Calcajun <
mega...@hotmail.com> wrote:
: Enthusiast vs Hobbyist
Some years ago, I gave a presentation to a ride safety seminar being put on
by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The objective was to present on
examination of safety issues, primarily rider behavior issues, from a
customer's persctive. I examined the terminology by visiting the
dictionary...
ENTHUSIAST:
A person who is highly interested in a particular activity or subject: a
roller coaster ~. See note at ZEALOT.
(Oxford American Dictionaries)
I was able to kill a couple of minutes of presentation time by exploring
that note:
ENTHUSIAST: Displays an intenst and eager interest in something (:a roller
coaster enthusiast)
FANATIC: Intense, eager, and possibly irrational in enthusiasm; suggests
extreme devotion and willingness to go to any lengths (:a roller coaster
fanatic who drove cross-country to visit his favorite park)
ZEALOT: Not only extreme devotion, but vehement activity in support of a
cause or goal (:a coaster zealot who attended a ride safety school)
Now it seems we've got people who don't feel they fit into any of these
categories, and so we get "hobbyist", perhaps something a little less
enthusiastic? Is that fair?
It's interesting, when I put the presentation together, I divided the world
of roller coaster enthusiasm into two "eras". I'd be interested to see what
today's r.r-c thinks. My thesis was as follows--
1. Pre-Internet enthusiasts
Characterized by groups such as ACE, NAPHA, and the off-shoots of those
groups such as MACC, WNYCC, GOCC, Coaster Zombies, RCCGB, ECC, and others.
These are all non-profit membership organizations.
2. Internet era
Several factors, including the Internet itself, changed the face of coaster
enthusiasts. A few items in particular--
1991: rec.roller-coaster (first Internet coaster group)
1995: The Raven (wood coaster that changed the world)
1995: World of Coasters (first "modern" coaster web site)
(acknowledged: Darlene Fladager's site at
unc.edu was earlier)
1998: Shivering Timbers (wood coaster that changed the world again)
1999: Cable TV specials
2000: Millennium Force
These factors (among others) led to an explosion in the number of
self-identified enthusiasts, served by a huge collection of Internet-only
discussion groups and organizations. In 2011, I listed 13 because that was
all that would fit on the screen.
I noted some similarities and differences...
Pre-Internet groups | Internet-era groups
====================================|=================================
|
Membership organizations | Membership organizations
|
Social groups (hold events) | Social groups (attend events)
|
Information (publications) | Information (discussion)
|
Preservation focused | "What's New" focused
|
Public education | Site promotion
|
Non-profit organizations | Often for-profit or website
| supporting
I also noted some demographic observations...
1978-1997 - "Pre-Internet"
o Adult, most likely male (or a member of his family)
o Loves amusement parks
o Interested in technology and/or history
o Has not been scared by a coaster in years
o Has probably ridden 100+ rides
o Enjoys coasters and flumes
o Gets sick on spinning rides
o May be scared by Ferris wheels and aerial tramways
o Has strong opinions and is vocal about them
o Joined an organization for...
* publications
* community
* special events
Since 1997 - "Internet era"
o Broader demographic (younger average age, more females)
o Loves to ride coasters
o Cares less about history
o Coasters may be a newer interest
o Has not ridden as many rides, but has ridden a few of them a *lot*
o Sees organizations as a means to ERT
* May not belong to any of the "traditional" organizations
o Less extensive general ride knowledge
That was the profile I came up with in 2008 and updated in 2011. My
question is, how well does any of it hold up in 2014. at least according to
this Internet-era community?
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
/X\ _ *** Respect rides. They do not respect you. ***
/XXX\ /X\ /X\_ _ /X\__ _ _ _____
/XXXXX\ /XXX\ /XXXX\_ /X\ /XXXXX\ /X\ /X\ /XXXXX
_/XXXXXXX\__/XXXXX\/XXXXXXXX\_/XXX\_/XXXXXXX\__/XXX\_/XXX\_/\_/XXXXXX
NEW! When emailing this account, include the 'canonical magic word' in
the body of your message for a quicker response.