Please Reply Directly to:
yak...@aol.com
It probably isn't possible and there are certainly none that exist.
Finding a ten-square with acceptable words is one of the great unsolved
puzzles in wordplay. Furthermore, the usual style of ten square has each
word twice, once running across and once running downwards. A ten-square
with twenty different words is a whole level more difficult still.
The best you can hope for is an 8x8 square with no blanks and no
repeated words. There are examples such as the one below by Jeff Grant
but some of the words are very obscure and you will have to write the
clues yourself. Smaller squares will have more acceptable words:
TRATTLED
HEMERINE
APOTOMES
METAPORE
NAILINGS
ALOISIAS
TENTMATE
ASSESSED
William
---------------------------------------------------------------
| * Crossword Maestro * (solves cryptic and non-cryptic clues)|
| * Anagram Genius * (remarkable anagrams of any text) |
---------------------------------------------------------------
| More information from: http://www.genius2000.com/ |
---------------------------------------------------------------
: Please Reply Directly to:
: yak...@aol.com
I doubt it's possible - a 10x10 wordsquare sounds highly unlikely. I've seen
6x6 and 10x3 - at a guess, 7x7 should be possible with a computer search and
a large and esoteric lexicon, but not 10x10. Is there any pressing reason not
to have blanks?
--
Martin DeMello
Remove the sep_field from my address to reply
Am I missing something, or does the problem specification not actually
_require_ that the answer be a 10x10 wordsquare? A barred grid would fit
what's being asked for well enough, and shouldn't be _that_ hard to find
(though "standard" crossword grid convention is to have odd-length sides,
as far as I'm aware).
--
: Dylan O'Donnell : Stay alert! :
: Demon Internet Ltd : Trust no-one! :
: Resident, Forgotten Office : Keep your laser handy! :
: http://www.fysh.org/~psmith/ : -- Greg Costikyan, "Paranoia" :
http://www.puzzlers.org/formrecords
...for more details, or if you're into word squares, etc. Some
members of the National Puzzlers' League (who "own" the above website)
still create these as puzzles.
Sik Cambon Jensen's thesis (available on the web, but I don't have
the URL handy) about computer generation of crosswords also contains
examples of larger squares, etc. (though not 10x10 ones).
Craig Kasper
On 26 Feb 1999, Martin Julian DeMello wrote:
<snip>
>
> I doubt it's possible - a 10x10 wordsquare sounds highly unlikely. I've seen
> 6x6 and 10x3 - at a guess, 7x7 should be possible with a computer search and
> a large and esoteric lexicon, but not 10x10. Is there any pressing reason not
> to have blanks?
>
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/current/9902puzz.htm
It's in the Feb. issue. If that URL doesn't work, back up to
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/current/index.htm and scroll down to
the puzzle link. They're archived.
A M E B A D E C A F
M A P A D A Y E R A
E P H O D R E L I C
B A O B A B B E A T
A D D A N Y O R Z O
D A R B Y M A Y O R
E Y E B O A A R M Y
C E L E R Y R I B S
A R I A Z O M B I E
F A C T O R Y S E X
Acag, Treesong
Acag, Treesong (ucal...@aol.com)
>http://www.puzzlers.org/formrecords
IIRC, "The Joy of Lex" cites a 10x10 wordsquare with some rather dubious
words in it.
--
Wei-Hwa Huang, whu...@ugcs.caltech.edu, http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~whuang/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Pop", "Soda", or "Coke"? http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~almccon/pop_soda/