http://www.guardian.co.uk/crossword/print/0,,-24963,00.html
Is it good etiquette to use an encyclopaedia/dictionary with such
crosswords or should one only be allowed to use their knowledge?
Is there a good on-line resource for cryptic crosswords for those
wanting to learn them?
I do think some words used are questionable though, as they have become
outdated......etc.
Some of you compilers might get some inspiration from here though!
Yes, "quick" is not the most descriptive term. "Straight" may be
better.
> Is it good etiquette to use an encyclopaedia/dictionary with such
> crosswords or should one only be allowed to use their knowledge?
Nobody else is involved, so etiquette doesn't apply. Whatever floats
your boat.
> Is there a good on-line resource for cryptic crosswords for those
> wanting to learn them?
An rpc regular's page: http://www.biddlecombe.demon.co.uk/puzzles.html
> An rpc regular's page: http://www.biddlecombe.demon.co.uk/puzzles.html
Looks OK to me. Thanks.
I often do it and in roughly half the puzzles there is a word or
phrase that is new to me. So dictionaries are IN!
Dictionaries are the new black!
> I often do it and in roughly half the puzzles there is a word or
> phrase that is new to me. So dictionaries are IN!
> Dictionaries are the new black!
There were two clues in the Guardian Quick Crossword today, being
Foulness and Rhodesian Ridgeback. I knew the answers because I live in
Essex, UK and a friend has a couple of the latter, but for others they
might have been a bit tough without the use of an encyclopaedia?