Stop H.R. 998 the "Homosexual Classrooms Act"

[Gays Attack Classrooms]

Stop Sen. Al Franken from homosexualizing public school
classrooms.

Stop mandatory pro-homosexual lectures to kids. Please select,
sign, and WE WILL FAX your petition to all 535 members of
Congress (saving you time!) to oppose and filibuster S.555 +
H.R. 998 the "Homosexual Classrooms Act" aka Student Non-
Discrimination.

http://stopsb48.com/

Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) has gained 5 Representatives and 2
Senators since last week, now with 155 House co-sponsors and 36
Senators supporting two truly demonic bills, S. 555 and H.R.
998. These bills violate public school children in all 50 states
by requiring mandatory pro-homosexual lectures to kids of all
ages (including kindergarten and 1st grade). Schools that
decline will lose funding.

The Washington Times confirms Democrats #1 education priority is
to homosexualize children in the classroom, by passing Senator
Al Franken's S. 555 and H.R. 998.

The bills "would be more appropriately titled the 'GLBT Student
Promotion Act,' " says the top lawyer for Concerned Women for
America, Mario Diaz. "The aim of the legislation is not the
protection of students. SNDA is a Trojan horse with the
objective of promoting acceptance of GLBT behavior by
eradicating deeply held [Christian] beliefs that proponents view
as 'homophobic.'

Stop this terrible piece of legislation and shove it up that
clown Franken's ass.

[Brian Salter-Duke]

As someone from the other side of the world, I will not comment on the
specifics of this Bill. However, it is clear in my country that getting
school students to show tolerance to gay and lesbian people is an
excellent idea. People do not chose to be gay or lesbian. Many teanage
students are driven to suicide by their peers showing total intolerance.
For Scouts to show tolerance, and I think that is what the Bill is all
about, is for Scouts to "do a good turn and help others. Whether you
chose to admit gay or lesbian leaders or members is up to you. We
decided long ago to do so, concentrating only on avoiding those who
abuse children, whether gay or straight. It does not encourage people to
be gay or lesbian. As I said that is not a choice.

["Followup-To:" header set to rec.scouting.issues.]

--
Brian Salter-Duke Melbourne, Australia
My real address is b_duke(AT)bigpond(DOT)net(DOT)au
Use this for reply or followup
Scouting: Tolerant, Pluralistic and Open to all young people.

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:45:09 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke
<b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:

> People do not chose to be gay or lesbian.

We don't choose other sicknesses either but we usually seek a cure for
them.

Hugh

[Brian Salter-Duke]

I thought you would join in, Hugh. Good to see you are still watching
this rather dead group. The scientific evidence is against you. Being
attracted to the same sex and wanting sexual fulfillment is no more a
sickness that being attracted to the opposite sex and wanting sexual
fulfillment. Thinking it is a sickness is just a prejudice, but at your
age you are not going to lose your prejudices so I will leave it at
that. However, forcing confused teenagers to commit suicide by their
prejudiced peers, is a sickness and that needs curing.

Brian.

> Hugh

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:44:21 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke

<b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:

>On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:30:12 GMT, J. Hugh Sullivan <Ea...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:45:09 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke
>><b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> People do not chose to be gay or lesbian.
>>
>> We don't choose other sicknesses either but we usually seek a cure for
>> them.
>
>I thought you would join in, Hugh. Good to see you are still watching
>this rather dead group.

I wondered about you also. I'm sorta glad the group is essentially
dead. BSA is not going to change and the situation could easily
escalate to violence.

You and I are much like Mrs. Lincoln - except for THAT she might have
enjoyed the play.

>The scientific evidence is against you. Being
>attracted to the same sex and wanting sexual fulfillment is no more a
>sickness that being attracted to the opposite sex and wanting sexual
>fulfillment.

The last evidence I saw was that they had one gene that was different
from normal people. I use "normal" because God's plan was for people
to procreate. If survival of the human race was not the plan we might
all be queer.

>Thinking it is a sickness is just a prejudice, but at your
>age you are not going to lose your prejudices so I will leave it at
>that. However, forcing confused teenagers to commit suicide by their
>prejudiced peers, is a sickness and that needs curing.

I was not confused as a teenager. And I presume the weakness that
would allow one to commit suicide is another sickness that needs a
cure.

Perhaps you understand weak people - I do not.

Hugh

[Brian Salter-Duke]

On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:05:18 GMT, J. Hugh Sullivan <Ea...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:44:21 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke
><b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:30:12 GMT, J. Hugh Sullivan <Ea...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:45:09 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke
>>><b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> People do not chose to be gay or lesbian.
>>>
>>> We don't choose other sicknesses either but we usually seek a cure for
>>> them.
>>
>>I thought you would join in, Hugh. Good to see you are still watching
>>this rather dead group.
>
> I wondered about you also. I'm sorta glad the group is essentially
> dead. BSA is not going to change and the situation could easily
> escalate to violence.

Violence?? What do you anticipate? I think BSA will change, or it will
die in the more liberal states. Maybe it will just evolve so gays are
accepted in some places and not in others.

> You and I are much like Mrs. Lincoln - except for THAT she might have
> enjoyed the play.
>
>>The scientific evidence is against you. Being
>>attracted to the same sex and wanting sexual fulfillment is no more a
>>sickness that being attracted to the opposite sex and wanting sexual
>>fulfillment.
>
> The last evidence I saw was that they had one gene that was different
> from normal people. I use "normal" because God's plan was for people
> to procreate. If survival of the human race was not the plan we might
> all be queer.

One gene is enough, but it is not just about genes.

>>Thinking it is a sickness is just a prejudice, but at your
>>age you are not going to lose your prejudices so I will leave it at
>>that. However, forcing confused teenagers to commit suicide by their
>>prejudiced peers, is a sickness and that needs curing.
>
> I was not confused as a teenager. And I presume the weakness that
> would allow one to commit suicide is another sickness that needs a
> cure.

I was not confused as a teenager. However, it is quite clear that many
teenagers who suspect that they are gay get very confused, very unhappy
and sometimes suicidial when faced by a society that tells them that
they are not normal, that God hates them and so on.

Interestingly just after posting yesterday I was reading in the
newspaper about results from the recently published Australian census.
40% of gays in Australia are Christian, less than the percentage of
non-gays, but significant nevertheless. The churches are divided here.
Some are strongly anti-gay but many now accept gays and give no credence
to the phrases in the old testement that appear to condemn it. All
Christions give no credence to other phrases in the old testement. More
gays ticked the "No religion" box than non-gays did by quite a lot, but
that is not surprising. The stance of some christians does not force
gays to be non-gays. It just gets them to give up on christianity as a
hatefull and unhelpfull organisation.

> Perhaps you understand weak people - I do not.

I do not think gays are weak. People who commit suicide may be weak. If
so then Scouters need to understand weak people, as they need to
understand all boys. You have a weakness. You do not understand weak
people.

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:25:03 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke
<b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:

>On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:05:18 GMT, J. Hugh Sullivan <Ea...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

>> I wondered about you also. I'm sorta glad the group is essentially
>> dead. BSA is not going to change and the situation could easily
>> escalate to violence.
>
>Violence?? What do you anticipate?

The reverse of what used to be... In my youth queers were beaten if
they "got out of line". The pendulum never stops swinging - too moral
to too liberal and back to too moral in the future.

>I think BSA will change, or it will
>die in the more liberal states. Maybe it will just evolve so gays are
>accepted in some places and not in others.

It's entirely possible that BSA will die in the liberal states. That's
better than acceptance.

>> I was not confused as a teenager. And I presume the weakness that
>> would allow one to commit suicide is another sickness that needs a
>> cure.
>
>I was not confused as a teenager. However, it is quite clear that many
>teenagers who suspect that they are gay get very confused, very unhappy
>and sometimes suicidial when faced by a society that tells them that
>they are not normal, that God hates them and so on.

Then they have a problem.

>Interestingly just after posting yesterday I was reading in the
>newspaper about results from the recently published Australian census.
>40% of gays in Australia are Christian, less than the percentage of
>non-gays, but significant nevertheless. The churches are divided here.
>Some are strongly anti-gay but many now accept gays and give no credence
>to the phrases in the old testement that appear to condemn it. All
>Christions give no credence to other phrases in the old testement. More
>gays ticked the "No religion" box than non-gays did by quite a lot, but
>that is not surprising. The stance of some christians does not force
>gays to be non-gays. It just gets them to give up on christianity as a
>hatefull and unhelpfull organisation.

Queers should be in church to ask forgiveness for their sin, just as
any other sinner. If they give up on Christianity, they lose, not me.

>
>> Perhaps you understand weak people - I do not.
>
>I do not think gays are weak. People who commit suicide may be weak. If
>so then Scouters need to understand weak people, as they need to
>understand all boys.

The purpose of BSA is to teach leadership and strong citizenship. That
is not possible if abnormal people (queers) are homogenized with
normal people.

>You have a weakness. You do not understand weak
>people.

And I do not choose to make the effort because I have always worked
with strong people.

The meek might inherit the earth but it won't take the strong very
long to get it back.

Hugh

[Brian Salter-Duke]

On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:21:51 GMT, J. Hugh Sullivan <Ea...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:25:03 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke
><b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:05:18 GMT, J. Hugh Sullivan <Ea...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>>> I wondered about you also. I'm sorta glad the group is essentially
>>> dead. BSA is not going to change and the situation could easily
>>> escalate to violence.
>>
>>Violence?? What do you anticipate?
>
> The reverse of what used to be... In my youth queers were beaten if
> they "got out of line". The pendulum never stops swinging - too moral
> to too liberal and back to too moral in the future.

So the violence is the moral position. Very sad.

I do not see the pendulum swinging back any time soon. In Europe and
Australia and in parts of the US, gays are just accepted. No fuss. No
bother.

>>I think BSA will change, or it will die in the more liberal states.
>>Maybe it will just evolve so gays are accepted in some places and not
>>in others.

> It's entirely possible that BSA will die in the liberal states. That's
> better than acceptance.

So lots of yuong people will lose the possabi;ity of taking part in a
wothwhiole movement? Again, how sad. In UK and Australia a different
route was followed. The Scouting movement is still strong and still
helps young [people to lead better lives. That is how it should.

>>> I was not confused as a teenager. And I presume the weakness that
>>> would allow one to commit suicide is another sickness that needs a
>>> cure.
>>
>>I was not confused as a teenager. However, it is quite clear that many
>>teenagers who suspect that they are gay get very confused, very unhappy
>>and sometimes suicidial when faced by a society that tells them that
>>they are not normal, that God hates them and so on.
>
> Then they have a problem.

And Scouting should help with that problem, not blame them.

>>Interestingly just after posting yesterday I was reading in the
>>newspaper about results from the recently published Australian census.
>>40% of gays in Australia are Christian, less than the percentage of
>>non-gays, but significant nevertheless. The churches are divided here.
>>Some are strongly anti-gay but many now accept gays and give no credence
>>to the phrases in the old testement that appear to condemn it. All
>>Christions give no credence to other phrases in the old testement. More
>>gays ticked the "No religion" box than non-gays did by quite a lot, but
>>that is not surprising. The stance of some christians does not force
>>gays to be non-gays. It just gets them to give up on christianity as a
>>hatefull and unhelpfull organisation.

> Queers should be in church to ask forgiveness for their sin, just as
> any other sinner. If they give up on Christianity, they lose, not me.

The gays in Australia who are Christian are convincing the church to take
a more tolerant line. They are winning too. Soon only the
fundamentalist and pentacolsta;list churches will be condemming. That
homosexuality is a sin is controversial. As a said earlier, those who
say the Bible states thsi, are quite happy to ignore many opther things
the bible says almost on the same page as the texts they quote.

>>
>>> Perhaps you understand weak people - I do not.
>>
>>I do not think gays are weak. People who commit suicide may be weak. If
>>so then Scouters need to understand weak people, as they need to
>>understand all boys.
>
> The purpose of BSA is to teach leadership and strong citizenship. That
> is not possible if abnormal people (queers) are homogenized with
> normal people.

It is perfectly possible and happens here and in the UK.

>>You have a weakness. You do not understand weak
>>people.
>
> And I do not choose to make the effort because I have always worked
> with strong people.

Then you were a very poor Scouter as Scouters have to work with all
boys and some are not strong.

> The meek might inherit the earth but it won't take the strong very
> long to get it back.

I consider that statement to be fascist. I thought you fought against
fascism. You seem to have forgotten what it was all about.

You clearly do not believe that "The meek might inherit the earth". So
here is one point where you do not follow what the Bible says.

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 00:44:46 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke
<b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:

>> The reverse of what used to be... In my youth queers were beaten if
>> they "got out of line". The pendulum never stops swinging - too moral
>> to too liberal and back to too moral in the future.
>
>So the violence is the moral position. Very sad.

God destroyed Sodom amd Gommorroh. Capital punishment has existed for
years. What is your point?

>I do not see the pendulum swinging back any time soon. In Europe and
>Australia and in parts of the US, gays are just accepted. No fuss. No
>bother.

I see it continuing to swing to a much more immoral posirtion in my
lifetime.

>> It's entirely possible that BSA will die in the liberal states. That's
>> better than acceptance.
>
>So lots of yuong people will lose the possabi;ity of taking part in a
>wothwhiole movement? Again, how sad.

How sad for those who refuse to qualify for membership in BSA. You
probably don't play professional sports or participate in Olympic
trials BECAUSE YOU DON"T QUALIFY. BSA has no more obligation to change
the standards than they.

>In UK and Australia a different
>route was followed. The Scouting movement is still strong and still
>helps young [people to lead better lives. That is how it should.

Get back to me about that when the UK is a world class power without
the USA - or Australia becomes a world class power. Our falling from
power coincides with our recognition of queers, socialists and
atheists - the very sort of immorality and ignorance (not you
personally) that you support.

>
>>>> I was not confused as a teenager. And I presume the weakness that
>>>> would allow one to commit suicide is another sickness that needs a
>>>> cure.
>>>
>>>I was not confused as a teenager. However, it is quite clear that many
>>>teenagers who suspect that they are gay get very confused, very unhappy
>>>and sometimes suicidial when faced by a society that tells them that
>>>they are not normal, that God hates them and so on.
>>
>> Then they have a problem.
>
>And Scouting should help with that problem, not blame them.

BSA helps all those who qualify for membership. Insecurity resulting
from social abnormality and failure should be treated by
professionals.

>> Queers should be in church to ask forgiveness for their sin, just as
>> any other sinner. If they give up on Christianity, they lose, not me.
>
>The gays in Australia who are Christian are convincing the church to take
>a more tolerant line. They are winning too. Soon only the
>fundamentalist and pentacolsta;list churches will be condemming. That
>homosexuality is a sin is controversial. As a said earlier, those who
>say the Bible states thsi, are quite happy to ignore many opther things
>the bible says almost on the same page as the texts they quote.

The Bible is very clear on whether a man should lie with a man as he
would lie with a woman. Only those looking for an excuse refuse to
accept that. And they prey on the ignorance of others for acceptance.
I'll admit that does appear to be working.

>> The purpose of BSA is to teach leadership and strong citizenship. That
>> is not possible if abnormal people (queers) are homogenized with
>> normal people.
>
>It is perfectly possible and happens here and in the UK.

Perhaps that is why Scouting is comparatively weak in those countries.
I have camped with people from other countries - they all looked
disadvantaged and poor.

>Then you were a very poor Scouter as Scouters have to work with all
>boys and some are not strong.

BSA DOES NOT have to work with all boys. BSA works with those who
qualify for membership.

You try to condemn me because of my strength - I condemn you because
you are morally weak.

>> The meek might inherit the earth but it won't take the strong very
>> long to get it back.
>
>I consider that statement to be fascist.

You have my permission to consider what you wish. I'll inform you when
that matters to me.

>You clearly do not believe that "The meek might inherit the earth". So
>here is one point where you do not follow what the Bible says.

Reread my statement. The strong would not have to take it back if the
meek did not inherit.

Hugh

[Brian Salter-Duke]

On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 15:21:51 GMT, J. Hugh Sullivan <Ea...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 00:44:46 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke
><b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:
>
>>> The reverse of what used to be... In my youth queers were beaten if
>>> they "got out of line". The pendulum never stops swinging - too moral
>>> to too liberal and back to too moral in the future.
>>
>>So the violence is the moral position. Very sad.
>
> God destroyed Sodom amd Gommorroh. Capital punishment has existed for
> years. What is your point?

Violence is rarely the moral way. The story of Sodom amd Gommorroh in
the Bible is not supported by any evidence. Capital punishment has
indeed exited for years, but the number of countries in the world that
use it is decreasing. It is immoral as it often kills innocent people.
It is not a mark of a civilised country. Many states in the US are
beginning to see that.

>>I do not see the pendulum swinging back any time soon. In Europe and
>>Australia and in parts of the US, gays are just accepted. No fuss. No
>>bother.
>
> I see it continuing to swing to a much more immoral posirtion in my
> lifetime.

What you see as imoral I see as a positive move.

>>> It's entirely possible that BSA will die in the liberal states. That's
>>> better than acceptance.
>>
>>So lots of yuong people will lose the possabi;ity of taking part in a
>>wothwhiole movement? Again, how sad.
>
> How sad for those who refuse to qualify for membership in BSA. You
> probably don't play professional sports or participate in Olympic
> trials BECAUSE YOU DON"T QUALIFY. BSA has no more obligation to change
> the standards than they.

This is a totally false comparision. Sure, only a few can can play
professional sports or participate in Olympic trials, but many many more
can participate in the sport. Scouting is not an organisation for the
elite. B-P designed it as a movement for all boys. Sure, there has to be
some rules, but there is not reason why it should have no boys in the
what you call the liberal states.

>>In UK and Australia a different route was followed. The Scouting
>>movement is still strong and still helps young [people to lead better
>>lives. That is how it should.

> Get back to me about that when the UK is a world class power without
> the USA - or Australia becomes a world class power. Our falling from
> power coincides with our recognition of queers, socialists and
> atheists - the very sort of immorality and ignorance (not you
> personally) that you support.

Scouting is not just for world class powers. It is for all countries.
Your analysis of the US falling from power is rubbish. You are losing
out because China is geting stronger and you are massively in debt to
them It is nothing to do with "recognition of queers, socialists and
atheists", but you do not have much time for looking at the evidence, do
you?

>>>>> I was not confused as a teenager. And I presume the weakness that
>>>>> would allow one to commit suicide is another sickness that needs a
>>>>> cure.
>>>>
>>>>I was not confused as a teenager. However, it is quite clear that many
>>>>teenagers who suspect that they are gay get very confused, very unhappy
>>>>and sometimes suicidial when faced by a society that tells them that
>>>>they are not normal, that God hates them and so on.
>>>
>>> Then they have a problem.
>>
>>And Scouting should help with that problem, not blame them.
>
> BSA helps all those who qualify for membership. Insecurity resulting
> from social abnormality and failure should be treated by
> professionals.

If it serious yes, but Scouting can and does very often give boys a
sense of their own importance when that is lacking. It is not just for
secure, strong kids. It is about making secure, strong kids.

>>> Queers should be in church to ask forgiveness for their sin, just as
>>> any other sinner. If they give up on Christianity, they lose, not me.
>>
>>The gays in Australia who are Christian are convincing the church to take
>>a more tolerant line. They are winning too. Soon only the
>>fundamentalist and pentacolsta;list churches will be condemming. That
>>homosexuality is a sin is controversial. As a said earlier, those who
>>say the Bible states thsi, are quite happy to ignore many opther things
>>the bible says almost on the same page as the texts they quote.
>
> The Bible is very clear on whether a man should lie with a man as he
> would lie with a woman. Only those looking for an excuse refuse to
> accept that.

Do you follow every single rule in Leviticus? I do not think so.

> And they prey on the ignorance of others for acceptance. I'll admit
> that does appear to be working.

>>> The purpose of BSA is to teach leadership and strong citizenship. That
>>> is not possible if abnormal people (queers) are homogenized with
>>> normal people.

Gays are not abnormal. What a horrible word is "homogenized" for people
quietly living along side each other without hassle. You are just simply
prejudiced.

>>It is perfectly possible and happens here and in the UK.
>
> Perhaps that is why Scouting is comparatively weak in those countries.

Scouting has been growing quite a lot in UK in recent years. In most
areas, the growth is limited by lack of leaders. The growth in Australia
is not strong, I agree. Is membership growing in the US? In particular,
is it growing outside the Mormons?

> I have camped with people from other countries - they all looked
> disadvantaged and poor.

So did some of the boys that B-P brought together on Brownsea Island
with boys from English Public (Private) schools. He made it clear from
the very beginning that it was not for advantaged and rich boys.

>>Then you were a very poor Scouter as Scouters have to work with all
>>boys and some are not strong.
>
> BSA DOES NOT have to work with all boys. BSA works with those who
> qualify for membership.

Maybe, but Scouters should still have to work with boys who are not
strong. Scouting should seek to widen the membership, because while you
may not have to take all boys in, it is clear that all boys could
benefit from Scouting.

> You try to condemn me because of my strength - I condemn you because
> you are morally weak.

I condemn you because you are morally weak. There is no proper grounding
for deciding what is morally strong. I thing my grounding od morality is
better than yours, but you will disagree.

>>> The meek might inherit the earth but it won't take the strong very
>>> long to get it back.
>>
>>I consider that statement to be fascist.
>
> You have my permission to consider what you wish. I'll inform you when
> that matters to me.
>
>>You clearly do not believe that "The meek might inherit the earth". So
>>here is one point where you do not follow what the Bible says.
>
> Reread my statement. The strong would not have to take it back if the
> meek did not inherit.

I do not see anywhere where Jesus says that the strong will take it back
again.

I am not a Christian, and I have no religion. However I was brought up
as a Christian, have direct experience of several Christian bodies and
have studied others. What is quite clear to me is that Christianity has
been highjacked by every political movement. This is why the different
Christian bodies differ so much and why all of them touch what is
written in the Bible only loosely. Your views are those of the
Christianity highjacked by the American right. The Christian Socialist
movement was just as bad although it did some excellent work in the
slums of East London and other towns in the UK. The Anglican Church was
once called the Conservative Party at prayer. I see no evidence to
believe any of them, and I find Christianity to be often immoral and
mostly not life enhancing. It frequently does not support science that
is the best method we have for discovering how the world and the
universe works. The religious attacks on evolution and the reality of
human caused climate change are simply disgusting. However, you can
believe pretty well anything you want as a Christian about anything. A
scientist can not.

Do you think anyone else is reading any of this?

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:16:22 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke
<b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:

>Do you follow every single rule in Leviticus? I do not think so.

What I do, or do not do, changes the rule in no way unless you say I
rule, in which case you must agree with me.

>Do you think anyone else is reading any of this?

I doubt it. Weak, immoral people would jump at the chance to disagree
with me if they were reading.

Hugh

[Brian Salter-Duke]

OK, I am going to let you have the last word on this and let this
newsgroup sink back into stupour.

Brian.

[J. Hugh Sullivan]

On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:45:49 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke
<b_d...@bigpond.com.au> wrote:

>OK, I am going to let you have the last word on this and let this
>newsgroup sink back into stupour.
>
>Brian.

Word.

Hugh

[metal...@gmail.com]

On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 10:05:01 PM UTC-4, Gays Attack Classrooms wrote:
> Stop Sen. Al Franken from homosexualizing public school
>
> classrooms.
>
>
>
> Stop mandatory pro-homosexual lectures to kids. Please select,
>
> sign, and WE WILL FAX your petition to all 535 members of
>
> Congress (saving you time!) to oppose and filibuster S.555 +
>
> H.R. 998 the "Homosexual Classrooms Act" aka Student Non-
>
> Discrimination.
>
>
>
> http://stopsb48.com/
>
>
>
> Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) has gained 5 Representatives and 2
>
> Senators since last week, now with 155 House co-sponsors and 36
>
> Senators supporting two truly demonic bills, S. 555 and H.R.
>
> 998. These bills violate public school children in all 50 states
>
> by requiring mandatory pro-homosexual lectures to kids of all
>
> ages (including kindergarten and 1st grade). Schools that
>
> decline will lose funding.
>
>
>
> The Washington Times confirms Democrats #1 education priority is
>
> to homosexualize children in the classroom, by passing Senator
>
> Al Franken's S. 555 and H.R. 998.

> being gay is a lifestyle choice. God makes no mistakes. i pray gay people would accept the free gift of salvation. turn from their sin, and follow the just, and perfect will of God.