In article
<
c8515b1e-3546-4386...@m18g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,
John Hurley <
hurle...@yahoo.com> writes
>Ken:
>
># If a person simply said that there PB was this time, that would be
>impossible to check.
>
>It is now crystal clear that Paul Ryan has only ever done 1 marathon
>and finished above 4 hours ( nothing wrong with that ).
>
>Anyone who has ever completed just 1 marathon will know their
>finishing time ( at least approximately ).
I would have thought so, yes.
>
>Telling an interviewer that they ran a marathon in under 3 hours ...
>given the above ... well ... bad things are going to happen with a
>"story" like that.
>
It all depends. The journalists have a message of their own "We
journalists are clever, we can catch out politicians that tell lies." I
say, not so. If a politician makes a statement of specific and
verifiable fact, then it is likely that someone will verify it. However,
the information may not be specific or verifiable. If the man had said I
ran in the Timbuktu Marathon in circa 1977, they didn't record the
results, and I have no idea if the course was measured or not, then it's
not verifiable.
Moreover, to repeat myself it's up to the runner to decide what he
counts as his personal best. In this particular case, I note that it was
a point to point course and a lot of the purists that I know wouldn't
count that in any case for the obvious reason that results might have
been affected by a tail wind. Have the journalists checked up on which
way the wind was blowing?
A pb was never meant to be something to show off about, and in my
opinion it's the time that you can run tomorrow that counts for
something.
Or as a girl in my running club put it:
"I'm fed up with listening to old men banging on about what good runners
they used to be".
--
Ken