Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Digitals celeb photos
0 views
Skip to first unread message
scottmike
Dec 24, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/24/98
to
Right, three little photos of no ones..
wouldnt Dallas's BEST photographer, the guy who has had the city give
his photos as gifts to KINGS have a better opp than this to take photos
of celebs?? I mean, this dude makes over $30,000 a day! Wouldnt his
work be in demand by REAL celebs???
wouldnt Dallas's BEST photographer, the guy who has had the city give
his photos as gifts to KINGS have a better opp than this to take photos
of celebs?? I mean, this dude makes over $30,000 a day! Wouldnt his
work be in demand by REAL celebs???
Pete Dixon
Dec 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/25/98
to
It appears that Eric is not known so much for his portraiture photography as
he is his high end commercial work. You see, these are pictures used for
advertising purposes, not for anyone's personal use. The decision in
selecting a competent photographer is largely that of the art director, the
advertising agency, perhaps the client, in some cases, and the creative team
involved in the advertising or promotional process. It is very unlikely that
a talent or celebrity would have much say, or would even care, for that
matter, in the selection. If it were for personal use, the celebrity would
likely commission a portrait photographer, such as an Avedon or Leibovitz, a
personal artist friend, or someone in their immediate demographic area. So,
I don't think his work would be in demand by celebrities. His little penis,
maybe, but not his work. Now get back to humiliating those innocent little
children with your demon spawned modeling pictures.
he is his high end commercial work. You see, these are pictures used for
advertising purposes, not for anyone's personal use. The decision in
selecting a competent photographer is largely that of the art director, the
advertising agency, perhaps the client, in some cases, and the creative team
involved in the advertising or promotional process. It is very unlikely that
a talent or celebrity would have much say, or would even care, for that
matter, in the selection. If it were for personal use, the celebrity would
likely commission a portrait photographer, such as an Avedon or Leibovitz, a
personal artist friend, or someone in their immediate demographic area. So,
I don't think his work would be in demand by celebrities. His little penis,
maybe, but not his work. Now get back to humiliating those innocent little
children with your demon spawned modeling pictures.
snottmike wrote in message <3682D3...@hotmail.com>...
digitalphoto
Dec 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/25/98
to
does everyone in this group know i have a small penis...................
and if so would anyone else care to share the length of his penis, that way i
will know if my 6.5" really is short..........
the king
slav...@yahoo.com
Dec 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/26/98
to
In article <36841B66...@mindspring.com>,
digitalphoto <digita...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> does everyone in this group know i have a small penis...................
>
> and if so would anyone else care to share the length of his penis, that way i
> will know if my 6.5" really is short..........
>
> the king
>
digitalphoto <digita...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> does everyone in this group know i have a small penis...................
>
> and if so would anyone else care to share the length of his penis, that way i
> will know if my 6.5" really is short..........
>
> the king
>
I'm told it's the width that counts. Either way, I'm in trouble...
Steve
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
digitalphoto
Dec 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/26/98
to
then i am in big trouble........mine is 6.5" long and .125" in
width................oh shit am i in trouble........
width................oh shit am i in trouble........
eric
0 new messages