for
> me. How about ski the sunny California? :)
>
> > BTW collisions no good. I betcha your respective energies had some kind of
> > strange interactive query about 5 seconds prior to impact. It's what
> > subatomic particles do also. They have "intelligence" just like the human
> > field.
>
> That's quite true, as a martial artist, I always "feel" my
> surrounding, and I ski as a martial art practice. As the time goes on,
> the "feeling" develops the "intelligence" on its own, so the body
> responds to the change spontaneously. That's the thrilling of the
> skiing I'm really skiing for.
As a life long team sport athlete, I learned spacial awareness and how
to judge movement in games.
Which comes in handy every once in a while.
My ski partner last week never played football or basketball. On
empty slopes, he would frequently come uncomfortably close because he
does not have the skills of spatial perception I do. Got a bit hairy
when we were on a cat track traverse to a chair and for some random
atom reason, he decided to pull right and stop. Right in front of
me. He got lucky, a run dropped off to the right, and I bounced
through a bump field rather than t-bone him.
I prefer to ski with ex-jocks rather than the outdoorsy types who got
picked last for sports involving a ball (which fits most of the
pussies in this newsgroup). More unconcious awareness of the people
around them.
As for the martial arts comparison, I'd say bullshit unless you
habitually take on more than one person, and you ain't Jackie Chan.
I've had a lot of experience and a lot of training in violence, and
while much of it involved awareness of your surroundings, virtually
none of that awareness applies to skiing. Unless, of course, you're
talking about snowboarders, much like walking through a crime ridden
neighborhood.
twobuddha
Not hard to be superior to any of the assholes in this newsgroup,
especially if you are talking about manhood. Or ethics.
Alan Baker
<0d1ff43f-e84b-417e...@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
twobuddha <twob...@gmail.com> wrote:
LOL
Ah, the BMOC complex emerges...
...the one that got everyone laughing at you when they finally actually
met you.
twobuddha
> In article
> <0d1ff43f-e84b-417e-95d5-f9589ab8c...@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
As usual, you are a stupid dumbfuck.
>
> Ah, the BMOC complex emerges...
You stupid fucking puck catching idiot, I make an informed post about
spatial awareness during movement, and you gotta conflate it into the
BMOC bullshit.
Which is absolute bullshit. No brags, no ego, just a flat, factual
statement that I have played ball sports that demand spatial awareness
of others for my entire life....and was pretty fucking good at them,
but I didn't mention it. Idiot. Dumbfuck.
As a puck catcher, you would not understand, because you don't move in
relationship to others. You just stand there and get hit by flying
hard objects. Your athletic accomplishment. Dumbfuck.
>
> ...the one that got everyone laughing at you when they finally actually
> met you.
Make up another whopper, dumbfuck. Nobody ever had the balls to laugh
at me to my face. Especially Kerrison and her buddies. Period.
Didn't happen. Period.
Indeed, as I remember, I was laughing MY ass off at that stupid bitch
and her buddies. To their face. In person. After this terminal
intermediate flat embarassed the BBOC (Big Bitch On Campus) in the
gates and a downhill race.
You're so fucking stupid, so invested trying to rationalize your
delusions, that you (and others) took a satirical, ironic shtick and
tried to make an ongoing source of amusement (to me and many others)
into a real desire to dominate this shithole. Which is ludicrous and
laughable. Just like you.
Go fuck yourself again, wack job.
Hey, come to think of it, YOU could have laughed in my face at
Whistler. But you didn't have the balls, and you've been making
excuses for your cowardice ever since.
LOLAY. Laughing out loud at you. Which I would damn well do in
person, and we both know it.
Alan Baker
<5e24cd24-3504-4892...@u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com>,
twobuddha <twob...@gmail.com> wrote:
LOL
Anyone who can read could read the bragging, Scottie. "Spatial awareness
during movement". What a load.
> >
> > ...the one that got everyone laughing at you when they finally actually
> > met you.
>
> Make up another whopper, dumbfuck. Nobody ever had the balls to laugh
> at me to my face. Especially Kerrison and her buddies. Period.
> Didn't happen. Period.
> Indeed, as I remember, I was laughing MY ass off at that stupid bitch
> and her buddies. To their face. In person. After this terminal
> intermediate flat embarassed the BBOC (Big Bitch On Campus) in the
> gates and a downhill race.
A big weight running straight.
> You're so fucking stupid, so invested trying to rationalize your
> delusions, that you (and others) took a satirical, ironic shtick and
> tried to make an ongoing source of amusement (to me and many others)
> into a real desire to dominate this shithole. Which is ludicrous and
> laughable. Just like you.
> Go fuck yourself again, wack job.
> Hey, come to think of it, YOU could have laughed in my face at
> Whistler. But you didn't have the balls, and you've been making
> excuses for your cowardice ever since.
I've not made any excuse. I said I wouldn't be there if you didn't meet
my condition and I kept my word. You could have met my condition, but
you obviously didn't actually want the meet to happen.
>
> LOLAY. Laughing out loud at you. Which I would damn well do in
> person, and we both know it.
I'm sure, Scottie.
Dave Cartman
<0d1ff43f-e84b-417e...@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
twobuddha <twob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That's quite true, as a martial artist, I always "feel" my
> > surrounding, and I ski as a martial art practice. As the time goes on,
> > the "feeling" develops the "intelligence" on its own, so the body
> > responds to the change spontaneously. That's the thrilling of the
> > skiing I'm really skiing for.
>
> As a life long team sport athlete, I learned spacial awareness and how
> to judge movement in games.
> Which comes in handy every once in a while.
> My ski partner last week never played football or basketball. On
> empty slopes, he would frequently come uncomfortably close because he
> does not have the skills of spatial perception I do.
Dude! You two are like super heros!!!
Dave Cartman
<0d1ff43f-e84b-417e...@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
twobuddha <twob...@gmail.com> wrote:
This is some funny, funny stuff!
"As a life long athlete...."
"I've had a lot of experience and a lot of training in violence..."
twobuddha
> In article
> <0d1ff43f-e84b-417e-95d5-f9589ab8c...@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
You think that is funny? Strange sense of humor, pervert. Not
surprised you laugh at the truth.
>
> "I've had a lot of experience and a lot of training in violence..."
You wouldn't find THAT funny. If you had the balls to spew your shit
in person.
>
> "As for the martial arts comparison, I'd say bullshit unless you
> habitually take on more than one person"-
As a man who has plenty of experience in the REAL world, a one on one
encounter teaches you nothing about the movement of many people.
Which you would know if you hadn't bullshitted about your own supposed
martial arts experience.
Busted again, Dickless Dave. With a pretty pathetic cheap shot.
Typical pervert.
twobuddha
>
>
>
> > You stupid fucking puck catching idiot, I make an informed post about
> > spatial awareness during movement, and you gotta conflate it into the
> > BMOC bullshit.
> > Which is absolute bullshit. No brags, no ego, just a flat, factual
> > statement that I have played ball sports that demand spatial awareness
> > of others for my entire life....and was pretty fucking good at them,
> > but I didn't mention it. Idiot. Dumbfuck.
> > As a puck catcher, you would not understand, because you don't move in
> > relationship to others. You just stand there and get hit by flying
> > hard objects. Your athletic accomplishment. Dumbfuck.
>
> LOL
You are insane. Deranged. Typical nutjob who always got picked
last. When busted making up a whopper, you LOL. As usual. LOLAY,
puck catcher.
>
> Anyone who can read could read the bragging, Scottie. "Spatial awareness
> during movement". What a load.
Stating the fact that I played sports is bragging? Insane. If you
ever made a team, you would know what I am talking about. Since you
are a dickless pussy and deranged freak, and probably always have
been, you make an absolute fool out of yourself and betray your
ignorance. What a load!
>
>
>
> > > ...the one that got everyone laughing at you when they finally actually
> > > met you.
>
> > Make up another whopper, dumbfuck. Nobody ever had the balls to laugh
> > at me to my face. Especially Kerrison and her buddies. Period.
> > Didn't happen. Period.
> > Indeed, as I remember, I was laughing MY ass off at that stupid bitch
> > and her buddies. To their face. In person. After this terminal
> > intermediate flat embarassed the BBOC (Big Bitch On Campus) in the
> > gates and a downhill race.
>
> A big weight running straight.
In the gates, too? You really are insane. Delusional. Demented.
When the facts conflict with your delusions, you ignore the facts.
Hey, dumbfuck? I embarassed the bitch. She bragged her ass off, got
humiliated, and launched a vile campaign of character defamation.
Sorta like you after you embarassed yourself by not showing up at
Whistler.
>
> > You're so fucking stupid, so invested trying to rationalize your
> > delusions, that you (and others) took a satirical, ironic shtick and
> > tried to make an ongoing source of amusement (to me and many others)
> > into a real desire to dominate this shithole. Which is ludicrous and
> > laughable. Just like you.
> > Go fuck yourself again, wack job.
> > Hey, come to think of it, YOU could have laughed in my face at
> > Whistler. But you didn't have the balls, and you've been making
> > excuses for your cowardice ever since.
>
> I've not made any excuse. I said I wouldn't be there if you didn't meet
> my condition and I kept my word. You could have met my condition, but
> you obviously didn't actually want the meet to happen.
>
>
>
> > LOLAY. Laughing out loud at you. Which I would damn well do in
> > person, and we both know it.
>
> I'm sure, Scottie.
So am I, freak.
twobuddha
> In article
> <0d1ff43f-e84b-417e-95d5-f9589ab8c...@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
>
Dude! You are really a pathetic, laughable pervert! How you could
conflate that statement into that ludicrous cheap shot is beyond me.
Desperate bullshit, as usual, Pervert Dave.
twobuddha
Bullshit. You're a classic usenet stalker.
>
> > threaten people's lives,
>
> I've never threatened anyone.
Your buddies sure have, freak.
>
> > tell vile and disgusting lies.
>
> I've never told any lies.
Absolute vile and disgusting lie, freak. I've busted YOU lying in
this thread several times.
>
> > Since just about everyone left in this shithole either does exactly
> > that or has no objection to people who do exactly that, nobody here is
> > a nice person.
> > Hey, freak? Wanna tell me what is so much fun about falsely accusing
> > me of molesting children? Making sick jokes about doing that?
>
> Your brother accused of that... ...before he committed suicide.
Nice of you to mention the context, freak. You repeat a lie, which
makes you a liar.
Pay attention here, freak. Close attention. You just made up a
whopper of a lie. A stone cold lie. Outright lie. My brother did
not commit suicide, and to say so is another of your insane delusions
and crazy inventions.
I'd tell you that you should be ashamed of yourself, but you are awash
in shame. You are so incredibly stupid and sick that you will never
deal with your own pathetic, despicable lack of any manhood.
How truly disgusting. How sick. How Alan Baker.
Alan Baker
<164777e5-8510-4d99...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
twobuddha <twob...@gmail.com> wrote:
Stating the fact that it made you especially spatially aware is.
> >
> >
> >
> > > > ...the one that got everyone laughing at you when they finally actually
> > > > met you.
> >
> > > Make up another whopper, dumbfuck. �Nobody ever had the balls to laugh
> > > at me to my face. �Especially Kerrison and her buddies. �Period.
> > > Didn't happen. �Period.
> > > Indeed, as I remember, I was laughing MY ass off at that stupid bitch
> > > and her buddies. �To their face. �In person. �After this terminal
> > > intermediate flat embarassed the BBOC (Big Bitch On Campus) in the
> > > gates and a downhill race.
> >
> > A big weight running straight.
>
> In the gates, too? You really are insane. Delusional. Demented.
> When the facts conflict with your delusions, you ignore the facts.
> Hey, dumbfuck? I embarassed the bitch. She bragged her ass off, got
> humiliated, and launched a vile campaign of character defamation.
> Sorta like you after you embarassed yourself by not showing up at
> Whistler.
Gates can be set straight too, tubby.
> >
> > > You're so fucking stupid, so invested trying to rationalize your
> > > delusions, that you (and others) took a satirical, ironic shtick and
> > > tried to make an ongoing source of amusement (to me and many others)
> > > into a real desire to dominate this shithole. �Which is ludicrous and
> > > laughable. �Just like you.
> > > Go fuck yourself again, wack job.
> > > Hey, come to think of it, YOU could have laughed in my face at
> > > Whistler. �But you didn't have the balls, and you've been making
> > > excuses for your cowardice ever since.
> >
> > I've not made any excuse. I said I wouldn't be there if you didn't meet
> > my condition and I kept my word. You could have met my condition, but
> > you obviously didn't actually want the meet to happen.
> >
> >
> >
> > > LOLAY. �Laughing out loud at you. �Which I would damn well do in
> > > person, and we both know it.
> >
> > I'm sure, Scottie.
>
> So am I, freak.
LOL
Alan Baker
<a9f0355c-2600-4045...@z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
twobuddha <twob...@gmail.com> wrote:
How is replying to you in a group designed for just such a thing
"stalking", Scottie?
> >
> > > threaten people's lives,
> >
> > I've never threatened anyone.
>
> Your buddies sure have, freak.
Nope.
> >
> > > tell vile and disgusting lies.
> >
> > I've never told any lies.
>
> Absolute vile and disgusting lie, freak. I've busted YOU lying in
> this thread several times.
Nope.
> >
> > > Since just about everyone left in this shithole either does exactly
> > > that or has no objection to people who do exactly that, nobody here is
> > > a nice person.
> > > Hey, freak? �Wanna tell me what is so much fun about falsely accusing
> > > me of molesting children? �Making sick jokes about doing that?
> >
> > Your brother accused of that... ...before he committed suicide.
>
> Nice of you to mention the context, freak. You repeat a lie, which
> makes you a liar.
I didn't repeat a lie. I called it an accusation and I don't know if
it's true or not.
> Pay attention here, freak. Close attention. You just made up a
> whopper of a lie. A stone cold lie. Outright lie. My brother did
> not commit suicide, and to say so is another of your insane delusions
> and crazy inventions.
If I'm wrong about that, I apologize.
> I'd tell you that you should be ashamed of yourself, but you are awash
> in shame. You are so incredibly stupid and sick that you will never
> deal with your own pathetic, despicable lack of any manhood.
> How truly disgusting. How sick. How Alan Baker.
LOL
twobuddha
They weren't. You just made up another lie. Then you defended the
lie. Typical of a pathological liar and delusional wack job who can't
admit that he lied. Weasel Boy.
Sorta like you weaseled out of Whistler....
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > You're so fucking stupid, so invested trying to rationalize your
> > > > delusions, that you (and others) took a satirical, ironic shtick and
> > > > tried to make an ongoing source of amusement (to me and many others)
> > > > into a real desire to dominate this shithole. Which is ludicrous and
> > > > laughable. Just like you.
> > > > Go fuck yourself again, wack job.
> > > > Hey, come to think of it, YOU could have laughed in my face at
> > > > Whistler. But you didn't have the balls, and you've been making
> > > > excuses for your cowardice ever since.
>
> > > I've not made any excuse. I said I wouldn't be there if you didn't meet
> > > my condition and I kept my word. You could have met my condition, but
> > > you obviously didn't actually want the meet to happen.
>
> > > > LOLAY. Laughing out loud at you. Which I would damn well do in
> > > > person, and we both know it.
>
> > > I'm sure, Scottie.
>
> > So am I, freak.
>
> LOL
LOLAY, pussy.
taichiskiing
> "taichiskiing" <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4f195424-453d-4ca7...@b36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> I'm a gem because I am generally agreeable?
No, methinks that you're a gem because: 1) you have the knowledge and
experience to appreciate my "ethereal" spins; 2) *admitting* that you
like them (praise something that taichiskiing does), that's quite a
"courageous action" in this group; 3) put them together, methinks that
you probably would say things true to the events. Gappers here only
know denial.
> I think you have a neat idea for
> instructors. As far as anyone laming you, just ignore if it bothers you in
> any way. They are nice people enjoying their internet fun. Nothing's
> serious.
No, I don't consider that those gappers are "nice people enjoying
their internet fun," nice people don't do things to have fun at
expense of other people being humiliated, that's what bully does, so
they are just bunch 'net bullies. They are annoying, but for they lack
of integrity, it doesn't bother me, I'll just treat them as they treat
other, that's called "their ways to themselves." I think that's fair
enough.
> Inner skier dude, that's where it's at alpha or approx 10 cps EEG activity.
> Many with various stages of adreneline or high beta addictions don't
> normally go there. Probably more than represented here in this newsgroup.
> Of course one can look beyond the visual in your skiing. I think your
> detractors are just pretending to choose not to.
Not sure what "alpha or approx 10 cps EEG activity" is, nevertheless,
your "spirit Chi" is right on as the "inner skiing" goes. Spirit
reflects the inner will, and Chi is the inner energy that drives/moves
our bodies, so Taichi Skiing is to "use will to wield the Chi, and use
Chi to drive the body/muscles and bones" to balance an external force--
gravity—in the balance of man and gravity, Taichi Skiing strives.
As I said, real high level skiing, any sport for that matter, is all
mental; they/gappers cannot see it, so they cannot do it, and they
cannot do it so they cannot see/understand it. Some of them may choose
not to see it, but most likely they just don't have the knowledge to
phantom it.
:)
IS
twobuddha
Better learn something about lying, defamation, and stalking, you sick
dickless freak. You're a stalker.
>
>
> > > > threaten people's lives,
>
> > > I've never threatened anyone.
>
> > Your buddies sure have, freak.
>
> Nope.
Another outright lie.
>
>
>
> > > > tell vile and disgusting lies.
>
> > > I've never told any lies.
>
> > Absolute vile and disgusting lie, freak. I've busted YOU lying in
> > this thread several times.
>
> Nope.
Another ridiculous, insane outright lie.
>
>
>
> > > > Since just about everyone left in this shithole either does exactly
> > > > that or has no objection to people who do exactly that, nobody here is
> > > > a nice person.
> > > > Hey, freak? Wanna tell me what is so much fun about falsely accusing
> > > > me of molesting children? Making sick jokes about doing that?
>
> > > Your brother accused of that... ...before he committed suicide.
>
> > Nice of you to mention the context, freak. You repeat a lie, which
> > makes you a liar.
>
> I didn't repeat a lie. I called it an accusation and I don't know if
> it's true or not.
You repeated a lie. Period. Liar. Dickless liar. Cowardly liar.
>
> > Pay attention here, freak. Close attention. You just made up a
> > whopper of a lie. A stone cold lie. Outright lie. My brother did
> > not commit suicide, and to say so is another of your insane delusions
> > and crazy inventions.
>
> If I'm wrong about that, I apologize.
IF? You made up a whopper of a lie, then you weasel on an apology?
What a pathetic, dickless, miserable excuse for a man you are.
>
> > I'd tell you that you should be ashamed of yourself, but you are awash
> > in shame. You are so incredibly stupid and sick that you will never
> > deal with your own pathetic, despicable lack of any manhood.
> > How truly disgusting. How sick. How Alan Baker.
>
> LOL
How truly disgusting. How sick. How Alan Baker, deranged delusional
pathological liar and craven coward.
VtSkier
>
> As I said, real high level skiing, any sport for that matter, is all
> mental; they/gappers cannot see it, so they cannot do it, and they
> cannot do it so they cannot see/understand it. Some of them may choose
> not to see it, but most likely they just don't have the knowledge to
> phantom it.
Sorry Ichin, English police here. The last sentence above should
read, "Some of them may choose not to see it, but most likely they
just don't have the knowledge to fathom it." 'Phantom' is something
else quite different.
>
> :)
> IS
Alan Baker
<cabeffe2-555b-4eb5...@o9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
twobuddha <twob...@gmail.com> wrote:
And yet you won't actually explain how that is...
> >
> >
> > > > > threaten people's lives,
> >
> > > > I've never threatened anyone.
> >
> > > Your buddies sure have, freak.
> >
> > Nope.
>
> Another outright lie.
LOL
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > tell vile and disgusting lies.
> >
> > > > I've never told any lies.
> >
> > > Absolute vile and disgusting lie, freak. �I've busted YOU lying in
> > > this thread several times.
> >
> > Nope.
>
> Another ridiculous, insane outright lie.
LOL
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > Since just about everyone left in this shithole either does exactly
> > > > > that or has no objection to people who do exactly that, nobody here
> > > > > is
> > > > > a nice person.
> > > > > Hey, freak? �Wanna tell me what is so much fun about falsely accusing
> > > > > me of molesting children? �Making sick jokes about doing that?
> >
> > > > Your brother accused of that... ...before he committed suicide.
> >
> > > Nice of you to mention the context, freak. �You repeat a lie, which
> > > makes you a liar.
> >
> > I didn't repeat a lie. I called it an accusation and I don't know if
> > it's true or not.
>
> You repeated a lie. Period. Liar. Dickless liar. Cowardly liar.
LOL
> >
> > > Pay attention here, freak. �Close attention. �You just made up a
> > > whopper of a lie. �A stone cold lie. �Outright lie. �My brother did
> > > not commit suicide, and to say so is another of your insane delusions
> > > and crazy inventions.
> >
> > If I'm wrong about that, I apologize.
>
> IF? You made up a whopper of a lie, then you weasel on an apology?
> What a pathetic, dickless, miserable excuse for a man you are.
My understanding was that he committed suicide. If that's wrong, I
apologize.
That's what normal people do, Scottie.
> >
> > > I'd tell you that you should be ashamed of yourself, but you are awash
> > > in shame. �You are so incredibly stupid and sick that you will never
> > > deal with your own pathetic, despicable lack of any manhood.
> > > How truly disgusting. �How sick. �How Alan Baker.
> >
> > LOL
>
> How truly disgusting. How sick. How Alan Baker, deranged delusional
> pathological liar and craven coward.
LOL
twobuddha
Explained it many times, stalker. You ignore it and keep stalking.
>
>
>
> > > > > > threaten people's lives,
>
> > > > > I've never threatened anyone.
>
> > > > Your buddies sure have, freak.
>
> > > Nope.
>
> > Another outright lie.
>
> LOL
When busted in an outright lie, you LOL. As usual. How sick.
>
>
>
> > > > > > tell vile and disgusting lies.
>
> > > > > I've never told any lies.
>
> > > > Absolute vile and disgusting lie, freak. I've busted YOU lying in
> > > > this thread several times.
>
> > > Nope.
>
> > Another ridiculous, insane outright lie.
>
> LOL
Stating that no one has threatend my life is an outright lie. When
busted in an outright lie, you laugh. Lying is fun, eh, freak?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > > > Since just about everyone left in this shithole either does exactly
> > > > > > that or has no objection to people who do exactly that, nobody here
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > a nice person.
> > > > > > Hey, freak? Wanna tell me what is so much fun about falsely accusing
> > > > > > me of molesting children? Making sick jokes about doing that?
>
> > > > > Your brother accused of that... ...before he committed suicide.
>
> > > > Nice of you to mention the context, freak. You repeat a lie, which
> > > > makes you a liar.
>
> > > I didn't repeat a lie. I called it an accusation and I don't know if
> > > it's true or not.
>
> > You repeated a lie. Period. Liar. Dickless liar. Cowardly liar.
>
> LOL
When busted falsely accusing me of molesting children, you LOL.
Dickless liar. Cowardly liar. Call me a child molester in person.
Hospital time. Ooooops, forgot. You don't have the balls.
>
>
>
> > > > Pay attention here, freak. Close attention. You just made up a
> > > > whopper of a lie. A stone cold lie. Outright lie. My brother did
> > > > not commit suicide, and to say so is another of your insane delusions
> > > > and crazy inventions.
>
> > > If I'm wrong about that, I apologize.
>
> > IF? You made up a whopper of a lie, then you weasel on an apology?
> > What a pathetic, dickless, miserable excuse for a man you are.
>
> My understanding was that he committed suicide. If that's wrong, I
> apologize.
You lied. Period. You get your "understanding" from your own insane
delusions.
>
> That's what normal people do, Scottie.
Normal people don't make up such ridiculous lies, wack job. But you
wouldn't know that, since you're not normal. Just a mentally ill
freak lying his ass off.
>
>
>
> > > > I'd tell you that you should be ashamed of yourself, but you are awash
> > > > in shame. You are so incredibly stupid and sick that you will never
> > > > deal with your own pathetic, despicable lack of any manhood.
> > > > How truly disgusting. How sick. How Alan Baker.
>
> > > LOL
>
> > How truly disgusting. How sick. How Alan Baker, deranged delusional
> > pathological liar and craven coward.
>
> LOL
When busted lying your ass off about my dead brother, you LOL. How
truly disgusting.
Walt
> taichiskiing wrote:
>> Some of them may choose
>> not to see it, but most likely they just don't have the knowledge to
>> phantom it.
>
> Sorry Ichin, English police here. The last sentence above should
> read, "Some of them may choose not to see it, but most likely they
> just don't have the knowledge to fathom it." 'Phantom' is something
> else quite different.
Agreed. It's not often you hear the word "phantom" used as a verb. I
believe that usage is restricted to my former profession. e.g. "Steve,
could you please phantom the overheads."
IOW, I have the knowledge and the equipment necessary to phantom things.
Most people don't.
//Walt
twobuddha
I think I will start using that verb to describe the craven cowards of
RSA who claim to have seen me in real life.
None of them ever had the nads to introduce themselves, unfortunately.
They phantomed. Sorta like Depends Boi Eric Leonard did in Fry's, or
Dickless David Hobbs at Crystal, or Wack Job Waldron at Green Lake, or
some other freak at Crystal. Did a phantom. Disappeared in plain
sight, other than the trail of piss they left behind them.
alan
> > > > How is replying to you in a group designed for just such a thing
> > > > "stalking", Scottie?
>
> > > Better learn something about lying, defamation, and stalking, you sick
> > > dickless freak. You're a stalker.
>
> > And yet you won't actually explain how that is...
>
> Explained it many times, stalker. You ignore it and keep stalking.
Nope. You have not ever explained why my replying to you makes me a
"stalker" but you replying to me doesn't do the same for you.
But if you believe differently, I'll accept a link to the post where
you explained it...
>
>
>
> > > > > > > threaten people's lives,
>
> > > > > > I've never threatened anyone.
>
> > > > > Your buddies sure have, freak.
>
> > > > Nope.
>
> > > Another outright lie.
>
> > LOL
>
> When busted in an outright lie, you LOL. As usual. How sick.
>
>
>
> > > > > > > tell vile and disgusting lies.
>
> > > > > > I've never told any lies.
>
> > > > > Absolute vile and disgusting lie, freak. I've busted YOU lying in
> > > > > this thread several times.
>
> > > > Nope.
>
> > > Another ridiculous, insane outright lie.
>
> > LOL
>
> Stating that no one has threatend my life is an outright lie. When
> busted in an outright lie, you laugh. Lying is fun, eh, freak?
When did I ever state that no one has threatened your life, Scottie. I
don't believe anyone has, but that belief is something I'm entitled to
hold and stating it doesn't make me a liar.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > > > > Since just about everyone left in this shithole either does exactly
> > > > > > > that or has no objection to people who do exactly that, nobody here
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > a nice person.
> > > > > > > Hey, freak? Wanna tell me what is so much fun about falsely accusing
> > > > > > > me of molesting children? Making sick jokes about doing that?
>
> > > > > > Your brother accused of that... ...before he committed suicide.
>
> > > > > Nice of you to mention the context, freak. You repeat a lie, which
> > > > > makes you a liar.
>
> > > > I didn't repeat a lie. I called it an accusation and I don't know if
> > > > it's true or not.
>
> > > You repeated a lie. Period. Liar. Dickless liar. Cowardly liar.
>
> > LOL
>
> When busted falsely accusing me of molesting children, you LOL.
I didn't accuse of that, Scottie.
> Dickless liar. Cowardly liar. Call me a child molester in person.
I've never called you that.
> Hospital time. Ooooops, forgot. You don't have the balls.
I'll be sure to phone you the next time I'm in Seattle. :-)
>
>
>
> > > > > Pay attention here, freak. Close attention. You just made up a
> > > > > whopper of a lie. A stone cold lie. Outright lie. My brother did
> > > > > not commit suicide, and to say so is another of your insane delusions
> > > > > and crazy inventions.
>
> > > > If I'm wrong about that, I apologize.
>
> > > IF? You made up a whopper of a lie, then you weasel on an apology?
> > > What a pathetic, dickless, miserable excuse for a man you are.
>
> > My understanding was that he committed suicide. If that's wrong, I
> > apologize.
>
> You lied. Period. You get your "understanding" from your own insane
> delusions.
LOL
Make up your mind: lying requires intent and therefore if I'm
delusional, I can't be lying.
>
>
>
> > That's what normal people do, Scottie.
>
> Normal people don't make up such ridiculous lies, wack job. But you
> wouldn't know that, since you're not normal. Just a mentally ill
> freak lying his ass off.
LOL
>
>
>
> > > > > I'd tell you that you should be ashamed of yourself, but you are awash
> > > > > in shame. You are so incredibly stupid and sick that you will never
> > > > > deal with your own pathetic, despicable lack of any manhood.
> > > > > How truly disgusting. How sick. How Alan Baker.
>
> > > > LOL
>
> > > How truly disgusting. How sick. How Alan Baker, deranged delusional
> > > pathological liar and craven coward.
>
> > LOL
>
> When busted lying your ass off about my dead brother, you LOL. How
> truly disgusting.
Just to be clear: I'm laughing at you, Scottie, not your dead brother.
Bob F
His detractors are responding to his never ending name calling, boasting, and
claims of superiority with no basis in fact. Many of us have tried to get
rational explanations for his claims, to no avail. Everyone that responds to him
with any questions obout his claims immediately become "gappers" and more. Good
luck being the nice gut to him. Try to get real info from him and see how long
it lasts.
Evojeesus
wrote:
> On Dec 12, 9:05 am, pigo <bobt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What's to "read beyond the images". That's pretty much all I do. I'm
> > quite familiar with the "forces on the human body".
> The force is invisible, so is the momentum, and certain movements
> cannot be done without the adequate momentums; your "hinge-door" joint
> movements would only destroy it.
Momentum is mass times velocity so it's always visible.Expert skiers
can appreciate what you're doing perfectly well, it's not rocket
science or esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
taichiskiing
> On Dec 13, 3:25 pm, taichiskiing <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 12, 9:05 am, pigo <bobt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > What's to "read beyond the images". That's pretty much all I do. I'm
> > > quite familiar with the "forces on the human body".
> > The force is invisible, so is the momentum, and certain movements
> > cannot be done without the adequate momentums; your "hinge-door" joint
> > movements would only destroy it.
>
> can appreciate what you're doing perfectly well, it's not rocket
> science or esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
Nice formula, but no, it only describes a "behavior" of the object,
but not momentum/force itself. In a straight line motion, centripetal
force doesn't exist, so is the centrifugal force; however, once the
motion moves out the straight line, both centripetal force and
centrifugal force come to exist at the same time. How do they happen?
Yes, it is the rocket science, and is known throughout the physics
community; only layman thinks that as esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
So, "Expert skiers can appreciate what you're doing perfectly well,"
but you non-experts can only do your own "esoteric mumbo-jumbo"?
:)
IS
taichiskiing
> His detractors are responding to his never ending name calling, boasting, and
> claims of superiority with no basis in fact.
Of course, given that you don't dare to "admit" that you are skier,
anything I do on skis will probably be a boasting to you.
> Many of us have tried to get rational explanations for
> his claims, to no avail. Everyone that responds to him
> with any questions obout his claims immediately become "gappers" and more.
Gappers are gappers; you are a turkey pretending that you know how to
fly like a eagle. See the *gap* there?
> Good luck being the nice gut to him.
> Try to get real info from him and see how long
> it lasts.
Even a 12 yo can learn from me to complete this long Taichi,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2dQKG0GxLM
Really, how long can you last, and how much do you know, and how much
will you learn?
:)
IS
Richard Henry
wrote:
> On Dec 15, 1:38 am, Evojeesus <evojee...@mailinator.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 13, 3:25 pm, taichiskiing <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 12, 9:05 am, pigo <bobt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > What's to "read beyond the images". That's pretty much all I do. I'm
> > > > quite familiar with the "forces on the human body".
> > > The force is invisible, so is the momentum, and certain movements
> > > cannot be done without the adequate momentums; your "hinge-door" joint
> > > movements would only destroy it.
>
> > Momentum is mass times velocity so it's always visible. Expert skiers
> > can appreciate what you're doing perfectly well, it's not rocket
> > science or esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
>
> Nice formula, but no, it only describes a "behavior" of the object,
> but not momentum/force itself. In a straight line motion, centripetal
> force doesn't exist, so is the centrifugal force; however, once the
> motion moves out the straight line, both centripetal force and
> centrifugal force come to exist at the same time. How do they happen?
> Yes, it is the rocket science, and is known throughout the physics
> community; only layman thinks that as esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
Talk about your mumbo-jumbo!
Where's Mr. physics guy?
Bob F
>> boasting, and claims of superiority with no basis in fact.
>
>
>> Many of us have tried to get rational explanations for
>> his claims, to no avail. Everyone that responds to him
>> with any questions obout his claims immediately become "gappers" and
>> more.
>
> fly like a eagle. See the *gap* there?
>
>> Try to get real info from him and see how long
>> it lasts.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2dQKG0GxLM
>
>
See what I mean?
Alan Baker
<1395249f-8237-4d2a...@a10g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
taichiskiing <thedreamo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 1:38 am, Evojeesus <evojee...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 13, 3:25 pm, taichiskiing <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 12, 9:05 am, pigo <bobt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > What's to "read beyond the images". That's pretty much all I do. I'm
> > > > quite familiar with the "forces on the human body".
> > > The force is invisible, so is the momentum, and certain movements
> > > cannot be done without the adequate momentums; your "hinge-door" joint
> > > movements would only destroy it.
> >
> > Momentum is mass times velocity so it's always visible. Expert skiers
> > can appreciate what you're doing perfectly well, it's not rocket
> > science or esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
>
> Nice formula, but no,
Actually, yes.
> it only describes a "behavior" of the object,
> but not momentum/force itself. In a straight line motion, centripetal
> force doesn't exist, so is the centrifugal force; however, once the
> motion moves out the straight line, both centripetal force and
> centrifugal force come to exist at the same time. How do they happen?
Centrifugal force never exists.
> Yes, it is the rocket science, and is known throughout the physics
> community; only layman thinks that as esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
>
> So, "Expert skiers can appreciate what you're doing perfectly well,"
> but you non-experts can only do your own "esoteric mumbo-jumbo"?
How would you know what experts can do?
The Dream of Meat Whistle
> In article
> <0d1ff43f-e84b-417e-95d5-f9589ab8c...@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
>
Are you kidding they are super heros. Bellicose Man and his trusty
sidekick Clumsy, roving the west doing battle with truthiness,
smorgasboards, and having to pay for anything.
taichiskiing
Yup, a loser doesn't know that it has lost long ago.
:)
IS
Alan Baker
<cfa5bcd0-cbc5-4c3f...@y32g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
taichiskiing <thedreamo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
For your first lesson in actual English comprehension, look up "irony".
taichiskiing
> taichiskiing <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 15, 8:40 am, "Bob F" <bobnos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > taichiskiing wrote:
> > > > On Dec 14, 6:17 pm, "Bob F" <bobnos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> His detractors are responding to his never ending name calling,
> > > >> boasting, and claims of superiority with no basis in fact.
>
> > > > Of course, given that you don't dare to "admit" that you are skier,
> > > > anything I do on skis will probably be a boasting for you.
>
> > > >> Many of us have tried to get rational explanations for
> > > >> his claims, to no avail. Everyone that responds to him
> > > >> with any questions obout his claims immediately become "gappers" and
> > > >> more.
>
> > > > Gappers are gappers; you are a turkey pretending that you know how to
> > > > fly like a eagle. See the *gap* there?
>
> > > >> Good luck being the nice gut to him.
> > > >> Try to get real info from him and see how long
> > > >> it lasts.
>
> > > > Even a 12 yo can learn from me to complete this long Taichi,
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2dQKG0GxLM
>
> > > > Really, how long can you last, and how much do you know?
>
> > > See what I mean?
>
> > Yup, a loser doesn't know that it has lost long ago.
>
> For your first lesson in actual English comprehension, look up "irony".
Really, what do you win? Mr. boring cheap shameless LOL?
:)
IS
taichiskiing
> taichiskiing <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 15, 1:38 am, Evojeesus <evojee...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> > > On Dec 13, 3:25 pm, taichiskiing <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 12, 9:05 am, pigo <bobt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > What's to "read beyond the images". That's pretty much all I do. I'm
> > > > > quite familiar with the "forces on the human body".
> > > > The force is invisible, so is the momentum, and certain movements
> > > > cannot be done without the adequate momentums; your "hinge-door" joint
> > > > movements would only destroy it.
>
> > > Momentum is mass times velocity so it's always visible. Expert skiers
> > > can appreciate what you're doing perfectly well, it's not rocket
> > > science or esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
>
> > Nice formula, but no,
>
> Actually, yes.
No, just make a opposite to my statement does not make an argument.
> > it only describes a "behavior" of the object,
> > but not momentum/force itself. In a straight line motion, centripetal
> > force doesn't exist, so is the centrifugal force; however, once the
> > motion moves out the straight line, both centripetal force and
> > centrifugal force come to exist at the same time. How do they happen?
>
> Centrifugal force never exists.
Learn how to duck, it may actually save your life one day,
http://www.taomartialarts.com/misc/chain_weapon.jpg
> > Yes, it is the rocket science, and is known throughout the physics
> > community; only layman thinks that as esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
>
> > So, "Expert skiers can appreciate what you're doing perfectly well,"
> > but you non-experts can only do your own "esoteric mumbo-jumbo"?
>
> How would you know what experts can do?
No more than "press on the base to go straight, and press on the edges
to turn."
:)
IS
Alan Baker
<d42c0510-b86a-494d...@g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
taichiskiing <thedreamo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Learn physics. Centrifugal force DOES NOT EXIST.
>
> > > Yes, it is the rocket science, and is known throughout the physics
> > > community; only layman thinks that as esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
> >
> > > So, "Expert skiers can appreciate what you're doing perfectly well,"
> > > but you non-experts can only do your own "esoteric mumbo-jumbo"?
> >
> > How would you know what experts can do?
>
> No more than "press on the base to go straight, and press on the edges
> to turn."
I don't know who you think you are quoting.
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
taichiskiing
Before I continue, let me do a roll call, how many of you support Alan
Baker argument?
> > > > Yes, it is the rocket science, and is known throughout the physics
> > > > community; only layman thinks that as esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
>
> > > > So, "Expert skiers can appreciate what you're doing perfectly well,"
> > > > but you non-experts can only do your own "esoteric mumbo-jumbo"?
>
> > > How would you know what experts can do?
>
> > No more than "press on the base to go straight, and press on the edges
> > to turn."
>
> I don't know who you think you are quoting.
The Flatboarding theory.
:)
IS
Dave Cartman
<947bf1a7-6424-4c39...@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
I was just surprised that with all that enhanced situational awareness
from "training in violence" and other sillyness, he'd have so many close
calls with RSA members and not know it. What if one of them had some
really dangerous on them like a restaurant tab or a bill for for cable
tv. What then!?!
Dave Cartman
<1395249f-8237-4d2a...@a10g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
taichiskiing <thedreamo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Nice formula, but no, it only describes a "behavior" of the object,
> but not momentum/force itself. In a straight line motion, centripetal
> force doesn't exist, so is the centrifugal force; however, once the
> motion moves out the straight line, both centripetal force and
> centrifugal force come to exist at the same time.
Have you ever considered writing a textbook of physics? Your mastery of
the subject is only rivaled by your social skills.
Richard Henry
Bob F
Ther you go again. Never anything even remotely useful to offer.
Bob F
Just the ones that know basic physics.
>
>>>>> Yes, it is the rocket science, and is known throughout the physics
>>>>> community; only layman thinks that as esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
>>
>>>>> So, "Expert skiers can appreciate what you're doing perfectly
>>>>> well," but you non-experts can only do your own "esoteric
>>>>> mumbo-jumbo"?
>>
>>>> How would you know what experts can do?
>>
>>> No more than "press on the base to go straight, and press on the
>>> edges to turn."
>>
>> I don't know who you think you are quoting.
>
> The Flatboarding theory.
Whatever that is.
Bob F
You've gat that dead right. He mutilates both completely.
twobuddha
EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!!!
twobuddha
> The Dream of Meat Whistle <3l30n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 13, 7:12 pm, Dave Cartman <ver...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <0d1ff43f-e84b-417e-95d5-f9589ab8c...@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > twobuddha <twobud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > That's quite true, as a martial artist, I always "feel" my
> > > > > surrounding, and I ski as a martial art practice. As the time goes on,
> > > > > the "feeling" develops the "intelligence" on its own, so the body
> > > > > responds to the change spontaneously. That's the thrilling of the
> > > > > skiing I'm really skiing for.
>
> > > > As a life long team sport athlete, I learned spacial awareness and how
> > > > to judge movement in games.
> > > > Which comes in handy every once in a while.
> > > > My ski partner last week never played football or basketball. On
> > > > empty slopes, he would frequently come uncomfortably close because he
> > > > does not have the skills of spatial perception I do.
>
> > > Dude! You two are like super heros!!!
>
> > Are you kidding they are super heros. Bellicose Man and his trusty
> > sidekick Clumsy, roving the west doing battle with truthiness,
> > smorgasboards, and having to pay for anything.
Is that anything like Dickless Ponytailed Boarder and Pumpkinhead,
along with Wack Job Waterboy, hiding and running and only doing battle
while hiding behind their computers wearing Depends?
Oh, yeah. We did hit a smorg in Canuckistan. Yummy.
And we had to pay for a lift ticket. One lift ticket in four days.
Life is a bitch, eh, freak?
>
> I was just surprised that with all that enhanced situational awareness
> from "training in violence" and other sillyness, he'd have so many close
> calls with RSA members and not know it.
A close encounter would be one where you got close to me, Depends
Boi. You hid. Ran. Dumped a load in your pants.
Here's a clue, beetch. I'm not worried about running into you freaks
for two reasons: None of you could take me on the best day of your
life, and it is certain that none of you will ever try. Not man
enough. As sure as the sun rises in the morning, you freaks will do
an Erik Leonard. Run, hide, anything but be a man.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Damn, that's funny.
> What if one of them had some
> really dangerous on them like a restaurant tab or a bill for for cable
> tv. What then!?!-
The notion of you being dangerous is hilarious. Thanks for the laugh,
Depends Boi. What are you going to do, take off your diaper and slap
me with the load?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Geez, this is funny.
twobuddha
>
>
>
>
>
> taichiskiing <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 15, 8:40 am, "Bob F" <bobnos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > taichiskiing wrote:
> > > > On Dec 14, 6:17 pm, "Bob F" <bobnos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> His detractors are responding to his never ending name calling,
> > > >> boasting, and claims of superiority with no basis in fact.
>
> > > > Of course, given that you don't dare to "admit" that you are skier,
> > > > anything I do on skis will probably be a boasting for you.
>
> > > >> Many of us have tried to get rational explanations for
> > > >> his claims, to no avail. Everyone that responds to him
> > > >> with any questions obout his claims immediately become "gappers" and
> > > >> more.
>
> > > > Gappers are gappers; you are a turkey pretending that you know how to
> > > > fly like a eagle. See the *gap* there?
>
> > > >> Good luck being the nice gut to him.
> > > >> Try to get real info from him and see how long
> > > >> it lasts.
>
> > > > Even a 12 yo can learn from me to complete this long Taichi,
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2dQKG0GxLM
>
> > > > Really, how long can you last, and how much do you know?
>
> > > See what I mean?
>
> > Yup, a loser doesn't know that it has lost long ago.
>
> For your first lesson in actual English comprehension, look up "irony".
For your umpteenth lesson in actual English comprehension, look up
"sanity".
Richard Henry
Just show one post that backs that up, and I will no longer call you
fat, coward, liar, or blowhard.
twobuddha
Awwwwwwwwwwwwww, Dickless Emergency Soccer Game Boi, are you trying to
negotiate? Bugs you that the truth gets told about you?
Tell you what, you stupid freak. You had a lot of fun making up and
repeating the slur that I used an Emergency Softball Game to avoid
meeting a freak who would not identify himself, expected me to show up
not knowing what he/she looked like, set a time and place and expected
me to take the word of a stalking pathological liar, etc. Of course,
the freak never showed when I told the freak I had a makeup softball
game. I gave a full day of notice, including the time and the place.
Had a lot of fun, eh, Dickless Henry? So am I.
You will pardon me if I use the same tactic you used, with a helluva
lot more accuracy. You chickened out on coming to Seattle for an
EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!!!
Tell you what, freak. You show up and spew your shit in person, and I
will no longer call you a coward, a psychopath, a stalker, a freak, a
blowhard fraud, and Dickless Henry. Until that time, EMERGENCY SOCCER
GAME!!!!!!!!!
Richard Henry
You still haven't shown any posts to back up your "emergency soccer
game" claim, so I assume you want everyone to know that you are still
a fat, lying, cowardly, bullying blowhard.
But everyone already knew that.
Alan Baker
<2980b4be-883e-489e...@f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
taichiskiing <thedreamo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Well certainly, all the people who understand physics.
>
> > > > > Yes, it is the rocket science, and is known throughout the physics
> > > > > community; only layman thinks that as esoteric mumbo-jumbo.
> >
> > > > > So, "Expert skiers can appreciate what you're doing perfectly well,"
> > > > > but you non-experts can only do your own "esoteric mumbo-jumbo"?
> >
> > > > How would you know what experts can do?
> >
> > > No more than "press on the base to go straight, and press on the edges
> > > to turn."
> >
> > I don't know who you think you are quoting.
>
> The Flatboarding theory.
LOL
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
twobuddha
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Hey, if I was such a cowardly, bullying blowhard, you would have shown
up like you said you would.
EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!!!
You can assume I am laughing my ass off at you, coward. But I won't
call you a bully. You ain't got the balls to try to bully me in
person, but I absolutely guarantee that if I ever see your face, I
damn sure will bully you around, freak. With great pleasure.
>
> But everyone already knew that
Nope. Because they would have shown at one of the many other meets I
have set up. Everybody here knows me, and everybody here fears me
just like you fear me. I am the MAN!!!!!! And you are Dickless
Henry. Everybody knows that.
EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!!!!
Keep making excuses for your cowardice, Dickless Henry. Same shit,
different day.
Alan Baker
<750f3fb5-070f-4b82...@b36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
twobuddha <twob...@gmail.com> wrote:
He never said he would show up.
But if you have any evidence that he did:
Let's see the post.
Richard Henry
>
> - Show quoted text -
Richard Henry
Like I said I would? Show the post, Scott.
> EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!!!
> You can assume I am laughing my ass off at you, coward. But I won't
> call you a bully. You ain't got the balls to try to bully me in
> person, but I absolutely guarantee that if I ever see your face, I
> damn sure will bully you around, freak. With great pleasure.
Ooh, I'm so frightened!!!! You fat, cowardly bully
It's easy to get me to shut up and leave all your posts alone - just
show the post.
> > But everyone already knew that
>
> Nope. Because they would have shown at one of the many other meets I
> have set up. Everybody here knows me, and everybody here fears me
> just like you fear me. I am the MAN!!!!!! And you are Dickless
> Henry. Everybody knows that.
> EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!!!!
Show the post, Scott.
> Keep making excuses for your cowardice, Dickless Henry. Same shit,
> different day.
I'm not making any excuses. You're the one who can't show the post,
the one making excuses for your lies.
taichiskiing
> taichiskiing <thedreamofbutter...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Before I continue, let me do a roll call, how many of you support Alan
> > Baker argument?
>
> Well certainly, all the people who understand physics.
So, there's no one to support your argument? How about you, Richard
Henry, you seem to claim that you know something about how other
people don't know physics. C'mon, gappers, don't you want to support
your comrades? So, who are "the people who understand physics"? Let's
have some names.
No, "all the people who understand physics" will not support your
argument.
> > > I don't know who you think you are quoting.
>
> > The Flatboarding theory.
>
> LOL
Yup, Mr. boring cheap LOL.
:)
IS
taichiskiing
> taichiskiing wrote:
> > Before I continue, let me do a roll call, how many of you support Alan
> > Baker argument?
>
> Just the ones that know basic physics.
The question is *who*? Will you say that "I'm Bob F/YOUR NAME, I
support Alan Baker's argument that "Centrifugal force DOES NOT EXIST"?
Just "yes" or "no," let's see how you gappers going to weasel out this
one.
No, no ones that know basic phsics would agree with Alan Baker's
argument.
> > The Flatboarding theory.
>
> Whatever that is.
So it goes, :)
IS
pigo
>
> - Show quoted text -
See Stuart? This is what I was talking about. He makes up some crap,
gets caught, and won't even show the post. It's been over ten years
now. We've got him figured out. Now we're just waiting for him to die.
Evojeesus
wrote:
> On Dec 15, 11:34 am, "Bob F" <bobnos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > taichiskiing wrote:
> > > Before I continue, let me do a roll call, how many of you support Alan
> > > Baker argument?
> > Just the ones that know basic physics.
> The question is *who*? Will you say that "I'm Bob F/YOUR NAME, I
> support Alan Baker's argument that "Centrifugal force DOES NOT EXIST"?
> Just "yes" or "no," let's see how you gappers going to weasel out this
> one.
Before you start you should state whether you've ever admitted having
been wrong on this forum. As far as I can recall you have been quilty
of weaseling out yourself...
Richard Henry
wrote:
I have training in more than basic physics. I was an honors student
enrolled as a college physics major, completing courses such as
Theoretical Mechanics, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Vector
Calculus, Advanced Calculus, Differential Equations - but enough of my
qualifications. Baker is correct - there is no formal concept known
as Centrifugal Force. That is a misconception given to the illusion
of a force felt by humans undergoing a continuing acceleration usually
caused by the application of a centripetal force applied to the human
directly or indirectly through the object to which the human is
attached.
I also took courses in psychology, which makes you interesting in a
different way.
twobuddha
> I also took courses in psychology, which makes you interesting in a
> different way.
Shame that you won't look at yourself. Compulsive, pathological liar,
psychopath, stalker, craven coward, manipulative freak: you are a
poster child in an abnormal psychology class.
twobuddha
Weaseling is the RSA ethos. Funny that you never call your buddies
out on this issue, when they lie their sick asses off, but pile on
Toecheese.
Irony meter goes flat skiing.
Richard Henry
Show the post, Scott.
twobuddha
There are times that the insanity of Bob Thompson is truly beyond
belief. This crap from Birther Bob, Swift Boat Bob, GW Bob, Child
Molester Bob.
Especially considering that HE promised to meet Henry in Seattle, then
pussied out when I leapt at the opportunity to hear him spew his crap
face to face. How embarassing for Thompson. Unfortunately, his brain
is so far gone from years of alcoholism and cocaine abuse that he
cannot comprehend reality.
>He makes up some crap,
Irony meter converts to Mormonism.
> gets caught, and won't even show the post. It's been over ten years
> now. We've got him figured out. Now we're just waiting for him to die.-
You could always try yourself, freak, you've threatened my life on
enough occasions.
Ooooops, forgot. That would take balls.
twobuddha
Tell ya what, freak. Show up in person, I show the post. You know,
no EMERGENCY SOCCER GAMES!!!!!
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> > Keep making excuses for your cowardice, Dickless Henry. Same shit,
> > different day.
>
> I'm not making any excuses.
EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Same shit, different day. I just love it when you freaks squirm and
wiggle and try to rationalize NONE of you ever being man enough to
spew your crap in person.
Especially you, you dickless stalking freak.
> You're the one who can't show the post,
> the one making excuses for your lies.-
Wrong again, freak. I could. But I won't play your game. YOU are
the one making excuses for your cowardice and dickless lack of any
manhood.
EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!!!!!
Damn, this is fun.
twobuddha
Show up and ask in person, like a man, freak. Ooooops, forgot. You
ain't got the balls. Couple hundred miles away, but instead of being
a man, you came up with an EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!
>
> > EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!!!
> > You can assume I am laughing my ass off at you, coward. But I won't
> > call you a bully. You ain't got the balls to try to bully me in
> > person, but I absolutely guarantee that if I ever see your face, I
> > damn sure will bully you around, freak. With great pleasure.
>
> Ooh, I'm so frightened!!!! You fat, cowardly bully
Yes, you are frightened. Totally terrified, and we both know it. For
damn sure, I can and will bully you if I ever see you in person, and
there won't be a fucking thing you can or would do about it.
EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!!!
>
> It's easy to get me to shut up and leave all your posts alone - just
> show the post.
>
> > > But everyone already knew that
>
> > Nope. Because they would have shown at one of the many other meets I
> > have set up. Everybody here knows me, and everybody here fears me
> > just like you fear me. I am the MAN!!!!!! And you are Dickless
> > Henry. Everybody knows that.
> > EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Show the post, Scott.
Sure. In person. Bluff called. Hey, do they play soccer in the
winter? Bet you suddenly found out that you're scheduled for games
every day through 2012.
>
> > Keep making excuses for your cowardice, Dickless Henry. Same shit,
> > different day.
>
> I'm not making any excuses.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!
> You're the one who can't show the post,
> the one making excuses for your lies.-
Not can't, freak. Won't. You know you are lying, I know you are
lying, everybody knows you are lying.
How embarassing for you. Not only did you run and hide, but now you
have to keep trying to cover up the reality of your profound and
public embarassment.
You're almost as much fun as Depends Boi Leonard.
EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!!!!
twobuddha
Whistler Boi jumps in to defend another craven coward who pussied out
on spewing his crap in person.
Ah, this is rich. Same answer.
Go fuck yourself, coward.
Alan Baker
<27e193aa-9201-4d5a...@f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
twobuddha <twob...@gmail.com> wrote:
He didn't promise to meet him in Seattle, Scott. That is false.
Richard:
"He knows where I am (Room 228, Red Lion Inn, McMinnville Oregon)."
Bob:
"Ok. I'll come up there. How long will you be there?"
<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skiing.alpine/msg/84c5e49d028a0115?hl
=en>
Too bad reality always kicks you in the ass, huh?
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia