jujitsu wrote:
NAUI is still a strong organization but has had some problems. They
actually went bancrupt here in Canada several years back due to poor
business management, but are now up and running regaining market share in
this country. The problem the non profit agencies have is that PADI's for
profit McDiver philosophy has been very effective in increasing % market
share. I am a PADI dive master but am seriously considering the possibility
of switching to NAUI to get my instructor ticket. While PADI is the
biggest, I am not convinced they are necessarily the best organization.
Greg
Where are you diving?
I've heard that back East, many more of the shops tend to be PADI than
NAUI (so more people would be cert'ed PADI). Out here in California
the reverse seems to be true - I know more NAUI cert'ed divers, and I
can't think of more than a handful of PADI cert'ed divers.
- heck
>Maybe this is a dumb question. I've been out of the loop a while. I was
>an active scuba diver until about the mid-80's. I used to meet as many
>who were NAUI cert'ed as PADI, but not anymore. Anyone know why?
NAUI is alive and well in Ottawa, Ontario. A group of us got
certified last spring, through Burton's dive shop. The course was
excellent and thorough. I had asked around before deciding, and
NAUI/Burton's was the feedback I received.
There are a few PADI shops, and PADI seems to be much better
represented in most cities.
They recently moved HW to Tampa, have had a significant increase in
certifications, has made significant inroads on the international markets and
has created a significantly powerful and well designed technical program.
Joel Silverstein
NAUI Course Director
www.NitroxDiver.com
Exactly - You might just get a clue, instead of getting a
PADI scam. NAUI takes dive education seriously, whereas
PADI appears to just be interested in their pyramid scheme
business opportunities. PADI is big. NAUI trains better. As
someone here has in his sig, "My opinion, and worth
everything you paid for it."
> Exactly - You might just get a clue, instead of getting a
> PADI scam. NAUI takes dive education seriously, whereas
> PADI appears to just be interested in their pyramid scheme
> business opportunities. PADI is big. NAUI trains better. As
> someone here has in his sig, "My opinion, and worth
> everything you paid for it."
>
That's MY occassional sig, whatever-your-name-is. And I'm also a PADI member.
I like PADI. They trained me well, they support me when I need it. My SO was
trained by NAUI. Her training was no better, no worse than mine at the same
level. My sister is SSI certified. She's competent, too. PADI has no pyramid
scheme in operation. They may be big, they may be for-profit and you may hate
them. But please refrain from slandering them with criminal accusations. If
you have legitimate complaints, feel free to ennumerate them and we can have
a discussion. Otherwise, please go away.
Just my opinion - and the facts, Jack.
--
Perry
x-no-archive: yes
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
No. We are both entitled to our opinions. I'm certified
both PADI and NAUI. As you'll see in another post, MY
preference is NAUI. That doesn't mean PADI doesn't turn out
competent divers. I just don't like the way they do
business, and *I* believe, both from personal experience and
observation that NAUI's training is more thorough. You
disagree - Ok with me. I'm still not going away.
I guess that's really all I'm saying, except that I just
don't like the *way* they do business. The "Diving Society"
for one thing, has me pissed.
Interesting maybe yes. Did NAUI resort to the deceptive
practices that PADI has with direct mail advertising
specifically designed to look like a bill that you're
*supposed* to pay? I rather doubt it, if for no other
reason than the fact that PADI is a for-profit agency,
whereas NAUI is a non-profit one. It isn't the "diving
society" itself that has me pissed - it's the *method* by
which they "advertise." It's deceptive, and even if I had
NO concerns about their training methods, this would drop
them way down as far as any respect or credibility is
concerned. Mainly, the reason I sort of "backed off" a
little was that when I read the post from the newbie who is
now concerned about his choice of classes, I was reminded
that some of our words here have a different effect on those
who are new - or about to be - to our wonderful sport.
Sometimes we (I) get all hung up on the details and forget
that there are others who read this stuff a bit differently.
I don't feel that's necessary and become concerned myself
with the effect. I know of no agencies who don't turn out
basically safe, competent divers. After that, it's up to
both the instructor AND the student as to what they do with
it. Instead of "bad," I'd rather just say "weak" and then
that further knowledge is up to the new diver to gain and
understand. His presence on this NG is a good start, even
if the rest of us tend to be - er, "blunt" sometimes. Can
we agree on THAT?
As a point of interest, Blue Cross in most states is (or was when I worked
for them) a not-for-profit corporation. Anyone want to make bets on whether
or not they made a profit last year?
If you didn't like the way your PADI/NAUI/YMCA/XYZ/whatever instructor
trained
you, complain to the agency but be sure you have the facts or it will not
amount
to anything. Point out the standard that was violated or keep quiet.
Chuck Hopf
>Thats all I need to see of this drivel.
<snip>
>If you didn't like the way your PADI/NAUI/YMCA/XYZ/whatever
instructor
>trained
>you, complain to the agency but be sure you have the facts
or it will not
>amount
>to anything. Point out the standard that was violated or
keep quiet.
>
>Chuck Hopf
Well, I guess my efforts didn't work and we *can't* agree on
anything can we?
In that case, understand you may not get me to leave (as in
your last post) and I will not "keep quiet." No standards
were violated. That's the very issue - weak standards.
I suppose now I have to resort to a much more academic way
of saying it - "fuck off!"
All agencies need money to function, to maintain an office staff,
process cards, etc. Instructors need to make at least enough to cover
expenses like insurance and renewal. Not all are about money by
philosophy however. The YMCA is still a not for profit organization, and
the charter of the YMCA insures that it will remain that way.
Alan Golden
YMCA instructor # 054-50-9687