eham.net vs. rec.radio.amateur.*

[J. B. Wood]

Hello, all. With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to
stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. Your time and
comment is appreciated. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,
--
John Wood (Code 5520) e-mail: wo...@itd.nrl.navy.mil
Naval Research Laboratory
4555 Overlook Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20375-5337

[-.-. --.-]

"J. B. Wood" <john...@nrl.navy.mil> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:ievfd4$43i$1...@ra.nrl.navy.mil...

> Hello, all. With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
> to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to stay
> on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. Your time and comment is
> appreciated. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,

Treasures and prepared minds usually are in hard places.

Love read any post on this NG, spam is not a issue.

My 2 cents,
-.-. --.-

[Bert Hyman]

In news:ievfd4$43i$1...@ra.nrl.navy.mil "J. B. Wood" <john...@nrl.navy.mil>
wrote:

> Hello, all. With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
> to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to
> stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. Your time and
> comment is appreciated. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,

A decent news client and news provider and well-populated filter and
killfiles makes reading any newsgroup a much nicer experience.

--
Bert Hyman W0RSB St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com

[K1TTT]

On Dec 23, 12:30 pm, "J. B. Wood" <john.w...@nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
> Hello, all.  With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
> to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to
> stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups.  Your time and
> comment is appreciated.  Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,
> --

> John Wood (Code 5520)        e-mail: w...@itd.nrl.navy.mil

> Naval Research Laboratory
> 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW
> Washington, DC 20375-5337

what is eham.net?

[Allodoxaphobia]

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:49:29 -0800 (PST), K1TTT wrote:
> On Dec 23, 12:30�pm, "J. B. Wood" <john.w...@nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
>> Hello, all. �With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
>> to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to
>> stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. �Your time and
>> comment is appreciated. �Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,
>

> what is eham.net?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=eham.net&l=1

[K1TTT]

On Dec 24, 7:15 pm, Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_...@example.net>
wrote:

well, duh... seems to be the hard way to get there if i really wanted
to... the point is, why bother?

[No Spam]

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:30:42 -0500, J. B. Wood wrote:

> Hello, all. With the wealth of info available on eham.net I'm beginning
> to wonder for amateur radio purposes if it's still worth the time to
> stay on unmoderated, spam-laden usenet newsgroups. Your time and
> comment is appreciated. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,

eham sucks
they "moderate" like a communist regime
I was kicked off for trying to resurrect a 1970s model linear that was
made for ham radio but was popular among the CBers of the time. I guess
to be a ham, you must purchase equipment from one of the eham sponsors?

eham is only trolled with a bunch of old dumb hams who have to have their
great grand children or nurse maids turn the computer on for them each
morning so they can go on a destructive rage with everybody young and new
to radio.

[Roupert]

HAHAHA Nice example!

Exactly why one should avoid eham!

The people who frequent there are simply too stupid to understand sarcasm
or anything complicated beyond what's on fox news. A disgrace to amateur
radio.