That is not how I read it. The description of them as "queer" is
bizarre, even crazy. They are CEOs of large organisations that have
learnt that opposing gays is not a good business plan to put it mildly.
They may even have principles that declare discrimination is morally
unacceptable and against Scouting principles.
I will make a prediction. The only way for the BSA to avoid a major
split is to adopt the plan that was suggested and leave it to the
chartering organisations. If they decide in May after all this fuss to
adopt a no change policy then a new organisation will break off.
Certainly in many areas, troops will announce no-discrimination policies
as some have already done. It then depends on what BSA National decides
to do. They may ignore it.
If they decide to make the change, that might be too much for the
Southern Baptists, the Mormons or the Methodists, and they might break
away, but they might just accept their right to continue to discriminate
against gays. I have been reading newspaper articles from all over the
USA. It is easy these days. Just search in Google News for "Gay Scouts".
The USA is deeply divided. In many places people support you, but in
many others there has been an outpouring of disgust about the boy who
was denied his Eagle, and the Lesbian Den Mother who was kicked out,
plus an outpouring of support for the BSA to make a change. If the BSA
wanted to make no change, it should never have let out that it was
discussing a change. The genie is out of the bottle now. It can not be
put back. Change of some sort is going to happen.
While all this is happening, BSA membership and income are both falling.
In Australia (at least in Victoria where I have seen figures) and the
UK, membership is increasing.