+-------------------+
| |
| |
| +-------------------+
| | | |
| +---------------|---+ |
| | | | | |
+---------|---------+ | |
| | | |
| | | |
| +-------------|-----+
| |
+-------------------+
Three similar rectangles can be completely linked
together such that removing any single rectangle
causes the remaining rectangles to become unlinked.
Now do the same thing with four similar rectangles.
-Evan
Below is a diagram of four similar rectangles linked in a Brunnian link
(unless I goofed on the over-under parts while editing to get the rectangles
looking similar in the font that I was using).
-Carl G.
+--------+
| |
| +------|-+
| | | |
| | +--------+
| | | | | |
+---|------|---|--------+
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
+-|----------|-|--------+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
+---|----+ | |
| | | |
+-|------+ |
| |
+--------+
This doesn't seem to work - e.g. rectangles 1 & 4 (in order of appearance)
are linked as a pair.
Mike.
I goofed up the fourth rectangle, possibly when I was trying to make the
rectrangles look "similar". I am not sure why there was a similarity
requirement, except to make the ASCII art harder. Below is another attempt,
but since this is a "quick fix", I may have missed something else.
Carl G.
+--------+
| |
| +------|-+
| | | |
| | +--------+
| | | | | |
+-|--------|---|--------+
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
+---|--------|-|--------+