Just say no to advanced scanning machines at air ports?
Editor RadioTalkingPoints
right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your
own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who
may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer)
for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole
or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the
entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you
apparently want to live in an imaginary world.
Why waste the money? Just show up in a bathrobe? Hey, if we are
going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get
inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked
and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? I mean,
why not have fun with it? If you are going to have to wait four hours
to check in, what on Earth are you going to do?
Why all the talk of gloom and doom? You should make me the CEO of
American Airlines, I'll make billions!
I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor on my
way of thinking now? You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having
fun again? Thanks Mark!
Happy New Year!
Editor RadioTalkingPoints
United States and give them all jobs at the TSA? I wonder what that
acronym will then stand for? Terrible Security Associates? Hmmm,
guess I'll have to work on that one?
You realize of course you'll have to install poles at the inspection
stations? LOL.
OMG! I hope they have toilet paper on the air plane, last I heard
those evironmental retards want to ban the stuff? Can you imagine? I
better get a beer, my mind is wandering now?
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
Esp since THz radiation might cause DNA damage.
--
Dirk
http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show
Brenda Ann
"Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7q2cq0...@mid.individual.net...
> Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote:
>> The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the
>> right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your
>> own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who
>> may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer)
>> for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole
>> or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the
>> entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you
>> apparently want to live in an imaginary world.
>>
>> Why waste the money? Just show up in a bathrobe? Hey, if we are
>> going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get
>> inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked
>> and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? I mean,
>> why not have fun with it? If you are going to have to wait four hours
>> to check in, what on Earth are you going to do?
>>
>> Why all the talk of gloom and doom? You should make me the CEO of
>> American Airlines, I'll make billions!
>>
>> I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor on my
>> way of thinking now? You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having
>> fun again? Thanks Mark!
>>
>> Happy New Year!
>>
>>
>>
>
> Esp since THz radiation might cause DNA damage.
>
> --
> Dirk
How long is it going to be before we have to fly in four point restraints in
our underware? This is bullshit by degrees. Now we can't have so much as a
blanket or pillow, let alone our laptop or anything else for at least the
last hour of the flight (on many domestic flights, this will mean not at
all, since we can't have anything before being at cruising altitude
already). They just keep punishing law abiding travelers, meanwhile, the
ones that are intent upon carnage will only figure another way around it.
This has been shown time and time again. Someone needs to do their friggin'
job and stop these yahoos BEFORE they get on the plane. This one could have
been stopped any of SEVERAL times before ever embarking! If I ever come
home, I'll take a friggin' BOAT, it's not so much more expensive anymore,
and you get your own room and don't have to eat nasty airline food (or deal
with a lack of it).
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
If enough people do that terrorists will start sinking ships and you
will be back to body searches etc again.
Brenda Ann
While it may not be impossible to sink a ship, it's a damn site harder than
dropping a plane. They'd have to have something significantly larger than
they could carry on their person to get through that hull. This is not to
say, of course, that they couldn't do some damage to whatever room they
happened to be in.
Kevin Alfred Strom
[...]
>
> How long is it going to be before we have to fly in four point restraints in
> our underware? This is bullshit by degrees. Now we can't have so much as a
> blanket or pillow, let alone our laptop or anything else for at least the
> last hour of the flight (on many domestic flights, this will mean not at
> all, since we can't have anything before being at cruising altitude
> already). They just keep punishing law abiding travelers, meanwhile, the
> ones that are intent upon carnage will only figure another way around it.
> This has been shown time and time again. Someone needs to do their friggin'
> job and stop these yahoos BEFORE they get on the plane. This one could have
> been stopped any of SEVERAL times before ever embarking! If I ever come
> home, I'll take a friggin' BOAT, it's not so much more expensive anymore,
> and you get your own room and don't have to eat nasty airline food (or deal
> with a lack of it).
>
Far better technique than converting our societies into
ever-tightening "national security" states:
1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting
revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did
so, 90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time.
At the same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion
and occupation of our own lands.
With all good wishes,
Kevin Alfred Strom.
--
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/
Paul Hyett
<kevin...@revilo-oliver.com> wrote in uk.politics.misc :
>
>Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening
>"national security" states:
>
>1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting
>revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so,
>90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the
>same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and
>occupation of our own lands.
If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop
hassling *them*...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
broadssailor
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom
Chicken and the egg......
America has long tried to change the world into it's own vision. The
UK has been its Poodle, certainly since Thatchers time, and probably
before.The 'Special relationship' IMHO is something which exists only
in the minds of some British politicians.
I do feel however, that the time has come for 'profiling' at airport
security. The Authorities know who is a 'probable, and who certainly
isn't, based on the intelligence information which they possess - why
aren't they using it?
IanT
"Editor RadioTalkingPoints" <editor.radiota...@gmail.com> wrote
in message
news:d957faaf-9464-4159...@c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> The following is the personal opinion of the author,
Good, you are legally responsible for the message.
>who reserves the
> right to republish this piece for profit,
I doubt anyone would pay you, but I do not give permission
for you to republish anythinh I type for profit or gain.
>which you may read at your
> own risk,
Why, will my cat explode?
>without any legal liabilities to the author
You said above you were responsible for the post, so that
includes legally.
>or anyone who
> may publish or share this article
At that point they would be jointly liable for the message.
>(which must include this disclaimer)
Which disclaimer?
> for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole
> or in part in or outside of a court of law,
You are legally responsible for what you post, if you do not agree
or recognise this point, do not post.
>if you do not agree, the
> entire article is to be considered a work of fiction,
It can't be as you are legally responsible for your message.
>since you
> apparently want to live in an imaginary world.
>
Are you talking about yourself? What you are displaying is
a classic symptom of mental illness.
> Why waste the money? Just show up in a bathrobe? Hey, if we are
> going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get
> inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked
> and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? I mean,
> why not have fun with it? If you are going to have to wait four hours
> to check in, what on Earth are you going to do?
>
> Why all the talk of gloom and doom? You should make me the CEO of
> American Airlines, I'll make billions!
>
> I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor on my
> way of thinking now? You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having
> fun again? Thanks Mark!
>
> Happy New Year!
>
>
What a boring pointless message you posted. Why spam newsgroups?
Christopher Helms
Say No all you want. You have already been overruled. This will be
implemented because even though it wouldn't have stopped the
underpants bomber, it's a cool new way for government employees to
seize more control over private citizens, and isn't that what freedom
is all about? The leering and jeering parts are just neat little
bonuses for them, on top of the very generous package of bonuses and
goodies they already enjoy.
Alang
wrote:
The first arab terrorist attacks against western interests were in
1970. Palestinians hijacking jets. Nobody except Israel was hassling
them but Israel did and still does get a lot of backing from both USA
and UK. The elephant in the room is still there and it's Israel and
Palestine. Sort that and much of the problem will vanish.
The current wave was sparked by the invasion of Iraq. Quite why that
was done I can't work out. If they wanted a villain then the obvious
choice was the country where the Sept 11 hijackers originated. Plus at
the time the same country was holding britons as prisoners and
allegations of torture were being made. We had a real excuse to invade
not like the phony one made for Iraq. The place is a hotbed of
religious fundamentalism. Invading and stamping it out should have
been a prime objective. Perhaps the reason the Saudis were left alone
is because the ruling families are pals with the ruling families in
the west.
Uncle Spam
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:29:58 GMT, Paul Hyett <p...@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom
....and they have their own private plane....;-)
William Black
> That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has
> done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of
> nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy,
> ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current
> global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us
> through intimidation and fear.
Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things,
but never Socialist...
--
William Black
"Any number under six"
The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.
McKevvy
Because it's politically incorrect. I heard a live interview on You
and Yours just after that nutter. The security rep said right away
that the airports and security services need to start observing the
likely people by body language and by using common sense instead of
imposing restrictions upon everyone. Let's face it, if you had two
guys at the checkout desk - one of them is a ginger haired Scot in a
kilt and the other is a middle-eastern looking guy with shifty eyes
and a slightly nervous disposition, then which one do you think is out
to drop the plane?
By the lack of our politicians actions we are all suffering by having
our liberties constantly restriced.
The terrorists are certainly winning.
McKevvy
dave
Someone needs to do their friggin'
> job and stop these yahoos BEFORE they get on the plane. This one could have
> been stopped any of SEVERAL times before ever embarking! If I ever come
> home, I'll take a friggin' BOAT, it's not so much more expensive anymore,
> and you get your own room and don't have to eat nasty airline food (or deal
> with a lack of it).
>
the place, and be done with it.
dave
You go first.
dave
>
> Chicken and the egg......
> America has long tried to change the world into it's own vision. The
> UK has been its Poodle, certainly since Thatchers time, and probably
> before.The 'Special relationship' IMHO is something which exists only
> in the minds of some British politicians.
> I do feel however, that the time has come for 'profiling' at airport
> security. The Authorities know who is a 'probable, and who certainly
> isn't, based on the intelligence information which they possess - why
> aren't they using it?
Ask the Dutch. They're the ones who let the NUB* onto the plane.
*Nigerian Underwear Bomber
William Black
Ask the US State Department, they're the ones who gave him a US visa.
broadssailor
.
>
> I suggest we get the fuck out of their territory, let the Israelis level
> the place, and be done with it.
I fear that Israel is the problem , not the solution.
There were no Arab terrorist attacks on western interests until 1970.
Make of that what you will
William Black
> 'William Black' wrote thus:
>
>> aracari wrote:
>>
>>> That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has
>>> done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of
>>> nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy,
>>> ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current
>>> global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us
>>> through intimidation and fear.
>> Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things,
>> but never Socialist...
>
>
Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means
of production, distribution and exchange.
All were in the hands of the Caliph.
Despotism and tyranny are not Socialist.
Although some Socialists are despots and run tyrannies...
Alang
<willia...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>aracari wrote:
>> 'William Black' wrote thus:
>>
>>> aracari wrote:
>>>
>>>> That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has
>>>> done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of
>>>> nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy,
>>>> ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current
>>>> global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us
>>>> through intimidation and fear.
>>> Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things,
>>> but never Socialist...
>>
>> Why not?
>>
>
>Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means
>of production, distribution and exchange.
>
>All were in the hands of the Caliph.
>
>Despotism and tyranny are not Socialist.
Of course they are.
Everybody is the property of the state. That's socialism
Gary Baldi
>
> Ask the Dutch. They're the ones who let the NUB* onto the plane.
>
> *Nigerian Underwear Bomber
Under instruction from the US Feds.........
William Black
But everyone wasn't.
The satraps were quasi independent rulers.
A society with formalised slavery isn't going to treat everyone in the
same way.
William Black
> 'William Black' wrote thus:
>
>> aracari wrote:
>>> 'William Black' wrote thus:
>>>
>>>> aracari wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has
>>>>> done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of
>>>>> nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy,
>>>>> ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current
>>>>> global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us
>>>>> through intimidation and fear.
>>>> Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things,
>>>> but never Socialist...
>
>>> Why not?
>
>
>> Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means
>> of production, distribution and exchange.
>
No
It's pretty fundamental to all Socialists, which is why we know Tony
Blair isn't one...
> I describe socialism as a snake with many heads which spend their
> time hissing and snapping at each other and only come together to
> fight their eternal enemy: freedom and liberty.
>
We all already know that you define words to mean what you want them to
mean.
So did Humpty Dumpty...
Brenda Ann
"McKevvy" <vicko_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ca0e0fd-60e5-496b...@s3g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
. The security rep said right away
> that the airports and security services need to start observing the
> likely people by body language and by using common sense instead of
> imposing restrictions upon everyone. Let's face it, if you had two
> guys at the checkout desk - one of them is a ginger haired Scot in a
> kilt and the other is a middle-eastern looking guy with shifty eyes
> and a slightly nervous disposition, then which one do you think is out
> to drop the plane?
It might be pointed out that in this case racial profiling based upon "a
middle eastern looking guy with shifty eyes" would not have been fruitful in
this case. What SHOULD have kept this guy off a plane was his own father
notifying authorities that he could be trouble..
dave
> Brenda Ann wrote:
>> What SHOULD have kept this guy off a plane was his own father
>> notifying authorities that he could be trouble..
>
> thinking it was just another Nigerian 419 message.<g>
>
Exactly. They got as far as "Nigerian banker"...
Chris X
"broadssailor" <graham....@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:e42cc95d-5e13-4ca0...@j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
Don't confuse the arch "useful idiot" Paul Hyett with your inconvenient
cold, hard facts :-) It's New Years Day - show some "compassion", man !
LOL !
cuh...@webtv.net
NASA's confirmed 2012 prediction
NASA is FULL of Sheeeeeeeeit! and I am ever so Happy to Say that
Again,,,, NASA is Full of Sheeeeeeeeeeit!
Looka here, head on over to your local libraries, look up that article
in Popular Science magazine which dates on back around eight or nine or
ten sumpin years ago.On the front cover and also in an article inside
that magazine, a former NASA employee, or retired NASA
employee/whatever, Mrs.Green said, NASA! YOU ARE BROKEN!
Yeah, go read that article in that Popular Science magazine.
cuhulin
cuh...@webtv.net
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=280445
Who do you believe our Real Enemies are?
cuhulin
dxAce
D. Peter Maus
We should send a "Thank You" e-mail to Obiteme...if ObitemeCare
gets signed into law there will be virtually no medical reasons for
the border to remain open.
And then maybe we can send Shatner back.
dxAce
"D. Peter Maus" wrote:
I'll be happy when we can send Governor Granholm back!
D. Peter Maus
LOL!
There's a lot of that going around. Word around here is that
Quinn will be gone in the next cycle, and a good number of governors
will be joining the ranks of the double digit unemployed.
cuh...@webtv.net
course) all they have is one Canoe and one Bow and Arrow.
Hey, Mississippi does a lot of trading/business with Canada.
cuhulin
cuh...@webtv.net
WMPN: Farmweek Veterans Honor Flight
I saw it on local tv, Mississippi Farmweek about twenty minutes ago
Honor the VETERANS.
Ahh haz tu waytch Mrs.Bucket on tee vee at ate pee emm thi ebeenin.
cuhulin
dave
Can you explain how your presence in Vietnam ca. '64-'65 enhanced my
liberty? How come the Bush family always makes beau coups bucks when
the USA goes to war?
aezael
<vicko_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I would be happy to appear bare naked if I would need to fly to any
place if it would prevent any more fanatics that would destroy many
people for fanatics that kill for their Islamic views.
cuh...@webtv.net
http://www.clarionledger.com
Backwater hick, you think so!?
GOOD on yer, World War Two Veteran, GOOD on yer.
http://www.devilfinder.com
D-Day Museum New Orleans,Louisiana
cuhulin
cuh...@webtv.net
have liked to fly and I Never Ever will fly again.F... that Sh.t!!!
y'all can have it!!!
DUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB
ASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
RISKS A MILITARY COUP.
http://www.rense.com/general89/obam.htm
GOOD! a U.S.Military Coup would/will be a damn sight Better that what is
in place now!
Rock On, U.S.Military, ROCKKKKKKKKKKKK ONNNNNNNN,,,,,,
When the Caissons Go Rollinggggg alonggggg,,,,,,,,
Oath Keepers.
cuhulin
cuh...@webtv.net
Slidell,Louisiana.I stopped off there about eighteen years ago.Hardly
anybody was there.It was in the hot Summertime.I kept my clothes on,
except for when I got ready to leave, I took me a shower bath at the
outside shower thingy.Don't waste your money at Indian Hills nudist
resort in Louisiana!
cuhulin
dave
They kill because we kill.
They want us to go home.
dave
> aezael wrote:
>> I would be happy to appear bare naked
>
> and yes, I've done my share of skinny dipping in a river,
> coed no less.
>
I'm going to opt for the hand search. It'll almost be like having a sex
life again.
dave
>Don't waste your money at Indian Hills nudist
> resort in Louisiana!
> cuhulin
>
Got it.
cuh...@webtv.net
Gibralta Drive here in Jackson,Mississippi too.
For example,,, Last Wednesday I was in that F...ed up NAPA store on
Gibralta Drive looking for a rebuild kit for my Carter Thermo Quad
carburetor.(my 1983 Dodge van) Those MOFOs wouldn't let me use their
restroom.I drink a LOT of coffee and in cold weather, that coffee runs
right through me! It was sort of an ''emergency'' to say the least! I
left the store, I went to a nearby Kentucky Fried Chicken place (Thank
You, Kentucky) so I could relieve meself.
Take my Advice,,,, Stay away from any and all NAPA auto parts stores!!!
F..K NAPA!!!!!!!!!
I told those NAPA A..holes I will Tell the World about NAPA!!!!!!!
cuhulin
cuh...@webtv.net
complain.(about NAPA) 800LETNAPA
Let me plug in my phone, I am fixin to call those NAPA SOBs!
cuhulin