Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: an ontopic post about code

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Slow Code

unread,
Nov 27, 2006, 7:22:22 PM11/27/06
to
"Sal M. Onella" <salmo...@food.poisoning.org> wrote in
news:o09ah.35501$zT4....@newsfe11.phx:

>
> "Plexus" <plexu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1164479455....@14g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>
> < snip >
>
>> Morse is FUN.
>
> Yeah, if you can do it. (Not everyone can.)


Sal.

Please keep your whiney ass out of the CW threads. If you want to shit
your diaper, please take it to the CB group, or start up a new own thread
with Markie and Opus.

SC

Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs

unread,
Nov 27, 2006, 7:37:42 PM11/27/06
to
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:22:22 GMT, Slow Code <my....@no.spam> wrote:

>"Sal M. Onella" <salmo...@food.poisoning.org> wrote in
>news:o09ah.35501$zT4....@newsfe11.phx:
>
>>
>> "Plexus" <plexu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1164479455....@14g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> < snip >
>>
>>> Morse is FUN.
>>
>> Yeah, if you can do it. (Not everyone can.)
>
>
>Sal.
>
>Please keep your whiney ass out of the CW threads.

why you whine in all th thread and spew your hatred of REAL Hams like
me

> If you want to shit
>your diaper, please take it to the CB group, or start up a new own thread
>with Markie and Opus.

get help for your intantace on toilet sex discussion in radio NGs,
steve
>
>SC
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

gwatts

unread,
Nov 28, 2006, 7:42:02 AM11/28/06
to
Slow Code wrote:
> ... If you want to shit

> your diaper, please take it to the CB group, or start up a new own thread
> with Markie and Opus.
>
> SC

Is this how you only start a thread and let everyone else keep it going?

You're rapidly approaching pitiful.

W8LNA

Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs

unread,
Nov 28, 2006, 3:17:37 PM11/28/06
to
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:42:02 GMT, gwatts <gwa...@frontiernet.net>
wrote:

no he he is wil past past that
>
>W8LNA

Slow Code

unread,
Nov 29, 2006, 8:29:08 PM11/29/06
to
gwatts <gwa...@frontiernet.net> wrote in
news:u8Wah.6331$Ka1....@news01.roc.ny:


He wanted to push for dumbing down ham radio, and we can't let that happen
in a thread that wants to protect it.

SC

kb9r...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 29, 2006, 8:32:49 PM11/29/06
to

nobdoy but the ProCode want Ham radio dumbed down

we are just trying to free Ham radio form the orible hamr done by the
ARRL with incentive licensing
>
> SC

Ron

unread,
Nov 30, 2006, 10:32:27 AM11/30/06
to

<kb9r...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1164850369.6...@h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Are you a "Pro-Code" person? If so, then how is it that you can be so with
such poor spelling skills?

If you are an example of what a "Pro-Code" person is, then I don't think
that HAM can really be "dumbed" down any further.

Ron


K4YZ

unread,
Nov 30, 2006, 11:46:10 AM11/30/06
to

Ron wrote:
> <kb9r...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> > we are just trying to free Ham radio form the orible hamr done by the
> > ARRL with incentive licensing
>
> Are you a "Pro-Code" person? If so, then how is it that you can be so with
> such poor spelling skills?
>
> If you are an example of what a "Pro-Code" person is, then I don't think
> that HAM can really be "dumbed" down any further.

Ron, Morkie is the No-Code camp's worst enemy...He's one of "them".


Morkie (Mark Morgan, KB9RQZ) claims to have three college degrees,
is allegedly now a geologist, and claims to have been "colonel" in the
US Army Chemical Corps. He's the only multi-degreed professional that
seems to be so incompetent as to be unable to employ spellchecking
software, however.

The funny thing about his latter claim was that he (a) alleged to
have been "drafted", (b) would have only bee SEVEN years old as the
last conscriptee was being mustered out in the 70's, and (c)
brandishes a sexual perversity that would get ANY officer's security
clearance pulled, let alone play with NBC / CBR items.

He also claims to be a Jewish Pagan, whatever those are supposed
to be, and has apparently "married" a male person while in Israel,
which I find hard to believe...Not that he'd "marry" a man, but that
the government of Israel would allow such things to occur in the Holy
Land.

He's trashed every newsgroup he's come into contact with and has
actually searched out newsgroups in order to cross post items in a lame
attempt to intimidate those who he'd like to see go away since they
make it a habit of busting him for his lying and tales.

So...Basically you're right when you say it can't get much "dumber"
than what it is...He passed the writtens...perhaps. The jury's out on
whether or not he was able to find a corruptable VE team to pass him
after he passed them an undetermined quantity of Jacksons or
Franklins.....

In any case...caveat emptor when it comes to dealing with him. I
do it because I'm already in a high stress job and he's cheap
entertainment.

73

Steve, K4YZ

Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs

unread,
Nov 30, 2006, 12:04:09 PM11/30/06
to
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:32:27 -0600, "Ron"
<apositi...@netscape.net> wrote:

>
><kb9r...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1164850369.6...@h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Slow Code wrote:
>>> gwatts <gwa...@frontiernet.net> wrote in
>>> news:u8Wah.6331$Ka1....@news01.roc.ny:
>>>
>>> > Slow Code wrote:
>>> >> ... If you want to shit
>>> >> your diaper, please take it to the CB group, or start up a new own
>>> >> thread with Markie and Opus.
>>> >>
>>> >> SC
>>> >
>>> > Is this how you only start a thread and let everyone else keep it
>>> > going?
>>> >
>>> > You're rapidly approaching pitiful.
>>> >
>>> > W8LNA
>>>
>>>
>>> He wanted to push for dumbing down ham radio, and we can't let that
>>> happen
>>> in a thread that wants to protect it.
>>
>> nobdoy but the ProCode want Ham radio dumbed down
>>
>> we are just trying to free Ham radio form the orible hamr done by the
>> ARRL with incentive licensing
>
>Are you a "Pro-Code" person?

no

indeed I think the ARS would better off if code use were banned but I
still believe in free speech

> If so, then how is it that you can be so with
>such poor spelling skills?

GIGO


>
>If you are an example of what a "Pro-Code" person is, then I don't think
>that HAM can really be "dumbed" down any further.

we are trying to end the dumbing down by ending code testing
>
>Ron

John Smith

unread,
Nov 30, 2006, 12:51:37 PM11/30/06
to

"K4YZ" <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1164905170.1...@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
> ...

> do it because I'm already in a high stress job and he's cheap
> entertainment.
>
> 73
>
> Steve, K4YZ
>

If you are NOT SC, you are his brother... indeed the
glitch/mis-configuration/error or settings which have been introduced
into your news reader/poster is a dead giveaway!

Perhaps your "high stress" job leads you to commit such mistakes? You
really should look into getting some help with that "little problem" of
yours, they have done wonders with new medications, yanno? <grin>

JS

an old friend

unread,
Nov 30, 2006, 1:12:15 PM11/30/06
to

John Smith wrote:
> "K4YZ" <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1164905170.1...@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
> > ...
> > do it because I'm already in a high stress job and he's cheap
> > entertainment.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Steve, K4YZ
> >
>
> If you are NOT SC, you are his brother... indeed the
> glitch/mis-configuration/error or settings which have been introduced
> into your news reader/poster is a dead giveaway!

for my edifcation would you care to elaborate I am always insterested
in learning new things


>
> Perhaps your "high stress" job leads you to commit such mistakes? You
> really should look into getting some help with that "little problem" of
> yours, they have done wonders with new medications, yanno? <grin>

it isn't his job it is the stress he feels whan anybody step out of the
box at all or opposes him

Tood dress his fire for the harmless if IMO silly interest Todd in
anime

Ander in his stubbron insistance on hold the ARSaccoutable for the
large amount of specturm we do hold ( and we deserve to held to it)

BB for just daring to disagree on what the ARS and how will it does it

with of course it started out as a simple disagree then he dicovered I
am Bisexaul tried to balck mail me about and I simply came out of the
ham shack closet. I made a fool years over his death threats and after
8 years he is still pissed about it

SC is Robeson borther of coconspirtor or siamaesetwin i can't realy
tell and I don't realy care abiout the detail
>
> JS

John Smith

unread,
Nov 30, 2006, 1:23:24 PM11/30/06
to
Interesting site:
http://www.qrz.com/callsign/K4YZ

I once dated a nurse, yanno? She didn't look like him!

JS

"an old friend" <kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1164910335....@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...

Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs

unread,
Nov 30, 2006, 1:34:57 PM11/30/06
to
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:23:24 -0800, "John Smith"
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Interesting site:
>http://www.qrz.com/callsign/K4YZ

indeed and I wonder how much of it SciFi

Slow Code

unread,
Nov 30, 2006, 7:40:44 PM11/30/06
to
"John Smith" <assembl...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:ekn5up$5ll$1...@news.ndhu.edu.tw:

>
> "K4YZ" <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1164905170.1...@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
>> ...
>> do it because I'm already in a high stress job and he's cheap
>> entertainment.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
> If you are NOT SC, you are his brother... indeed the
> glitch/mis-configuration/error or settings which have been introduced
> into your news reader/poster is a dead giveaway!


You're as looney as Markie, John. Stop trying to figure out who
everyone is and maybe try to work on being a good radio operator. Then
maybe your presence on the internet will be valuable.

SC

Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs

unread,
Nov 30, 2006, 8:27:56 PM11/30/06
to

steve/SC you have ben busted

John Smith

unread,
Nov 30, 2006, 8:25:59 PM11/30/06
to

No trouble at all...

Noticing who the idiots are is easy, more so in your case, but easy with
most of 'em...

JS

Ron

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 12:27:49 AM12/1/06
to

<Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs> wrote in message
news:vl3um2l9dhdjftl39...@4ax.com...

Interesting. Does speach apply to CW? After all, it is a non-voice form of
operation.

>> If so, then how is it that you can be so with
>>such poor spelling skills?
>
> GIGO

Can I assume by that you mean that you never learned to spell?

OK, neither did I, but then again my news reader has a spell-checking
program.

>>
>>If you are an example of what a "Pro-Code" person is, then I don't think
>>that HAM can really be "dumbed" down any further.
>
> we are trying to end the dumbing down by ending code testing
>>
>>Ron
>>
> http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

I am a no-code op. Removing the requirement for CW neither dumbs down the
HAM service, nor makes it more intelligent. CW is a niche form of operation
anymore. Some people enjoy it for reasons that I cannot personally fathom,
but what the heck, if its their thing then let them have at it. More power
to them. CW is no longer the main mode of operation used anywhere in the
world. Phone is. CW has no "practical" use any longer, it is used for
entertainment only. Again, more power to those who choose to do it.
Removing the 5wpm requirement for more advanced licensing only makes sense.
No one requires anyone to know PSK31 or RTTY now do they? The FCC does not
add that as a specific element of the testing process because it is a "mode"
of operation, no more or less than CW is. Knowing and being able to operate
CW does not make one more of a man, more of a woman, smarter, taller,
slimmer, or better looking. Its just another mode of operation, one that is
going into retirement slowly and painfully. Why not just let those who
enjoy it, do so, and let the rest of us get on with expanding the hobby into
new areas that technology make available to us. Why force us to regress 30
years instead of allowing those who enjoy CW to learn and participate in the
revolution that technology is providing for the Amateur Radio Service?

Ron


Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 12:35:29 AM12/1/06
to

sure it does

which is ilrelavant to the fact that the ARS would be better off if it
were banned

staing that the ARS would be better if CW USE were banned is not the
same as calling for it to be to be

that you choose imply it is is indicative of your lack of skill with
english or in your lack of belief in the free speech rights of all

the facts you object and insinate that I lack the free speech to state
my opinion is IMO indicative that you don't truely believe in free
speech etc for yourself


>
>>> If so, then how is it that you can be so with
>>>such poor spelling skills?
>>
>> GIGO
>
>Can I assume by that you mean that you never learned to spell?

you can assume what ever you like. that amoug your absolute rights

as is the right to be an ass

you excerise both as you choose


>
>OK, neither did I, but then again my news reader has a spell-checking
>program.

the one I prefer does not


>
>>>
>>>If you are an example of what a "Pro-Code" person is, then I don't think
>>>that HAM can really be "dumbed" down any further.
>>
>> we are trying to end the dumbing down by ending code testing
>>>
>>>Ron
>>>
>> http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
>
>I am a no-code op.

realy? so am I

> Removing the requirement for CW neither dumbs down the
>HAM service, nor makes it more intelligent.

indeed


> CW is a niche form of operation
>anymore. Some people enjoy it for reasons that I cannot personally fathom,
>but what the heck, if its their thing then let them have at it. More power
>to them. CW is no longer the main mode of operation used anywhere in the
>world. Phone is. CW has no "practical" use any longer, it is used for
>entertainment only. Again, more power to those who choose to do it.
>Removing the 5wpm requirement for more advanced licensing only makes sense.
>No one requires anyone to know PSK31 or RTTY now do they? The FCC does not
>add that as a specific element of the testing process because it is a "mode"
>of operation, no more or less than CW is. Knowing and being able to operate
>CW does not make one more of a man, more of a woman, smarter, taller,
>slimmer, or better looking. Its just another mode of operation, one that is
>going into retirement slowly and painfully. Why not just let those who
>enjoy it, do so, and let the rest of us get on with expanding the hobby into
>new areas that technology make available to us. Why force us to regress 30
>years instead of allowing those who enjoy CW to learn and participate in the
>revolution that technology is providing for the Amateur Radio Service?

all true

John Smith

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 1:05:10 AM12/1/06
to
Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs wrote:

> the one I prefer does not

Mark:

Take a look at this link, the software is shareware, claims to work with
ANY windows app. I am hoping it might be worth your time, look for the
download link, I have not tried it.

http://www.sharewareconnection.com/spell-magic.htm

Regards,
JS

K4YZ

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 5:15:47 AM12/1/06
to

John Smith wrote:
> "K4YZ" <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1164905170.1...@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
> > ...
> > do it because I'm already in a high stress job and he's cheap
> > entertainment.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Steve, K4YZ
> >
>
> If you are NOT SC, you are his brother... indeed the
> glitch/mis-configuration/error or settings which have been introduced
> into your news reader/poster is a dead giveaway!

Nope.

The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
any annonymous character's "address".

> Perhaps your "high stress" job leads you to commit such mistakes? You
> really should look into getting some help with that "little problem" of
> yours, they have done wonders with new medications, yanno? <grin>

Sounds like Lennie, to me....

Steve, K4YZ

John Smith

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 12:36:47 PM12/1/06
to
K4YZ wrote:
> Nope.
>
> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
> any annonymous character's "address".
>
> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>
> Steve, K4YZ
>

To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.

You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
their minds.

You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
minutes on google will enlighten you.)

JS

Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 1:20:00 PM12/1/06
to
On 1 Dec 2006 02:15:47 -0800, "K4YZ" <steven...@aol.com> wrote:

>
>John Smith wrote:
>> "K4YZ" <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1164905170.1...@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
>> > ...
>> > do it because I'm already in a high stress job and he's cheap
>> > entertainment.
>> >
>> > 73
>> >
>> > Steve, K4YZ
>> >
>>
>> If you are NOT SC, you are his brother... indeed the
>> glitch/mis-configuration/error or settings which have been introduced
>> into your news reader/poster is a dead giveaway!
>
> Nope.

yep


>
> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>any annonymous character's "address".

Steve I can easily fake a set of header for any location where I had
interenet access in the past

I lack the knowledge of how to generate new one but I know it is can
be done

you are therefore lying when you claim thae fact you succeeded in
comiting forgery is proof you are not SC

it is merely proof you are a forger


>
>> Perhaps your "high stress" job leads you to commit such mistakes? You
>> really should look into getting some help with that "little problem" of
>> yours, they have done wonders with new medications, yanno? <grin>
>
> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>
>Steve, K4YZ

Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 1:21:49 PM12/1/06
to

I use it some but it is very cumbersome and certainly unuable due to
time constraints when some like robeson is in full vioce or keyboard
is you prefer
>
>Regards,
>JS

John Smith

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 2:49:14 PM12/1/06
to
K4YZ wrote:
> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
> any annonymous character's "address".
>
> Steve, K4YZ
>

You might enjoy viewing the headers associated with this post, it is the
result of doing nothing, except proxy-ing though a very high security
proxy--now what country do you think I am in? And, if you had to use
the headers to find out?

JS


A. G. Bell

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 6:14:33 PM12/1/06
to

<Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs> wrote in message
news:0ks0n2hpd00e5ncmb...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:05:10 -0800, John Smith
> <assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs wrote:
> >
> >> the one I prefer does not
> >
> >Mark:
> >
> >Take a look at this link, the software is shareware, claims to work with
> >ANY windows app. I am hoping it might be worth your time, look for the
> >download link, I have not tried it.
> >
> >http://www.sharewareconnection.com/spell-magic.htm
>
> I use it some but it is very cumbersome and certainly unuable due to
> time constraints when some like robeson is in full vioce or keyboard
> is you prefer
> >
> >Regards,
> >JS

Don't waste your time sounding intelligent, Mark! God forbid you'd miss a
chance to dump on any of Steve's posts at least six times each.
Steve Robesin is apparetly to you what Lloyd Davies is to Roger Wiseman. He
stalks, you punce.


Slow Code

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 8:41:34 PM12/1/06
to
John Smith <assembl...@gmail.com> wrote in news:eko0io$uim$1...@aioe.org:


You still hoping to be a good radio operator some day or did you decide to
pack it in like Markie?

SC

Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 9:24:46 PM12/1/06
to

JS is code tested and aprooved just missed the brain washing sessions
you attened steve
>
>SC

Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 9:27:44 PM12/1/06
to
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:14:33 -0500, "A. G. Bell" <hello?@marksakook>
wrote:

>
><Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs> wrote in message
>news:0ks0n2hpd00e5ncmb...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:05:10 -0800, John Smith
>> <assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Ma...@kb9rqz.aprs wrote:
>> >
>> >> the one I prefer does not
>> >
>> >Mark:
>> >
>> >Take a look at this link, the software is shareware, claims to work with
>> >ANY windows app. I am hoping it might be worth your time, look for the
>> >download link, I have not tried it.
>> >
>> >http://www.sharewareconnection.com/spell-magic.htm
>>
>> I use it some but it is very cumbersome and certainly unuable due to
>> time constraints when some like robeson is in full vioce or keyboard
>> is you prefer
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >JS
>
>Don't waste your time sounding intelligent, Mark!


I waste nothing sir


>God forbid you'd miss a
>chance to dump on any of Steve's posts at least six times each.

god forbids no such nor do I post more than or twice to any of steve
posts that he chooses to post the same over and over 300 times as he
did today required the cuting and pasting of 30 replies is all
you don't like the reptivenes ask Roesb to at least come up with new
lies to tell

>Steve Robesin is apparetly to you what Lloyd Davies is to Roger Wiseman. He
>stalks, you punce.

I defend myself but thank you for publicly agreeing that Steve is
Stalking me that is a crime

why is it that you blame the victum of the crime for the result?

Ma...@kb9rqz.org

unread,
Jun 1, 2007, 11:07:44 PM6/1/07
to

Dlod it would help if you went and found some gruop where everybody is
indeed stupid to try your misderection tricks in

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

Dloyd Lavies

unread,
Jun 1, 2007, 11:15:19 PM6/1/07
to
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Mark, why would I need a group where everyone is stupid when I have
you? You seem to have enough stupidity to cover the entire group.
Like I've said and you can believe what you want to believe, I really
don't care, I only post under this nym or my own call, I don't need
mulitple nyms, I have no need, one is sufficent and appears that it
still is because you have been unable to detect who I am. Think for a
minute Mark, what purpose would it serve to have multiple nyms? None.

Dloyd

www.kb9rqz.blogspot.com


Ma...@kb9rqz.org

unread,
Jun 1, 2007, 11:19:29 PM6/1/07
to

you might convince somebody you were a man in such a gruop

and you don't have me dloyd

> You seem to have enough stupidity to cover the entire group.

and you are theif a fraud and a coward all things that make for a BAD
ham

>Like I've said and you can believe what you want to believe, I really
>don't care,

might generous of you

> I only post under this nym or my own call, I don't need
>mulitple nyms,

so you say but you are proven dishonest so...

> I have no need,
that is a lie you need the other to have something to tlak to when the
thread does not go your way

> one is sufficent and appears that it
>still is because you have been unable to detect who I am. Think for a
>minute Mark, what purpose would it serve to have multiple nyms? None.

you keep lying te purpose it to sound like a legion when you are only
one bitter old ham

lacking the support of anybody real you invent followers plenty of
prupose there

Ma...@kb9rqz.org

unread,
Jun 10, 2007, 10:52:24 PM6/10/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

but dloyd et al forgets

Ma...@k4yz.org

unread,
Jun 14, 2007, 5:01:30 PM6/14/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

so get a life Larry

kb9rqz

unread,
Jun 14, 2007, 6:23:27 PM6/14/07
to

----- Original Message -----
From: <Ma...@k4yz.org>
Newsgroups:
alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 4:01 PM
Subject: Dloyd Lavies, Usenet Moron and Thread Hi-Jacke, Blackmailer and
Supreme hypocrtie


> On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
> <assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >K4YZ wrote:
> >> Nope.
> >>
> >> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
> >> any annonymous character's "address".
> >>
> >> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
> >>
> >> Steve, K4YZ
> >>
> >
> >To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
> >anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
> >IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
> >spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
> >

Except that Mark hasn't the savvy to do so.

> >You waste my time.

Then stfu.

>Worse, you think us all idiots here.

As you have just proven.


You remind me
"If I want a cock I go for a man if I
want pussy I go fo r a fmeale simple as that [sic]"


Ma...@k4yz.org

unread,
Jun 14, 2007, 6:25:46 PM6/14/07
to
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:23:27 -0500, "kb9rqz" <gay@chassell> wrote:

>

Dloyd Lavies, Usenet Moron and Thread Hi-Jacke, Blackmailer and
Supreme hypocrti

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"

Ma...@k4yz.org

unread,
Jun 14, 2007, 6:26:10 PM6/14/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

larry face facts you have no proof

Ma...@tayleorrobesin.org

unread,
Jul 4, 2007, 5:54:00 PM7/4/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

just something the needs saying again IMO

Not Roger

unread,
Jul 4, 2007, 5:58:55 PM7/4/07
to

<Ma...@TayleorRobesin.org> wrote in message
news:8n5o831ffppl85h8r...@4ax.com...

Ma...@tayleorrobesin.org

unread,
Jul 6, 2007, 4:17:36 PM7/6/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

something you need to dloyd dloyd is I know something of the ab

Ma...@tayleorrobesin.org

unread,
Sep 6, 2007, 2:53:33 PM9/6/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

Ma...@tayleorrobesin.org

unread,
Sep 24, 2007, 10:55:52 PM9/24/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

bears repeating

Gavrielah Hojnacki

unread,
Sep 25, 2007, 10:44:32 AM9/25/07
to
1) I was draft into the US Army.
2) I is a member of the Chemcal Cops
3) The military wont let me retire.
4) I dosn't serve under the name 'Mark Morgan but that's okay cuz theFBI,
DOD, and CIA have al todl me I candodit.
5) I is on-the-lam from stalking former marines and fatal
atraction four ex-shemale wife almoney
6) I was recenty, paying $5/hr. to acess my ISP
7) I has a 248 IQ, but cant figre out how touse a spel checker.
8) I is a bi-sexual Pagan male ham who like to be spanked.
9) I can't find any action on the military base in Central IL, so I hav to
ask the peple on th USNET.
http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/
10) I punce gotcha


<Ma...@TayleorRobesin.org> wrote in message
news:f5ugf3126el380ab0...@4ax.com...
> bears repeating
>
>
INDEED!

Ma...@k4yzrobesin.org

unread,
Sep 25, 2007, 12:16:57 PM9/25/07
to

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--

KB9RQZ

unread,
Sep 25, 2007, 1:05:37 PM9/25/07
to

"Gavrielah Hojnacki" <g...@he-she.com> wrote in message
news:46f912dc$0$26384$8826...@free.teranews.com...

you have been fooled and hoodwinked into to follow the trail breadcrumbs of
a gruop of vile net stalkers I welcome to this site recovered largely as
result of that rotteneighboor.com posting just gott this sit back uner my
control you will soon find find link two my other blog that explore bisexal
ham radio and the peoples in it.

http://ipunce.blogspot.com/index.html

Shalom

Shalom

Ma...@k4yzrobesin.org

unread,
Sep 25, 2007, 1:26:02 PM9/25/07
to
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:05:37 -0400, "KB9RQZ" <kb9rqz
fake

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--

Ma...@k4yzrobesin.org

unread,
Sep 28, 2007, 11:43:50 PM9/28/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

bears repeating

kons...@hotmail.com

unread,
Sep 29, 2007, 5:25:33 AM9/29/07
to

<Ma...@k4yzRobesin.org> wrote in message
news:efirf3dhr0ot0lu27...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
> <assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>K4YZ wrote:
>>> Nope.
>>>
>>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>>
>>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>>
>>> Steve, K4YZ
>>>
>>
>>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>>
>>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>>their minds.
>>
>>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>>
>>JS
> bears repeating becuase i have nothing else to say and it is late

kb9rqz

unread,
Sep 30, 2007, 5:29:31 PM9/30/07
to

"KB9RQZ" <kb9...@punce.com> wrote in message
news:46f933ee$0$26505$8826...@free.teranews.com...
INDEED!!!

Ma...@k4yzrobesin.org

unread,
Sep 30, 2007, 5:57:50 PM9/30/07
to
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:29:31 -0400, "kb9rqz" <kb9queer
fake

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--

Ma...@k4yzrobesin.org

unread,
Oct 2, 2007, 4:23:15 PM10/2/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS
bears repeating

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"

Ma...@k4yzrobesin.org

unread,
Oct 8, 2007, 7:37:54 AM10/8/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

bears repeating esp in terms of the recent rash of forgeries of me

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
altopia is never used by KB9RQZ
nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google

posts from these sorucees are fakes

Ma...@k4yzrobesin.org

unread,
Oct 8, 2007, 11:48:32 AM10/8/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS


why is the foger so carefull to bury this repost too

kb9...@amsat.org

unread,
Oct 21, 2007, 2:31:10 PM10/21/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
altopia is never used by KB9RQZ
nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google

posts from these sorucees are fakes

but till at least terranews is back running well I might use anyserver that comes to hand

Ma...@k4yzrobesin.org

unread,
Oct 20, 2007, 6:00:43 AM10/20/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

since someone wants us to belive that he is steve

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
altopia is never used by KB9RQZ
nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google

posts from these sorucees are fakes

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--

John Doe

unread,
Oct 22, 2007, 9:28:06 PM10/22/07
to

<Ma...@k4yzRobesin.org> wrote in message
news:g8kjh3liom72i3fg0...@4ax.com...

HEY DUMMY - U POSTED THIS CRAP-TRASH IN THE WRONG GROUP


kb9...@amsat.org

unread,
Oct 26, 2007, 6:50:33 AM10/26/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

bearsrepeating

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
altopia is never used by KB9RQZ
nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google

posts from these sorucees are fakes

but till at least terranews is back running well I might use anyserver that comes to hand

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

kons...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 26, 2007, 10:15:36 PM10/26/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 12:08:01 AM10/27/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

a calsiss post

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 12:13:08 PM10/27/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

still true today forging flooder

John Doe

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 1:59:11 PM10/27/07
to

<kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7so6i3prd6s8orf15...@4ax.com...

You never make an OT post about anything - all you do is keep posting this
stupid woger comment!
You are the biggest jerk around!


Unknown

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 2:37:20 PM10/27/07
to

>
> You never make an OT post about anything - all you do is keep posting
> this stupid woger comment!
> You are the biggest jerk around!
But, don't you see? It is not Mark's fault.
Just ask him.
It is Roger's fault.
It is Dloyd's fault.
It is Steve's fault.
It is Delorean's fault.
Heck, it is your fault, too.
Are you beginning to see the pattern here? When Mark behaves stupidly (a
daily occurence) it is ALWAYS someone else's fault. He just cannot help
himself, don't you see?

But you are right about one thing. He IS the biggest jerk (I have a less
kind descriptor) around.


Unknown

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 2:38:36 PM10/27/07
to
Nitwit Mark floods the group with inane posts and then has the unmitigated
stupidity to call someone else a "flooder".
How ironic.


kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 3:58:30 PM10/27/07
to
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:59:11 -0400, "John Doe" <hgo...@adelphia.net>
wrote:

you are lying

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2007, 4:31:07 PM10/27/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

you can runn but you can hardly hide

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 28, 2007, 6:49:17 PM10/28/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

still bearing repeating

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 31, 2007, 12:20:05 PM10/31/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

bearign repeating

John Doe

unread,
Oct 31, 2007, 12:53:19 PM10/31/07
to
This post is not OT on code!!!!

<kb9...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qgahi3530ubm16bf7...@4ax.com...

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 31, 2007, 1:25:53 PM10/31/07
to
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:53:19 -0400, "John Doe" <hgo...@adelphia.net>
wrote:

>This post is not OT on code!!!!
>

it is entirely on topic as it is a about control

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 31, 2007, 1:26:00 PM10/31/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 31, 2007, 10:37:01 PM10/31/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 10, 2007, 12:17:17 PM11/10/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

and another

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
altopia is never used by KB9RQZ

nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google and noow motezrella

posts from these sorucees are fakes

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 12, 2007, 8:03:12 PM11/12/07
to

nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google and noow motezrella

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 17, 2007, 2:50:14 PM11/17/07
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:00:43 -0400, Ma...@k4yzRobesin.org wrote:

nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google and noow motezrella

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 12, 2007, 7:36:03 PM11/12/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
altopia is never used by KB9RQZ
nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google and noow motezrella

posts from these sorucees are fakes

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 17, 2007, 7:31:33 PM11/17/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>e

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 17, 2007, 7:41:14 PM11/17/07
to

nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google and noow motezrella

posts from these sorucees are fakes

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 18, 2007, 11:01:50 AM11/18/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 18, 2007, 3:47:53 PM11/18/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

hell even Ican look like I cam coming from somewhere else anytime I
like

you can do that same stop trying that lie about header

you are a fake and a fraud

Dloyd Lavies

unread,
Nov 18, 2007, 3:50:42 PM11/18/07
to
> nor is Konst...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google and noow motezrella

>
> posts from these sorucees are fakes
>
> and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well
>
> G
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 18, 2007, 3:54:41 PM11/18/07
to

kons...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 18, 2007, 4:32:16 PM11/18/07
to

hell even Ican look like I cam coming from somewhere else anytime I
like and i can and do post over calls of others at
http://kd8ctl.blogspot.com


you can do that same stop trying that lie about header since i know all
about lies and how to tel them

you are a fake and i am a fraud and my mind goes topy turvy at my funy
http://khkb9rqz.blogspot.com/ where i cannot splell a word

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a
congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

altopia is never used by KB9RQZ

nor is my mind ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google and noow
motezrella

posts from these sorucees are fakes

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

-

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 18, 2007, 4:33:53 PM11/18/07
to
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:32:16 -0500, "kb9...@hotmail.com"
<kons...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>http://kd8ctl.blogspot.com

nice confession dloyd

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/


altopia is never used by KB9RQZ

nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google and noow motezrella

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2007, 12:40:59 AM11/19/07
to
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
<assembl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>K4YZ wrote:
>> Nope.
>>
>> The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share
>> any annonymous character's "address".
>>
>> Sounds like Lennie, to me....
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
>To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies,
>anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones
>IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time
>spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world.
>
>You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me
>of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys
>with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in
>"expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle
>their minds.
>
>You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such
>technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the
>latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15
>minutes on google will enlighten you.)
>
>JS

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/
altopia is never used by KB9RQZ
nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever udsed on the usenet from anywhere but google and noow motezrella

posts from these sorucees are fakes

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2007, 10:43:02 AM11/19/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2007, 11:37:14 AM11/19/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2007, 2:20:18 PM11/19/07
to

Denny

unread,
Nov 19, 2007, 4:42:58 PM11/19/07
to
Sure would be pleasant if you folks would take your childish squabbles
elsewhere...

konstans

unread,
Nov 19, 2007, 4:44:29 PM11/19/07
to

"Denny" <k8...@mailblocks.com> wrote in message
news:266539a5-61fa-42e5...@b32g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...

> Sure would be pleasant if you folks would take your childish squabbles
> elsewhere...

never been my choise as to where to fight sory about that


kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2007, 4:48:45 PM11/19/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 20, 2007, 11:26:01 AM11/20/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 20, 2007, 7:14:14 PM11/20/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 21, 2007, 8:18:52 AM11/21/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 23, 2007, 12:28:09 AM11/23/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 25, 2007, 12:32:59 PM11/25/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 27, 2007, 7:13:24 PM11/27/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 27, 2007, 8:59:26 PM11/27/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 28, 2007, 1:43:57 PM11/28/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 5, 2007, 3:00:15 PM12/5/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 7:07:54 PM12/7/07
to

kb9...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 10:11:14 PM12/7/07
to
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages