Well first off the comparing of the M-80 to the TX-350 is wrong. Reason being
the M-80 is 2X2290 transistors in it. The TX-350 has 2X2879 transistors in it.
If they are comparing to the davemade amps they probably should compare to the
davemade M200 or the 200. Both of these amps have more heatsink, bigger case
and a fan for both. The M200 is 1(2290) driving 2(2879).
ICE, ICE, AND MORE ICE MR. ICECOLD BIG APPLE TREES JUST GOT DOWN........
827 GONEEEEEE
XFORCE827 wrote in message <19990116043229...@ng-cd1.aol.com>...
:AND THE AX-400 X-FORCE AMP IS 2x2879'S ALSO
:
:827 GONEEEEEE
>Ice, I compared the X-Force to the M80 ONLY IN PHYSICAL SIZE. I
>never mentioned the output of an M80 once, since it isn't
>directly comparable. As you mentioned, the Dave Made 200 would
>be the equivalent of the X-Force AX-400. Sean
Oh OK Cool Sean.
MC
If the "big numbers" weren't on the band with these boxes and
were only doing the "clean" numbers that you quoted, they
wouldn't be able to SMASH other boxes that were showing lower
"more realistic" numbers so easily.
We can talk specs all day long, but what does it do on the air
??? Sean
>
MC TURNER wrote in message <36A4F6E1...@IX.NETCOM.COM>...
Toll Free
UpINdapool wrote in message <19990121224517...@ng139.aol.com>...
>2 120 watt pills don't ever do 600 watts unless you drive them with 590
watts
>the end .........the trick is in the meter or a rotten ant match....
If he has 310 real Watts going up the pipe with a 5W carrier, what he
has is a double sideband transmitter. Some of the newer rigs can be
easily bastardized to do this as they use a DSB generator with carrier
re-insertion. Given that the carrier exists to demodulate the
intelligence at the receiving end, you'll be making more heat than
light. Not surprisingly, there's no benefit to this (real or
perceived). 8-)
Clearly, he's using his opponents carrier power to demodulate his big
sidebands at the receiving end. 8-) This guy deserves the prize for
using his head!
Cheers!
Andy
Put him on his own and