Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Stainless Steel Tube for Yagi Directors

98 views
Skip to first unread message

maxpo...@yahoo.com.au

unread,
Jun 9, 2008, 1:24:19 AM6/9/08
to
Hello All,
I am building a DL6WU Yagi for 2 metres and am wondering if 1/4 inch
stainless steel tube would be okay for the directors and reflector. I
have been given some so it would save me from having to buy aluminium.
I will still use aluminium for the folded dipole and for the boom. Any
thoughts would be welcome.
Cheers
Max

Alan Peake

unread,
Jun 9, 2008, 1:37:32 AM6/9/08
to


It will probably be a bit lossier than using Al but my first Yagi on 288
MHz(in the early 60s)was made out of 8g fencing wire and it seemed to work
reasonably well. Try the evaluation version of Eznec - I think you can
specify the material.
Alan

Alan Peake

unread,
Jun 9, 2008, 2:04:47 AM6/9/08
to

Just checked - tried a 6m yagi and with Cu elements, gain is 9.64dB With
SS elements, gain is 9.41 dB
Alan

Brian Howie

unread,
Jun 9, 2008, 3:05:57 AM6/9/08
to
In message <484CC19C...@nosspam.activ8.net.au>, Alan Peake
<adp...@nosspam.activ8.net.au> writes
MMANA gives >3dB degradation for Fe over Al (11ele DK7ZB on 2m), which
surprises me. What does Eznec give ?

Brian GM4DIJ


--
Brian Howie

Alan Peake

unread,
Jun 9, 2008, 8:57:45 AM6/9/08
to

Brian Howie wrote:

> MMANA gives >3dB degradation for Fe over Al (11ele DK7ZB on 2m), which
> surprises me. What does Eznec give ?
>
> Brian GM4DIJ

Using an 11 el DL6WU at 144.2MHz and 10mm elements, EZNEC gives gains of
14.31 dBi for Al and 14.22 for SS. With 5mm elements, it's 14.54 for Al
and 14.37 for SS.
I used a figure of 7e-7 ohm-m for the resistivity. Most stainless steels
range from 5e-7 to 7.4e-7 ohm-m.
3dB does seem excessive.
Alan VK2ADB


lt...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jun 9, 2008, 11:20:11 AM6/9/08
to
Max,
While there may be some degradation in gain from using stainless
steel, would it really make that much difference? I think the 'biggy'
is that you already have the stainless steel and would have to find
the aluminum. Maybe the next 'biggest' thing would be making
electrical contact between sections of that steel? A tenth of a dB
loss just ain't no step for a stepper...
- 'Doc

(all puns intended)


Roy Lewallen

unread,
Jun 9, 2008, 1:13:39 PM6/9/08
to

Apparently Brian used iron as the model material, which of course is
magnetic. Skin depth is reduced, and therefore RF resistance increased,
by the square root of the permeability. So if the iron model's
permeability is, say, 100, it would increase the effective resistance by
a factor of 10.

Some stainless steels are magnetic, some are not. The magnetic ones have
much higher RF resistance than the non-magnetic ones for the above reason.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Brian Howie

unread,
Jun 9, 2008, 3:04:06 PM6/9/08
to
In message <JdadnVG0m79Y-dDV...@posted.easystreetonline>,
Roy Lewallen <w7...@eznec.com> writes

Yes I rechecked it with 7e-7 ohm-m and 0 permeability and got a lot
better results. Moral here is don't use iron wire for antennas .

73 Brian GM4DIJ

--
Brian Howie

Lumpy

unread,
Jun 9, 2008, 9:33:20 PM6/9/08
to

"Sorry OM, I just can't copy you.
Can you switch to a beam with aluminum elements?"

...

"CQ Aluminum, CQ Aluminum, CQ Aluminum"


Lumpy

You Played on Lawrence Welk?
Yes but no blue notes. Just blue hairs.

www.LumpyGuitar.net


0 new messages