The main reason for this questions is I'm wondering how well 1+ GHz
(GPS) signals transmit through about 1.5 inches of expanded
polystyrene (styrofoam).
Thanks in advance for any insight!
Dave
Hi Dave,
Such material at that frequency is often used to construct a
di-electric lens. That is, when the di-electric constant (which is
analogous to index of refraction) is taken into account of curvature
which, in turn, is of sufficient size with respect to wavelength; then
you have the means to construct lens of the common shape you encounter
for light lenses. This means both follow the same characteristics
given the same shape. For a slab of Polystyrene, it would be
equivalent to plate glass (no gain/magnification).
As long as your di-electric is free of impurities, then for all
intents and purposes it is as clear to RF as glass is to light. Add
impurities and you stand the chance of making sunglasses for your
antenna (unfortunately the analog of sunlight would be your precious
RF).
Optical lenses are hundreds to thousands to millions of wavelengths
across. On the other hand, RF lenses stand to be much smaller in
relation, and as such there is a minimum size whereby no advantage may
be found (don't expect to build an effective, but sloppy quarterwave
lens).
73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
Off the cuff, I'd say it'll have no noticable effect...
Some of this can have additives which may change the equation.
Lenses...Hmmm. Interesting idea.
I can try it and see what effect I can see on the signal strength bars on
the GPS.
I do know that my older GPS (Sequential receiver) doesn't receive in the
house. I suspect it is from the foil backing on the fiber glass insulation
in the ceiling.
Steve N.
--
Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's.
Roy Lewallen, W7EL
In your case, the loss tangent of polystyrene for RF is among the best if
there is no moisture trapped in the foam (closed cell type preferably), and
since the dielectric constant approaches that of air, then the loss at the
GPS frequency will be virtually nil.
--
Crazy George
Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address
"David Harper" <achil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fef44ceb.0406...@posting.google.com...
light was one
"David Harper" <achil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fef44ceb.0406...@posting.google.com...
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.690 / Virus Database: 451 - Release Date: 5/22/2004
Dave
How much of *what you want to know* could be learned from a test in the
microwave??
As you probably know, it will be very difficult to include enough
Polystyrene around a GPS receiver (and its antenna) to effect the accuracy
of its readings.
I get pretty good accuracy from my DeLorme GPS while it is inside my
house. That is actually a statement about the poor construction of the
house, I suppose.
Jerry
Thanks everyone for all the info! That was definately educational and
answered my quesiton.
Dave
It did?
Yeah, now I can amaze all my friends and co-workers. All I need to do
now is get some of that "male enhancement" Enzyte and I'll probably be
CEO by next month.
What I was looking for was really this: tangent loss and dielectric
constant are the two main factors that determine RF propogation
properties through a material.
> Yeah, now I can amaze all my friends and co-workers. All I need to do
> now is get some of that "male enhancement" Enzyte and I'll probably be
> CEO by next month.
>
It seemed to work for Smilin' Bob! I love those commercials.