Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Do I Insulate the yagi boom from the mast

675 views
Skip to first unread message

barett

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 4:13:10 AM8/22/09
to
When mounting any yagi beam to a metal mast, is it best to insulate the boom
from the metal mast?

Are there any benefits in insulating the boom from the mast or not when
mounting?

Thanks


nm...@wt.net

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 6:42:35 AM8/22/09
to
On Aug 22, 3:13 am, "barett" <bar...@blueyounder.co.uk> wrote:
> When mounting any yagi beam to a metal mast, is it best to insulate the boom
> from the metal mast?

No. At least from a lightning point of view. I never insulate the boom
from the mast.


>
> Are there any benefits in insulating the boom from the mast or not when
> mounting?

Not that I can think of.

Gerard

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 7:49:08 AM8/22/09
to
"barett" <bar...@blueyounder.co.uk> schreef in bericht
news:dMNjm.257432$bA.3...@newsfe16.ams2...

> When mounting any yagi beam to a metal mast, is it best to
> insulate the boom from the metal mast?
No, yagi beams are electrically '0' in the middle of the
elements, so there is no need to insulate the boom
from the mast.

> Are there any benefits in insulating the boom from the mast or
> not when mounting?

I can think of no benefits to insulate. NOT insulating has the
benefit that static can run to ground if the mast is grounded.

Log-per antennas should be insulated from their masts as the
booms are part of the feed, and should not contact each other
or ground.

73 - Gerard - PE1OUD

E-mail: pe1oud(NOTTHIS)@amsat.org

barett

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 10:49:14 AM8/22/09
to
I am causing TVI at the moment and I was told that if I insulated the beam
from the mast and choked the coax just below the beam it would guarantee to
solve my TVI problem and improve the efficiency of the antenna. What do you
think?

It's a lot of work to drop the beam back down to ground level to do this.


"barett" <bar...@blueyounder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dMNjm.257432$bA.3...@newsfe16.ams2...

Cecil Moore

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 11:00:48 AM8/22/09
to
barett wrote:
> When mounting any yagi beam to a metal mast, is it best to insulate the boom
> from the metal mast?

The voltage at the center of the elements is supposed
to be zero. Therefore, the boom is supposed to have
zero potential and thus can be mounted to a metal mast.
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 11:03:17 AM8/22/09
to
barett wrote:
> I am causing TVI at the moment and I was told that if I insulated the beam
> from the mast and choked the coax just below the beam it would guarantee to
> solve my TVI problem and improve the efficiency of the antenna. What do you
> think?
>
> It's a lot of work to drop the beam back down to ground level to do this.

Get the guy who made the guarantee to do the work.
Don't pay him if it doesn't work.

JB

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 12:22:49 PM8/22/09
to
"barett" <bar...@blueyounder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:xzTjm.137864$zh1.1...@newsfe04.ams2...
It might be a good idea to drop the whole thing and make sure there is no
corrosion anywhere, even at the cost of replacing hardware and any rusty
masts. rust and corrosion can actually cause broadband noise and harmonics
that doesn't come out of the transmitter. Perhaps there is an issue with
your rotor?

Richard Clark

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 12:50:12 PM8/22/09
to
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:49:14 +0100, "barett"
<bar...@blueyounder.co.uk> wrote:

>I am causing TVI at the moment and I was told that if I insulated the beam
>from the mast and choked the coax just below the beam it would guarantee to
>solve my TVI problem and improve the efficiency of the antenna.

Stop listening to those people who "told" you this and "guarantee"
(whatever that means) it as a solution.

TVI is most frequently caused by your feedline's proximity to RF
sensitive devices AND the presence of Common Mode currents on the
feedline. Put a choke on the transmission line at the feed point and
another choke one quarter wavelength away from the feed point towards
the transmitter.

This is a very common topic here and if you were to Google the group's
combined postings about it, you would find a world of education that
goes beyond this simple prescription. (Google the terms TVI and
Common Mode and Choke.)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

barett

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 2:35:48 PM8/22/09
to

"barett" <bar...@blueyounder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dMNjm.257432$bA.3...@newsfe16.ams2...

Thanks all for your help. The search I did on Goole has given me loads to
read up on, so I should be fine now.
Thanks again


Bob Bob

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 2:39:03 PM8/22/09
to
Kind of off topic but maybe interesting.

In Sydney in I guess the late 70's two broadcast FM stations came online
on 105 and 106MHz (Approx). Their antennas were both mounted on one of
the big TV towers in the northern suburbs.

Individual tests proved positive, good range etc etc. When they were
both turned on however they caused severe interference to the AM BC band
(1MHz or so) and also the CH10 TV (212MHz or so). As I remember hearing
the fault was a rusty rivet holding some tower sections together.

This information is anecdotal. I havent verified it!

Cheers Bob VK2YQA

Sal M. Onella

unread,
Aug 26, 2009, 1:55:00 AM8/26/09
to

"Bob Bob" <bob3...@suddenlink.net> wrote in message
news:qjq5m6-...@p400bob.personal.cox.net...

> Kind of off topic but maybe interesting.
>
> In Sydney in I guess the late 70's two broadcast FM stations came online
> on 105 and 106MHz (Approx). Their antennas were both mounted on one of
> the big TV towers in the northern suburbs.
>
> Individual tests proved positive, good range etc etc. When they were
> both turned on however they caused severe interference to the AM BC band
> (1MHz or so) and also the CH10 TV (212MHz or so). As I remember hearing
> the fault was a rusty rivet holding some tower sections together.
>
> This information is anecdotal. I havent verified it!

Oh, yes! The "rusty bolt effect" is well known to those of us who have
worked US Navy EMI problems. I did it off and on for almost thirty years.
A non-linear junction mixes two or more signals and the structure involved
reradiates the sums and differences of the fundamentals and their harmonics.
The structure can be any topside metallic item or collection of items.

The result is a comb of frequencies which can cause widespread interference
literally for miles. In some cases broadband noise is also present. In
really bad cases, HF receive is effectively non-functional.

The solution is to bond or insulate everything topside in areas of high RF
energy -- eliminate as many non-linear junctions as possible.


Cecil Moore

unread,
Aug 26, 2009, 7:25:48 AM8/26/09
to
Sal M. Onella wrote:
> A non-linear junction mixes two or more signals ...

I once had a cracked/cold solder joint in a 40m downspout
vertical that seemed to partially rectify the source
signal generating undesirable harmonics on 15m detected
by another ham 1/2 mile away. A jumper across the bad
junction cured the problem.

Sal M. Onella

unread,
Aug 26, 2009, 11:54:14 PM8/26/09
to

"Cecil Moore" <nos...@w5dxp.com> wrote in message
news:%Y8lm.154347$0e4....@newsfe19.iad...

> Sal M. Onella wrote:
> > A non-linear junction mixes two or more signals ...
>
> I once had a cracked/cold solder joint in a 40m downspout
> vertical that seemed to partially rectify the source
> signal generating undesirable harmonics on 15m detected
> by another ham 1/2 mile away. A jumper across the bad
> junction cured the problem.

Yup. Navy ships have from a few dozen to several hundred such jumpers,
depending on ship type. Many are welded but some are bolted, especially if
the object must be moved for use, etc.

I have heard that hams who use a tin roof as an HF ground plane are apt to
generate harmonics.

Sal


christofire

unread,
Aug 27, 2009, 6:25:31 AM8/27/09
to

"Sal M. Onella" <salmo...@food.poisoning.org> wrote in message
news:Grnlm.152588$FP2....@newsfe05.iad...


Some of the towers and masts used for broadcasting in the UK have welded-on
tabs that are welded together after the sections are bolted together. A
particular potential problem has existed since Band II was extended up to
108 MHz: that of generation and radiation of IPs in the band above, used for
VOR and ILS.

Chris


Michael Coslo

unread,
Aug 27, 2009, 11:36:05 AM8/27/09
to
Sal M. Onella wrote:

> I have heard that hams who use a tin roof as an HF ground plane are apt to
> generate harmonics.


As well as those who spend too much time around the wimmin!


- 73 de Mike N3LI -

0 new messages