Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Developers for T-Max?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

thornton roby

unread,
Jan 18, 1990, 5:52:24 PM1/18/90
to
I've been told that standard developers (such as HC-110) are fine
for T-Max shot at rated speeds. What other developers have people
tried? Is T-Max developer worth the cost if you`re not pushing?

--
Thornton Roby, Auto-trol Technology Corp.
12500 N. Washington St., Denver CO 80241-2404 +1 303 252 2407
{...}!ncar!ico!auto-trol!thorob tho...@auto-trol.com

donl mathis

unread,
Jan 19, 1990, 6:28:35 PM1/19/90
to
In article <6...@auto-trol.UUCP>, tho...@auto-trol.UUCP (thornton roby) writes:
> I've been told that standard developers (such as HC-110) are fine
> for T-Max shot at rated speeds. What other developers have people
> tried? Is T-Max developer worth the cost if you`re not pushing?

I found that the highlights fell off in HC-110 1:7 (dilution B). I
switched to T-Max developer, and have also had problems with the
highlights falling off at 1:7; i now use the recommended 1:4 dilution.

I would urge you to consider the cost of the developer in relation to
the cost of the film (i.e. work it out in cents-per-frame or whatever),
and then if you find that the cost of the developer is completely
insignificant in the grand scheme of things, as i did, don't even
consider the developer cost when you're choosing the "right" one.
--

- donl mathis at Silicon Graphics Computer Systems, Mountain View, CA

do...@sgi.com

Tim Henrion@Eng@Banyan

unread,
Jan 22, 1990, 8:56:17 AM1/22/90
to
> I've been told that standard developers (such as HC-110) are fine
> for T-Max shot at rated speeds. What other developers have people
> tried? Is T-Max developer worth the cost if you`re not pushing?
>
One interesting developer I have seen but never tried
(I don't shoot a lot of T-Max anymore) is something called
"Press-MAXX". It is a third party developer developed
specifically to process T-Max films. Part of their
sales pitch includes two micro-photographs of TMX and
TMY processed in both T-Max developer and "Press-MAXX".
The "Press-MAXX" negatives BLEW AWAY T-Max developer
in both grain size and sharpness, especially sharpness.
If you're interested and can't find any, W.B. Hunt
in Melrose, MA (they advertise in Shutterbug) is where
I saw this stuff.

Tim Henrion
t...@banyan.com --or-- ...!bu.edu!banyan!tim

j.w.wolford

unread,
Jan 23, 1990, 12:19:35 PM1/23/90
to
From article <6...@auto-trol.UUCP>, by tho...@auto-trol.UUCP (thornton roby):

> I've been told that standard developers (such as HC-110) are fine
> for T-Max shot at rated speeds. What other developers have people
> tried? Is T-Max developer worth the cost if you`re not pushing?

I have used HC-110 Dilution B and along with a reduction if film speed
I got alot grainier (sp ?) negs...

Then I read the Kodak T-MAX pub... and they said HC-110 cut the E.I. rating
of the film in half... they did not make any comment on grain...

Some people say that the grain shows up more because the HC-110 provides
for a sharper neg... but I'm not sure of this at this time...

> Thornton Roby, Auto-trol Technology Corp.
> 12500 N. Washington St., Denver CO 80241-2404 +1 303 252 2407
> {...}!ncar!ico!auto-trol!thorob tho...@auto-trol.com

Jeff Wolford uunet---+
att!iwsag!jww |
att!iwsag!iwtjw!jww ucbvax--+---- att --+ iwsag!jww
|
decvax--+

Grant Cunningham

unread,
Jan 25, 1990, 12:58:27 AM1/25/90
to
> EID:572b 14379dae
> UFGATE newsin 1.27
> From: tho...@auto-trol.UUCP (thornton roby)
> Date: 18 Jan 90 22:52:24 GMT
> Organization: Auto-trol Technology, Denver
> Message-ID: <6...@auto-trol.UUCP>
> Newsgroups: rec.photo

>
> I've been told that standard developers (such as HC-110) are
> fine
> for T-Max shot at rated speeds. What other developers have
> people
> tried? Is T-Max developer worth the cost if you`re not
> pushing?

After much experimentation in the pro- and tech-oriented B&W lab that I own, I can tell you this: The best all-around Tmax developer for film at rated speed is good old D-76 1:1. The Tmax developer, and especially HC-110, have a severe problem with highlight blocking. I've found that people unhappy with Tmax suddenly become happy when their film is souped in D-76!

--Grant


--
Grant Cunningham - via FidoNet node 1:105/14
UUCP: ...!{uunet!oresoft, tektronix!reed}!busker!222.5!Grant.Cunningham
ARPA: Grant.Cu...@p5.f222.n105.z1.FIDONET.ORG

0 new messages