Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Lance Armstrong Doped?
0 views
Skip to first unread message
B
Dec 5, 2009, 8:05:44 PM12/5/09
to
This article has been making the rounds since a week.
http://cozybeehive.blogspot.com/2009/11/8-things-on-lance-armstrong-from-other.html
http://cozybeehive.blogspot.com/2009/11/8-things-on-lance-armstrong-from-other.html
Tough to argue for Armstrong. Clearly seems a druggie...
John Hurley
Dec 6, 2009, 4:33:41 AM12/6/09
to
On Dec 5, 8:05 pm, B <1.crazyboy.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
snip
> This article has been making the rounds since a week.http://pleasedontspamme.notsocozybeehive.blogspot.com/2009/11/8-things-on-lance-armstrong-f...
>
> Tough to argue for Armstrong. Clearly seems a druggie...
Lemond has always seemed much more like a whiner than a winner to me.
No one in history has been tested as much as Lance has.
B
Jan 3, 2010, 6:40:37 AM1/3/10
to
On Dec 6 2009, 4:33 am, John Hurley <johnbhur...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 8:05 pm, B <1.crazyboy.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> snip
>
> > This article has been making the rounds since a week.http://pleasedontspamme.notsocozybeehive.blogspot.com/2009/11/8-thing......> On Dec 5, 8:05 pm, B <1.crazyboy.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> snip
>
>
> > Tough to argue for Armstrong. Clearly seems a druggie...
>
> Lemond has always seemed much more like a whiner than a winner to me.
>
> No one in history has been tested as much as Lance has.
"No one in history has been tested as much as Lance has."
Hmm.
Can you prove that? Without numbers, I can't believe such trivia.
0 new messages