Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Movie Sequels

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Tom Collins

unread,
Jan 2, 2001, 7:59:18 PM1/2/01
to
The producers/writers have used a variety of ways to represent movie/TV
sequel titles. For example:
Strait numbers like 2, 3, 4
Roman Numerals like II, III, IV
Words like Returns, Back, Final
Or just craziness like 2 1/2, 33 1/3.

How many different ways can you find that have been used in the past. Please
include the whole movie name.
I'm looking for variations of the sequel part, not the original titles, e.g.
Rocky IV & Star Trek IV count as only one variation.

Good Luck.
--

Tom Collins
tcol...@america.net
(or remove the nospam when doing a reply)


Joe

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 8:29:05 AM1/3/01
to
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001 19:59:18 -0500, Tom Collins wrote:
>The producers/writers have used a variety of ways to represent movie/TV
>sequel titles. For example:
>Strait numbers like 2, 3, 4
>Roman Numerals like II, III, IV
>Words like Returns, Back, Final
>Or just craziness like 2 1/2, 33 1/3.
>

Pluralise the original title:

e.g. Alien -> Aliens.

Introduce a completely new title:

e.g. First Blood -> Rambo.

These lead to my obPuzzle:

Some films have a sequel for which there doesn't seem to be a prequel,
e.g. there are films called Alien 3 and Rambo 3, but no Alien 2 or
Rambo 2. How many examples are there?

Matthew T. Russotto

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 8:40:21 AM1/3/01
to
In article <iQu46.1074$Dm5....@eagle.america.net>,

Tom Collins <tcol...@america.net.no-spam> wrote:
}The producers/writers have used a variety of ways to represent movie/TV
}sequel titles. For example:
}Strait numbers like 2, 3, 4
}Roman Numerals like II, III, IV
}Words like Returns, Back, Final
}Or just craziness like 2 1/2, 33 1/3.
}
}How many different ways can you find that have been used in the past. Please
}include the whole movie name.
}I'm looking for variations of the sequel part, not the original titles, e.g.
}Rocky IV & Star Trek IV count as only one variation.

Comparatives: Die Hard, Die Hard 2:Die Harder
The third was Die Hard with a Vengeance, which probably counts as craziness.

Rambo changed its title and sequel method midway through: First
Blood, Rambo: First Blood Part II, Rambo III

Star Wars uses "Episode" followed by a roman numeral, and an episode name

Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope (not the original title)
Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back
Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace
Star Wars: Episode II.I/II - The Many Deaths of Jar-Jar Binks (OK, maybe not)

Star Trek uses a roman numeral and a subtitle e.g.
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Kahn

There's probably a ridiculous number of variations.

--
Matthew T. Russotto russ...@pond.com
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue."

The Vaughans

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 10:03:23 AM1/3/01
to
Tom Collins wrote:

> The producers/writers have used a variety of ways to represent movie/TV
> sequel titles. For example:
> Strait numbers like 2, 3, 4
> Roman Numerals like II, III, IV
> Words like Returns, Back, Final
> Or just craziness like 2 1/2, 33 1/3.
>
> How many different ways can you find that have been used in the past.

Sorry, but I am too lazy to look up some specific titles. But one genre is the
"Son of" type. And I think "Bride of Frankenstein" is a sequel as well.

Mark VandeWettering

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 1:09:20 PM1/3/01
to

You'd have to include "Abbott and Costello meet" with those. :-)

Mark

--
/* __ __ __ ____ __*/float m,a,r,k,v;main(i){for(;r<4;r+=.1){for(a=0;
/*| \/ |\ \ / /\ \ / /*/a<4;a+=.06){k=v=0;for(i=99;--i&&k*k+v*v<4;)m=k*k
/*| |\/| | \ V / \ \/\/ / */-v*v+a-2,v=2*k*v+r-2,k=m;putchar("X =."[i&3]);}
/*|_| |_ark\_/ande\_/\_/ettering <ma...@telescopemaking.org> */puts("");}}

Mike Keith

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 1:22:28 PM1/3/01
to
>> The producers/writers have used a variety of ways to represent movie/TV
>> sequel titles. For example:
>> Strait numbers like 2, 3, 4
>> Roman Numerals like II, III, IV
>> Words like Returns, Back, Final
>> Or just craziness like 2 1/2, 33 1/3.
>>
>> How many different ways can you find that have been used in the past.
>

(1) Nonconsecutive numbers: 2001 -> 2010

(2) I'm not sure where this falls in the various types that
have been mentioned, but the Italian movie/sequel pair

"Quando le donne avevano la coda" ->
"Quando le donne persero la coda"

is syntactically interesting, with a word changed in the
middle of the title.

James Mcadams

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 2:24:21 PM1/3/01
to
In article <20010103132228...@ng-ct1.aol.com>,

Mike Keith <dom...@aol.comXYZXYZ> wrote:
>
>(2) I'm not sure where this falls in the various types that
>have been mentioned, but the Italian movie/sequel pair
>
>"Quando le donne avevano la coda" ->
>"Quando le donne persero la coda"
>
>is syntactically interesting, with a word changed in the
>middle of the title.

A related American example: "Vacation", "European Vacation"...

JIMMC.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim McAdams | Do,
jmca...@interaccess.com | or Do Not.
630-859-6902 | There is no "Try". - Yoda
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eric Sosman

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 2:38:11 PM1/3/01
to
Mike Keith wrote:
>
> >> The producers/writers have used a variety of ways to represent movie/TV
> >> sequel titles. For example:
> >> Strait numbers like 2, 3, 4
> >> Roman Numerals like II, III, IV
> >> Words like Returns, Back, Final
> >> Or just craziness like 2 1/2, 33 1/3.
> >>
> >> How many different ways can you find that have been used in the past.

Colors: "I am Curious (Yellow)" and "I am Curious (Blue)."

--
Eric....@east.sun.com

Jim Gillogly

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 3:22:37 PM1/3/01
to
Tom Collins wrote:
> I'm looking for variations of the sequel part, not the original titles, e.g.
> Rocky IV & Star Trek IV count as only one variation.

There's also "and the":

Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, etc.
Tarzan and the Four O'Clock Army, etc.

Or 's:

Tarzan's Desert Mystery

Or, in fact, <any> phrase after the protagonist's name:

Tarzan Comes to Delhi

Or before it:

The Mask of Zorro

In fact, there are a great many movies of the form:

The <foo> of Zorro

so that's probably a specific variation in itself.
--
Jim Gillogly
Mersday, 12 Afteryule S.R. 2001, 20:16
12.19.7.15.8, 13 Lamat 11 Kankin, Second Lord of Night

Paul Bobby

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 2:29:22 PM1/3/01
to
Zulu


and then the prequel

Zulu Dawn


On Tue, 2 Jan 2001 19:59:18 -0500, "Tom Collins"

Mark Brader

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 3:41:14 PM1/3/01
to
I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997)
-> I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1998)

This example is also interesting because both titles refer to the
summer of 1996, so the second one is actually wrong. (Or so I hear
from multiple sources; I haven't seen either movie myself.) It's
about the 6th example of a feature film whose title exhibits an error.
--
Mark Brader (Douglas R.) Hofstadter's Law:
Toronto "It always takes longer than you expect, even
m...@vex.net when you take into account Hofstadter's Law."

My text in this article is in the public domain.

Jeremy Cooke

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 3:59:57 PM1/3/01
to
A couple that spring to mind:


"I know what you did last summer" and its sequel "I still know what you did
last summer"

Not so much sequels but a series of films;
Three Colours Red
Three Colours Blue
Three Colours Yellow (I think, though I haven't seen them)

Hot Shots Part Deux

Manon Des Sources & Jean De Florette

Jaws 3D

Look Who's Talking Too - sequal to Look who's talking

Three Men and a Little Lady - sequal to Three Men and a Baby

Silence of the Lambs & Hannibal - an interesting sequel title as it's
title is a character from the original.

The entire collection of the classic "Carry on..." films (Carry on up your
convenience, Carry on Camping.....etc etc). Not sequels in the strictest
sense though.

In the same vein as the Carry On films, the "Confessions of a...." films.
(...Plumber, ...Window Cleaner, ...Driving Instructor). Classics!!!!!


Hope this helps.

Jeremy

Tom Collins wrote in message ...

Joseph Mcveety

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 4:03:04 PM1/3/01
to
Weren't there a bunch of "Flint" movies which had titles such as:
"In Like Flint" and "Our Man Flint"?

A search of IMDB ought to turn them up.

I don't know if the 007 films have been mentioned yet or not, either.

Jim Gillogly

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 5:04:42 PM1/3/01
to
Jeremy Cooke wrote:

> Silence of the Lambs & Hannibal - an interesting sequel title as it's
> title is a character from the original.

To confuse the situation more, they're both sequels to the also
unrelated title Manhunter, a 1986 Michael Mann movie with Brian
Cox in the anthropophagous role of Dr. Hannibal Lektor/Lecter.
--
Jim Gillogly
Mersday, 12 Afteryule S.R. 2001, 22:00

Max

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 6:50:52 PM1/3/01
to
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001 12:22:37 -0800, Jim Gillogly <j...@acm.org> wrote:

>There's also "and the":
>
> Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, etc.
> Tarzan and the Four O'Clock Army, etc.
>
>Or 's:
>
> Tarzan's Desert Mystery
>
>Or, in fact, <any> phrase after the protagonist's name:
>
> Tarzan Comes to Delhi
>
>Or before it:
>
> The Mask of Zorro
>
>In fact, there are a great many movies of the form:
>
> The <foo> of Zorro
>
>so that's probably a specific variation in itself.
>--
> Jim Gillogly
> Mersday, 12 Afteryule S.R. 2001, 20:16
> 12.19.7.15.8, 13 Lamat 11 Kankin, Second Lord of Night

Which brings to mind all the Bob Hope / Bing Crosby "Road" pictures --
(On the Road to xxxxx).

Pro-Zak

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 7:34:35 PM1/3/01
to
Mad Max
Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior
Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome

Steven Howard

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 9:47:04 PM1/3/01
to
A couple of other variations:

Spelling out the word "part", as in THE GODFATHER, PART 2 and THE
GODFATHER, PART 3.

Putting the "part" part first, as in PART 2, WALKING TALL (alternate
title of, what else, WALKING TALL, PART 2).

Same title, different subtitles, as in AUSTIN POWERS: INTERNATIONAL
MAN OF MYSTERY and AUSTIN POWERS: THE SPY WHO SHAGGED ME.

Using a year rather than a number, as in BROADWAY MELODY OF 1936,
BROADWAY MELODY OF 1938, etc. (all "sequels" to BROADWAY MELODY).

Prepending the word "another" to the original title, as in ANOTHER 48
HRS, ANOTHER STAKEOUT, ANOTHER THIN MAN, etc. (Presumably the third
movie in such a series would be "YET ANOTHER <FOO>").

Trivia: Was THE GODFATHER, PART 2, the first "numerical" sequel?

Trivia II: What was the first movie sequel where the entire title was
the title of the first movie followed by the Roman numeral II?

========
Steven Howard
mrb...@earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~mrblore


Matthew T. Russotto

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 10:46:41 PM1/3/01
to
In article <3A53A1FA...@acm.org>, Jim Gillogly <j...@acm.org> wrote:
}Jeremy Cooke wrote:
}
}> Silence of the Lambs & Hannibal - an interesting sequel title as it's
}> title is a character from the original.
}
}To confuse the situation more, they're both sequels to the also
}unrelated title Manhunter, a 1986 Michael Mann movie with Brian
}Cox in the anthropophagous role of Dr. Hannibal Lektor/Lecter.

Where's _Red Dragon_ fit in?

Jim Gillogly

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 11:20:20 PM1/3/01
to
"Matthew T. Russotto" wrote:
>
> In article <3A53A1FA...@acm.org>, Jim Gillogly <j...@acm.org> wrote:
> }Jeremy Cooke wrote:
> }
> }> Silence of the Lambs & Hannibal - an interesting sequel title as it's
> }> title is a character from the original.
> }
> }To confuse the situation more, they're both sequels to the also
> }unrelated title Manhunter, a 1986 Michael Mann movie with Brian
> }Cox in the anthropophagous role of Dr. Hannibal Lektor/Lecter.
>
> Where's _Red Dragon_ fit in?

Manhunter, Red Dragon, and Red Dragon: The Pursuit of Hannibal Lecter
are all names for the same movie.
--
Jim Gillogly
Highday, 13 Afteryule S.R. 2001, 04:19

Andy Averill

unread,
Jan 3, 2001, 11:26:19 PM1/3/01
to

"Tom Collins" <tcol...@america.net.no-spam> wrote in message
news:iQu46.1074$Dm5....@eagle.america.net...

> The producers/writers have used a variety of ways to represent movie/TV
> sequel titles. For example:
> Strait numbers like 2, 3, 4
> Roman Numerals like II, III, IV
> Words like Returns, Back, Final
> Or just craziness like 2 1/2, 33 1/3.
>
> How many different ways can you find that have been used in the past.
Please
> include the whole movie name.
> I'm looking for variations of the sequel part, not the original titles,
e.g.
> Rocky IV & Star Trek IV count as only one variation.

:Here's a related trivia question:

Can you name a movie that's both a sequel to a remake and a remake of a
sequel?


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----

D. A. Thompson

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 1:39:01 AM1/4/01
to
"Tom Collins" <tcol...@america.net.no-spam> wrote:

>The producers/writers have used a variety of ways to represent movie/TV
>sequel titles. For example:
>Strait numbers like 2, 3, 4
>Roman Numerals like II, III, IV
>Words like Returns, Back, Final
>Or just craziness like 2 1/2, 33 1/3.
>
>How many different ways can you find that have been used in the past. Please
>include the whole movie name.
>I'm looking for variations of the sequel part, not the original titles, e.g.
>Rocky IV & Star Trek IV count as only one variation.

*Changing a place name:
Ernest Goes to _______, Road to _______.

*Taking an initial from the original title and adding a number, then
subtitling with the original's full name:
D2: The Mighty Ducks, D3: The Mighty Ducks.

*Subtitle is a number written out:
Decalogue: One, Decalogue: Two, etc.

*Vs.:
Godzilla vs. ________.

*3D:
T2 3D, Jaws 3-D
[The planned title for Jaws 3-D was Jaws 3 People 0, according to IMDB]

*Spinoff sequel merging with the original series, creating chaos:
Scanner Cop 2, a.k.a. Scanners IV: Scanner Cop.

Richard John Cavell

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 12:54:49 AM1/4/01
to
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, it was written:

> Can you name a movie that's both a sequel to a remake and a remake of a
> sequel?

? Return to Oz ?

--------------
Richard Cavell
Medical Student, Debater, Chess Player, etc.
-richar...@mail.com

Newsgroups - Please keep any discussion on the group, and copy your
replies to me via email. (Server problems).

Do you want filthy language and abuse sent back to you? Just send me bulk
unsolicited email! Don't say you didn't ask for it!

Aaron M. Ucko

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 1:23:29 AM1/4/01
to
"Jeremy Cooke" <jeremy...@virgin.net> writes:

> A couple that spring to mind:
>
> "I know what you did last summer" and its sequel "I still know what you did
> last summer"
>
> Not so much sequels but a series of films;
> Three Colours Red
> Three Colours Blue
> Three Colours Yellow (I think, though I haven't seen them)

White, actually:

1. Trois couleurs: Bleu (1993)
(Three Colors: Blue (1994) (USA))
2. Trzy kolory: Bialy (1994)
(Three Colors: White (1994) (USA))
3. Trois couleurs: Rouge (1994)
(Three Colors: Red (1994) (USA))

Evil Dead -> Evil Dead 2 -> Army of Darkness
The Addams Family -> Addams Family Values
Aladdin -> The Return of Jafar
(probably other "The Return Of ___"s)

and last but by no means least

1. Toxic Avenger, The (1985)
2. Toxic Avenger, Part II, The (1989)
3. Toxic Avenger Part III: The Last Temptation of Toxie, The (1989)
4. Citizen Toxie: The Toxic Avenger Part 4 (1999)

[I wish I could say I was making that series up.]

--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC <a...@mit.edu> (finger a...@monk.mit.edu)

tom.sa...@shopsmart.com

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 4:21:45 AM1/4/01
to

> :Here's a related trivia question:
>
> Can you name a movie that's both a sequel to a remake and a remake of
a
> sequel?
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
>

SPOILER

SPACE


Father of the Bride Part II (1995) is a sequel to Father of the Bride
(1991) which was a remake of the Spencer Tracey 1950 original. Since
the Spencer Tracey film also had a a sequel (Father's Little Dividend)
which the 1995 film remakes, FOTBP2 is both a sequel to a remake and a
remake of a sequel.

Tom

--
Tom Salinsky - these are opinions are mine alone.
-------------------------------------------------
"Why do people insist upon singing 'Jerusalem'?
It's just a series of questions - the answer to the first
verse being "no" and to the second "get them yourself."


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

tom.sa...@shopsmart.com

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 4:22:31 AM1/4/01
to
In article <3a53e7a3$1$zeoyber$mr2...@news.cis.dfn.de>,
Is Quatermass II (1955) the answer to both questions?

Shammy

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 4:39:30 AM1/4/01
to

"Matthew T. Russotto" <russ...@wanda.vf.pond.com> wrote in message

<snip>


> Star Wars: Episode II.I/II - The Many Deaths of Jar-Jar Binks (OK, maybe
not)

One can only hope .

--
Shammy


Shammy

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 4:42:00 AM1/4/01
to
What about the Bond movies?
Sequels?

Also, is anyone counting?
--
Shammy

"Jeremy Cooke" <jeremy...@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:JqM46.49178$ca6.7...@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com...

Joe

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 7:00:57 AM1/4/01
to
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001 18:47:04 -0800, Steven Howard wrote:
>
>Trivia: Was THE GODFATHER, PART 2, the first "numerical" sequel?

No. Probably Henry V, Part II, or something like that :-)

Mark Brader

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 9:23:10 AM1/4/01
to
Joseph Mcveety writes:
> Weren't there a bunch of "Flint" movies which had titles such as:
> "In Like Flint" and "Our Man Flint"?

A bunch of two, to be exact. Those two.



> I don't know if the 007 films have been mentioned yet or not, either.

Irrelevant, since they are not named in any systematic way. (Well, all
right, they do mean that "no system" is one answer. And, of course,
that has been a frequent choice.)

One interesting series as regards naming has been the Inspector Clouseau
movies written and directed (and mostly also produced) by Blake Edwards.
The first two, which were made at the same time and released very close
together, had no systematic names: "The Pink Panther" (1963) and "A Shot
in the Dark" (1964). The second movie was actually an adaptation of a
play that did not have Clouseau in it, and he, played by Peter Sellers,
was the only character in common between the two movies.

A gap of several years followed, during which a different set of people
made the movie "Inspector Clouseau" (1968), directed by Bud Yorkin and
starring Alan Arkin as Clouseau.

Edwards then resumed his series with "The Return of the Pink Panther"
(1974), which was a combined sequel to the first two movies, using
characters from both. Obviously, this used the "The Return of" naming
convention, which was justified because the stories of the first and
third movies each revolved around a jewel named the Pink Panther.

The jewel was never seen again, but there were 5 more movies in the
series after that (three of them after Sellers had died!), and they
all had Pink Panther in the title: "The Pink Panther Strikes Again"
(1976), "Revenge of the Pink Panther" (1978), "Trail of the Pink
Panther" (1982), "Curse of the Pink Panther" (1983), and finally
"Son of the Pink Panther" (1993). Clearly the viewer was supposed to
view the name as being transferred to Clouseau himself; the last movie
was indeed about his son.

("Clous", by the way, is French for nails, and "eau" means water. Hmm.)

A similar case was that of the Thin Man series, starring William Powell
and Myrna Loy as mostly-retired detective Nick Charles and his wife
Nora. In the original "The Thin Man" (1934), the title character was a
crime suspect, and his thinness figured in the story. The second movie
was about Charles's next case, hence the title "After the Thin Man" (1936).
The third movie was "Another Thin Man" (1939), its title clearly referring
to a new character, whose measurements were purely incidental.

But as the series continued with "Shadow of the Thin Man" (1941), "The
Thin Man Goes Home" (1945), and "Song of the Thin Man" (1947), the same
sort of transference to the continuing character occurred. Certainly
this had occurred by the fifth movie, where nobody "went home" except
Nick himself. Even the third movie, according to the IMDB, was promoted
under the alternate title "Return of the Thin Man".
--
Mark Brader | "The occasional accidents had been much overemphasized,
Toronto | and later investigations ... revealed that nearly 90%
m...@vex.net | ... could have been prevented." --Wiley Post, 1931

Mark Brader

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 9:29:41 AM1/4/01
to
Steven Howard:

>> Trivia: Was THE GODFATHER, PART 2, the first "numerical" sequel?

"Joe":

> No. Probably Henry V, Part II, or something like that :-)

Actually it *is* something like that. The first "numerical" sequel movie
was "Karl XII, del II" (1925). The title character was a King of Sweden
and, yes, "del" is Swedish for "part".
--
Mark Brader "Do YOU trust US?"
Toronto "YES!! Well, we try to."
m...@vex.net -- A Walk in the Woods, by Lee Blessing

Dave Seaman

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 11:13:32 AM1/4/01
to
In article <slrn958pfo...@mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk>,

There was only one Henry V play, but there was a "Henry VI, Part II",
"Henry VI, Part III", and "Henry IV, Part II". The Henry VI plays were
the earliest that Shakespeare wrote.

--
Dave Seaman dse...@purdue.edu
Amnesty International calls for new trial for Mumia Abu-Jamal
<http://www.amnestyusa.org/abolish/reports/mumia/>

Ed Murphy

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 4:34:11 PM1/4/01
to
"Mark Brader" <m...@vex.net> wrote:

> Joseph Mcveety writes:
> > Weren't there a bunch of "Flint" movies which had titles such as:
> > "In Like Flint" and "Our Man Flint"?
>
> A bunch of two, to be exact. Those two.

"Fletch" and "Fletch Lives" also come to mind.

> One interesting series as regards naming has been the Inspector Clouseau
> movies written and directed (and mostly also produced) by Blake Edwards.
> The first two, which were made at the same time and released very close
> together, had no systematic names: "The Pink Panther" (1963) and "A Shot
> in the Dark" (1964). The second movie was actually an adaptation of a
> play that did not have Clouseau in it, and he, played by Peter Sellers,
> was the only character in common between the two movies.

Several Kevin Smith movies ("Clerks", "Mallrats", "Chasing Amy", "Dogma"
- I think) have the common characters Jay and Silent Bob.


--
Ed Murphy <fo...@jps.net> http://rivendell.fortunecity.com/meridian/309/
"Most of the time, it seemed sublimely unaware of its limbs,
though it was beginning to suspect it had hands."

Andy Averill

unread,
Jan 4, 2001, 10:06:31 PM1/4/01
to
Brilliant -- that's the one I was thinking of.

<tom.sa...@shopsmart.com> wrote in message
news:931fb5$s7i$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...

Peter Morris

unread,
Jan 8, 2001, 12:55:31 PM1/8/01
to

"Tom Collins" <tcol...@america.net.no-spam> wrote in message
news:iQu46.1074$Dm5....@eagle.america.net...
> The producers/writers have used a variety of ways to represent movie/TV
> sequel titles. For example:
> Strait numbers like 2, 3, 4
> Roman Numerals like II, III, IV
> Words like Returns, Back, Final
> Or just craziness like 2 1/2, 33 1/3.
>
> How many different ways can you find that have been used in the past.
Please
> include the whole movie name.
> I'm looking for variations of the sequel part, not the original titles,
e.g.
> Rocky IV & Star Trek IV count as only one variation.
>
> Good Luck.

House 2 - The Second Storey


Norman L. DeForest

unread,
Feb 21, 2001, 4:31:44 AM2/21/01
to

On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Tom Collins wrote:

> The producers/writers have used a variety of ways to represent movie/TV
> sequel titles. For example:
> Strait numbers like 2, 3, 4
> Roman Numerals like II, III, IV
> Words like Returns, Back, Final
> Or just craziness like 2 1/2, 33 1/3.
>
> How many different ways can you find that have been used in the past. Please
> include the whole movie name.
> I'm looking for variations of the sequel part, not the original titles, e.g.
> Rocky IV & Star Trek IV count as only one variation.

I heard of a porn comedy in the '60s or '70s titled:
"If You Don't Stop It, You'll Go Blind!"
The sequel was called:
"Can I Do It Until I Need Glasses?"

--
Norman De Forest [=||=] http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~af380/Profile.html
af...@chebucto.ns.ca -- "there's something awfully appealing about sending
vegetables into low earth orbit. Particularly brussels sprouts and MCSEs."
-- Justin Warren in a.t-s.r, Feb 19, 2001

0 new messages